Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Trellix ESM Logo

Top 10 Trellix ESM Alternatives

Vendor: Trellix
3.7 out of 5
Leave a review

Top Trellix ESM Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Trellix ESM based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Splunk Enterprise Security, Microsoft Sentinel, and IBM Security QRadar. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Trellix Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Trellix, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Trellix ESM Logo
Trellix ESM Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security handles large data efficiently with advanced search, machine learning, and real-time alerts, appealing to those seeking extensive data capabilities. In comparison, Trellix ESM offers core SIEM functions with a focus on cost-effective, straightforward security solutions for simpler needs.
Download Splunk Enterprise Security vs. Trellix ESM Report
Splunk Enterprise Security has higher setup costs, whereas Trellix ESM offers a more cost-effective solution for implementation. Pricing reflects the distinct approaches of the two services.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security has higher setup costs, whereas Trellix ESM offers a more cost-effective solution for implementation. Pricing reflects the distinct approaches of the two services.
Trellix ESM Logo
Microsoft Sentinel
4.1 out of 5
Trellix ESM Logo
Microsoft Sentinel
4.1 out of 5
Trellix ESM excels in data correlation and comprehensive reporting, offering competitive pricing and responsive customer service. In comparison, Microsoft Sentinel provides advanced threat detection, seamless integration with other Microsoft products, and extensive cloud-native capabilities, making it a preferred choice for advanced features and integrations.
Download Microsoft Sentinel vs. Trellix ESM Report
Trellix ESM has a high setup cost often requiring professional assistance, whereas Microsoft Sentinel offers a lower setup cost and is more user-friendly. This makes Microsoft Sentinel more accessible for smaller budgets.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix ESM has a high setup cost often requiring professional assistance, whereas Microsoft Sentinel offers a lower setup cost and is more user-friendly. This makes Microsoft Sentinel more accessible for smaller budgets.
Trellix ESM Logo
Trellix ESM Logo
IBM Security QRadar
4.0 out of 5
IBM Security QRadar offers advanced threat detection and seamless integration, ideal for large deployments. In comparison, Trellix ESM provides customizable dashboards and real-time threat detection, suitable for those prioritizing flexibility and cost-efficiency. QRadar's scalability contrasts with Trellix's user interface improvement needs.
Download IBM Security QRadar vs. Trellix ESM Report
IBM Security QRadar typically has a lower setup cost compared to Trellix ESM, which may involve higher initial expenses due to its complex implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM Security QRadar typically has a lower setup cost compared to Trellix ESM, which may involve higher initial expenses due to its complex implementation.
Trellix ESM Logo
Elastic Security
3.9 out of 5
Trellix ESM Logo
Elastic Security
3.9 out of 5
Trellix ESM excels in threat intelligence and customizable alerts, ensuring robust monitoring capabilities. In comparison, Elastic Security offers superior scalability and open-source integrations, making it a more comprehensive solution for handling larger data sets efficiently. Trellix ESM's appeal lies in its cost-effectiveness and ease of deployment, while Elastic Security's advanced features justify a higher initial investment.
Download Elastic Security vs. Trellix ESM Report
Trellix ESM offers low setup costs, whereas Elastic Security requires higher initial investment. Trellix ESM is cost-effective for initial setup, while Elastic Security might be more expensive.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix ESM offers low setup costs, whereas Elastic Security requires higher initial investment. Trellix ESM is cost-effective for initial setup, while Elastic Security might be more expensive.
Trellix ESM Logo
LogRhythm SIEM
4.2 out of 5
Trellix ESM Logo
LogRhythm SIEM
4.2 out of 5
Trellix ESM offers comprehensive threat detection and customizable dashboards. In comparison, LogRhythm SIEM excels with advanced analytics and seamless integrations. Trellix's easier deployment contrasts with LogRhythm's superior customer support. Trellix's lower setup cost is enticing, while LogRhythm's higher cost is offset by its functionality.
Download LogRhythm SIEM vs. Trellix ESM Report
Trellix ESM users indicate setup costs are high, while LogRhythm SIEM users note moderate setup costs. Trellix ESM often involves additional expenses compared to LogRhythm SIEM, which is generally perceived as more cost-effective during initial deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix ESM users indicate setup costs are high, while LogRhythm SIEM users note moderate setup costs. Trellix ESM often involves additional expenses compared to LogRhythm SIEM, which is generally perceived as more cost-effective during initial deployment.
Trellix ESM Logo
Fortinet FortiSIEM
3.8 out of 5
Trellix ESM Logo
Fortinet FortiSIEM
3.8 out of 5
Trellix ESM offers strong event correlation and efficient security data management. In comparison, Fortinet FortiSIEM provides extensive third-party platform integration and comprehensive threat intelligence. Trellix ESM is cost-effective and easier to deploy, while Fortinet FortiSIEM, despite higher costs, excels in versatility and support.
Download Fortinet FortiSIEM vs. Trellix ESM Report
Trellix ESM incurs higher setup costs, while Fortinet FortiSIEM offers a more cost-effective initial setup. Trellix ESM is noted for its comprehensive features, contrasted by Fortinet FortiSIEM’s affordability and quicker deployment capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix ESM incurs higher setup costs, while Fortinet FortiSIEM offers a more cost-effective initial setup. Trellix ESM is noted for its comprehensive features, contrasted by Fortinet FortiSIEM’s affordability and quicker deployment capabilities.
Trellix ESM Logo
Exabeam
3.9 out of 5
Trellix ESM Logo
Exabeam
3.9 out of 5
Trellix ESM features robust threat intelligence and extensive integrations. In comparison, Exabeam excels with advanced machine learning and ease of use. Trellix ESM could enhance scalability, while Exabeam requires better documentation. Trellix ESM has higher setup costs, whereas Exabeam offers a better balance of pricing and ROI.
Download Exabeam vs. Trellix ESM Report
Trellix ESM users report moderately high setup costs, while Exabeam users note lower initial setup expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix ESM users report moderately high setup costs, while Exabeam users note lower initial setup expenses.
Trellix ESM Logo
AlienVault OSSIM
3.7 out of 5
Trellix ESM Logo
AlienVault OSSIM
3.7 out of 5
Trellix ESM excels in customer support and ease of deployment, making it a cost-effective choice with good scalability. In comparison, AlienVault OSSIM offers more comprehensive features and integration flexibility, justifying its higher price with advanced monitoring capabilities and a significant long-term ROI.
Download AlienVault OSSIM vs. Trellix ESM Report
Trellix ESM has a higher setup cost, contrasted by AlienVault OSSIM which offers a more budget-friendly initial expense. Trellix ESM provides enterprise-grade features, while AlienVault OSSIM focuses on cost-effectiveness with its open-source model.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix ESM has a higher setup cost, contrasted by AlienVault OSSIM which offers a more budget-friendly initial expense. Trellix ESM provides enterprise-grade features, while AlienVault OSSIM focuses on cost-effectiveness with its open-source model.
Trellix ESM Logo
Trellix ESM Logo
Google Chronicle Suite
3.9 out of 5

Trellix ESM is valued for competitive pricing and responsive customer support. In comparison, Google Chronicle Suite excels with advanced automation and scalability. Additionally, Trellix ESM’s integration flexibility contrasts with Google Chronicle Suite’s comprehensive security ecosystem and extensive feature set, appealing to different tech buyer needs.

Download Google Chronicle Suite vs. Trellix ESM Report
Trellix ESM users report high setup costs, whereas Google Chronicle Suite is noted for its lower setup expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix ESM users report high setup costs, whereas Google Chronicle Suite is noted for its lower setup expenses.
Trellix ESM Logo
Trellix ESM Logo
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM
4.3 out of 5
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM excels in support and pricing for those valuing cost-effectiveness and usability. In comparison, Trellix ESM offers a broader feature set and comprehensive security capabilities. Securonix is user-friendly in deployment, while Trellix ESM, though complex, justifies its higher cost with robust features.
Download Securonix Next-Gen SIEM vs. Trellix ESM Report
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM has a higher setup cost, while Trellix ESM offers a more cost-effective initial setup, highlighting a significant difference in the implementation expenses of both solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM has a higher setup cost, while Trellix ESM offers a more cost-effective initial setup, highlighting a significant difference in the implementation expenses of both solutions.
Trellix ESM Logo
Trellix ESM Logo
Stellar Cyber Open XDR
1 out of 5

Stellar Cyber Open XDR enhances threat detection and response with advanced analytics and integrations. Its valuable features include AI-driven insights and real-time monitoring. Some users point to room for improvement in deployment processes and customizability to better align with diverse industry needs.

Download Stellar Cyber Open XDR vs. Trellix ESM Report
It’s a single license platform.
View comparison
Pricing
It’s a single license platform.
Trellix ESM Logo
Trellix ESM Logo
Sumo Logic Security
4.1 out of 5
Trellix ESM excels in real-time threat detection and incident management, with a clear pricing structure. In comparison, Sumo Logic Security offers advanced log management and analytics. Trellix ESM's intuitive deployment contrasts with Sumo Logic's seamless cloud integration. Each presents distinct features justifying their respective costs.
Download Sumo Logic Security vs. Trellix ESM Report
Trellix ESM setup costs are higher, reflecting its advanced features, while Sumo Logic Security offers a more affordable setup, appealing to budget-conscious users.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix ESM setup costs are higher, reflecting its advanced features, while Sumo Logic Security offers a more affordable setup, appealing to budget-conscious users.
Trellix ESM Logo
Trellix ESM Logo
OpenText Enterprise Security Manager
3.9 out of 5
OpenText Enterprise Security Manager offers robust tools and device coverage, appealing to those prioritizing security versatility. In comparison, Trellix ESM might attract buyers seeking flexible deployment and effective support, despite needing improved SaaS integration and customization for reports.
Download OpenText Enterprise Security Manager vs. Trellix ESM Report
OpenText Enterprise Security Manager has a lower setup cost than Trellix ESM, making it a more budget-friendly option for organizations prioritizing upfront expense control, while Trellix ESM's setup requires a larger initial investment for its comprehensive features.
View comparison
Pricing
OpenText Enterprise Security Manager has a lower setup cost than Trellix ESM, making it a more budget-friendly option for organizations prioritizing upfront expense control, while Trellix ESM's setup requires a larger initial investment for its comprehensive features.
Trellix ESM Logo
Trellix ESM Logo
ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer
3.7 out of 5
Trellix ESM attracts users with its scalability and reliability for large enterprises. In comparison, ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer offers extensive customization and strong analytics. Trellix ESM needs better third-party integration and user-friendly reporting, while ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer requires quicker setup and improved documentation.
Download ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer vs. Trellix ESM Report
Trellix ESM has a higher setup cost compared to ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer which offers a more cost-effective setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix ESM has a higher setup cost compared to ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer which offers a more cost-effective setup.
Trellix ESM Logo
Trellix ESM Logo
NetWitness Platform
3.7 out of 5
NetWitness Platform excels in advanced threat detection and packet analysis, appealing to those needing detailed scrutiny. In comparison, Trellix ESM offers robust analytics and integration capabilities, making it ideal for holistic cybersecurity management. Trellix ESM provides smoother deployment, while NetWitness Platform ensures high-level threat assessments.
Download NetWitness Platform vs. Trellix ESM Report
NetWitness Platform is praised for offering customizable setup costs, while Trellix ESM is noted for its competitive and predictable pricing model. NetWitness may involve higher initial investments, unlike Trellix ESM, which provides a more budget-friendly setup approach.
View comparison
Pricing
NetWitness Platform is praised for offering customizable setup costs, while Trellix ESM is noted for its competitive and predictable pricing model. NetWitness may involve higher initial investments, unlike Trellix ESM, which provides a more budget-friendly setup approach.
Trellix ESM Logo
DNIF HYPERCLOUD
3.8 out of 5
Trellix ESM Logo
DNIF HYPERCLOUD
3.8 out of 5
Trellix ESM offers comprehensive threat detection and incident response with straightforward deployment and competitive pricing. In comparison, DNIF HYPERCLOUD provides advanced analytics, real-time data processing, and innovative features, albeit with a steep learning curve and higher costs. This demonstrates a trade-off between affordability and advanced capabilities.
Download DNIF HYPERCLOUD vs. Trellix ESM Report
Trellix ESM has a higher setup cost compared to DNIF HYPERCLOUD. DNIF HYPERCLOUD is more cost-effective for initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix ESM has a higher setup cost compared to DNIF HYPERCLOUD. DNIF HYPERCLOUD is more cost-effective for initial setup.
Trellix ESM Logo
Trellix ESM Logo
SolarWinds Security Event Manager
3.9 out of 5
SolarWinds Security Event Manager excels in pricing and support, offering robust reporting and real-time monitoring. In comparison, Trellix ESM is valued for advanced customization and powerful analytics. SolarWinds is appreciated for quick deployment, while Trellix provides a detailed setup and higher-end features.
Download SolarWinds Security Event Manager vs. Trellix ESM Report
SolarWinds Security Event Manager has a higher setup cost with a longer initial configuration time, while Trellix ESM offers a more affordable setup with a quicker implementation process.
View comparison
Pricing
SolarWinds Security Event Manager has a higher setup cost with a longer initial configuration time, while Trellix ESM offers a more affordable setup with a quicker implementation process.
Trellix ESM Logo
Trellix ESM Logo
OpenText Behavioral Signals
4.0 out of 5
Trellix ESM offers robust analytics and reliable customer service, making it ideal for seamless deployment. In comparison, OpenText Behavioral Signals provides superior behavioral analytics and long-term value, appealing to those prioritizing advanced predictive capabilities and detailed guidance.
Download OpenText Behavioral Signals vs. Trellix ESM Report
Trellix ESM features a straightforward setup with minimal initial costs, while OpenText Behavioral Signals may involve higher setup expenses, highlighting a key distinction between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix ESM features a straightforward setup with minimal initial costs, while OpenText Behavioral Signals may involve higher setup expenses, highlighting a key distinction between the two solutions.
Trellix ESM Logo
Snare
4.0 out of 5
Trellix ESM Logo
Snare
4.0 out of 5

Trellix ESM impresses with its extensive security event management and customizable dashboards. In comparison, Snare stands out for its robust log management and ease of integration. Trellix ESM offers strong customer service, while Snare provides straightforward deployment and favorable pricing with quick ROI.

Download Snare vs. Trellix ESM Report
Trellix ESM has an initial setup cost that is higher than Snare. However, Snare's lower setup cost comes with fewer advanced features.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix ESM has an initial setup cost that is higher than Snare. However, Snare's lower setup cost comes with fewer advanced features.
Trellix ESM Logo
Trellix ESM Logo
NNT Log Tracker Enterprise
4.1 out of 5
Trellix ESM provides real-time threat monitoring and comprehensive reporting tools, offering straightforward installation and responsive support. In comparison, NNT Log Tracker Enterprise excels in advanced compliance management and detailed log analysis, with more granular control and extensive features, justifying its higher price.
Download NNT Log Tracker Enterprise vs. Trellix ESM Report
Trellix ESM has a higher initial setup cost, while NNT Log Tracker Enterprise offers a more budget-friendly setup process.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix ESM has a higher initial setup cost, while NNT Log Tracker Enterprise offers a more budget-friendly setup process.
Trellix ESM Logo
Graylog Security
4.3 out of 5
Trellix ESM Logo
Graylog Security
4.3 out of 5
Trellix ESM offers advanced threat detection and real-time monitoring. In comparison, Graylog Security provides flexible data parsing and powerful search capabilities. Trellix ESM excels in deployment and customer service, while Graylog Security presents a competitive pricing model with quicker ROI.
Download Graylog Security vs. Trellix ESM Report
Trellix ESM has a higher initial setup cost compared to Graylog Security, which offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix ESM has a higher initial setup cost compared to Graylog Security, which offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
Trellix ESM Logo
Trellix ESM Logo
IBM Watson for Cyber Security
4.0 out of 5
Trellix ESM's comprehensive features and straightforward deployment make it ideal for ease of use. In comparison, IBM Watson excels in advanced AI capabilities and ROI, offering superior analytics and threat detection. Trellix ESM is intuitive, while IBM Watson benefits complex environments with precision and extensibility.
Download IBM Watson for Cyber Security vs. Trellix ESM Report
Trellix ESM involves higher setup costs, whereas IBM Watson for Cyber Security is known for more budget-friendly setup expenses. This significant difference highlights a key consideration between the two solutions for prospective users.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix ESM involves higher setup costs, whereas IBM Watson for Cyber Security is known for more budget-friendly setup expenses. This significant difference highlights a key consideration between the two solutions for prospective users.
Trellix ESM Logo
RSA enVision
3.6 out of 5
Trellix ESM Logo
RSA enVision
3.6 out of 5
Trellix ESM offers intuitive navigation and robust security analytics appealing to budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, RSA enVision stands out with extensive log management and customization, suiting complex environments. Trellix ESM enables easier deployment, while RSA enVision ensures long-term value with comprehensive features.
Download RSA enVision vs. Trellix ESM Report
Trellix ESM has a higher setup cost compared to RSA enVision, reflecting its advanced capabilities and extensive feature set. Meanwhile, RSA enVision offers a more budget-friendly initial setup, making it a cost-effective choice for smaller enterprises.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix ESM has a higher setup cost compared to RSA enVision, reflecting its advanced capabilities and extensive feature set. Meanwhile, RSA enVision offers a more budget-friendly initial setup, making it a cost-effective choice for smaller enterprises.

Related categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
Log Management
IT Operations Analytics