Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

HPE Intelligent Management Center vs OpenText Network Node Manager i comparison

Hewlett Packard Enterprise and OpenText are both solutions in the Network Management Applications category. Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.5, while OpenText is ranked #15 with an average rating of 9.0. Hewlett Packard Enterprise holds a 5.9% mindshare in NMA, compared to OpenText’s 2.1% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of OpenText users who would recommend it.
HPE Intelligent Management ...
Read 7 HPE Intelligent Management Center reviews
  • 1,233 Views
  • 879 Comparison Views
85% willing to recommend
OpenText Network Node Manag...
Read 23 OpenText Network Node Manager i reviews
  • 418 Views
  • 237 Comparison Views
95% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 2, 2025

OpenText Network Node Manager i and HPE Intelligent Management Center are competing network management solutions. OpenText Network Node Manager i seems to have the upper hand in cost-effectiveness and customer support, while HPE Intelligent Management Center is favored for its rich feature set.

Features: OpenText Network Node Manager i provides real-time monitoring and fault management with multi-vendor support, integrating seamlessly with other systems. Its topology mapping feature offers a clear network overview. HPE Intelligent Management Center excels in infrastructure monitoring, link monitoring, and automation, efficiently managing extensive networks with its abundant customization options.

Room for Improvement: OpenText Network Node Manager i could improve in scalability to cater to larger enterprises. More intuitive interfaces and enhanced reporting functionalities would be beneficial. HPE Intelligent Management Center may need a simpler initial setup process along with better integration with non-HP devices. Enhanced support for legacy systems could also refine its vast offerings.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Network Node Manager i offers a straightforward deployment process and reliable support, ensuring efficient problem resolution. Although HPE Intelligent Management Center's deployment process is more complex, it benefits from comprehensive onboarding resources and a dedicated support team for long-term reliability.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Network Node Manager i is cost-effective with a low setup cost, providing a favorable ROI for budget-conscious businesses. HPE Intelligent Management Center, despite a higher initial cost, justifies its price through a substantial ROI, particularly suitable for enterprises requiring comprehensive network solutions.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed HPE Intelligent Management Center vs. OpenText Network Node Manager i Report (Updated: March 2025).
Buyer's Guide
HPE Intelligent Management Center vs. OpenText Network Node Manager i
March 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 845,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

HPE Intelligent Management ...
Ranking in Network Management Applications
8th
Average Rating
7.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
OpenText Network Node Manag...
Ranking in Network Management Applications
15th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
5.9
Number of Reviews
23
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Network Management Applications category, the mindshare of HPE Intelligent Management Center is 5.9%, down from 7.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Network Node Manager i is 2.1%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Network Management Applications
 

Featured Reviews

Muhammad_Faisal - PeerSpot reviewer
Achieve seamless network and link monitoring with comprehensive device management
The most valuable function is that the IMC takes an entire backup of my network devices, and I can also redeploy them. The really beneficial feature is the link monitoring. I had checked Check Point's product, however, my requirements are better fulfilled by IMC. The main feature is that IMC automatically configures the device for my use. I have over 200 features in my network, and IMC manages the complete environment. Automation is good, but I mainly use it for monitoring. I am too satisfied with this product.
Read full review
Mirit Goldring-Boymshtain - PeerSpot reviewer
Easy-to-implement product with a valuable map topology feature
The platform has a lot of interesting capabilities. Implementation is simplified, in contrast to some products like SolarWinds, where external assistance is often required for meet uploads. It is more inexpensive than other products in the market. In a specific customer implementation, the complex topology of the customer's network revealed a separate and closed segment at one of their sites. We could not understand the status of the broken network and devices. With the help of NNMi, we got a view of the issues. The product helps us reduce downtime and improve incident response time by offering remediation options. The tools run automatically, checking the network activities for different areas and time zones. It provides efficient documentation, interface, and integration features. I rate the product a nine out of ten.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"One of the notable advantages is its ability to provide quick responses, especially in critical situations."
"The most useful feature is infrastructure monitoring including switches and servers."
"It's a very complete product with a lot of functionality."
"The most valuable feature is the interface and its ease of use."
"The most valuable function is that the IMC takes an entire backup of my network devices, and I can also redeploy them."
"It's quite a mature solution."
"You can utilize the main file from various vendors for integration."
"The platform has good stability."
"It is stable for fault and availability."
"The best feature is the solution's entire credibility with all vendors."
"Topology creation is the most valuable feature."
"It gives us a good overview of what's happening in our networks and the devices in the networks."
"If you install one node on Network Node Manager and want to scale it up, it's pretty easy to create more nodes."
More OpenText Network Node Manager i pros
 

Cons

"One notable deficiency is the lack of online support for the product."
"I would like to see additional modules included."
"The integration with other network devices needs improvement."
"I face the issue with the integration with links on Fortinet Firewall."
"HPE Intelligent Management Center is a bit slow."
"Right now, we have open tickets and they are not closing as expected."
"The dashboards are not customizable and it's not user-friendly."
"Micro Focus Network Node Manager is not the best when it comes to drilling down for more visibility, especially regarding traffic."
"Micro Focus Network Node Manager is not powered to drill down for traffic visibility."
"The way the solution currently works means I'm not able to customize my own reports."
"As the technologies evolve, also these solutions or the monitoring tools should evolve to cover the progress in technology, including capabilities related to monitoring of virtualized devices today, as the DNS is on the table in this way."
"The solution should integrate with NAC servers."
"When I open a ticket, usually they respond very late. Some of the people I negotiate with seem undertrained."
More OpenText Network Node Manager i cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There are licensing costs and they are quite expensive."
"The price of this solution is not at all cheap, but it's reasonable compared to SolarWinds."
"The solution is priced mid-range compared to the competition."
"It's an expensive solution."
"It is more inexpensive than other products in the market."
"The solution is quite expensive."
"I wasn't involved in the pricing, but I think it's quite expensive."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Management Applications solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
17%
Government
14%
Educational Organization
8%
Financial Services Firm
6%
Computer Software Company
18%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about HPE Intelligent Management Center?
One of the notable advantages is its ability to provide quick responses, especially in critical situations.
See all answers
What needs improvement with HPE Intelligent Management Center?
I face the issue with the integration with links on Fortinet Firewall. This will be sorted out with the help of IMC, and now I have a modem dialing as per my needs.
See all answers
What is your primary use case for HPE Intelligent Management Center?
I am using this solution for network monitoring, links monitoring, and complete monitoring of my infrastructure. I also deploy FortiVAF, FortiAnalyzer, and FortiManager as part of a complete securi...
See all answers
What do you like most about Micro Focus Network Node Manager?
The platform has good stability.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Micro Focus Network Node Manager?
They should add AI options in the product's next release.
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Network Node Manager?
We use the product monitoring network infrastructure, interfaces, and devices.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Cisco DNA Center vs HPE Intelligent Management Center Logo
Cisco DNA Center vs HPE Intelligent Management Center
Compared 44% of the time
Aruba Airwave vs HPE Intelligent Management Center Logo
Aruba Airwave vs HPE Intelligent Management Center
Compared 29% of the time
Huawei eSight vs HPE Intelligent Management Center Logo
Huawei eSight vs HPE Intelligent Management Center
Compared 7% of the time
IBM Tivoli NetCool vs HPE Intelligent Management Center Logo
IBM Tivoli NetCool vs HPE Intelligent Management Center
Compared 7% of the time
SolarWinds Network Configuration Manager vs HPE Intelligent Management Center Logo
SolarWinds Network Configuration Manager vs HPE Intelligent Management Center
Compared 7% of the time
More HPE Intelligent Management Center Competitors
SolarWinds Network Configuration Manager vs OpenText Network Node Manager i Logo
SolarWinds Network Configuration Manager vs OpenText Network Node Manager i
Compared 36% of the time
DX Spectrum vs OpenText Network Node Manager i Logo
DX Spectrum vs OpenText Network Node Manager i
Compared 24% of the time
Cisco DNA Center vs OpenText Network Node Manager i Logo
Cisco DNA Center vs OpenText Network Node Manager i
Compared 21% of the time
Fortinet FortiManager vs OpenText Network Node Manager i Logo
Fortinet FortiManager vs OpenText Network Node Manager i
Compared 20% of the time
More OpenText Network Node Manager i Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Network Management Applications
March 2025
HPE Intelligent Management Center reportDownload HPE Intelligent Management Center product report
Buyer's Guide
OpenText Network Node Manager i
March 2025
OpenText Network Node Manager i reportDownload OpenText Network Node Manager i product report
 

Also Known As

HPE IMC
Micro Focus Network Node Manager, Network Node Manager, HPE Network Node Manager
 

Overview

HPE Intelligent Management Center (IMC) is a comprehensive management platform that was built from the ground up to support the Fault, Configuration, Accounting, Performance, Security (FCAPS) model. It provides features and functions that are designed for comprehensive management of the network infrastructure. IMC was designed to provide the following functions:

  • Supports the ITIL operational center of excellence IT practices model.
  • Uses a single-pane management paradigm to enable end-to-end business management of IT services
  • Provides scalability by supporting distributed and hierarchical system architectures, through additional operating system and database support.
  • Uses an SOA model to provide full resource, service, and user management.
  • Enables integration of traditionally separate management tools using a modular design.
  • Enables enterprises to expand their infrastructure management in scale and to seamlessly accommodate new technologies at the same time.
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
OpenText Network Node Manager i (NNMi) delivers powerful capabilities enabling NOCs to manage modern networks. NNMi Smart Plug-ins expand NNMi into specialized environments, helping your team reduce time to resolve issues. NNMi is a core component of Network Operations Management.
OpenText
 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
IPC, Exelon, VivaCom, 
Buyer's Guide
HPE Intelligent Management Center vs. OpenText Network Node Manager i
March 2025
Free Report: HPE Intelligent Management Center vs. OpenText Network Node Manager i
Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Intelligent Management Center vs. OpenText Network Node Manager i and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our HPE Intelligent Management Center vs. OpenText Network Node Manager i report.
See our list of best Network Management Applications vendors.

We monitor all Network Management Applications reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.