HPE Integrity vs Lenovo Flex System comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Hewlett Packard Enterprise and Lenovo are both solutions in the Blade Servers category. Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #11 with an average rating of 7.5, while Lenovo is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.0. Hewlett Packard Enterprise holds a 4.0% mindshare in Blade Servers, compared to Lenovo’s 4.4% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Lenovo users who would recommend it.

HPE Integrity

Read 21 HPE Integrity reviews

1,517 Views
1,517 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Lenovo Flex System

Read 10 Lenovo Flex System reviews

1,440 Views
1,440 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

HPE Integrity

Lenovo Flex System

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 3, 2025

HPE Integrity and Lenovo Flex System are top contenders in the enterprise server market. Lenovo Flex System seems to have the upper hand with its advanced scalability and flexibility, making it attractive for dynamic workloads.

Features: HPE Integrity is noted for its robust architecture, seamless integration with existing systems, and high availability. It provides strong performance and reliability, particularly for mission-critical environments. Lenovo Flex System shines with modularity, a wide range of configurations, and extensive customization options, enhancing adaptability and resource management.

Room for Improvement: HPE Integrity may benefit from lower setup costs, enhanced scalability, and more modern management tools. It could also improve in terms of deployment speed. Lenovo Flex System could work on reducing initial setup complexity in certain configurations, expanding support for legacy systems, and enhancing documentation clarity for new users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Lenovo Flex System offers a straightforward deployment model with intuitive management tools, complemented by efficient customer service. HPE Integrity has a more traditional setup that might require more time and resources, though it also provides comprehensive support. Lenovo's easier setup is a clear advantage.

Pricing and ROI: HPE Integrity typically involves a higher setup cost due to its reliability features, offering high long-term ROI through steady performance. Lenovo Flex System presents competitive pricing with flexible cost structures, delivering significant ROI through scalability and efficient resource management, which provides a faster return on investment.

To learn more, read our detailed HPE Integrity vs. Lenovo Flex System Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

HPE Integrity vs. Lenovo Flex System

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,076 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HPE Integrity

Ranking in Blade Servers

11th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

5.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Lenovo Flex System

Ranking in Blade Servers

9th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Blade Servers category, the mindshare of HPE Integrity is 4.0%, up from 2.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Lenovo Flex System is 4.4%, up from 3.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Blade Servers Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Lenovo Flex System	4.4%
HPE Integrity	4.0%
Other	91.6%

Blade Servers

Featured Reviews

Jason Quartey

Oracle Database Administrator at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees

Robust security layers have supported mission-critical banking and protected sensitive data

Where I have not really enjoyed is the flexibility of doing things. You are just in a straitjacket with what they give you. The flexibility of doing things is limited compared to other platforms. The backup and restore features on that module were a bit old. I couldn't create a snapshot and provision a server in minutes. The VM features that I can use now easily were not that easy with HPE Integrity and were not even available for us. I had a lot of interaction with HPE Integrity and wanted to move to a different platform for a different experience. I did not see any products matching the Dell PowerFlex environment in terms of server capabilities when it comes to HPE Integrity. We are now using Oracle products and Oracle Data Guard. Oracle on HPE Integrity was a bit more difficult because you have to get separate patches, separate tunables, and separate kernel settings for HPE Integrity. Everything was so proprietary on HPE Integrity, making it difficult to have one solution. The Dell Linux environment with Oracle Linux OS now will be much easier.

Read full review

Farhan-Ahmad

Senior System Administrator at Khushhali Microfinance Bank

Used to run the compute load on servers, but firmware and driver upgrades are a bit difficult

We use the solution for multiple purposes, such as in the virtualization cluster and the standalone applications We use the solution as a compute model to run the compute load on servers. The solution's firmware and driver upgrades are a bit difficult. I have been using Lenovo Flex System for…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We need to be able to offer our customers continuous service 24/7, and we are able to do all this with Integrity."

"It just keeps on going; we don't have any problems with any HPE equipment, to be fair."

"It is very fast and easy to use."

"The Integrity series combined with the software layer presents an excellent Mission Critical landscape that brings simplicity in a complex landscape to the foreground."

"As a summary, I would say it's been the best high availability platform that HP has produced, at least that we have been able to use and forward to our customers with the highest service level availability."

"It's very reliable, efficient, and strong, and at the time that we used it, it was scalable so we were able to put as much CPU as I wanted up to 64."

"The stability is pretty good."

"It's a very good product to use for medium-sized companies."

More HPE Integrity pros

"The stability and speed are always good. The processor is good and it's still working with our loads."

"I'd recommend Flex System to others as it's much better than any other product we've had and advise that they use XClarity for system management."

"I have found the solution to be quite stable."

"It's stable, it works well, and we have had no problem with it for a long time."

"The Lenovo Flex System is very stable."

"The product is very user-friendly and has many resources at the enterprise level."

"The most valuable feature of the Lenovo Flex System is the storage system."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

More Lenovo Flex System pros

Cons

"It's quite expensive, so we're considering moving some services to Linux services."

"HPE Integrity is a pain. HPE hasn't put much work into developing the solution in the past few years because it will be discontinued soon."

"Where I have not really enjoyed is the flexibility of doing things. You are just in a straitjacket with what they give you."

"I would like to see a GUI interface to manage resources and deploy new servers."

"It is an old technology, so there is not much growth that we can do on it now."

"I don't know if Integrity will survive too much because if the Itanium processors are not going to be supportive anymore, I think in the midterm (4 or 5 years), Integrity's going to be replaced by another product line."

"Unlike other platforms, it lacks easy integration with popular cloud services like Office 365."

"Since Intel featured this product as a mainframe class, it should perform closer to a mainframe."

More HPE Integrity cons

"The user-interface needs improvement, because they have an application from which we have to manage the whole system and all the infrastructure. This application is not working at our premises, because of some problem with the hardware itself. So although we brought it with our systems, and we used it to manage all the systems: the storage, the switches, and everything, nevertheless we have to support every part alone and enter the interface in one-by-one."

"The solution could improve by providing more integration with other platforms."

"Flex System's integration with the XClarity Management System could be improved."

"The user interface needs improvement because they have an application from which we have to manage the whole system and all of the infrastructure."

"Forced restarts due to free upgrades is an issue that needs to be resolved. We can manage this as we have high availability and redundancy, but without that it could be a real problem."

"Continuing the production of this product is necessary. It is currently out of support, and we are seeking support from other sources besides Lenovo."

"It does not have the same module flexibility that was present in IBM Blade. On the Blade System, I was able to choose between the Cisco module, or BMC module. Since the switch to Lenovo, I have not had the same choice of modules, only the BMC modules."

"The installation was not easy."

More Lenovo Flex System cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Price-wise, the solution is very expensive."

"The pricing is the best."

"There is no license required to use HPE Integrity."

"HPE Integrity's pricing could be better."

"The price is not very expensive."

"We have the whole maintenance for the 3 years, starting the deployment. We also have the VMware license for 3 years and I think we have another license to buy. There are no additional costs besides licensing."

"There is a one-off payment to buy the equipment and the support is purchased annually."

"The price is interesting. I am able to quote a client based on their needs and offer them either Lenovo or Dell."

"The 14 blade server allows significant room for upscaling before having to invest in another chassis. You would have to purchase another chassis much sooner in the case of an eight or nine blade server."

"We are just paying the operational cost, which is not much."

"The is an annual license cost to use the Lenovo Flex System. If the price was less expensive and flexible overall and for additional features, our customers would be happier."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Blade Servers solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,076 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

19%

Outsourcing Company

16%

Marketing Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

Construction Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	12

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with HPE Integrity?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for HPE Integrity?

We are still working with HP products, specifically HPE Integrity servers. We are about to migrate this year to Dell. For Unix, because we are using Unix now, we're going to move to Linux on that p...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering HPE Integrity?

Data protection and application support features are important considerations. My total experience has been seven out of ten. Regarding disaster recovery, we just have the servers that we configure...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Lenovo Flex System?

Compared to its quality, the pricing is very reasonable and represents good value.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Lenovo Flex System?

Continuing the production of this product is necessary. It is currently out of support, and we are seeking support from other sources besides Lenovo.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Lenovo Flex System?

We are using Lenovo Flex System on the server for our VMware environment, which includes our VMs and all our servers, Linux and Windows. It manages the daily operation efficiently.

See all answers

Comparisons

Supermicro SuperBlade vs HPE Integrity

Compared 14% of the time

HPE Superdome X vs HPE Integrity

Compared 10% of the time

HPE Synergy vs HPE Integrity

Compared 10% of the time

HPE BladeSystem vs HPE Integrity

Compared 10% of the time

More HPE Integrity Competitors

HPE Synergy vs Lenovo Flex System

Compared 15% of the time

HPE Superdome X vs Lenovo Flex System

Compared 13% of the time

HPE NonStop vs Lenovo Flex System

Compared 10% of the time

Supermicro SuperBlade vs Lenovo Flex System

Compared 9% of the time

More Lenovo Flex System Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

HPE Integrity

September 2026

Download HPE Integrity product report

Buyer's Guide

Blade Servers

August 2026

Download Lenovo Flex System product report

Also Known As

HP Integrity Superdome , HP Integrity, SGI Altix

Flex System Blade Servers, Flex System SN Series

Overview

HPE Integrity is renowned for reliability, scalability, and high availability. It supports mission-critical tasks and offers a secure architecture with excellent fault tolerance, ideal for SAP and HP-UX environments.

HPE Integrity's robust performance and secure architecture make it reliable for continuous operation and critical tasks. Despite its strong capabilities, users seek improvements in GUI management, modern technology integration, and virtualization. They appreciate its rapid deployment, integrated networking, and ease of use while noting issues with outdated technology, support, and cloud compatibility. Suitable for environments demanding zero downtime, it encounters challenges in staying current with modern software and efficient resource usage.

What are the key features of HPE Integrity?

Reliability: Provides robust fault tolerance, ensuring continuous service.
Scalability: Offers versatile scalability that adapts to growing demands.
Rapid Deployment: Facilitates quick implementation in varied environments.
Integrated Networking: Supports comprehensive connectivity for seamless operations.
Secure Architecture: Maintains a strong security focus to protect data integrity.

What benefits or ROI should organizations consider?

24/7 Availability: Ensures uninterrupted operations in critical applications.
Ease of Use: Simplifies management, reducing training costs and time.
Fault Tolerance: Enhances resilience, minimizing potential downtime.
Troubleshooting Efficiency: Quickly resolves issues, maintaining productivity.

In industries like finance, banking, and air traffic control, HPE Integrity is essential as a database server for SAP systems where zero downtime is critical. It is widely used in production settings involving Blade servers and virtual machines, also serving disaster recovery needs despite some hardware challenges. Transition considerations to alternate solutions like Dell arise due to compatibility in Unix to Linux migrations.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Lenovo Flex System is a robust platform known for its high performance, stability, and user-friendly setup. It efficiently supports virtualization and cloud services with minimal support needs, offering consistent power for compute model operations.

Lenovo Flex System provides a reliable infrastructure with a focus on performance and stability. It supports high resource consumption with its 14 blade server design, making it suitable for complex compute operations. Users benefit from straightforward setup, optimal pricing, and network efficiency. While highly valued for its storage and computation capabilities, improvements in management software and integration with XClarity Management System are desirable. Enhancements in driver updates, single-screen infrastructure management, and customer support can further optimize its use, especially in virtualization and private cloud environments utilizing VMware and databases like Oracle.

What are the most important features?

High Performance: Delivers consistent speed and reliable computing power.
Stability: Offers minimal support needs over several years.
User-Friendly Setup: Straightforward installation process.
Extensive Storage: 14 blade server design supports high resource consumption.
Efficient Network: Ensures network efficiency for compute operations.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Consistent Power: Supports demanding compute model operations reliably.
Pricing Efficiency: Provides good value relative to its performance.
Reduced Downtime: Minimal issues lead to better operation continuity.
Storage Capacity: Supports multiple database systems efficiently.

Lenovo Flex System is ideal for industries focused on virtualization and private cloud services. It supports creating virtual machines using VMware for frontend and backend applications. Companies use it for managing Microsoft and Linux operating systems and integrating hybrid cloud solutions for automated environments, benefiting those requiring robust, reliable platform management for daily operations.

Lenovo

Sample Customers

Home Credit Bank

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

HPE Integrity vs. Lenovo Flex System

September 2026

Free Report: HPE Integrity vs. Lenovo Flex System

Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Integrity vs. Lenovo Flex System and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,076 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HPE Integrity vs. Lenovo Flex System report.

See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.

We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.