Google Cloud Storage vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP comparison

Google and NetApp are both solutions in the Cloud Storage category. Google is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.8, while NetApp is ranked #2 with an average rating of 9.0. Google holds a 8.1% mindshare in CS, compared to NetApp’s 12.1% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of Google users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of NetApp users who would recommend it.

Google Cloud Storage

Read 78 Google Cloud Storage reviews

1,376 Views
560 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Read 62 NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP reviews

2,085 Views
554 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Google Cloud Storage

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 17, 2024

Google Cloud Storage and NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP compete in cloud storage and data management solutions. Users generally prefer the pricing and support of Google Cloud Storage, but NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP's advanced features make it a strong contender.

Features: Google Cloud Storage offers scalable storage solutions, seamless integration with other Google services, and robust security measures. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP provides comprehensive data management tools such as SnapMirror, FlexClone, and advanced data protection capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Google Cloud Storage requires enhancements in data migration tools, improved support for legacy systems, and better user documentation. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP needs a more intuitive management interface, enhanced integration with non-NetApp environments, and streamlined setup processes.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Google Cloud Storage is praised for straightforward deployment and seamless integration with Google's ecosystem. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP handles complex deployments but has a steeper learning curve. Both offer highly rated customer service, with Google Cloud having an edge in initial setup and integration.

Pricing and ROI: Google Cloud Storage features competitive pricing, especially for long-term storage, and offers good ROI due to its scalability and lower maintenance costs. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP has higher pricing reflecting its advanced features and data management capabilities, offering solid ROI for enterprises with complex data needs.

To learn more, read our detailed Google Cloud Storage vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP Report (Updated: May 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud Storage vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

May 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,592 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Google Cloud Storage

Ranking in Cloud Storage

1st

Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services

3rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Ranking in Cloud Storage

2nd

Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services

7th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Migration (1st), Cloud Backup (14th), Cloud Software Defined Storage (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Cloud Storage category, the mindshare of Google Cloud Storage is 8.1%, down from 11.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is 12.1%, down from 14.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Storage

Featured Reviews

Manimaran Tannimalai

Managing Partner at Cloud Analytics Sdn Bhd

User interface consistency facilitates seamless project planning and design for specialized tasks

While Google has made efforts to address SAP loads, the company lacks a product specialist focus. They cover a broad range of products, which might affect their ability to compete well in certain niches. Google's strength lies in their adapted approach to specific tasks, as seen with SAP loads. Generally, their focus is widespread.

Read full review

Pramod-Talekar

Sr Service Engineer at a healthcare company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Allows customers to manage SAN and NAS data within a single storage solution

The tool's most valuable features are the SnapLock and SnapMirror features. If something goes wrong with the data, we can restore it. This isn't a mirror; we store data in different locations. If there's an issue on the primary site, we can retrieve data from the secondary site. Multiprotocol support in NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is beneficial because it allows customers to manage SAN and NAS data within a single storage solution. This feature eliminates the need to purchase different types of storage.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"On the phone, I appreciate how seamless it is."

"The responses from the technical team are fast...It is a stable product...We do have plans to increase the number of users since it is a scalable product."

"Google Cloud Storage is fast, and it's scalable."

"It's user-friendly. We find it to be very easy to use."

"Google Cloud was cheaper compared to AWS and Azure."

"The combination of Firebase features, including storage, the Firebase database, and authentication, has been the most valuable. Firebase offers Google authentication, which is convenient for our needs. Additionally, Firebase provides email authentication and Gmail authentication, which are easy to set up and integrate into our applications."

"The solution is scalable."

"The solution is easy to use."

More Google Cloud Storage pros

"The solution’s unified file and block-storage access across our infrastructure is invaluable. Without it, we can't do what we do."

"The solution’s Snapshot copies and thin clones in terms of operational recovery are good. Snapshot copies are pretty much the write-in time data backups. Obviously, critical data is snapshotted a lot more frequently, and even clients and end users find it easier to restore whatever they need if it's file-based, statical, etc."

"The most valuable features of this solution are SnapShot, FlexClone, and deduplication."

"CVO gives us the ability to access data as quickly as possible, which is critical because of the mission set we handle. Some things cannot wait. For example, we tried having the data in the cloud itself, but it took too long for us to retrieve it from cold or deep storage. If we have it ONTAP or on-prem, it's so much easier to pull it within minutes."

"The most valuable features are tiering to S3 and being able to turn it on and off, based on a schedule."

"The solution’s Snapshot copies and thin clones in terms of operational recovery are the best thing since sliced bread. Rollback is super easy. It's just simple, and it works. It's very efficient."

"The fast recovery time objective with the ability to bring the environment back to production in case something happens."

"If anything happens, their technical support will come onsite and fix it."

More NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP pros

Cons

"The problem I face right now is that my data warehouse is being hosted on Google Cloud, however, integration between Google Cloud to Microsoft Azure is a big problem."

"It would be helpful to offer more packages to increase the storage."

"Here in the Philippines, we don't have direct support from Google. We have self-studied to learn the services."

"The solution’s stability could be improved."

"I'm not really comfortable with the user interface because I don't use it very often."

"I do not find any areas needing improvement currently."

"I want the product to be available at a cheaper cost."

"It was not easy to reach the storage because there were different network zones."

More Google Cloud Storage cons

"I rate the scalability a five out of ten."

"There is room for improvement in tier one support, especially with potential language barriers and communication challenges."

"The solution is not stable when using single nodes. This is a problem. NetApp should work on this solution to make it more stable with HA nodes and resolve this issue."

"I would like to see better integration with Active IQ."

"I would like some more performance matrices to know what it is doing. It has some matrices inherent to the Cloud Volumes ONTAP. But inside Cloud Manager, it would also be nice to see. You can have a little Snapshot, then drill down if you go a little deeper."

"When Azure does their maintenance, they do maintenance on one node at a time. With the two nodes of the CVO, it can automatically fail over from one node to the node that is staying up. And when the first node comes back online, it will fail back to the first node. We have had issues with everything failing back 100 percent correctly."

"When it comes to support provided by NetApp, they have room for improvement. Every time we go through their support, we end up answering the same routine questions."

"I would like to see more information about Cloud Volumes ONTAP using Google Cloud Platform on NetApp's website."

More NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We pay a monthly subscription."

"If you want a shared file system, you have to buy a server with the minimum capacity of one TB."

"I just use the free storage that comes with Gmail. I have 15 gigabytes."

"Regarding the cost of the solution, Google offers its users a pay-as-you-go model pricing."

"Approximately 800 to 1,000 USD is paid towards the licensing costs of the solution. The solution is neither expensive nor cheap, meaning it is moderately priced. There are no extra costs apart from the licensing costs of the solution."

"There is a license needed to use Google Cloud Storage at our university."

"The price of the license could be cheaper. We are on an annual subscription."

"They have recently changed their pricing structures, it used to be free but now it is a paid service. However, I am on a monthly subscription and the price is reasonable."

More Google Cloud Storage pricing and cost advice

"I know the licensing is a bit on the high-end. That's when we had to downsize our MetroCluster disks and just migrate to disks that were half used. We migrated into those just to reduce maintenance costs."

"We purchased the product directly from NetApp."

"It is expensive. There are no costs in addition to their standard licensing fees."

"The standard pricing is online. Pricing depends. If you're using the PayGo model, then it's just the normal costs on the Microsoft page. If you're using Bring Your Own License, which is what we're doing, then you get with your sales contact at NetApp and start figuring out what price is the best, in the end, for your company."

"Purchasing through the AWS Marketplace was good, but it was a test system, not a real purchase."

"Overall, the pricing of NetApp is aggressive and the pricing becomes more aggressive as the amount of data increases. The cost for a given volume of data that you are storing becomes lower. The greater the volume of data, the cheaper the license."

"The pricing could be improved. It is a good product, but it is very expensive for me."

"We find the pricing to be favorable due to the educational sector we belong to."

More NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Storage solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

51%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Educational Organization

29%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Google Cloud Storage?

It is flexible and simple to use.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google Cloud Storage?

Google Cloud ( /products/google-cloud-reviews ) was cheaper compared to AWS ( /products/amazon-aws-reviews ) and Azure ( /products/microsoft-azure-reviews ). AWS ( /products/amazon-aws-reviews ) wa...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Google Cloud Storage?

See all answers

What do you like most about NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP?

So a lot of these licenses are at the rate that is required for capacity. So they're they're able to reduce the license consumption and also the consumption of the underlying cloud storage.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP?

The solution's pricing is reasonable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP?

NetApp's support could improve.

See all answers

Comparisons

AT&T Cloud Storage vs Google Cloud Storage

Compared 20% of the time

Amazon S3 Glacier vs Google Cloud Storage

Compared 16% of the time

Amazon S3 vs Google Cloud Storage

Compared 14% of the time

Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs Google Cloud Storage

Compared 11% of the time

Huawei FusionStorage vs Google Cloud Storage

Compared 3% of the time

More Google Cloud Storage Competitors

Azure NetApp Files vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Compared 18% of the time

Amazon S3 vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Compared 12% of the time

Red Hat Ceph Storage vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Compared 10% of the time

Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Compared 9% of the time

Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store) vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Compared 3% of the time

More NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud Storage

June 2025

Download Google Cloud Storage product report

Buyer's Guide

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

June 2025

Download NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP product report

Also Known As

No data available

ONTAP Cloud, CVO, NetApp CVO

Overview

Google Cloud Storage is praised for its fast performance, seamless integration, high security, and scalability. Users store and access large amounts of data easily, backup files, host websites, and collaborate on projects. The platform's reliability and cost-effectiveness make it a top choice for data storage and management.

Google

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is an efficient storage management solution for managing and storing data in the cloud. It offers seamless integration with cloud providers, advanced data replication capabilities, and high data protection. With reliable performance, it is ideal for industries like healthcare and finance.

NetApp

Sample Customers

1. Adobe 2. Airbnb 3. Amazon 4. Apple 5. AT&T 6. Baidu 7. Cisco 8. Coca-Cola 9. Dell 10. eBay 11. Facebook 12. Ford 13. Google 13. HP 14. IBM 15. Intel 16. JPMorgan Chase 17. LinkedIn 18. Lyft 19. Microsoft 20. Netflix 21. Nike 22. Oracle 23. PayPal 24. Pinterest 25. Qualcomm 26. SAP 27. Spotify 28. Tesla 29. Toyota 30. Twitter 31. Visa 32. Walmart 33. WeWork

1. Accenture 2. Acer 3. Adidas 4. Aetna 5. AIG 6. Apple 7. Bank of America 8. Barclays 9. Bayer 10. Berkshire Hathaway 11. BNP Paribas 12. Cisco 13. Coca-Cola 14. Comcast 15.ConocoPhillips 16. CVS Health 17. Dell 18. Deutsche Bank 19. eBay 20. Eli Lilly 21. FedEx 22. Ford 23. Freescale Semiconductor 24. General Electric 25. Google 26. Honeywell 27. IBM 28. Intel 29. Intuit 30. JPMorgan Chase 31. Kellogg's 32. KeyCorp 33. Liberty Mutual 34. L'Oréal 35. Mastercard

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud Storage vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

May 2025

Free Report: Google Cloud Storage vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Find out what your peers are saying about Google Cloud Storage vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP and other solutions. Updated: May 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Google Cloud Storage vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP report.

See our list of best Cloud Storage vendors and best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.