Huntress Managed SIEM vs Logpoint comparison

Read 24 Logpoint reviews

4,412 Views
2,427 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

Huntress Managed SIEM

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 29, 2026

Logpoint and Huntress Managed SIEM compete in the cybersecurity domain, focusing on threat detection and response. Logpoint has the upper hand in pricing and support satisfaction, while Huntress is favored for its robust feature set.

Features: Logpoint provides an intuitive analytics platform, real-time threat monitoring, and seamless integration with various environments. Huntress Managed SIEM offers automated threat hunting, remediation services, and a proactive security management approach.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Logpoint supports cloud, hybrid, and on-premises deployment with accessible customer support. Huntress Managed SIEM emphasizes a lightweight deployment process and timely customer support, ensuring a smooth setup.

Pricing and ROI: Logpoint is cost-effective with competitive pricing and solid ROI for budget-conscious organizations. Huntress Managed SIEM, although priced higher, justifies its cost with advanced security features and compelling ROI through proactive threat management.

To learn more, read our detailed Huntress Managed SIEM vs. Logpoint Report (Updated: April 2026).

Huntress Managed SIEM vs. Logpoint

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,244 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Huntress Managed SIEM

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

31st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Logpoint

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

29th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Log Management (30th), User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (15th), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (34th), Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (19th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category, the mindshare of Huntress Managed SIEM is 1.1%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Logpoint is 1.2%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Logpoint	1.2%
Huntress Managed SIEM	1.1%
Other	97.7%

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

Featured Reviews

reviewer2805510

Partner Account Manager at a wholesaler/distributor with 51-200 employees

Human-guided threat monitoring has delivered rapid, confident incident response and strong compliance

I believe Huntress Managed SIEM could be improved by increasing integrations with non-Microsoft solutions as this would broaden its appeal. A broader out-of-the-box solution for diverse environments including IoT, Mac OS, and Linux servers would be valuable. I would rate Huntress Managed SIEM an eight because a couple of things could be changed, such as having more integrations with non-Microsoft systems, improved customization on the dashboard, and enhanced reporting in the threat intelligence updates. Being unable to click on new niche variants of threats is another point I would mention, but overall an eight out of ten is a good score because I think it is a very well-priced solution for its capabilities and all the positives I have outlined. The eight rating is primarily influenced by those integration and customization points I mentioned, which are the main requests from customers.

Read full review

Rifat Hasan

System Engineer at Corporate Projukti Limited

Has lacked proper integration and consistent support communication

I selected Logpoint for the pricing as it is reasonable. I am located in Bangladesh, South Asia, Dhaka. I have tried to contact Exabeam by mail repeatedly, but there has been no response. My company, Corporate Projukti Limited, including my Bangladesh area head, technical director, and team manager, have sent emails to contact Exabeam solution, but there is no response. There is already a distributor in Bangladesh. The weakness with Logpoint is UEBA. UEBA is recommended, but not extra. Exabeam's UEBA is an extra feature. SOAR is extra, but Logpoint's product measurement is 40 or 50. There is a 10% difference with the UEBA and SOAR, so Logpoint is weak there. I would appreciate extra features in Logpoint such as SOAR. SOAR and UEBA are included features in Logpoint. Logpoint's UEBA is a weak point, while Exabeam's UEBA has extra AI through automation. Exabeam has a license included, and the extra license is an add-on. In Logpoint, it is included, which makes it a weak point.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Huntress Managed SIEM's response time is far superior to any other vendor we have tested in terms of MDR."

"The single pane of glass management with the other security products we use from Huntress is incredibly valuable."

"Huntress Managed SIEM is designed to make powerful threat detection, response, and compliance support accessible without the complexities and costs of traditional SIEMs."

"Huntress is a great company and incredibly helpful with deployment."

"During the year I have been using it, I have seen improvements such as no alert fatigue, which is beneficial, and obviously the automated threat detection."

"The main advantage of Logpoint is the support service. They reply within ten minutes to an hour to our queries."

"The technical support for Logpoint is very good, and I would rate it as nine out of ten."

"Even if I bash a lot on LogPoint, I must say that it's a bang for the buck product."

"The solution is user-friendly."

"The UEBA component, as well as the SOAR component, are some of the most valuable features of Logpoint."

"The product is easy to use."

"The solution's most valuable aspect is the combination of the software and the support that they have."

"I use the product for my research and development to enhance my work."

More Logpoint pros

Cons

"I would appreciate more features in the stack. I would like Huntress Managed SIEM to integrate with EDRs like SentinelOne to combine that level of intelligence and information into their stack so that they can leverage whatever protections the client has and gather that intelligence to help with the MDR side."

"In my opinion, there is room for improvement in Huntress Managed SIEM, particularly in integration with third-party solutions."

"There should be better exclusions of log types and the ability to exclude specific types of logs that might be using a lot of data."

"The scalability for SMEs and MSPs is noteworthy for a few hundred endpoints, but it struggles with scalability when dealing with high logs, multi-site, multi-tenant setups, and large volumes of endpoints, which poses a challenge."

"Customer Service: This is a HUGE problem."

"The thing that makes it a little bit challenging is when you run into a situation where you have logs that are not easily parsable."

"My issues with the product are mainly with regard to how it handles collecting logs."

"LogPoint must find a way to integrate the servers without agents."

"What could be improved in LogPoint is its UI because it's less friendly to users than LogRhythm. The UI could be more aesthetically appealing to users. It's completely outdated."

"It is a good product, but its interface or GUI could be better."

"One of the downsides is it is not a SaaS solution. It must be on-premises."

"It needs to improve performance. That's somehow something that others do better."

More Logpoint cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"It has a fixed price, which is what I like about LogPoint. I bought the system and paid for it, and I pay maintenance. It is not a consumption model. Most SIEMs or most of the log management systems are consumption-based, which means that you pay for how many logs you have in the system. That's a real problem because logs can grow very quickly in different circumstances, and when you have a variable price model, you never know what you're going to pay. Splunk is notoriously expensive for that reason. If you use Splunk or QRadar, it becomes expensive because there are not just the logs; you also have to parse the logs and create indexes. Those indexes can be very expensive in terms of space. Therefore, if they charge you by this space, you can end up paying a significant amount of money. It can be more than what you expect to pay. I like the fact that LogPoint has a fixed cost. I know what I'm going to pay on a yearly basis. I pay that, and I pay the maintenance, and I just make it work."

"Our licensing fees are about $10,000 USD per month, which I think is fair."

"My company used to pay for LogPoint costs annually. It's a cost-effective solution. I'm not part of the Finance team, though, so I'm not sure exactly what the licensing fee is or what license my company had."

"Logpoint's pricing is mid-ranged and depends on the number of devices."

"LogPoint seemed like it was a good product, but it was expensive and there wasn't any room to move the pricing when customers needed a lower-costing solution."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I would rate LogPoint's pricing a seven. It is not very expensive compared to some of the more costly products, and it is not very cheap compared to some of the cheaper products in the SIEM market."

"It was on a yearly basis at about $100K. It was not a huge environment. We were running it on our own virtual server environment, which, of course, had a cost. There was hardware and some energy cost, and then there were Microsoft Windows licenses for servers. That's all, but there was nothing in comparison to the licensing costs."

"For a hundred user deployment the cost is about $10,000. The next year it would be the same because it's a subscription-based license. There are separate costs as well, for example, if a customer asks for training for their staff."

More Logpoint pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Insurance Company

16%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Educational Organization

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

15%

Construction Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Large Enterprise	1

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	18
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Huntress Managed SIEM?

I think the pricing for SIEM is good.

What needs improvement with Huntress Managed SIEM?

What is your primary use case for Huntress Managed SIEM?

My main use case for Huntress Managed SIEM is working with partners who will then be able to deliver the customer needs to the end user. I work with enabling partners and discuss security informati...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for LogPoint?

I rate the pricing at eight, suggesting it's relatively good or affordable.

What needs improvement with LogPoint?

What is your primary use case for LogPoint?

I had experience with Logpoint before, and I contacted the Exabeam solution, but there was no response; they did not contact me. Bangladesh already has a Logpoint distributor. In terms of complianc...

Wazuh vs Huntress Managed SIEM

Comparisons

Compared 15% of the time

Microsoft Sentinel vs Huntress Managed SIEM

Compared 12% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity AI SIEM vs Huntress Managed SIEM

Compared 11% of the time

Fluency vs Huntress Managed SIEM

Compared 11% of the time

Hunters vs Huntress Managed SIEM

Compared 8% of the time

More Huntress Managed SIEM Competitors

IBM Security QRadar vs Logpoint

Compared 8% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Logpoint

Compared 8% of the time

Elastic Security vs Logpoint

Compared 5% of the time

Wazuh vs Logpoint

Compared 3% of the time

Microsoft Sentinel vs Logpoint

Compared 3% of the time

More Logpoint Competitors

Product Reports

Download Huntress Managed SIEM product report

Huntress Managed SIEM

May 2026

Download Logpoint product report

May 2026

Overview

Huntress Managed SIEM delivers advanced threat detection and response capabilities tailored for Security Information and Event Management. It addresses cybersecurity challenges with automated monitoring and actionable insights.

Huntress Managed SIEM stands out by offering comprehensive security event monitoring designed for modern cybersecurity landscapes. It identifies potential threats and vulnerabilities, ensuring actionable data for quicker response. Its integration capabilities with existing security infrastructure make it a reliable choice for enhancing cyber defenses and incident resolution.

What are the key features of Huntress Managed SIEM?

Automated Threat Detection: Identifies threats automatically to streamline defense processes.
Incident Response: Facilitates rapid action with clear response strategies.
Security Event Correlation: Analyzes diverse data sources for threat correlation.
Integrative Monitoring: Works seamlessly with current security setups.

What benefits and ROI should users anticipate from Huntress Managed SIEM?

Improved Security Posture: Enhances the ability to detect and respond to incidents.
Operational Efficiency: Reduces time and effort needed for monitoring and response.
Cost-effectiveness: Offers robust security without the need for extensive resources.
Scalability: Grows with the business to maintain effective security measures.

Huntress Managed SIEM is widely used across industries such as finance, healthcare, and retail, where it is critical to protect sensitive information. Its adaptability to different enterprise needs makes it an ideal choice for strengthening security frameworks in diverse sectors.

Huntress

Logpoint offers a robust SIEM system tailored for compliance with regulations like PCI DSS and GDPR, enhancing security monitoring and enabling efficient incident response.

Logpoint strengthens cybersecurity by offering essential tools for log collection, security monitoring, and forensic analysis. Its features include an intuitive dashboard, a powerful correlation engine, and extensive third-party integrations, making it a versatile asset for security operations centers. Despite its advantages, areas for improvement include ransomware protection, cloud-native deployment, and more flexible pricing. Improvements in features like SOAR and UEBA functionality can boost its competitiveness.

What are the most important features of Logpoint?

Easy-to-use dashboard: Simplifies interaction with intuitive design.
Correlation engine: Connects data for in-depth security insights.
Comprehensive log collection: Facilitates extensive data gathering.
Third-party integrations: Connects seamlessly with other tools.
UEBA and SOAR components: Enhance threat response and automation.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Cost-effectiveness: Provides significant value for its pricing.
User-friendly interface: Enhances usability with straightforward design.
Compliance navigation: Eases PCI DSS and GDPR compliance.
Quick support service: Provides responsive customer assistance.

Many organizations utilize Logpoint across industries as part of their security infrastructure. It supports standard compliance, orchestrating incident responses and security threat monitoring. Logpoint empowers businesses by integrating and correlating security data, improving cybersecurity posture in varied environments.

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

AP Pension, Copenhagen Airports, KMD, Terma, DISA, Danish Crown, Durham City Council, Game, TopDanmark, Lahti Energia, Energi Midt, Synoptik, Eissmann Group Automotive, Aligro, CG50...