Google Cloud Backup and DR (formerly Actifio Enterprise) vs QoreStor comparison

Google and Quest Software are both solutions in the Copy Data Management category. Google is ranked #5, while Quest Software is ranked #6 with an average rating of 7.0. Google holds a 11.2% mindshare in CDM, compared to Quest Software’s 7.1% mindshare. Additionally, 50% of Google users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Quest Software users who would recommend it.

Google Cloud Backup and DR ...

Read 2 Google Cloud Backup and DR (formerly Actifio Enterprise) reviews

337 Views
337 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

QoreStor

Read 9 QoreStor reviews

4,102 Views
82 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Google Cloud Backup and DR ...

QoreStor

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 1, 2026

Google Cloud Backup and DR and QoreStor are competitors in data backup and storage solutions, with Google Cloud offering superior cloud integration and scalability for large enterprises, while QoreStor is favored by those focused on deduplication and storage efficiency.

Features: Google Cloud Backup and DR integrates seamlessly with various cloud services, enables streamlined data management, and offers advanced recovery options. QoreStor provides powerful data deduplication, significantly optimizing storage and transfer efficiency. The contrast lies in Google Cloud's extensive cloud-native features against QoreStor's strong focus on reducing storage costs through effective deduplication.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Google Cloud Backup and DR is backed by extensive Google ecosystem documentation and support, ensuring smoother deployment and robust customer service. QoreStor's straightforward approach simplifies its deployment process, emphasizing ease of use while maintaining a focus on simplifying the deployment experience.

Pricing and ROI: Google Cloud Backup and DR may involve higher initial costs due to its integration and scalability features, but it justifies these costs with its long-term cloud benefits. QoreStor is cost-effective, offering significant savings through its deduplication technology, leading to a favorable ROI for those prioritizing storage efficiency. The difference is evident in the long-term value of Google Cloud's expansive capabilities versus QoreStor's immediate cost efficiency.

To learn more, read our detailed Google Cloud Backup and DR (formerly Actifio Enterprise) vs. QoreStor Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud Backup and DR (formerly Actifio Enterprise) vs. QoreStor

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,164 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Google Cloud Backup and DR ...

Ranking in Copy Data Management

5th

Average Rating

6.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

QoreStor

Ranking in Copy Data Management

6th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Backup and Recovery (50th), Data Replication (9th), Disk Based Backup Systems (8th), Storage Software (4th), Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (27th), Software Defined Storage (SDS) (19th), File and Object Storage (23rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Copy Data Management category, the mindshare of Google Cloud Backup and DR (formerly Actifio Enterprise) is 11.2%, down from 11.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of QoreStor is 7.1%. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Copy Data Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Google Cloud Backup and DR (formerly Actifio Enterprise)	11.2%
QoreStor	7.1%
Other	81.7%

Copy Data Management

Featured Reviews

reviewer1446237

BI Project Manager/ Scrum Master at a computer software company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Easy to set up and can integrate with cyber recovery solutions but is only for Google Cloud

The initial setup is straightforward. I'd rate the experience eight out of ten. Time-wise, maybe within a couple of hours, everything should be up and running. You need to have good planning to have network communication between your VPCs where your workloads reside and where your backup appliance resides. Good planning is required connectivity-wise. In terms of authentication, you need to plan what level of authentication is required for what level of users. These are the two main things that need to be taken care of at the outset. From the integrator side, one guy should be enough to deploy the product. Once it is operational and handed over, it's up to the customer to handle the product, to maintain the product.

Read full review

Jeff Manuszak

CTO at EDSI

Cost-efficient, highly scalable, and installable on different types of hardware

They could improve on support a little bit. We have not had to engage their support much, but when we do have issues, it can take longer to get things resolved. We are pretty lenient as we do a lot of IT support ourselves. We are not very hard on support organizations, but when a customer has a support issue, it would be easier if the support processes were a little bit more automated. It would be beneficial to have an easier way to upload diagnostic dump files. They can make it easy for the customer to collect the diagnostic data. There can be some kind of monitoring solutions to alert users to issues with the appliance or software, making it easy for customers to monitor their systems in the field. This is especially critical because it stores customers' backups, and a failure can have significant business impacts. If a customer does not have the backups and has a disaster, they can be out of business, so monitoring is key.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Immediate recovery and data virtualization."

"I would definitely recommend this product for customers who have big databases, big data, and lots of developers."

"Technical support is good."

"The dedupe and compression are pretty extreme. On disk, we're getting dedupe rates of up to 65 percent of data and compression of 34 percent. When you go to the cloud, it's more like 76 percent for dedupe and almost 50 percent for compression."

"QoreStor has helped us to reduce our backup storage requirements on-premises. We've been using the same devices for quite a while, and so it lets us keep using them as opposed to having to rip out all that hardware and create a new on-prem solution. The advantage here is even if we had to retire the hardware tomorrow, the QoreStor part doesn't change. We just have to have additional hardware and put the solution back on whatever hardware we pick and it'll do the same thing."

"The features we use for the data deduplication are nice because we're able to back up a much larger amount of data, yet it doesn't necessarily take up that much data on the devices."

"Not having to be onsite to swap tapes on a daily, weekly, or monthly basis, alone, has really paid for its usage through the savings in time."

"We need revisions and safe backup so that it could be held up in court, but deduplication and compression are the main features why we have Quest QoreStor. That's where it really shines. I use ZFS and XFS at home, and Quest QoreStor is even better."

"It integrates with various backup software solutions, which makes it compatible with existing backup workflows and processes."

"QoreStor has helped us to reduce our backup storage requirements on-premises, and we've been using the same devices for quite a while, so it lets us keep using them as opposed to having to rip out all that hardware and create a new on-prem solution."

"Quest QoreStor definitely saved us money."

More QoreStor pros

Cons

"Backup to tapes is not supported."

"Backup to tapes is still in demand and it's not supported."

"As of now, it's predominantly meant for Google Cloud. It would be good if it could be extended to other clouds as well."

"Overall, I am happy with this solution, but a way to export configuration settings would be beneficial. After everything is set up and configured, there should be a way to export the configuration. In case something happens to the QoreStor server, and we need to reinstall and configure everything, being able to import the configuration would be helpful. This feature does not currently exist."

"The installation could use improvement. The initial installation was a little touchy and it's not really user-installable. You have to have a connection to support to install."

"The management interface is in need of improvement. The graphical user interface (GUI) for the web management tools appears clunky, and not super intuitive."

"In terms of improvement, we would like to have an Air Gap feature to prevent a virus from attaching to something. So that when we don't do a backup, we want the QoreStor to stay offline. It would be a nice feature to have."

"The setup of the software is definitely not the easiest thing in the world."

"In terms of improvement, we would like to have an Air Gap feature to prevent a virus from attaching to something."

"The setup of the software is definitely not the easiest thing. I worked a lot with Quest engineers, especially in the early days when we were first testing it and trying it out. I actually had some of the developers working with us at one point because they were going through these point releases, and I was having trouble getting it to work in this S3-compatible situation. We got it all working eventually, but setup is definitely not the easiest thing in the world."

"Support is one point of improvement for Quest QoreStor. Support is sometimes not adequate."

More QoreStor cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Quest QoreStor's pricing is affordable. We evaluated Veeam, a well-known company for backup solutions, but found their pricing to be quite high. Veeam's price was almost double. For us, Quest QoreStor is very affordable."

"The pricing is good. It is competitive for a managed services provider. I like the ability to pay by the terabyte, allowing for an incremental cost that we and our customers can afford, so the solution grows with the customer."

"The cost is per terabyte, and overall, the cost was reasonable when compared to some competitors."

"Its pricing model is very attractive. You have one price, and you get everything from QoreStor."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Copy Data Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Comms Service Provider

Performing Arts

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What else besides data replication does QoreStor offer?

Quest QoreStor can be used for multiple things besides data replication. For example, it can be trusted to make a backup of your data. You know that replication and backups are different, right? Re...

See all answers

How does Quest QoreStore protect your data?

One of our favorite features of Quest QoreStore for data protection isn't the backup, actually, though we're using it actively (maybe just as much as data replication, to be honest). We absolutely ...

See all answers

How does Quest QoreStore solve repetitive data replicas?

When I first found out about data replication and the many benefits it had, I couldn't help but wonder - what about the copies you don't need? Like it's unavoidable for some of the copies to get da...

See all answers

Comparisons

Perforce Delphix vs Google Cloud Backup and DR (formerly Actifio Enterprise)

Compared 33% of the time

IBM Storage Defender Copy Data Management vs Google Cloud Backup and DR (formerly Actifio Enterprise)

Compared 23% of the time

Catalogic ECX vs Google Cloud Backup and DR (formerly Actifio Enterprise)

Compared 17% of the time

More Google Cloud Backup and DR (formerly Actifio Enterprise) Competitors

Hitachi Universal Replicator vs QoreStor

Compared 3% of the time

Dell PowerProtect Data Domain vs QoreStor

Compared 3% of the time

Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS) vs QoreStor

Compared 3% of the time

DataCore SANsymphony vs QoreStor

Compared 3% of the time

CTERA Enterprise File Services Platform vs QoreStor

Compared 3% of the time

More QoreStor Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Copy Data Management

April 2026

Google Cloud Backup and DR (formerly Actifio Enterprise) report

Download Google Cloud Backup and DR (formerly Actifio Enterprise) product report

Buyer's Guide

QoreStor

April 2026

Download QoreStor product report

Also Known As

No data available

QoreStor

Overview

Google Cloud Backup and DR (formerly Actifio Enterprise) offers comprehensive data protection and disaster recovery capabilities. It empowers organizations to safeguard critical data while ensuring rapid recovery and minimal downtime.

As a versatile cloud-based platform, Google Cloud Backup and DR provides robust functionality for managing data across diverse environments. Users benefit from its powerful backup capabilities, allowing seamless data recovery and reduced operational impact. The platform supports hybrid deployments, efficiently handling data both on-premises and in the cloud. Its intuitive management interface and advanced security features ensure data reliability and compliance.

What are the key features of Google Cloud Backup and DR?

Backup and Recovery: Ensures data resilience with comprehensive backup and rapid restoration processes.
Hybrid Cloud Support: Facilitates data management across on-premises and cloud environments.
Data Encryption: Provides robust security with end-to-end encryption protocols.
Automation Capabilities: Streamlines operations with automated backup and recovery workflows.
Scalability: Supports dynamic data growth and varied workload needs.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Cost Efficiency: Reduces infrastructure expenses through optimized resource utilization.
Operational Continuity: Minimizes downtime, ensuring consistent business operations.
Data Security: Enhances protection with comprehensive security features.
Flexibility: Adapts to specific industry needs, offering tailored solutions.
Ease of Integration: Simplifies deployment with existing infrastructure.

Google Cloud Backup and DR is leveraged by industries such as finance, healthcare, and retail to meet specific regulatory and operational requirements. In healthcare, it ensures the secure management of patient data while supporting compliance with health regulations. Retailers use it for seamless continuity in operations, preventing data loss during peak shopping periods.

Google

QoreStor optimizes storage costs through advanced deduplication and compression, seamlessly integrating with backup infrastructures and supporting diverse hardware. It enhances data security with replication and offers flexible deployment with minimal maintenance.

QoreStor offers significant benefits in deduplication, which leads to space savings and reduced storage expenses. This system integrates effortlessly with backup platforms like NetVault and Veeam, functioning as a reliable backup target for both on-premises and cloud environments. The ease of integration is complemented by its replication capabilities, which add a layer of data security by enabling geographically dispersed backups. Its cloud tiering functionality extends storage capabilities, ensuring cost-effectiveness compared to other solutions. While enhancements are needed in areas like Cloud Tier support, Air Gap features, and GUI intuitiveness, the continued developments aim to further optimize storage and backup solutions.

What are QoreStor's key features?

Deduplication and Compression: Achieves high deduplication rates and space savings.
Seamless Integration: Works well with diverse backup infrastructures.
Replication: Facilitates data security through multi-location backups.
Cloud Tiering: Extends storage capabilities efficiently.
Minimal Maintenance: Requires low maintenance efforts.

What benefits should be considered in user reviews?

Cost-Effectiveness: Offers competitive pricing and optimized storage.
Storage Optimization: Reduces storage needs with advanced data handling.
Flexibility: Supports diverse hardware and deployment options.
Data Security: Enhances protection with robust replication features.

QoreStor is widely implemented in industries for backup and restore operations, providing data deduplication and compression as key functionalities. Its integration as a backup target across platforms like NetVault and Veeam makes it ideal for enterprises that require efficient data management and storage cost control. Many organizations utilize its features to optimize cloud storage seamlessly while focusing on internal data handling or acting as service resellers.

Quest Software

Sample Customers

Admirals Bank, Euronet Worldwide, Emerald Queen Casino, Rezolve Group Inc., Logi-Tech, Service Credit Union NH

American Airlines, at&t, Bank of America. Barclays, ebay, Ford

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud Backup and DR (formerly Actifio Enterprise) vs. QoreStor

April 2026

Free Report: Google Cloud Backup and DR (formerly Actifio Enterprise) vs. QoreStor

Find out what your peers are saying about Google Cloud Backup and DR (formerly Actifio Enterprise) vs. QoreStor and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Google Cloud Backup and DR (formerly Actifio Enterprise) vs. QoreStor report.

See our list of best Copy Data Management vendors.

We monitor all Copy Data Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.