No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Hyperglance vs IBM Kubecost comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 5, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Hyperglance
Ranking in Cloud Cost Management
12th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
5.6
Number of Reviews
13
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
IBM Kubecost
Ranking in Cloud Cost Management
24th
Average Rating
9.4
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Cloud Cost Management category, the mindshare of Hyperglance is 0.9%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Kubecost is 2.7%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Cloud Cost Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Hyperglance0.9%
IBM Kubecost2.7%
Other96.4%
Cloud Cost Management
 

Featured Reviews

Raj kuruhuri  - PeerSpot reviewer
Founding Member at Flash AI
Cloud governance has improved and teams optimize costs with automated real-time visibility
Hyperglance features help in codeless automation, which means we can fix common issues and optimize resources without doing any coding. Hyperglance has positively impacted our organization by helping us with agentless and self-hosted deployments, which has saved 38% time for deployments that we used to do manually. The automated process has saved us time and money as we cut resources. In the metrics we have tracked, we have saved 22% in costs. The time and cost savings from Hyperglance have allowed our team to focus on other projects and improved our workflow. Hyperglance has helped us save on cost, improve efficiency, and reduce manual work while enabling real-time compliance checks with very good features. We have saved a lot of time and resources by reducing the manual work which the new team needs to do. Now the team is occupied in other work and they are more productive, providing us more user stories in the organization.
DIRK UYTTERHOEVEN - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Enterprise Architect at DV Consulting
Identifies and eliminates overprovisioning of expensive resources like storage, highly scalable and offers performance
I like the overall product because I can select what monitoring should be enabled and whatnot. In our case, we really focus on performance because it's clear that the price is related to most performance setups. So the more performance, the more expensive. So we look into the performance that the customer needs, and then based upon that feedback from the remote control, we change the parameters. And even the end user will not notice it is not using it, so we just make money without any impact on the end users.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Hyperglance provides visibility that creates a unified view of the entire cloud system, allowing us to debug much faster than we were able to initially."
"Hyperglance on the Up to 3,000 Resources Pay as You Go plan has improved our organization by giving us a much clearer visibility into our cloud infrastructure."
"Hyperglance has helped us save on cost, improve efficiency, and reduce manual work while enabling real-time compliance checks with very good features."
"Hyperglance has improved our organization by giving us a single view of all resources across GovCloud, helping us quickly identify misconfigurations, maintain compliance, and reduce manual work that used to take hours."
"Hyperglance provides all these, but the configuration and use depend on your goals."
"Hyperglance: Up to 5000 Resources [Pay as you go] provided a visual representation of our cloud resources and usage, showing which EC2 instances were underutilized or overprovisioned, and recommended resizing the instances based on actual usage, which led to a reduction of 30% to 35% in cloud spending."
"The biggest positive impact of Hyperglance on my organization is operational efficiency because it centralizes infrastructure visibility, cost management, and compliance monitoring into a single platform, which reduces manual effort, improves the accuracy of infrastructure documentation, helps identify unused resources, and supports proactive governance, allowing teams to spend less time on administrative tasks and more time delivering business value."
"We have seen measurable improvements in a few areas since adopting Hyperglance, with the biggest impact on operational efficiency and cloud cost visibility by identifying underutilized EC2 instances, unattached storage volumes, and outdated test resources across multiple AWS accounts, which reduced our monthly cloud spend by roughly ten to fifteen percent while also improving troubleshooting time because engineers can trace dependencies and visualize architecture much faster instead of manually piecing information together from native cloud consoles."
"The price is reasonable, considering the value it delivers."
"I mostly like the dashboards."
"It offers a detailed examination of your cluster, including the types of instances utilized, allocated CPU and RAM, and resource distribution for specific applications."
 

Cons

"The main challenge I see with Hyperglance is not functionality but usability; it provides a lot of valuable information, but new users may need time to learn how to navigate and interpret the data effectively."
"Hyperglance can be improved by providing a less steep learning curve."
"The initial configuration is hectic, and it takes time to realize value gain."
"From my perspective, Hyperglance can only improve its UI/UX design. They can improve their dashboard as well, as their dashboard has a lot of customization limits, so they can improve it."
"The current limitations in Hyperglance: Up to 5000 Resources [Pay as you go] are heavily focused on cloud environments and may not offer the same visibility in hybrid infrastructure."
"Hyperglance could be costly for someone with simple infrastructure."
"Some dashboards and visualizations can become cluttered at scale, so I believe more flexible filtering and cleaner navigation would help."
"One area where Hyperglance could improve is performance speed when dealing with very large environments, as sometimes the visual maps take longer to load."
"There is a significant potential for enhancing it through the incorporation of advanced technologies like AI and generative AI."
"The integration with other solutions could be improved."
"Faster monitoring could potentially improve overall stability in the production environment."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The cost is cheap. Kubecost has an open-source core."
"The real savings come from using Kubecost features like autoscaling and serverless functions to optimize your resource usage. If you treat it like a data center migration without fine-tuning, it might cost more."
"The cost of the tool may seem nominal compared to the potential savings in infrastructure expenses."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Cost Management solutions are best for your needs.
908,745 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
25%
Insurance Company
22%
Outsourcing Company
14%
Energy/Utilities Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Construction Company
14%
Insurance Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business12
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise6
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Hyperglance?
The pricing is a bit high, but it is manageable for large enterprise organizations.
What needs improvement with Hyperglance?
The initial configuration is hectic, and it takes time to realize value gain.
What is your primary use case for Hyperglance?
The primary use case is to get visibility of cloud infrastructure and find security misconfigurations.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

Hyperglance: Up to 1000 Resources
Kubecost - Amazon EKS cost monitoring
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Hyperglance vs. IBM Kubecost and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.
908,745 professionals have used our research since 2012.