HP Wolf Security vs Kaspersky Total Security comparison

HP and Kaspersky are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. HP is ranked #31 with an average rating of 8.0, while Kaspersky is ranked #28 with an average rating of 8.2. HP holds a 6.1% mindshare in EPP, compared to Kaspersky’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of HP users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 81% of Kaspersky users who would recommend it.

HP Wolf Security

Read 8 HP Wolf Security reviews

8,798 Views
7,341 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Kaspersky Total Security

Read 23 Kaspersky Total Security reviews

1,016 Views
884 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

HP Wolf Security

Kaspersky Total Security

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

HP Wolf Security and Kaspersky Total Security are two leading cybersecurity products. While HP Wolf Security offers better pricing and customer support, Kaspersky Total Security is viewed as superior due to its advanced features.

Features: HP Wolf Security includes robust threat detection, hardware-enforced security measures, and enhanced data protection. Kaspersky Total Security offers a comprehensive suite with password management, parental controls, and a secure VPN. Despite strong defenses from HP Wolf Security, Kaspersky Total Security provides a broader range of valuable features.

Room for Improvement: HP Wolf Security could improve its software integration capabilities, user interface, and reporting features. Kaspersky Total Security could enhance its resource consumption, mobile app functionality, and advanced threat detection accuracy.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HP Wolf Security users find the deployment process straightforward and appreciate the responsive customer service. Kaspersky Total Security users also acknowledge easy deployment but prefer more streamlined customer service.

Pricing and ROI: HP Wolf Security is cost-effective with satisfactory ROI, making it ideal for budget-conscious buyers. Kaspersky Total Security, although more expensive, delivers high value through its extensive feature set, justifying the cost.

To learn more, read our detailed HP Wolf Security vs. Kaspersky Total Security Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

HP Wolf Security vs. Kaspersky Total Security

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,040 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HP Wolf Security

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

31st

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

3.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (33rd)

Kaspersky Total Security

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

28th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of HP Wolf Security is 6.1%, up from 2.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kaspersky Total Security is 0.7%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

Bert Hickman

Owner at Stoneridge Engineering, LLC

Adds a layer of safety, especially for laptops operating in various environments

The tool's deployment is easy. HP Wolf Security's deployment was a swift process since it was initially compatible with Windows 10, the operating system on both machines. However, when I transitioned to Windows 11, I encountered minor issues that prompted me to delve deeper into Wolf Security to fine-tune security settings according to my preferences. While I mostly used default settings, there was an initial adjustment where I disabled the AI function related to malware. Currently, the system is running smoothly with no reported issues. Adjusting some settings raised concerns about compatibility between HP Wolf Security and Norton 360. Specifically, aspects of HP Wolf Security, such as the virtual machine component, intrigued me, but I hesitated due to potential conflicts. During my investigation, Windows 11 raised a flag, questioning the system's security settings with Norton 360 and HP Wolf Security. However, it seems that they coexist well without causing issues.

Read full review

Ashford Asante

IT Manager at Lancaster Kumasi City

A tool with an easy initial setup phase that can be centrally managed by users

What needs to be improved is what my company sends to Kaspersky's team when we are working with it, and then they work on it, which is why we always have updates to take care of the bugs and all those things. You can't have one thing in the solution that needs to be improved. The solution is affordable. For the solution itself, while you are working with it, you come across stuff, that Kaspersky's network helps you deal with since you can send your stuff to Kaspersky's team, and they have access to certain reports, and based on the reports and what what are we doing, the solution is always worked on, so that it can be made the best and efficient application. On a daily basis, the tool is being improved, and I am okay with it. Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business Select is automated. The cloud application for Kaspersky is automated. For the solution needed for individual systems, Kaspersky provides you with a platform that provides internet security. With Kaspersky, you have a platform that allows you to access www.kaspersky.com and see the systems that you have worked on in the past. If you need to do anything with your individual machines indirectly, you can manage it through a centralized system. The solution's automation capabilities is an area where certain improvements are required.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the process isolation because it simply stops malware from infecting the machines."

"Now, instead of us having to go through that analysis, they actually give us a monthly report that shows us: "Here's what you got hit with, here's what would have happened, here are the forensics behind the attack," and, obviously, Bromium stopped it."

"We've been able to isolate and prevent malicious code from external email attachments and from downloaded internet files. Those are the two big areas that have really made an impact."

"The isolation feature is the most important because it prevents attacks."

"It has prevented thousands of potential threats by encapsulating them within its own vSentry container, thus providing overall protection and integrity of the operating system."

"The feature that stands out the most is that when someone clicks on a link in an email... [if] that link is malicious and it has some malware or keylogger attached to it, when it opens up in that Bromium virtualized browser, there's no chance of it actually being on the machine and running, because as soon as they click that "X" in the upper right-hand side of the browser, everything just vanishes. That is an added plus."

"I use HP Wolf Security to add a layer of safety, especially for laptops operating in various environments."

"Our overall security posture has absolutely improved as a result of adding Bromium to our security stack. We continue to have less user impact through a significantly reduced amount of malware infections. It's become a non-event."

"The solution is useful for protecting laptops."

"Kaspersky Total Security provides a good return on investment by improving data security and reducing costs by sixty percent with its robust security features."

"It has advanced features for detecting malware and ensuring customer safety."

"I respect the solution for its pricing."

"The solution has a lot of features like IDS and IPS detection system, antispam, and firewall."

"It automatically identifies potential threats in emails, websites, and documents, swiftly blocking or quarantining anything harmful to prevent any damage or infection to my system."

"I find the solution to be very stable in terms of security and protection of the data."

"There has been a return on investment for our small and medium business users."

More Kaspersky Total Security pros

Cons

"Initially, when we came in contact with Bromium a few years ago, it had a nice threat analyst, or a LAVA Pop, which is what they used to call it. Once it detected malware, it would show us the malware's path... I don't see that on the computers now. We only get to see that in the console. I would like to still see that on the individual machines because when we go out to look at a machine, we don't necessarily have access to the console."

"I did not find this to be an out-of-the-box solution, it required planning and alignment across many groups."

"Room for improvement would be keeping up with the rate of change, specifically on Windows platforms. There are a lot of updates that come out for Microsoft Windows operating systems and the Bromium product needs to be able to keep up quickly with those updates and all the browser updates that are coming out. It's hard to do, but that's really where they need to be more responsive because we end up with problems and then we have to call support to get patches, etc."

"They need to improve the compatibility with other applications and its stability. It works well with attacks, but it doesn't work well with all software on the clients. There is a lot of troubleshooting and a lot of things that need to be tuned to make it work and not break things."

"Reporting is one of the shortcomings of the product. We do mine the data that's in there from a forensics perspective... It becomes very difficult because you have to spend a lot of time digging through the volumes of data. Reporting is absolutely the biggest shortcoming."

"They have always struggled with usability. The protection that it offers you is tremendous, but there's definitely an impact with use of resources on the computer. It's gotten a lot better now with Win 10. But sometimes, when you open up a website, it's going to take longer than it would without Bromium, and it's the same with documents."

"The tool behaves differently when I ported to Windows 11."

"Initial setup was complex. There were many configurations that needed to be worked out with the vendor. The setup required hands-on assistance from Bromium."

More HP Wolf Security cons

"The solution’s security could be improved."

"The solution’s email protection area should be improved."

"Anti-malware and anti-phishing policies in the solution are areas with certain shortcomings where improvements are required."

"There is room for improving security."

"It would be beneficial if the resource usage could be reduced to lessen the burden on devices."

"The system can be demanding on resources, making devices busy when running the client application. It would be beneficial if the resource usage could be reduced to lessen the burden on devices."

"Regarding improvement, Kaspersky has a slightly larger system footprint, leading to a 5-10% performance slowdown compared to when I wasn't using Kaspersky."

"Enhancing the encryption code, particularly in relation to ransomware would be a great addition for future use."

More Kaspersky Total Security cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product came as a bundle with the machine."

"I think the pricing is a good value. All of these security products are always going to be very expensive, but I don't think Bromium is unreasonable. I think Bromium is decently priced. It’s a tiered licensing platform. The more you buy, the cheaper gets per unit, and I think their tiers are very well defined. I think they're fair."

"Pricing is reasonable."

"The product's pricing is a good value. We only run it on our internet-facing workstations, we don't run it on everything in our environment. We are very selective. Some organizations may want to consider doing something like that to reduce their license count."

"The pricing is very fair compared to the competition. The licensing is straightforward."

"Users need to pay a licensing fee for the solution, which is neither cheap nor expensive."

"We have a yearly license, and it's not expensive."

"Kaspersky Total Security is not an expensive solution."

"There is a need to renew the license on an annual basis."

"The product is not expensive."

"Kaspersky Total Security is a cheap solution."

"The pricing of the solution is good."

"We pay around $30 to $35 for the solution yearly."

More Kaspersky Total Security pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Government

Retailer

Computer Software Company

25%

Comms Service Provider

University

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HP Wolf Security?

The product came as a bundle with the machine.

See all answers

What needs improvement with HP Wolf Security?

The tool behaves differently when I ported to Windows 11.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for HP Wolf Security?

I use HP Wolf Security to add a layer of safety, especially for laptops operating in various environments.

See all answers

What do you like most about Kaspersky Total Security?

I am satisfied with the solution's security features because we have been using it for years.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kaspersky Total Security?

The pricing for Kaspersky Total Security is quite affordable, rated at eight out of ten, and all necessary licensing fees are included.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kaspersky Total Security?

The system can be demanding on resources, making devices busy when running the client application. It would be beneficial if the resource usage could be reduced to lessen the burden on devices.

See all answers

Comparisons

Norton Small Business vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 16% of the time

Bitdefender Total Security vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 15% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 9% of the time

McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 9% of the time

Malwarebytes vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 3% of the time

More HP Wolf Security Competitors

Bitdefender Total Security vs Kaspersky Total Security

Compared 8% of the time

Malwarebytes vs Kaspersky Total Security

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Kaspersky Total Security

Compared 7% of the time

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum vs Kaspersky Total Security

Compared 7% of the time

Norton Small Business vs Kaspersky Total Security

Compared 6% of the time

More Kaspersky Total Security Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

HP Wolf Security

March 2025

Download HP Wolf Security product report

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

March 2025

Download Kaspersky Total Security product report

Also Known As

Bromium vSentry

No data available

Overview

HP Wolf Security is a comprehensive cybersecurity solution that bolsters your organization's cyber-resilience on multiple fronts. With its full-stack security approach, it ensures layered protection from hardware to the cloud, providing a robust defense against cyber threats. HP Wolf Security introduces endpoint isolation, a cutting-edge feature that effectively halts threats that may go unnoticed by Next-Generation Antivirus (NGAV) and Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) systems. Moreover, it extends its security coverage to printers, equipping them with advanced detection and self-healing capabilities to further safeguard your digital ecosystem. This integrated solution streamlines IT and security risk management, resulting in fewer alerts and false positives, and reduces the time and effort required for endpoint incident analysis and remediation. Notably, HP Wolf Security prioritizes productivity, allowing you to manage risk without disrupting the user experience, enabling worry-free work from anywhere, and offering rapid IT disaster recovery at scale.

Kaspersky Total Security provides robust antivirus and malware protection, comprehensive security for banking systems, infrastructure, endpoints, and personal devices including antivirus, firewall, and VPN services.

Kaspersky Total Security is a multi-faceted solution featuring antivirus, firewall, VPN services, and protection for personal devices, company laptops, and critical data. It is utilized for patching, managing vulnerabilities, and safeguarding against threats from USB drives and harmful websites. With features like anti-spam for Microsoft Exchange Server and secure web browser modes for online banking, Kaspersky offers comprehensive protection for personal and business use. Additionally, its combination of machine learning, AI, and reliable intrusion prevention makes it a preferred choice for many users.

What are the most important features of Kaspersky Total Security?

Antivirus: Provides efficient virus protection and real-time threat detection.
Firewall: Ensures safer internet browsing and blocks unauthorized access.
VPN Services: Secures online activities and protects privacy.
Machine Learning and AI: Enhances automatic threat identification and management.
Vulnerability Management: Offers timely vulnerability fixes and patching.
Anti-Spam: Filters unwanted emails, especially for Microsoft Exchange Server.
Fast Scanning: Performs quick and thorough scans for threats.
User-Friendliness: Easy to install and simple to manage.

What are the benefits or ROI users should look for in reviews when evaluating Kaspersky Total Security?

Cost-Free Accessibility: Provides significant value without additional cost.
Reliability: Ensures continual protection against threats.
Central Management: Facilitates easy monitoring and control.
Safe Browsing: Enhances visibility and safety during online activities.
Lightweight Performance: Does not heavily impact system performance.

Kaspersky Total Security is implemented across diverse industries to fortify banking systems, infrastructure, and endpoints. It protects personal devices, company laptops, and sensitive data, ensuring a safe digital environment for users. Industries rely on its anti-spam features for secure communication and its secure browser modes for safe online banking. Kaspersky's superior intrusion prevention and automated threat recognition powered by AI and machine learning enhance industry-specific cybersecurity measures.

Kaspersky

Sample Customers

Valspar

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

HP Wolf Security vs. Kaspersky Total Security

March 2025

Free Report: HP Wolf Security vs. Kaspersky Total Security

Find out what your peers are saying about HP Wolf Security vs. Kaspersky Total Security and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HP Wolf Security vs. Kaspersky Total Security report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.