No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Heimdal Email Security vs SAS Fraud Management comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Heimdal Email Security
Ranking in Fraud Detection and Prevention
57th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.9
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Email Security (57th)
SAS Fraud Management
Ranking in Fraud Detection and Prevention
11th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Fraud Detection and Prevention category, the mindshare of Heimdal Email Security is 0.8%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAS Fraud Management is 2.1%, down from 4.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Fraud Detection and Prevention Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
SAS Fraud Management2.1%
Heimdal Email Security0.8%
Other97.1%
Fraud Detection and Prevention
 

Featured Reviews

Melvin Ong - PeerSpot reviewer
Country Manager at PT Symcaw Solutions Indonesia
Straightforward to set up, reliable, and offers good functionality
We primarily use the solution for email security and general email management.  It's improved our productivity.  The solution works well overall. The functionality is very good.  The setup process is easy.  It is stable and reliable. It's scalable.  I don't have any specific areas that need…
reviewer1562526 - PeerSpot reviewer
Head of Practice at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
Scalable and easy to use but could have better technical support
The solution is very stable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable and the performance has been very good so far. That said, from my perspective, has had some issues with stability and performance issues in that they have a lot of data and it has some indexing and mechanisms that work a bit slow.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It is stable and reliable."
"The solution is easy to use."
"The security is also very good."
"The solution is very stable; there are no bugs or glitches, it doesn't crash or freeze, and it has been reliable with very good performance so far."
"Presently, the main purpose of SAS is to maintain a centralized platform for all of the verticals — like agriculture, NSME, and home loans — where the bank can monitor everything from one system."
 

Cons

"The solution could be less expensive."
"Occasionally, there are some mechanisms that can work a bit slow."
"It is a little bit costly."
"Technical support could be much quicker and much more flexible."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"If your company has the budget, I would absolutely recommend SAS."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Fraud Detection and Prevention solutions are best for your needs.
900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
21%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Logistics Company
7%
Energy/Utilities Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
25%
Comms Service Provider
18%
Educational Organization
7%
Computer Software Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Also Known As

MailSentry
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Brother, Symbion, CPH West
Nets
Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, BioCatch, ThreatMetrix and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Updated: June 2026.
900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.