Trellix ESM vs i-SIEM [EOL] comparison

Cybereason and Trellix are both solutions in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category. Additionally, 100% of Cybereason users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 76% of Trellix users who would recommend it.

i-SIEM [EOL]

Read 1 i-SIEM [EOL] review

100% willing to recommend

Trellix ESM

Read 38 Trellix ESM reviews

1,943 Views
1,768 Comparison Views

76% willing to recommend

i-SIEM [EOL]

Trellix ESM

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 2, 2025

Trellix ESM and i-SIEM [EOL] compete in the SIEM landscape. i-SIEM [EOL] appears to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive features and perceived value, while Trellix ESM has strengths in pricing and support.

Features: Trellix ESM offers advanced analytics capabilities, integration with security operations, and robust threat detection and response mechanisms. i-SIEM [EOL] provides flexibility, scalability, and adaptability for diverse environments, catering to varied organizational needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Trellix ESM has a straightforward deployment process with substantial support. i-SIEM [EOL], although highly customizable, may require more configuration but provides adequate customer service for new users.

Pricing and ROI: Trellix ESM is known for competitive pricing and clear ROI, attractive for cost-conscious organizations with upfront investment aligning with long-term savings. i-SIEM [EOL], potentially more expensive initially, offers strong ROI through its adaptable infrastructure, yielding increased efficiency and performance over time.

To learn more, read our detailed Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

i-SIEM [EOL]

Average Rating

9.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Trellix ESM

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (25th)

Featured Reviews

Dannie Combs

Senior Vice President and Chief Information Security Officer at Donnelley Financial Solutions

The alert fatigue and false positive rates have just plummeted, which is really exciting.

empow has a few areas of improvement as with any other technology, such as continuing to drive innovation in the dashboard. While we've been extremely impressed with the dashboard's ease of use, flexibility, ability to drill down deeply, and focus very intently on an area of interest, there will always be opportunities to be more innovative and open it up to a wider audience than just the operations group, for example. With reporting, there is always a desire to have custom reporting for every client of empow. Relative to keeping up with the sheer pace of cloud-native technologies, it should provide more options for clients to deploy their technologies in unique ways. This is an area that I recommend that they maintain focus.

Read full review

Mohit Dhingra

Senior Vice President IT at AS IT Consulting Pvt. Ltd.

Offers comprehensive report generation while maintaining ease of integration

We need to improve Trellix ESM by making sure that most of the logging devices available in the global market should be covered, and if there is any device which is not covered, there should not be any additional charges for writing the custom parsers on that. We can add some new features regarding AI in the future for Trellix ESM, but the maturity will take a longer time. There are many false positives that happen in an environment during the first couple of months, or around six months, so the system analyst is not able to identify whether the event which has occurred is a true positive or a false positive.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"As a result of the automation, we are able to manage SIEM with a small security team. I'm in a unique position where we have been growing the security organization quite rapidly over the last three and a half years. But, as a direct result of the empow transition and legacy collection of tools towards the empow platform, we've been able to keep that head count flat. We've been able to redirect a lot of the security team's time away from the wash, rinse, repeat activities of responding to alarms where we have a high degree of confidence that they will be false positives, adjusting the rules accordingly. This can be a bit frustrating for the analyst when they have to spend hours a day dealing with these types of probable false positives. So, it has helped not only us keep our headcount flat relative to the resources necessary to provide the assurances that our executives expect of us for monitoring, but allows our analyst team to spend the majority of their time doing what they love. They are spending their time meaningfully with a higher degree of confidence and enjoying getting into the incident response type activity."

"The most valuable feature for us is that it comes with many correlations, reports, and dashboards already available. It's also very easy to use."

"McAfee as a whole is a good solution."

"The most valuable feature in ESM is its search and reporting feature. It's really nice."

"It is a good central viewpoint for issues. These can then be investigated in more detail on the subnet server(s)/endpoints."

"The most valuable feature is that if the scanning does find something, it quarantines it. Then you can decide what you are going to do with it."

"Scalability is quite easier with Trellix ESM, because all we need to do is add more receivers to it, so it can go to any point."

"It blocks the things which are not to be allowed. It has an adaptive mode where it learns for itself."

"The most valuable feature is the correlation rules."

More Trellix ESM pros

Cons

"Relative to keeping up with the sheer pace of cloud-native technologies, it should provide more options for clients to deploy their technologies in unique ways. This is an area that I recommend that they maintain focus."

"The user interface could be more user-friendly."

"The product's stability is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"Product currently requires Flash."

"The product’s alert response feature needs improvement. It could be more flexible and secure."

"Tech support is required each time there is a system update of the solution."

"The product is mature and needs little improvement, but we could enhance the customized dashboarding based on use cases."

"There should be support for multitenancy in the product."

"I would like to see good analytics in future releases."

More Trellix ESM cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I don't have to put up with any longer with these hypercomplex licensing agreements. Every time I want to add some additional reporting as a compliance centric or regulatory specific, e.g., GDPR, PCI, or Sarbanes-Oxley, many providers would have an additional license for this, which felt a bit ridiculous to me. With the simplified licensing architecture, there were no hidden "gotchas" down the road with empow. Something I have experienced with other providers that I've worked with in the past."

"With a higher degree of fidelity in the alarms, we were able to avoid adding additional resources to our teams. We take into account the cost of security resources in the market and the significantly higher fidelity from the alarms that are being generated. This drove down our costs with our MSSP. It drove down my cost for human capital internally. It drove down our need to have multiple resources supporting the underlying infrastructure and health and maintenance of empow as a platform from several resources down to one. Therefore, human capital costs were significantly reduced. Our operating expenses were significantly reduced. Our capital costs were significantly reduced while tripling our capacity and our run rate reduced. It was almost a "too good to be true" situation. Fortunately, for us, it worked out very nicely."

"McAfee is the right choice for a low-budget solution."

"We pay for our licensing fees on a yearly basis, and there are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."

"The product is slightly expensive."

"The price of McAfee ESM is higher than some of the other solutions. There are additional features that can be added at an additional fee."

"When compared to IBM Security QRadar and other similar platforms, the pricing of McAfee ESM is reasonable and comparatively less expensive."

"We renew our license annually."

"The cost is dependent on the customer's environment and requirements."

"The pricing is fair."

More Trellix ESM pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

Vinod Shankar

Manager, Enterprise Risk Consulting at a tech company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Feb 26, 2015

HP ArcSight vs. IBM QRadar vs. McAfee Nitro vs. Splunk vs. RSA Security vs. LogRhythm

We at Infosecnirvana.com have done several posts on SIEM. After the Dummies Guide on SIEM, we are following it up with a SIEM Product Comparison – 101 deck. So, here it is for your viewing pleasure. Let me know what you think by posting your comments below. The key products compared here are…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Performing Arts

11%

Media Company

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

16%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	15
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	24

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for McAfee ESM?

When discussing Trellix ESM pricing and licensing, if you consider some premium product, the pricing also has to be premium, however, enterprise customers who look for a premium product, alongside ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with McAfee ESM?

Areas of Trellix ESM that could be improved or enhanced include checking on the clients who are still on-prem, especially banks, as most are not moving everything to the cloud due to confidentialit...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for McAfee ESM?

My customer's usual use case for Trellix ESM involves one client, as most of the users have moved to ESM. Nowadays, they don't use IPS only, since McAfee IPS is standalone; they incorporate firewal...

See all answers

Comparisons

DNIF HYPERCLOUD vs i-SIEM [EOL]

Compared 25% of the time

Netsurion vs i-SIEM [EOL]

Compared 21% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs i-SIEM [EOL]

Compared 15% of the time

Logpoint vs i-SIEM [EOL]

Compared 12% of the time

AWS Security Hub vs i-SIEM [EOL]

Compared 11% of the time

More i-SIEM [EOL] Competitors

OpenText Enterprise Security Manager vs Trellix ESM

Compared 22% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs Trellix ESM

Compared 14% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Trellix ESM

Compared 12% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Trellix ESM

Compared 10% of the time

LogRhythm SIEM vs Trellix ESM

Compared 6% of the time

More Trellix ESM Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

January 2026

Download i-SIEM [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

Trellix ESM

January 2026

Download Trellix ESM product report

Also Known As

No data available

McAfee ESM, NitroSecurity, McAfee Enterprise Security Manager

Overview

i-SIEM [EOL] is an innovative security information and event management platform designed to enhance threat detection and response capabilities in IT environments.

i-SIEM [EOL] offers a comprehensive approach to managing and analyzing security alerts, ensuring that businesses can effectively mitigate risks. With advanced threat intelligence and robust analytics, it helps organizations streamline their security operations and improve incident response times, providing each organization the information required to make informed security decisions.

What are the most important features of i-SIEM [EOL]?

Real-time Monitoring: Continuously tracks network activity to detect potential threats.
Advanced Threat Detection: Utilizes AI to identify sophisticated attacks.
Customizable Dashboards: Allows users to tailor their view and focus on relevant data.
Automated Incident Response: Streamlines the response process by automating certain actions.
Scalable Architecture: Easily adapts to growing business needs.

What benefits and ROI should users consider in reviews?

Improved Security Posture: Enhanced monitoring capabilities reduce risk exposure.
Operational Efficiency: Automation cuts down manual efforts and saves time.
Increased Visibility: Comprehensive insights into activity improve decision-making.
Cost Management: Helps allocate resources more effectively, potentially reducing costs.

i-SIEM [EOL] is particularly beneficial in industries such as finance and healthcare where data security is paramount. Its ability to integrate with existing infrastructure allows seamless adoption, offering enhanced security without disrupting operations. Industries handling sensitive information value its advanced capabilities to safeguard data integrity.

Cybereason

Make your organization more resilient and confident with Trellix Security Operations. Filter out the noise and cut complexity to deliver faster, more effective SecOps. Integrate your existing security tools and connect with over 650 Trellix solutions and third-party products.

Trellix

Sample Customers

University of Oklahoma, Donnelley

San Francisco Police Credit Union, Wªstenrot Gruppe, Volusion, California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, Government of New Brunswick, State of Colorado, Macquarie Telecom, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Cologne Bonn Airport

Buyer's Guide

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

January 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Wazuh, IBM and others in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM). Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) vendors.

We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.