IBM API Connect vs Oracle API Management comparison

IBM and Oracle are both solutions in the API Management category. IBM is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.2, while Oracle is ranked #20 with an average rating of 9.0. IBM holds a 6.4% mindshare in APIM, compared to Oracle’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

IBM API Connect

Read 75 IBM API Connect reviews

8,910 Views
6,632 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Oracle API Management

Read 5 Oracle API Management reviews

483 Views
360 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM API Connect

Oracle API Management

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

IBM API Connect and Oracle API Management compete in the API management sector. While IBM is noted for its affordability and support, Oracle stands out for its comprehensive features, making it appealing to enterprises seeking advanced analytics and integration.

Features: IBM API Connect includes lifecycle management, robust security protocols, and high scalability. Oracle API Management offers comprehensive analytics, superior interoperability, and advanced security capabilities.

Room for Improvement: IBM API Connect could enhance analytics capabilities, improve interoperability, and streamline complex deployments. Oracle API Management may benefit from simplifying the deployment process, reducing its learning curve, and optimizing resource usage.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM API Connect offers a straightforward deployment model with strong customer support for quick adoption and efficient problem resolution. Oracle API Management requires a more hands-on deployment approach but provides extensive resources and detailed support for seamless implementation.

Pricing and ROI: IBM API Connect is cost-effective with lower initial setup costs and promises a quicker return on investment, appealing to budget-conscious buyers. Oracle API Management involves higher initial costs but offers advanced features that suggest significant long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM API Connect vs. Oracle API Management Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IBM API Connect vs. Oracle API Management

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,040 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM API Connect

Ranking in API Management

5th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (7th)

Oracle API Management

Ranking in API Management

20th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the API Management category, the mindshare of IBM API Connect is 6.4%, up from 6.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle API Management is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Management

Featured Reviews

KavitaChavan

Associate Manager at Baariz

Quite flexible and provides excellent performance for API gateway

The only disadvantage I can see is that it requires heavy hardware support, which can be considered quite expensive. In terms of new functionality, I think the analytics can be improved in V10. The analytics feature was better in the older version, 2.18. But in V10, it's not as flexible. When exporting analytics as KSP or JSON, it's not well formatted. They can work on enhancing the analytics part. Additionally, they can focus on reducing the hardware cost.

Read full review

Sagar SampadMall

IT-Operation Head at Granules India Ltd

Provides robust security for financial transactions and protects the ERP database from direct exposure

My main feedback is about the account management. I feel they should connect with clients more frequently, beyond just selling the product. They should actively seek feedback and tailor the approach to client needs. It shouldn't always be about pushing additional products. My main suggestion is focused solely on the account management approach, specifically fostering closer and more proactive client relationships. So, the pricing could also be bit improvement.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It allows enterprises to expose some of their tech to outside stakeholders."

"API Connect's data gateway is one of the strongest in the market."

"We are able to share those APIs instantly within the organization; even if we want to share it outside publicly, then we can have those capabilities."

"It acts as a central gateway for both external APIs and underlying systems. It's basically a central middleware for hosting APIs to the internet and consuming APIs from internal systems. It provides central governance for any APIs going outside the network, ensuring security and a common contract for API definitions."

"The solution is very stable."

"The most valuable features are stability and security."

"The product gathers data to measure API performance."

"Publishers can easily identify, create, and publish APIs on the developer portal, defining plans, packages, and potentially billing rules."

More IBM API Connect pros

"The most valuable features for us are security and centralization."

"The initial setup isn't overly difficult."

"The security, the authentication, and the publishing qualities are great."

"It is very secure, easy to manage, and easy to configure. It is a web-based API. Moreover, we get direct support from Oracle guys."

Cons

"The installation was difficult with the IBM toolkit."

"Installation is weak."

"The integration of cloud-based services is where we're looking for improvement in this platform."

"Automation for our Domino applications could be improved."

"They seem to have left out a feature for microservices and also a certification module for OIDC."

"The monetization of the API could be improved. The pricing for the consumer is also very important to improve this solution."

"The implementation process could benefit from improvements, as it may take some time to become accustomed to the deployment."

"Extracting the data could be improved."

More IBM API Connect cons

"From an administration and developer point of view, the user interface and user experience are not great."

"Oracle should actively seek feedback and tailor the approach to client needs. It shouldn't always be about pushing additional products."

"We'd like it if they could reduce the cost without sacrificing on features."

"Before gaining experience with the product, I found that it was not simple to use and things took longer to do than I had anticipated."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is expensive when compared to other products in this class. There were no extra fees for add-ons or technical support."

"The pricing is significantly high."

"It would be a good idea to bring down the pricing by at least 20 to 30 percent."

"It is quite an expensive product."

"The pricing is too expensive with IBM. Sometimes, we prefer to go with an open source or something more lightweight."

"The price of the solution is expensive. However, there are a lot of customization capabilities."

"It is an expensive solution. The licensing model is based on a per-subscription and per-subscriber end-user basis, meaning the price is determined by the end-users of the platform."

"This is a licensed product. If your company is looking to obtain a license, you have to work with IBM partners."

More IBM API Connect pricing and cost advice

"Oracle is not a cheap solution and it is not affordable for all of our clients in Portugal."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

23%

Financial Services Firm

18%

Insurance Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

11%

Healthcare Company

10%

Government

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM API Connect?

Publishers can easily identify, create, and publish APIs on the developer portal, defining plans, packages, and potentially billing rules.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM API Connect?

Price depends on many factors like size of the deal, competitive factors, timing, customer profile or where the pricing for API Calls is very competitive comparing to any of the leader players.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM API Connect?

The only downside where improvements are needed is probably on the licensing side. Scalability is an issue with IBM API Connect, making it an area where improvements are required.

See all answers

What do you like most about Oracle API Management?

It is very secure, easy to manage, and easy to configure. It is a web-based API. Moreover, we get direct support from Oracle guys.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle API Management?

We opted for a five-year license. It's mid-range, not too high. More affordable than many other options. It's already more affordable than others, especially for small companies it is accommodating...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle API Management?

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM DataPower Gateway vs IBM API Connect

Compared 26% of the time

Apigee vs IBM API Connect

Compared 21% of the time

Microsoft Azure API Management vs IBM API Connect

Compared 15% of the time

Amazon API Gateway vs IBM API Connect

Compared 6% of the time

Kong Gateway Enterprise vs IBM API Connect

Compared 6% of the time

More IBM API Connect Competitors

Apigee vs Oracle API Management

Compared 60% of the time

Microsoft Azure API Management vs Oracle API Management

Compared 21% of the time

More Oracle API Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IBM API Connect

March 2025

Download IBM API Connect product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle API Management

March 2025

Download Oracle API Management product report

Overview

IBM API Connect facilitates API management and integration in the financial sector. Companies use it to expose, secure, and manage APIs for banking, insurance, and fintech, deploying it on-premises, in the cloud, or as a hybrid solution.

IBM API Connect focuses on creating and monetizing APIs while enabling seamless transactions and integration with third-party services. It is vital for compliance with regulations and enhances external communication among institutions. With deployment options suitable for different environments, it supports centralized gateway management, robust security features, and comprehensive API lifecycle management. Users benefit from powerful analytics, user-friendly interfaces, and high performance with capabilities in message transformation and efficient monitoring.

What are the most important features?

Centralized Gateway: Manages all APIs through a single entry point.
Robust Security: Ensures API protection with advanced security measures.
Comprehensive API Lifecycle Management: Covers creation, deployment, and retirement of APIs.
User-Friendly Interface: Simplifies API creation and management tasks.
Powerful Analytics: Provides insights into API usage and performance.
Seamless Integration: Connects easily with third-party services and internal systems.
Flexible Deployment Options: Supports on-premises, cloud, and hybrid environments.
High Performance: Optimizes API performance and reduces latency.
Message Transformation: Manipulates and formats messages between different systems.
Visualization Tools: Enables clear and detailed views of API usage statistics.

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

API Monetization: Generates additional revenue streams from APIs.
Enhanced Compliance: Ensures adherence to industry regulations and standards.
Improved External Communication: Facilitates integration and communication among financial institutions.
Technical Support: Benefit from reliable customer support and easy configuration.
Deployment Flexibility: Choose from on-premises, cloud, or hybrid options.

IBM API Connect is extensively implemented in the financial sector, enabling banking, insurance, and fintech services to manage APIs efficiently. Companies use it to ensure secure transactions, integration with third-party services, and compliance with regulatory standards. Its deployment flexibility accommodates different infrastructure needs, making it suitable for a wide range of financial applications.

IBM

Oracle API Management enable you to streamline business and IT objectives by managing the lifecycle of your APIs, outsource application enhancement by empowering developers through API adoption, and add a mobile front to your applications and capture new revenue opportunities with seamless API enablement.

Oracle

Sample Customers

Heineken, Tine, Finologee, Axis Bank

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

IBM API Connect vs. Oracle API Management

March 2025

Free Report: IBM API Connect vs. Oracle API Management

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM API Connect vs. Oracle API Management and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM API Connect vs. Oracle API Management report.

See our list of best API Management vendors.

We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.