Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Kaspersky Total Security vs Symantec Endpoint Security comparison

Kaspersky and Broadcom are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. Kaspersky is ranked #27 with an average rating of 8.2, while Broadcom is ranked #11 with an average rating of 7.3. Kaspersky holds a 0.8% mindshare in EPP, compared to Broadcom’s 4.0% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of Kaspersky users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.
Kaspersky Total Security
Read 23 Kaspersky Total Security reviews
  • 1,101 Views
  • 958 Comparison Views
81% willing to recommend
Symantec Endpoint Security
Read 144 Symantec Endpoint Security reviews
  • 9,976 Views
  • 8,481 Comparison Views
80% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Symantec Endpoint Security and Kaspersky Total Security compete in the enterprise and personal security software category. Kaspersky Total Security seems to have the upper hand due to its more advanced features and comprehensive protection.

Features: Symantec Endpoint Security is known for its advanced threat protection capabilities, ease of integration with existing systems, and efficient resource handling. Kaspersky Total Security offers an extensive array of features such as secure payment options, password management, and privacy protection tools, making it more encompassing and user-friendly.

Room for Improvement: Symantec Endpoint Security could improve in reducing system impact during scans and providing more intuitive configuration options. Users also suggest better user interface and reporting features. Kaspersky Total Security could enhance the speed of customer service response, offer more flexible licensing options, and reduce the system resource usage.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Symantec Endpoint Security users find the deployment process straightforward and value its reliable customer service, though the initial setup might be complex for some. Kaspersky Total Security is noted for its smooth deployment process and user-friendly installation, but there is a need for faster customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Symantec Endpoint Security is perceived as cost-effective, offering a good balance between expense and security capabilities, providing satisfactory ROI. Kaspersky Total Security is considered pricier; however, its wide range of features and thorough protection justify the higher cost for those seeking premium security, ultimately delivering solid ROI.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Kaspersky Total Security vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Kaspersky Total Security vs. Symantec Endpoint Security
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 851,604 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Kaspersky Total Security
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
27th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
23
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Symantec Endpoint Security
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
11th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
144
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Kaspersky Total Security is 0.8%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Symantec Endpoint Security is 4.0%, down from 4.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
 

Featured Reviews

Ashford Asante - PeerSpot reviewer
A tool with an easy initial setup phase that can be centrally managed by users
What needs to be improved is what my company sends to Kaspersky's team when we are working with it, and then they work on it, which is why we always have updates to take care of the bugs and all those things. You can't have one thing in the solution that needs to be improved. The solution is affordable. For the solution itself, while you are working with it, you come across stuff, that Kaspersky's network helps you deal with since you can send your stuff to Kaspersky's team, and they have access to certain reports, and based on the reports and what what are we doing, the solution is always worked on, so that it can be made the best and efficient application. On a daily basis, the tool is being improved, and I am okay with it. Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business Select is automated. The cloud application for Kaspersky is automated. For the solution needed for individual systems, Kaspersky provides you with a platform that provides internet security. With Kaspersky, you have a platform that allows you to access www.kaspersky.com and see the systems that you have worked on in the past. If you need to do anything with your individual machines indirectly, you can manage it through a centralized system. The solution's automation capabilities is an area where certain improvements are required.
Read full review
Hakeem_Abdulkareem - PeerSpot reviewer
The solution has given us visibility into compliance within our whole system and helped us ensure everything is updated
Symantec's application security module needs some improvement. You need to create a lot of fingerprints for application security. For instance, let's say I have different brands of ATMs in my environment, like Wincor and NCR. I use GRG to deploy an application control to whitelist some applications. I have to get the exact image of the different models of ATMs. When I tested in the past, some machines would not connect to the server without that. Only the approved software on the ATM should run. Anything outside that should not even come up at all. We did this so that an outside person doesn't introduce malicious software to the ATM. That's the essence of locking down with application control. Using Symantec for application control has been hectic, so I use Carbon Black to do the lockdown. Checking that data security will work fine with Carbon Black. Carbon Black worked fine. Setting up approval in Carbon Black works differently than Symantec. In Symantec, we first need the fingerprints of the applications running underneath. Before setting up Carbon Black, you first install the agent, allowing it to learn the environment. It will analyze all the software's behavior and provide recommendations for what should be allowed. It's more straightforward, whereas configuring application control in Symantec is a bit cumbersome.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable features of the solution stem from the fact that it can be centrally managed, allowing users to know what is happening and what can be expected in the systems."
"The solution has a lot of features like IDS and IPS detection system, antispam, and firewall."
"The protection has been top-notch, according to our use case and ISP."
"Kaspersky Total Security directly detects if there are any threats on the internet or when I use a USB stick."
"I installed Kaspersky for protection if there is a virus on my computer"
"Kaspersky is reliable because it checks everything before I want to log in."
"I find the solution to be very stable in terms of security and protection of the data."
"Kaspersky Total Security provides a good return on investment by improving data security and reducing costs by sixty percent with its robust security features."
More Kaspersky Total Security pros
"This product is valuable for ransomware protection, general malware protection, and network exploitation protection."
"The solutions' main features are patch management and security."
"Stability-wise, it is very good and we have had no trouble."
"Symantec is very user-friendly, the interface and functions are very simple for everyone to understand. Additionally, it's a very robust system."
"I think the key thing for me, is interoperability, in that you can deploy it to Windows, Mac, and Linux. That's been a really important feature in the last two years. Now there's one management console to cover all three OSs."
"We never expect downtime. There is also great ease of use for my admins."
"The features are very nice. We are getting updates continuously from the Symantec side regarding any attacks, such as zero-day attacks. Symantec helps us in mitigating any attacks or threats early."
"It's a robust product."
More Symantec Endpoint Security pros
 

Cons

"Anti-malware and anti-phishing policies in the solution are areas with certain shortcomings where improvements are required."
"The solution’s security could be improved."
"The authorization process could be faster."
"Its interface needs to be more user-friendly."
"When you get the license number, there isn't a clear section in the program's interface that leads you to renew your license. You have to look and search a lot about it."
"Kaspersky Total Security's configuration part is complex."
"Kaspersky Total Security should be easier to manage and improve user interaction. Resetting often requires some experience, which can be a problem for generic users. Web users also encounter some issues that should be improved."
"Kaspersky Total Security’s stability and performance need improvement."
More Kaspersky Total Security cons
"It should support the next-generation IPS. Currently, it supports only IPS."
"Overall, the price could be reduced."
"They lack the visibility you get in a heuristical, artificial, AI type of product, like a next-gen antivirus."
"Symantec Endpoint Security can improve management because it is difficult to do. It is not a straightforward tool to use. Additionally, the dashboards and reports could be better. It is difficult to understand what exactly is your current status."
"It could use more feature parity between what is offered with their on-prem console as well as their hosted console."
"There have been some complaints about the visibility of current licensing, as sometimes it does not show all the seats, and customers have trouble getting a complete overview of Symantec licenses."
"In a few cases, when we enable the IPS/IDS feature, there are performance-related issues on the end devices. If we run quite a few features of Symantec, especially the IPS/IDF, it consumes a lot of processing and memory capacity."
"There is a lack of reporting and alerts."
More Symantec Endpoint Security cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing of the solution is good."
"We have a yearly license, and it's not expensive."
"We pay around $30 to $35 for the solution yearly."
"The solution's pricing is cheap and better than that of Sophos."
"Kaspersky Total Security is a cheap solution."
"The product is not expensive."
"Kaspersky Total Security is an expensive solution."
"There is a need to renew the license on an annual basis."
More Kaspersky Total Security pricing and cost advice
"It is cheap. It is especially cheaper than Malwarebytes, which is three times higher than this. It is also cheaper than Cisco. Its price is almost similar to Bitdefender, Gravity, and CloudZone."
"The price of the product is competitive if compared to its competitors in the market."
"Symantec Endpoint Security is a moderately priced solution."
"Symantec Endpoint Security is an expensive solution."
"We pay our licensing fees on a yearly basis, and everything is included in that price."
"We pay on a yearly basis..."
"We receive a discounted price for this solution because we are a non-profit organization."
"The pricing is as per the environment. If all the features are there, there will be a cost for them. There were no additional costs for me. Support and other things were included in the pricing."
More Symantec Endpoint Security pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
26%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
University
7%
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Kaspersky Total Security?
I am satisfied with the solution's security features because we have been using it for years.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kaspersky Total Security?
The pricing for Kaspersky Total Security is quite affordable, rated at eight out of ten, and all necessary licensing fees are included.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Kaspersky Total Security?
The system can be demanding on resources, making devices busy when running the client application. It would be beneficial if the resource usage could be reduced to lessen the burden on devices.
See all answers
Which is better - Cortex XDR or Symantec End-User Endpoint Security?
Aqua Security is easy to use and very manageable. Its main focus is on Kubernetes and Docker. Security is a very valuable feature and their speed of integration is very good. The initial setup was ...
See all answers
Which offers better endpoint security - Symantec or Microsoft Defender?
We use Symantec because we do not use MS Enterprise products, but in my opinion, Microsoft Defender is a superior solution. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security s...
See all answers
What do you like most about Symantec End-User Endpoint Security?
Symantec have everything – documentation, videos, data sheets.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

HP Wolf Security vs Kaspersky Total Security Logo
HP Wolf Security vs Kaspersky Total Security
Compared 30% of the time
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Kaspersky Total Security Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Kaspersky Total Security
Compared 10% of the time
Malwarebytes vs Kaspersky Total Security Logo
Malwarebytes vs Kaspersky Total Security
Compared 7% of the time
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum vs Kaspersky Total Security Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum vs Kaspersky Total Security
Compared 7% of the time
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Kaspersky Total Security Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Kaspersky Total Security
Compared 4% of the time
More Kaspersky Total Security Competitors
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Symantec Endpoint Security
Compared 18% of the time
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Symantec Endpoint Security
Compared 17% of the time
Trend Micro Deep Security vs Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
Trend Micro Deep Security vs Symantec Endpoint Security
Compared 8% of the time
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs Symantec Endpoint Security
Compared 7% of the time
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs Symantec Endpoint Security Logo
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs Symantec Endpoint Security
Compared 4% of the time
More Symantec Endpoint Security Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
May 2025
Kaspersky Total Security reportDownload Kaspersky Total Security product report
Buyer's Guide
Symantec Endpoint Security
April 2025
Symantec Endpoint Security reportDownload Symantec Endpoint Security product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
Symantec EPP, Symantec Endpoint Protection (SEP)
 

Overview

Kaspersky Total Security provides robust antivirus and malware protection, comprehensive security for banking systems, infrastructure, endpoints, and personal devices including antivirus, firewall, and VPN services.

Kaspersky Total Security is a multi-faceted solution featuring antivirus, firewall, VPN services, and protection for personal devices, company laptops, and critical data. It is utilized for patching, managing vulnerabilities, and safeguarding against threats from USB drives and harmful websites. With features like anti-spam for Microsoft Exchange Server and secure web browser modes for online banking, Kaspersky offers comprehensive protection for personal and business use. Additionally, its combination of machine learning, AI, and reliable intrusion prevention makes it a preferred choice for many users.

What are the most important features of Kaspersky Total Security?
  • Antivirus: Provides efficient virus protection and real-time threat detection.
  • Firewall: Ensures safer internet browsing and blocks unauthorized access.
  • VPN Services: Secures online activities and protects privacy.
  • Machine Learning and AI: Enhances automatic threat identification and management.
  • Vulnerability Management: Offers timely vulnerability fixes and patching.
  • Anti-Spam: Filters unwanted emails, especially for Microsoft Exchange Server.
  • Fast Scanning: Performs quick and thorough scans for threats.
  • User-Friendliness: Easy to install and simple to manage.
What are the benefits or ROI users should look for in reviews when evaluating Kaspersky Total Security?
  • Cost-Free Accessibility: Provides significant value without additional cost.
  • Reliability: Ensures continual protection against threats.
  • Central Management: Facilitates easy monitoring and control.
  • Safe Browsing: Enhances visibility and safety during online activities.
  • Lightweight Performance: Does not heavily impact system performance.

Kaspersky Total Security is implemented across diverse industries to fortify banking systems, infrastructure, and endpoints. It protects personal devices, company laptops, and sensitive data, ensuring a safe digital environment for users. Industries rely on its anti-spam features for secure communication and its secure browser modes for safe online banking. Kaspersky's superior intrusion prevention and automated threat recognition powered by AI and machine learning enhance industry-specific cybersecurity measures.

Kaspersky

Symantec Endpoint Security is a robust and reliable product that provides complete protection against viruses, malware, Trojans, and malicious files. It offers application and device control, ease of use in deploying and updating, a central control console, stability, scalability, auto-discovery capabilities, patch management, endpoint detection and response capabilities, intrusion detection module. 

The Symantec Global Intelligence Network (GIN) provides threat intelligence and detection across endpoints, email, and web traffic. It has helped organizations reduce downtime, increase productivity, and improve security posture. Symantec Endpoint Security is easy to use, has a flexible administration, and offers more value than expected.

Broadcom
 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Audio Visual Dynamics, Red Deer Advocate, Asia Pacific Telecom Co. Ltd., Kibbutz Ein Gedi, and AMETEK, Inc.
Buyer's Guide
Kaspersky Total Security vs. Symantec Endpoint Security
April 2025
Free Report: Kaspersky Total Security vs. Symantec Endpoint Security
Find out what your peers are saying about Kaspersky Total Security vs. Symantec Endpoint Security and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Kaspersky Total Security vs. Symantec Endpoint Security report.
See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.