No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Hasura vs Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 15, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Hasura
Ranking in Data Management Platforms (DMP)
7th
Average Rating
7.8
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Informatica Intelligent Dat...
Ranking in Data Management Platforms (DMP)
2nd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
215
Ranking in other categories
Data Integration (1st), Data Quality (1st), Business Process Management (BPM) (5th), Business-to-Business Middleware (1st), API Management (9th), Cloud Data Integration (3rd), Data Governance (3rd), Test Data Management (2nd), Cloud Master Data Management (MDM) (1st), Data Masking (2nd), Metadata Management (2nd), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (5th), Test Data Management Services (3rd), Product Information Management (PIM) (1st), Data Observability (2nd), AI Data Analysis (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Data Management Platforms (DMP) category, the mindshare of Hasura is 1.1%. The mindshare of Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) is 10.0%, down from 16.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Management Platforms (DMP) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC)10.0%
Hasura1.1%
Other88.9%
Data Management Platforms (DMP)
 

Featured Reviews

Yogi V - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Software Engineer at Pine Labs
Streamlines secure card data queries and has revealed performance limits that need improvement
The best features Hasura offers are the permissions and the ability to connect to the database seamlessly when we use GraphQL, which Hasura handles exceptionally well. These features impact my day-to-day work positively, as they are tremendously helpful at the application level architecture design. However, the disadvantage revolves around performance. You need to upgrade to the Enterprise version to achieve better performance and ensure proper memory is assigned in your hosting container for optimal speed as required. Hasura impacts our organization positively by being extremely useful. When we create multiple actions and cache them with Hasura, the caching has proven to be more than helpful. Furthermore, integrating OpenTelemetry into our Node application with Hasura has the added benefit of tracking Hasura calls directly, which helps us monitor our performance effectively.
RC
Contractor at Sanlam
Cloud data catalog has streamlined lineage and quality while leaving more automation to improve
I have not explored IDMC's automation capabilities driven by AI and metadata too much at the moment, but it is on the cards. We are basically creating the foundation, as the whole migration has taken place recently and it is still early days. I think Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) is evolving, and as the vendors move forward, they pick up new concepts from each other. I have seen that products leapfrog each other, and from my experience over the years, the big players tend to copy features or add enhancements based on industry trends. I feel whatever the tool does not have now, there is a feedback loop allowing us to request new features, and we continually ask for different ways to do things as we have a pipeline into the product management team. It is difficult to say what additional features I would prefer to see in the next release of IDMC. I would appreciate more automation on the lineage front, with more AI to seamlessly join independent sources and create seamless lineage between different technologies, such as from file into database A into a different database and landing up in a reporting system such as Cognos, Qlik, Qlik Sense, QlikView, or Power BI.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Hasura's best feature is that it provides an API gateway, and it also provides remote schemas and monitoring, which are the best methods they are offering."
"Hasura greatly reduced the time to deliver and also definitely increased the productivity as a result."
"Hasura offers fast prototyping, allowing me to have an instance and an API set up with Docker Compose in five minutes."
"We use Hasura because it's a quick way to prototype, and the GraphQL API is a plus that we really weren't accustomed to using, but that works well for us given our business logic."
"Hasura positively impacted our organization through useful access control, allowing us to directly obtain data without extra layers of access control processes, which increased efficiency and speed."
"Hasura has positively impacted my organization because for this project, whatever project I'm working on where previously we were using the normal DB2 which was a little complicated to use, Hasura made it very easy to understand the data flowing and data integration."
"My advice for others looking into using Hasura is that it is really the best database to use, so please go ahead and use it."
"The most significant benefit I have seen with Hasura is that it makes the developer's job much easier by eliminating the need to write custom APIs and schemas."
"So far, we have been pleased with its capabilities."
"The profiling features are much better than the on-premise version."
"The solution is stable."
"Some of Axon's valuable features include creating your business glossaries, importing DQ rules, and creating change management."
"The solution scales well."
"Informatica Cloud Data Integration is good overall."
"With my firm, our use of Informatica Cloud is primarily to implement a set of financial integrations from various accounting systems into a Salesforce environment, and by leveraging Informatica Cloud Mapping Designer, we were able to create sets of reusable templates that were source agnostic, making supporting the integration for hundreds of customers feasible with just a small team of integration specialists."
"The scalability is very high."
 

Cons

"I have transitioned to Supabase recently, so it's more of an all-in-one solution than Hasura."
"I believe that I chose a seven out of ten because I think the UI can be made better and the navigation could have been better."
"Hasura could improve by allowing us to build complex queries within it instead of depending on source databases, which might affect response speed."
"Regarding Hasura's AI capabilities, I think the governance and security for the credentials we store for Hasura login are at risk, so that data can be stolen easily."
"My advice for others considering Hasura is that sometimes it may not support capturing remote schemas effectively; for example, if I change something in CockroachDB, it sometimes fails to capture the change until one or two days later."
"The graphical user interface, the web interface that is offered is particularly very slow if you have a lot of endpoints configured."
"There is an issue with HTTP transactions since HTTP is a stateless protocol, making it impossible to maintain transactions, which is the only drawback found in the GraphQL queries."
"The learning curve for Hasura is not straightforward, so it takes time to learn."
"Compared to PowerCenter, Data Quality needs some improvement; when we are dealing with large amounts of data for extraction purposes, it doesn't always work out and we often experience some memory issues here and there."
"Informatica Cloud Data Quality has significant room for improvement. It is not stable, and there are several issues, especially on the cloud side, unlike the on-premise version which was very stable."
"In certain domains, I am looking for material-level match features that are not customizable. The current solution requires code-writing and tweaking, while other solutions offer material-level matches."
"Database access is highly restricted with PIM."
"The solution doesn't directly connect to any of the analytical tools."
"Needs to implement the new workflow with simple steps and a quick visualization with a 360 view of the data."
"The user interface of the product needs to be improved"
"The product isn't mature enough to provide suitable connectors to various data engines."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"Informatica MDM's price could be lower."
"I rate the product's pricing a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive."
"The price is comparable."
"The solution is expensive."
"The solution's pricing model is easy, but it is very expensive."
"Informatica MDM is very expensive. Apart from licensing fees, they have broken down their products into multiple products, and they charge for each and every product. If the data is huge, they charge for the data. At times, we have to use third party services for data cleaning, and they charge for that as well."
"I rate the product's pricing a seven on a scale of one to ten, where one is the lowest price and ten is the highest price."
"The pricing is high compared to other tools on the market."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Management Platforms (DMP) solutions are best for your needs.
919,894 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Outsourcing Company
19%
Hospitality Company
15%
Wholesaler/Distributor
9%
Construction Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Outsourcing Company
9%
Construction Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise10
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business51
Midsize Enterprise27
Large Enterprise155
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Hasura?
I have transitioned to Supabase recently, so it's more of an all-in-one solution than Hasura. I would rate Hasura an eight out of ten because it's not perfect and there are cases where I would use ...
What is your primary use case for Hasura?
My main use case for Hasura is building my ideas. For instance, back in Turkey, I was trying to create a QR menu application and with my friends, we utilized Hasura. I haven't been using Hasura at ...
What advice do you have for others considering Hasura?
I have no idea regarding Hasura's AI capabilities and would be interested to hear details about that. I haven't used those features regarding Hasura's AI capabilities, so I cannot provide any opini...
How does Azure Data Factory compare with Informatica Cloud Data Integration?
Azure Data Factory is a solid product offering many transformation functions; It has pre-load and post-load transformations, allowing users to apply transformations either in code by using Power Q...
Which Informatica product would you choose - PowerCenter or Cloud Data Integration?
Complex transformations can easily be achieved using PowerCenter, which has all the features and tools to establish a real data governance strategy. Additionally, PowerCenter is able to manage huge...
What are the biggest benefits of using Informatica Cloud Data Integration?
When it comes to cloud data integration, this solution can provide you with multiple benefits, including: Overhead reduction by integrating data on any cloud in various ways Effective integration ...
 

Also Known As

No data available
ActiveVOS, Active Endpoints, Address Verification, Persistent Data Masking
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
The Travel Company, Carbonite
Find out what your peers are saying about Hasura vs. Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.
919,894 professionals have used our research since 2012.