HCL AppScan vs Onapsis comparison

Why PeerSpot?

HCLSoftware and Onapsis are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. HCLSoftware is ranked #24 with an average rating of 7.0, while Onapsis is ranked #38. HCLSoftware holds a 2.4% mindshare in AS, compared to Onapsis’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 84% of HCLSoftware users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Onapsis users who would recommend it.

HCL AppScan

Read 44 HCL AppScan reviews

9,624 Views
6,159 Comparison Views

84% willing to recommend

Onapsis

Read 1 Onapsis review

2,052 Views
1,929 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

HCL AppScan

Onapsis

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between HCL AppScan and Onapsis based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about SonarSource Sàrl, Checkmarx, Veracode and others in Application Security Tools.

To learn more, read our detailed Application Security Tools Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Tools

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HCL AppScan

Ranking in Application Security Tools

24th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (20th), Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (7th)

Onapsis

Ranking in Application Security Tools

38th

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of HCL AppScan is 2.4%, up from 2.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Onapsis is 0.9%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
HCL AppScan	2.4%
Onapsis	0.9%
Other	96.7%

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Ravi Khanchandani

Founder Director at Techsa Services

Has improved identification of encryption and authentication issues across cloud and on-prem applications

During the learning curve of onboarding HCL AppScan, we learned that HCL has altered the portfolio and now offers HCL AppScan 360, which has a much better look and feel with an improved user interface. However, there is one feature called SCA, which stands for Software Composition Analysis, that could be improved. When I'm doing an application scan, HCL AppScan has the ability to generate information about what components are in use. For example, if I'm scanning a web application, it shows me the various components being used. It tells me whether I have Java libraries, .NET frameworks, or other log management libraries such as Log4j, and what versions of those specific components are present. I would like to see more detailed reports from the tool. Currently, you can find out the components belonging to a specific software, but if detailed reporting became available, you would be in a better position to identify vulnerabilities. For instance, I could identify that I had the Log4j vulnerability and know that I need to fix my application accordingly. If they add the features I'm describing, I would consider giving them a higher rating. However, I've only been experienced with the product for three months.

Read full review

it_user19113

SAP Security Consulting Engineer at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

It checks for and reports vulnerabilities on all SAP systems at the OS, DB and SAP levels.

I really love how Onapsis X1 is able to check SAP for threats; the reporting was something I felt could be improved. It could be a little easier to use and to publish for consumption with a larger audience. Currently, it takes some background jobs and additional work to get them published. It was difficult to get interactive reports to the different levels of the business. I would have to download them and send them out, or save them on my SharePoint site and send out a weekly link. In the version of the product I was usingת I had to log into the X1 system directly to get to the reports. Reporting would be used by several different areas of the organizationת many of whom would be at the director and executive levels. It would not make sense to have them log directly into the tool to look at these reports. Add to this that there was only one ID that could be used to log in and view the reports. To solve this problemת I had to run all of the different reports; executive summary down to detailed analysis and then export them out to my security team SharePoint site. To automate this processת a batch script was created to run after the X1 analyzed the systems. The script would pull the reports and place them in the SharePoint site automatically, but it was a bit of a hassle to get set up.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"AppScan's most valuable features include its ability to identify vulnerabilities accurately, provide detailed remediation steps, and the newly introduced AI-powered features that enhance its functionality further."

"AppScan is stable."

"It provides a better integration for our ecosystem."

"We use it as a security testing application."

"I prefer Appscan, as it much more user friendly, and it detects cross-site scripting and SQL injection issues much better than other tools in the market."

"The HCL AppScan turnaround time for Burp Suite or any new feature request is pretty good, and that is why we are sticking with the HCL."

"SAST is the only feature that works using the on-prem version."

"It was easy to set up."

More HCL AppScan pros

"It has hardened our SAP system by providing details of vulnerabilities in our SAP landscape."

Cons

"Many silly false positives are produced."

"We would like to see a check in the specific vulnerabilities in mobile applications or rooted devices, such as jailbreaking devices."

"The tool should improve its output. Scanning is not a challenge anymore since there are many such tools available in the market. The product needs to focus on how its output is being used by end users. It should be also more user-friendly. One of the major challenges is in the tool's integration with applications that need to be scanned. Sometimes, the scanning is not proper."

"The solution could improve by having a mobile version."

"They should have a better UI for dashboards."

"They could incorporate AI to enhance vulnerability detection and improve the product's reporting capabilities."

"Unfortunately, there is a big discussion if it is very expensive to use it or not, and there are competitors."

"There is not a central management for static and dynamic."

More HCL AppScan cons

"Reporting was something I felt could be improved. It could be a little easier to use and to publish for consumption with a larger audience."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate the product's pricing a nine out of ten. The product's pricing is expensive compared to the features that they offer."

"Pricing was the main reason that we went ahead with this solution as they were the lowest in the market."

"The price is very expensive."

"I rate the product's price a seven on a scale of one to ten, where one is low, and ten is high. HCL AppScan is an expensive tool."

"Our clients are willing to pay the extra money. It is expensive."

"With the features, that they offer, and the support, they offer, AppScan pricing is on a higher level."

"The product has premium pricing and could be more competitive."

"The solution is moderately priced."

More HCL AppScan pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

Construction Company

University

12%

Construction Company

12%

Energy/Utilities Company

12%

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	31

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with HCL AppScan?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for HCL AppScan?

I'm currently working with BigFix and HCL AppScan. At least three people in my company are using HCL AppScan. Since we are a reseller, we run it in both lab environments and live production applica...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HCL AppScan?

AppScan is considered more cost-effective than Veracode, although I have not updated the exact pricing details. Companies often choose based on budget constraints, with Veracode being on the higher...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Veracode vs HCL AppScan

Compared 7% of the time

Checkmarx One vs HCL AppScan

Compared 7% of the time

SonarQube vs HCL AppScan

Compared 5% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs HCL AppScan

Compared 5% of the time

Invicti Web + API vs HCL AppScan

Compared 5% of the time

More HCL AppScan Competitors

SonarQube vs Onapsis

Compared 13% of the time

ERPScan SMART Cybersecurity Platform vs Onapsis

Compared 11% of the time

Nullify vs Onapsis

Compared 11% of the time

Qualys Web Application Scanning vs Onapsis

Compared 8% of the time

w3af vs Onapsis

Compared 3% of the time

More Onapsis Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

HCL AppScan

October 2026

Download HCL AppScan product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Tools

October 2026

Download Onapsis product report

Also Known As

IBM Security AppScan, Rational AppScan, AppScan

No data available

Overview

HCL AppScan offers quick vulnerability detection with effective SDLC integration and is known for its user-friendly interface and seamless security integration.

HCL AppScan provides dynamic and static scanning to identify vulnerabilities like XSS and SQL injection. It integrates well into CI/CD pipelines, supports multiple languages, and offers web and dynamic scanning, helping businesses ensure security across development lifecycles. Users benefit from API coverage, Postman integration, and its ability to function in cloud and on-premise environments, facilitating a shift from DevOps to DevSecOps practices.

What features define HCL AppScan?

User-friendly interface: Simplifies navigation and usage.
Vulnerability detection: Quickly identifies issues like XSS and SQL injection.
Integration with SDLC: Seamlessly blends with development processes.
Dynamic scanning: Offers comprehensive security evaluations.
Multiple language support: Supports diverse programming environments.

What benefits should users consider?

Scalability: Adapts to growing needs and projects.
Low false-positive rates: Delivers accurate and reliable results.
Detailed reporting: Provides comprehensive vulnerability insights.
Effective integration: Enhances CI/CD pipeline security.

HCL AppScan is leveraged in sectors requiring rigorous security checks, such as finance and healthcare, where it conducts comprehensive scans and offers insights into potential vulnerabilities. Its robust scanning capabilities aid companies in maintaining compliance and security standards.

HCLSoftware

Onapsis provides cybersecurity and compliance solutions for critical business applications. It focuses on enhancing security by detecting vulnerabilities and ensuring compliance with industry regulations.

Organizations increasingly rely on Onapsis to protect their business applications from potential threats. Designed to detect and mitigate threats in real-time, it ensures business continuity by integrating with existing security frameworks. Its platform offers robust insights into vulnerabilities, enabling proactive response and management of security policies tailored to enterprise needs.

What are the key features of Onapsis?

Vulnerability Management: Identifies and reports critical risks within business applications.
Compliance Automation: Ensures adherence to regulatory standards.
Real-time Threat Monitoring: Provides continuous surveillance for immediate response.
Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly works with existing IT infrastructure.

What benefits and ROI should you expect?

Improved Security Posture: Enhanced protection for critical assets reduces risks.
Operational Efficiency: Streamlined processes lead to better resource allocation.
Risk Mitigation: Proactive threat identification prevents potential breaches.
Regulatory Compliance: Automated compliance reduces audit preparation time and costs.

Onapsis is implemented across industries like finance, healthcare, and manufacturing to secure ERP systems. Its role in protecting core business applications aligns with the industry-specific needs of securing sensitive data and maintaining compliance with sector regulations.

Onapsis

Sample Customers

Essex Technology Group Inc., Cisco, West Virginia University, APIS IT

Sony, US Army, Westinghouse, AXA. Galicia, Daimler, Roche, Levi's, Siemens, ABB, KPMG, Mercardo Libre, Verizon, Bacardi, Adgas, Sicpa, Whirlpool, Leaseplan

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Tools

October 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about SonarSource Sàrl, Checkmarx, Veracode and others in Application Security Tools. Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.