VMware Aria Operations for Logs and Grafana Loki are notable contenders in the log management solutions category. Based on user reviews, VMware Aria Operations for Logs possesses an advantage in customer support and comprehensive features, while Grafana Loki is noted for its scalability and ease of use, meeting user requirements effectively.
Features: VMware Aria Operations for Logs offers advanced analytics, real-time monitoring, and efficient log correlation across systems. Grafana Loki is recognized for its integration with the Grafana ecosystem, informative dashboards, and lightweight architecture.
Room for Improvement: VMware Aria Operations for Logs could improve integration flexibility with non-VMware platforms, customization options, and feature streamlining. Grafana Loki could enhance analytics features, alerting capabilities, and streamline functionalities based on user input.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: VMware Aria Operations for Logs has a structured deployment process with robust customer support. Grafana Loki is noted for its straightforward deployment and effective use of community support, despite limited formal customer service.
Pricing and ROI: VMware Aria Operations for Logs has a higher setup cost, justified by its expansive features and support. Grafana Loki offers cost efficiencies, especially with its open-source version, providing significant long-term ROI benefits despite the need for additional resource management.
Loki leads to significant cost savings by reducing server downtime and aiding engineers in prompt issue resolution.
We have not had to open any tickets yet, as we solve issues through forums and wikis.
I usually do not use official support; I typically rely on community blogs and forums for support of Grafana Loki.
Customer service and support have declined.
While support staff is knowledgeable, getting access to specialists can be challenging when dealing with the limits of a product.
I did not need technical support because I am a professional with VMware.
Loki offers great scalability, allowing us to manage and compress logs extensively.
Since payment is based on hardware, scalability impacts are managed more effectively than with other tools paid by data volume.
It's relatively easy to find individuals with the skills to work with VMware because it is a widely spread tool.
VMware as a whole provides very stable tools.
Its stability is rated one hundred percent according to best practices.
Managing a lot of data involves reliance on hardware and network performance, which are external factors that can affect stability.
Improvements could be made in the enablement of the product, addressing the complexity of implementing these tools.
It would be beneficial if Loki could directly access Windows Server logs or events directly from the servers.
There is also dissatisfaction with Broadcom's broader attitude, which is prompting me to search for alternatives.
VMware Aria Operations for Logs is not a cost-effective tool.
It would be beneficial to have a roadmap for these dashboards to ensure consistent functionality.
The cloud version is competitively priced compared to other market solutions.
Since it is an open source tool, there are no charges or fees.
Splunk, often paid by the terabytes, becomes expensive quickly if not managed carefully.
The price has risen significantly, and for smaller customers, the cost can be up to ten times more than before.
VMware comes with a lot of packages, however, it remains too expensive.
It provides a clear picture about the state of the system and gives needed information for taking action and quickly fixing problems.
Grafana Loki is notably cost-effective.
The most valuable part of Loki is the ability to filter logs by keywords and devices.
This tool also provides greater insight when integrated with VMware infrastructure, making it more precise than other tools.
The most valuable features are log centralization and long-term retention for logs.
A valuable feature of VMware Aria Operations for Logs is its ability to allow personalization of dashboards and requests.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Grafana Loki | 5.6% |
| VMware Aria Operations for Logs | 1.5% |
| Other | 92.9% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 8 |
| Large Enterprise | 4 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
| Large Enterprise | 12 |
Grafana Loki is a powerful log aggregation and analysis tool designed for cloud-native environments. Its primary use case is to collect, store, and search logs efficiently, enabling organizations to gain valuable insights from their log data.
The most valuable functionality of Loki is its ability to scale horizontally, making it suitable for high-volume log data. It achieves this by utilizing a unique indexing approach called "Promtail," which efficiently indexes logs and allows for fast searching and filtering. Loki also supports log streaming in real-time, ensuring that organizations can monitor and analyze logs as they are generated.
By centralizing logs in a single location, Loki simplifies log management and troubleshooting processes. It provides a unified view of logs from various sources, making it easier to identify and resolve issues quickly. With its powerful query language, organizations can extract meaningful information from logs, enabling them to gain insights into system performance, identify anomalies, and detect potential security threats.
Loki's integration with Grafana, a popular open-source visualization tool, allows users to create rich dashboards and visualizations based on log data. This combination enhances the observability of systems and applications, enabling organizations to make data-driven decisions and improve overall operational efficiency.
Manage data at scale with centralized log management, deep operational visibility and intelligent analytics for troubleshooting and auditing across private, hybrid and multi-cloud environments.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
