Grafana Enterprise Stack vs Huawei eSight comparison

Grafana Labs and Huawei are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Grafana Labs is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.6, while Huawei is ranked #35 with an average rating of 9.0. Grafana Labs holds a 0.9% mindshare in IM, compared to Huawei’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Grafana Labs users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 72% of Huawei users who would recommend it.

Grafana Enterprise Stack

Read 14 Grafana Enterprise Stack reviews

2,428 Views
2,404 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Huawei eSight

Read 10 Huawei eSight reviews

3,565 Views
2,210 Comparison Views

72% willing to recommend

Grafana Enterprise Stack

Huawei eSight

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Huawei eSight and Grafana Enterprise Stack compete in IT monitoring and management. Grafana Enterprise Stack appears to have the upper hand due to its robust features, justifying its higher cost, whereas Huawei eSight stands out in pricing and support.

Features: Huawei eSight focuses on network management with comprehensive visualization, automation capabilities, and infrastructural oversight. Grafana Enterprise Stack is known for flexible data visualizations, integration with various data sources, and customizable dashboards.

Room for Improvement: Huawei eSight could enhance integration flexibility, expand data source compatibility, and improve dashboard customization. Grafana Enterprise Stack might work on improving its pricing structure, enhance support for network management functions, and streamline more features for infrastructural oversight.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Huawei eSight offers a user-friendly deployment with strong support, suitable for organizations needing steady assistance. Grafana Enterprise Stack provides streamlined cloud-based deployment with a broad support ecosystem, ideal for those prioritizing quick setup and community resources.

Pricing and ROI: Huawei eSight is cost-effective, yielding substantial ROI for users needing affordable network oversight. Grafana Enterprise Stack requires a higher investment but delivers high ROI with its advanced analytics, justifying costs for data-driven organizations.

To learn more, read our detailed Grafana Enterprise Stack vs. Huawei eSight Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Grafana Enterprise Stack vs. Huawei eSight

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,747 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Grafana Enterprise Stack

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

13th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Huawei eSight

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

35th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Management Applications (11th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Grafana Enterprise Stack is 0.9%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Huawei eSight is 0.8%, down from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Grafana Enterprise Stack	0.9%
Huawei eSight	0.8%
Other	98.3%

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Rajan M

Test Lead at Calpine Group

Efficient monitoring and alerting enhance operational insights

With Grafana Enterprise Stack, we can identify issues that New Relic cannot help with. While New Relic requires purchase and supports frontend and backend components, Grafana Enterprise Stack helps identify where issues are occurring. When we need to deep dive into issues, we use New Relic to trace transactions and determine where maximum impact occurs, whether in core size, DB side, or frontend components that slow performance. We first evaluate with Grafana Enterprise Stack, then move to New Relic if we identify performance degradation, such as DB queries taking too much time. Grafana Enterprise Stack responds to queries within 6 to 12 hours. They contact users through email immediately when available. Similarly, New Relic follows the same pattern, responding immediately when requests are raised and resolving issues promptly.

Read full review

Gary Strydom

Desktop Analyst at Transnet

Used to monitor devices and provides the hardware alarms feature

Huawei eSight has helped me overcome many monitoring aspects of the hardware. From a single view, I can monitor all the hardware. Instead of logging on to each piece of hardware and monitoring it individually, I can monitor them from one single point. I would recommend the solution to other users because it provides a single point of view of the hardware. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The ability to graph actual, live, or on-the-fly activity is valuable; it is an added value to work with Grafana Enterprise Stack and to display results or logs, which are huge in nature, in graphical characters."

"Grafana Enterprise Stack is a powerful open-source platform with robust capabilities in data visualizations, dashboard creations, and alerting."

"Grafana has enough features around dashboard management. It's got enough plugins to create your dashboards."

"Grafana's full observability stack, known as LGTM, is highly valuable."

"It is very easy to deploy and integrate with any application or infrastructure layer."

"The dashboards are pretty good."

"The tool's most valuable feature is real-time monitoring. It helps in securing the application or the node by allowing us to monitor and manage resource consumption during peak times. For instance, from 10 AM to 2 PM, we may experience high memory utilization. It helps us to solve these issues."

"It is truly reliable."

More Grafana Enterprise Stack pros

"eSight allows me to monitor and solve any problem in the backbone and any switch in real-time."

"I like the real-time location monitor or RTLS feature. It is similar to the monitoring feature in Cisco Prime."

"We use this solution to monitor our sales."

"The solution's most valuable dashboard features include monitoring storage, resource availability, and hardware alarms."

"One of the most beneficial features of Huawei eSight is its simplicity and ease of use."

"We use Huawei eSight to monitor devices like Wi-Fi controllers, LAN switches, and routers."

"The most important features are alarm management and the visualization of the health of our network devices."

"Since we have a central monitoring system, we can proactively monitor those devices, easily capture any abnormalities before major downtime, and quickly address the issues before they become a bigger problem in the future."

More Huawei eSight pros

Cons

"They could use more small tutorials to explain a bit about how Grafana works."

"Grafana Enterprise Stack is complex and not easy or simple."

"Integrating AI capabilities for automated self-healing and reduced manual interventions would be valuable."

"In terms of what Grafana provides, it just provides the charting tools. Everything else is third-party."

"The connection between metrics, logs, and traces could be improved. Currently, one needs to ingest labels and timestamps for them to be connected, however, drilling down sometimes takes time."

"The solution should include integration with Power BI."

"I have encountered occasional issues with false inputs or incorrect data in Grafana."

"The connection between metrics, logs, and traces could be improved."

More Grafana Enterprise Stack cons

"Something that could be improved is the lack of integration with Cisco switches. In the next release, I would like to see better reporting."

"The price is very expensive."

"Huawei eSight should work on the option to have the email notification working on Office 365 Exchange."

"The solution and the operating system come separately. It would be easier if we did not have to deploy anything. A bundle feature would be better."

"It will be better if they can make the simple network topology part more presentable. It would also be better if they had API integration and integration with third-party devices."

"The price could be less costly."

"The solution needs to improve it's user interface to make it more modern and stylish. They need to design proper menu positions, features, etc. Right now the layout is complicated."

"In my experience with eSight, I can tell you that you will experience a number of alerts that can be stressful to the administrator monitoring plenty of devices."

More Huawei eSight cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I use the tool's free license."

"Pricing depends on the competition. If your competitor is like Cisco, then Huawei is much more competitive when it comes to pricing."

"Its pricing is better than any other Huawei product. Some products are cheaper in Huawei, and some products are cheaper in Cisco. Cisco has more benefits and options than Huawei if you consider different network environments."

"The pricing for Huawei eSight is reasonable, especially with the base license and incremental licenses for additional devices. However, the variety of license types can be a bit complex. We used to sell eSight but switched to another solution, so we're not actively trading it anymore."

"The price is very expensive."

"The solution’s pricing is reasonable."

"I would rate this solution a nine out of ten for pricing. The pricing depends on which features you use and can become expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Energy/Utilities Company

19%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	1

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Grafana Enterprise Stack?

I am trying to think about its advanced alerting features; we do not use it too much for that. We do get it to report through to our help desk system and if a threshold gets broken, then a ticket i...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Grafana Enterprise Stack?

I have switched to a different suite, focusing on customer edge solutions that are mostly Fortinet. To manage it, I use Grafana Enterprise Stack and a whole bunch of tools that we wrote ourselves. ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Grafana Enterprise Stack?

We use Grafana Enterprise Stack in all of our clients. I rate this product an eight out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Huawei eSight?

Huawei eSight should work on the option to have the email notification working on Office 365 Exchange.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Huawei eSight?

We use the solution to monitor the hardware environment of our data center. We mainly use Huawei eSight to monitor the devices. It assists in monitoring our devices in terms of utilization and moni...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Huawei eSight?

See all answers

Comparisons

NetApp Data Infrastructure Insights vs Grafana Enterprise Stack

Compared 18% of the time

LiveNX vs Grafana Enterprise Stack

Compared 8% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Grafana Enterprise Stack

Compared 6% of the time

Lenovo XClarity Orchestrator vs Grafana Enterprise Stack

Compared 5% of the time

VMware Aria Operations for Applications vs Grafana Enterprise Stack

Compared 5% of the time

More Grafana Enterprise Stack Competitors

Cisco DNA Center vs Huawei eSight

Compared 7% of the time

Zabbix vs Huawei eSight

Compared 5% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Huawei eSight

Compared 5% of the time

Hillstone Security Manager vs Huawei eSight

Compared 4% of the time

Aruba Airwave vs Huawei eSight

Compared 4% of the time

More Huawei eSight Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Grafana Enterprise Stack

June 2026

Download Grafana Enterprise Stack product report

Buyer's Guide

Network Management Applications

June 2026

Download Huawei eSight product report

Overview

Grafana Enterprise Stack is a powerful tool for real-time data monitoring and visualization. With its flexible and scalable features, it is widely used for creating dashboards, analyzing metrics, and gaining insights into infrastructure, databases, and applications.

Its valuable features include powerful visualization capabilities, extensive data source integrations, customizable dashboards, a user-friendly interface, and a robust alerting system. Users appreciate its flexibility, scalability, and ability to integrate with different data sources, making it suitable for a wide range of industries and use cases.

Grafana Labs

Huawei eSight provides efficient network and infrastructure management, known for supporting all Huawei devices. With features like alarm management and device health visualization, it remains a stable, scalable tool for Huawei partners seeking effective monitoring and control.

Huawei eSight offers detailed monitoring, supporting Huawei devices seamlessly, praised for its simplicity and integration with Windows servers. Users appreciate its Network Traffic Analyzer and dashboard, which includes storage and resource monitoring. It is cost-effective and scales well for Huawei users. However, interface and menu design updates are needed, alongside better automation and third-party device integration like Cisco switches. Improvements in wireless reporting and licensing options would enhance usability. Excessive alerts and flexibility issues should be addressed, as should support and deployment processes.

What key features does Huawei eSight provide?

Alarm Management: Provides timely notifications for potential issues.
Device Health Visualization: Offers clear insights into device status and performance.
Real-Time Location Monitor: Tracks device locations efficiently.
Network Traffic Analyzer: Analyzes traffic for better decision making.
Resource Monitoring: Monitors resources ensuring optimal usage.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Cost-Effectiveness: Provides value suitable for Huawei devices.
Stability: Ensures reliable performance.
Scalability: Adapts to growing network demands.
Efficiency: Simplifies management tasks.

Huawei eSight is widely adopted in industries for managing network infrastructure. Organizations use it to monitor switches, routers, and access points, often in data centers or enterprise networks. It aids in device configuration, management, and support, tailored to networks built on Huawei's product ecosystem.

Huawei

Sample Customers

1. Uber 2. PayPal 3. eBay 4. Sony 5. Red Hat 6. IBM 7. Cisco 8. Adobe 9. Expedia 10. Booking.com 11. Airbnb 12. LinkedIn 13. Twitter 14. Netflix 15. Spotify 16. Pinterest 17. Slack 18. GitLab 19. Docker 20. Atlassian 21. Salesforce 22. Microsoft 23. Google 24. Amazon 25. Facebook 26. Apple 27. Intel 28. Oracle 29. SAP 30. VMware 31. HP 32. Dell

Marina Bay, CITIC Pacific Mining

Buyer's Guide

Grafana Enterprise Stack vs. Huawei eSight

June 2026

Free Report: Grafana Enterprise Stack vs. Huawei eSight

Find out what your peers are saying about Grafana Enterprise Stack vs. Huawei eSight and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Grafana Enterprise Stack vs. Huawei eSight report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.