HashiCorp Terraform vs OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management comparison

HashiCorp Terraform vs. OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management

Download the complete report

Helped 900,838 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Intune

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Configuration Management category, the mindshare of Microsoft Intune is 4.9%, down from 10.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of HashiCorp Terraform is 7.3%, up from 3.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management is 2.1%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Configuration Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Microsoft Intune	4.9%
HashiCorp Terraform	7.3%
OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management	2.1%
Other	85.7%

Configuration Management

Featured Reviews

OluwashileAdeniyi

Senior Infrastructure Security Engineer at a outsourcing company with 51-200 employees

Centralized endpoint security has improved and supports hybrid work and BYOD policies

Regarding what I dislike about Microsoft Intune and its downsides, I would say that more Mac controls are needed because we have limited Mac and Linux control. When comparing controls and policies between Windows, Mac, and Linux, Windows has almost everything you can think of, while Mac and Linux have limited types of control. You cannot implement certain things on Mac and Linux that you can on Windows. The limited controls are a major issue. Additionally, if Microsoft could find a way to embed servers into Microsoft Intune, that would be beneficial. Microsoft Intune is not really designed for servers or Windows servers. It is more tailored towards Windows 11 and Windows 10 operating systems. Windows servers are not fully supported. Enterprise organizations usually have both servers and endpoints, which are users' workstations. For servers, most people look for other solutions such as SCCM, which is Configuration Manager. However, SCCM is what Microsoft Intune is trying to replace. Both SCCM and Microsoft Intune belong to Microsoft. Microsoft is trying to transition organizations into Microsoft Intune, the native cloud solution. However, because this update is still in process, servers are not fully compatible with Microsoft Intune and cannot be managed by it. The current policy that has emerged from issues with clients is what they call co-management, which is relatively new, and I do not know if adoption is significant. Many legacy or older customers who have been using these products for decades still have SCCM. When it is time for them to manage their Windows devices, they use what is called cloud attach. Cloud attach is a term whereby your SCCM is connected to your Microsoft Intune. Most people do not know about it, but I have deployed it for several organizations. Cloud attach and co-management work together so that your device is in SCCM, but some policies are pushed from Microsoft Intune. It is like two different solutions working hand in hand. That is what they call co-management. Microsoft Intune does not bring all of your endpoint and security management tools into one place, which is the goal and how it should be. However, as I mentioned, servers are not included. If we talk about end users, Microsoft Intune does bring all your devices together. In a typical enterprise environment, you have end users with workstations, laptops, company-issued phones, and bring your own devices. You can create policies for all of these. However, for the backend, your servers do not have much coverage. Servers are not really covered by Microsoft Intune in that way.

Read full review

Vaishnavi Pramod Isasre

DevOps Cloud Engineer at Infosys

Has automated multi-cloud deployments and simplified infrastructure management with reusable modules

We have developed one solution using HashiCorp Terraform. HashiCorp Terraform's state management capabilities are the main key point because whatever HashiCorp Terraform creates is stored in a state. Managing this state file is crucial. We can manage it either locally or remotely, but using local storage can lead to failures, and we might lose our state file. Best practice is to store it remotely, such as on AWS S3 or Azure storage blobs, and we must maintain versions of the state file. This allows us to revert to previous states in version control if there are issues with the current state. HashiCorp Terraform's modular architecture is beneficial because I have created a module for EC2 instances. When a team member wants to create an EC2 instance, they can utilize my module without recreating it. This approach follows the DRY principle (do not repeat yourself), achieving simplicity and reducing code repetition. On a scale of one to ten, I rate HashiCorp Terraform an eight out of ten.

Read full review

it_user1272306

Chief Technology Officer at DoITWise

Helpful impact analysis and the discovery capability is quite good

This tool works hand-in-hand with RPA technology. RPA will allow you to control your servers by deploying the server automation agent. You don't have the discovery, but then you can deploy the policies that maintain the authorized versus current state. On top of that, you can use server automation to deploy patches or remediate configuration issues on the operating system. My advice to anybody who is implementing this solution is to ensure that the process is set up properly, first. Once the process is set up, the tool will do the rest for you. Overall, this is a comprehensive tool that works well, and I wouldn't touch it other than to enhance the UI and make containerization work without the CDF. I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Intune's most valuable features are the device, compliance, and configuration policies."

"After implementing Microsoft Intune, we have seen a 50 to 70% reduction in device provisioning time and a 30 to 40% reduction in routine endpoint management efforts, allowing our IT team to focus less on routine management and providing faster software deployment while experiencing a significant reduction in support tickets."

"Microsoft Intune helps secure hybrid work by allowing organizations to manage and secure devices remotely."

"The stability is good."

"With on-premises Active Directory, the main challenge was that we had no control when a user was working from home. We didn't know what exactly a user was doing and whether the AV was up to date or not. Intune provides better control of their machines."

"If you need only to load a specific profile and you don't have deep security functionalities, et cetera, Intune is very nice and good."

"It meets the basic security needs and management needs for most organizations."

"From a solution perspective, I always recommend that you go for it."

More Microsoft Intune pros

"It is a stable solution."

"HashiCorp Terraform has changed my workflow significantly because it spends considerably less time compared to my previous approach and I can say that it is 10 times faster than my previous method."

"With HashiCorp Terraform, I can create all resources in one click, which saves around eighty percent of my time."

"The feature "Terraform Plan" is the most valuable in HashiCorp Terraform as it allows us to see the differences between the current infrastructure and the one we are about to deploy, keeping things safe. Additionally, we appreciate the use of the modules as it helps in making the application scalable."

"The valuable features of HashiCorp Terraform are the infrastructure can be written, shared, and collaborated on using code, which speeds up deployment. Additionally, bugs and issues can be fixed in the code and redeployed, making it less risky. It is a more efficient method compared to the traditional approach of writing scripts to set up infrastructure."

"The most valuable feature is predictability."

"The most valuable feature is the support for different platforms like cloud, datacenters, VCS, databases, various storage types, and Kubernetes."

"This is a super robust solution and I would recommend it to anyone."

More HashiCorp Terraform pros

"The most valuable feature is the impact analysis."

"Automatic Spiral Discovery: This feature enables deep and dynamic configuration and change management."

"Overall, this is a comprehensive tool that works well, and I wouldn't touch it other than to enhance the UI and make containerization work without the CDF."

"We use it for managing our desktops; we have 350,000 desktops and it allows us to manage and control them relatively easily."

"Helps me perform changes in connected infrastructure thanks to the discovery features."

Cons

"Microsoft documentation is a bit hard to get around, so having more control over devices would be good."

"Reliability is something that I feel there is a tad bit of concern. The only point is that we need to sync multiple times to get something pushed through."

"Microsoft Intune is not user-friendly to manage and has room for improvement."

"If your MDM has to be really specific, perhaps Intune is not the better option."

"One drawback of Intune is that we cannot find devices based on a user's region or location."

"Microsoft Intune lacks the ability to provide seamless remote assistance or remote control."

"One area where Microsoft Intune could be improved is troubleshooting, as it sometimes takes time to identify the exact cause when application deployments or policy assignments do not work as expected."

"Intune's third-party patch management could be better. It should be easier for the average system admin to keep non-Microsoft applications updated."

More Microsoft Intune cons

"When connecting to services on a hybrid cloud, I sometimes face issues with understanding usernames or passwords, leading to loss of connectivity. User education could improve this."

"While Terraform is incredibly powerful, its reliance on a state file introduces significant operational complexity and risk. Managing the state for a team requires a carefully configured remote backend with locking to prevent corruption. The state file can also inadvertently store sensitive data in plain text, creating a security risk. Furthermore, refactoring code is not straightforward, as simple resource renames can lead to unintended destruction and recreation of infrastructure if not handled with specific 'terraform state' commands."

"The error logging could be better. Sometimes, when you try to set something on Terraform, it gives you an error, but you don't understand how the error has been logged."

"I would like to see a short-term option for a short-term plan."

"I've noticed that although Terraform is very good at deploying, it lacks in running script."

"The area for improvement is the speed at which resources become available."

"On a scale from one to ten, I would give this solution a rating of seven; strictly because I was uncomfortable using the ARM template earlier. After another six months, I am sure I will give it a rating of 10, but at this point in time in my experience, I say seven, but not because of the tool itself."

"The product can integrate and utilize more services from different competitors. Currently, their commands are quite similar to Kubernetes, which we use in our CI/CD pipeline. Also, they should consider incorporating Windows command line, like PowerShell."

More HashiCorp Terraform cons

"It needs dashboards."

"The infrastructure itself is stable, but the agent has a lot of problems."

"The native UI should be simplified because it is outdated and a little bit over-complicated."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing is on a yearly basis."

"Our enterprise agreement includes Microsoft Intune at no additional cost."

"It is reasonable. When you have Microsoft 365 E3 or E5 license, it is already licensed in that license. So, you could say it is free."

"They have categorized the licenses according to the size of the business. So, if it's a smaller organization, we can choose the license accordingly. If it's a big organization, then we can choose accordingly. Everything is clearly mentioned, and we can decide. It's suitable for all kinds of infrastructure, and that's very goo"

"Intune is linked with Microsoft. We can deploy the Microsoft E365 license to users by Intune. There are different types of licenses, such as device administrator licenses, E5 licenses for device enrollment manually, and P1 and p2 licenses for device enrollment automatically. These are the licenses required for the administration."

"Microsoft offers some licensing where it's included at no extra cost when customers are already using the licenses. In such a case, it's a really good value. If you have to buy the licensing for it, it's probably on par with other solutions. It isn't substantially more or less expensive. The great thing is that it is included in some of Microsoft's licensed packages. So, some customers don't have to spend additional money for it. Typically, most providers that support Intune do charge a management fee of some sort or some fee. Certainly, we're no exception."

"Previously the price was $4 per month per user. Now it's $2.25 per user per month."

"Even if they charge a premium, they aim to provide equal value."

More Microsoft Intune pricing and cost advice

"The product can be cost-effective, especially if you use the CLI and do not require the cloud solutions provided by HashiCorp."

"You can do everything with the free license of this solution."

"There are free and paid versions of the solution. We use the free version."

"HashiCorp Terraform is a cost-effective solution."

"Terraform is a little expensive."

"They have given it to us at a monthly cost, but it is on a yearly basis."

"I rate the price of HashiCorp Terraform a seven out of ten."

"We use the solution's free version."

More HashiCorp Terraform pricing and cost advice

"This is a really good tool for the money."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Configuration Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,838 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

17%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Consumer Goods Company

Construction Company

University

30%

Construction Company

10%

Government

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	190
Midsize Enterprise	65
Large Enterprise	185

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	27
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	25

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does Microsoft Intune compare with VMware Workspace One?

Microsoft Intune is a great tool for managing a mobile device fleet while keeping access control. The solution makes ...

What are the pros and cons of Microsoft Intune?

Microsoft Intune is a great configuration management tool and has a lot of good things going for it. Here are some of...

How does Google Cloud Identity compare with Microsoft Intune?

Microsoft Intune offers not only an easy-to-deploy data protection and productivity management solution, but also ...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HashiCorp Terraform?

I have never experienced pricing, setup cost, or licensing for HashiCorp Terraform.

What needs improvement with HashiCorp Terraform?

Currently, there is not much to add. However, something that could improve the experience is bridging the gap between...

What is your primary use case for HashiCorp Terraform?

My main use case is only to provision the VM. Normally, in previous times, my team and I worked very hard to build th...

Jamf Pro vs Microsoft Intune

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Compared 10% of the time

IBM MaaS360 vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 10% of the time

Workspace ONE UEM vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 4% of the time

ManageEngine Endpoint Central vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 4% of the time

More Microsoft Intune Competitors

Red Hat Satellite vs HashiCorp Terraform

Compared 7% of the time

VMware Aria Automation vs HashiCorp Terraform

Compared 7% of the time

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs HashiCorp Terraform

Compared 6% of the time

AWS CloudFormation vs HashiCorp Terraform

Compared 6% of the time

BigFix vs HashiCorp Terraform

Compared 5% of the time

More HashiCorp Terraform Competitors

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management

Compared 9% of the time

AWS Systems Manager vs OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management

Compared 7% of the time

BMC TrueSight Server Automation vs OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management

Compared 7% of the time

Red Hat Satellite vs OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management

Compared 6% of the time

Chef vs OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management

Compared 5% of the time

More OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management Competitors

Product Reports

Microsoft Intune

Download Microsoft Intune product report

HashiCorp Terraform

Download HashiCorp Terraform product report

Configuration Management

Download OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management product report

OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management report

Also Known As

Intune, MS Intune, Microsoft Endpoint Manager

Terraform

Micro Focus ZENworks Configuration Management, HPE CMS, HPE Configuration Management, Micro Focus Configuration Management

Overview

Microsoft Intune is a cloud-based service designed for device management, security, and compliance. It supports automation and facilitates endpoint management for Windows, iOS, and Android devices, ensuring data protection and efficient policy enforcement.

Microsoft Intune offers seamless integration with tools like Windows Autopilot to automate device setup and deployment. Integrated with Azure Active Directory, it enhances policy management while providing robust reporting and analytics tools for compliance tracking. Despite its intuitive interface aimed at simplifying navigation and device security management, there are challenges such as compatibility issues with Linux and Mac, limited policy support for Android, and demands for better third-party integration. It's widely used for both corporate-owned devices and BYOD scenarios in dynamic IT environments.

What are the key features of Microsoft Intune?

Windows Autopilot: Automates device setup for rapid deployment.
Azure Active Directory Integration: Enhances user policy management.
Reporting and Analytics: Improves compliance visibility.
Mobile Application Management: Ensures app security without compromising personal data.
Cloud-Based Management: Allows management from any location.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Time Efficiency: Automation reduces time in policy enforcement and configuration updates.
Enhanced Security: Ensures data protection across corporate-owned and BYOD devices.
Improved Compliance: Advanced reporting tools enhance compliance visibility.
Flexible Management: Cloud-based nature supports management from any location.

In industries such as finance and healthcare, Microsoft Intune is implemented to ensure data protection and compliance with regulatory standards. Manufacturing sectors utilize Intune for managing a distributed workforce across global locations, while educational institutions employ it to secure and manage devices in learning environments supporting both students and faculty.

Microsoft

HashiCorp Terraform is a versatile tool for managing and provisioning infrastructure across multi-cloud environments using infrastructure as code, ensuring efficient and secure deployment through modular structures and integration with numerous providers.

HashiCorp Terraform allows users to automate and manage infrastructure seamlessly across platforms such as Azure, AWS, and GCP. The platform supports the creation and adjustment of infrastructure components with modularity and state management at its core. Its state file allows for automation and version control while enhancing predictability in deployments. Reusable modules and the HCL language contribute to ease of use, while the open-source community and third-party integrations offer flexible solutions across diverse environments. Despite its robust capabilities, there are areas for improvement, such as backend monitoring, enhanced YAML support, faster resource integration, and improved security protocols.

What are the key features of HashiCorp Terraform?

Modularity: Supports the breakdown of infrastructure into reusable components, simplifying management.
Multi-cloud Support: Operates across different platforms including AWS, Azure, and GCP.
Infrastructure as Code: Benefits from defining infrastructure using a descriptive language.
State Management: Utilizes a state file for version control and tracking changes.
Third-party Integration: Connects with numerous external providers to extend functionalities.

What should users look for in reviews?

Automation Efficiency: Speeds up deployment and management processes.
Scalability: Enables robust scaling of infrastructure to meet dynamic requirements.
Community Support: Utilizes a strong open-source community for continuous improvement.
Security Protocols: Ensures adherence to security standards in multi-cloud environments.

HashiCorp Terraform finds application in varied industries primarily for automated infrastructure deployment. It streamlines processes on major cloud platforms and is effective in developing and maintaining pipelines for continuous integration and deployment. The tool offers infrastructure consistency and rapid provisioning beneficial to projects in sectors ranging from finance to healthcare.

HashiCorp

OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management provides robust IT asset management and configuration capabilities. Designed to manage devices and applications efficiently, it ensures seamless operations across networks while reducing complexity in IT environments.

OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management helps businesses streamline device management by automating routine IT tasks. It's well-suited for managing desktops, laptops, and servers. The software supports centralized administration, which reduces downtime and manpower costs. IT departments value its scalability and secure configuration capabilities, enabling them to manage diverse networks with ease.

What are the key features?

Device Management: Simplifies the management of endpoints with automated updates and patches.
Asset Inventory: Provides comprehensive tracking and management of software and hardware assets.
Remote Control: Allows secure remote access to troubleshoot devices.
Policy Enforcement: Ensures compliance through automated policy deployment.
Reporting: Offers detailed insights and reports on device statuses and usage patterns.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Cost Efficiency: Reduces IT administration costs by automating repetitive tasks.
Improved Security: Enhances security with robust patch management.
Easy Scalability: Supports growing infrastructure without scaling issues.
Time Savings: Minimizes downtime and increases productivity with efficient management.

Industries such as healthcare, education, and finance leverage OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management for its customizable configurations that suit regulatory requirements and data security needs. Its deployment supports diverse network structures, offering flexibility in managing unique IT demands across sectors.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Mitchells and Buzzers, Callaway

Information Not Available

Tech Mahindra, NNIT, ASIC

HashiCorp Terraform vs. OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management