Oracle API Management vs WSO2 API Manager comparison

Oracle and WSO2 are both solutions in the API Management category. Oracle is ranked #20 with an average rating of 9.0, while WSO2 is ranked #9 with an average rating of 7.7. Oracle holds a 0.4% mindshare in APIM, compared to WSO2’s 4.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Oracle users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of WSO2 users who would recommend it.

Oracle API Management

Read 5 Oracle API Management reviews

483 Views
360 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

WSO2 API Manager

Read 40 WSO2 API Manager reviews

6,382 Views
4,570 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Oracle API Management

WSO2 API Manager

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Oracle API Management and WSO2 API Manager compete in API management. Oracle API Management holds an edge due to its robust customer support and integration within Oracle's cloud ecosystem, appealing to enterprises needing extensive support. In contrast, WSO2 API Manager offers a comprehensive feature set that appeals to businesses seeking open-source flexibility.

Features: Oracle API Management is favored for its seamless integration with Oracle's cloud services, advanced analytics, and high scalability, making it suitable for large enterprises. It provides strong, built-in monitoring tools. WSO2 API Manager is open-source, offering flexibility and a high degree of customization. It supports multi-tenancy and showcases strong policy management capabilities. Oracle's strength lies in its powerful cloud integration, whereas WSO2 offers a more adaptable environment.

Room for Improvement: Oracle API Management could improve on its high initial costs and offer more flexible pricing models. Enhanced user documentation and community engagement would benefit Oracle's user base. WSO2 API Manager, while open-source and adaptable, requires more initial configuration, which can be time-consuming. Its support community could also be expanded to enhance peer assistance. Simplifying its deployment process would improve user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle API Management is praised for seamless deployment in Oracle Cloud with extensive technical support, crucial for organizations requiring reliable assistance. WSO2 API Manager, as an open-source solution, involves more configuration but is supported by detailed documentation and community support. Oracle offers easy implementation, whereas WSO2 provides deployment flexibility.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle API Management typically has higher initial costs because of its premium offerings and support but yields significant ROI through its comprehensive service suite. WSO2 API Manager's open-source model presents a lower setup cost, facilitating faster initial ROI, specifically for businesses with existing infrastructure. Oracle's solution demands higher investment for enhanced support and integrated services, while WSO2 remains a cost-effective, customizable alternative.

To learn more, read our detailed Oracle API Management vs. WSO2 API Manager Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Oracle API Management vs. WSO2 API Manager

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Oracle API Management

Ranking in API Management

20th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

WSO2 API Manager

Ranking in API Management

9th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the API Management category, the mindshare of Oracle API Management is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WSO2 API Manager is 4.8%, up from 4.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Management

Featured Reviews

Sagar SampadMall

IT-Operation Head at Granules India Ltd

Provides robust security for financial transactions and protects the ERP database from direct exposure

My main feedback is about the account management. I feel they should connect with clients more frequently, beyond just selling the product. They should actively seek feedback and tailor the approach to client needs. It shouldn't always be about pushing additional products. My main suggestion is focused solely on the account management approach, specifically fostering closer and more proactive client relationships. So, the pricing could also be bit improvement.

Read full review

VishalSingh14

IT Engineer at Reliance Industries Ltd

Easy to deploy APIs and easy to manage CORS configuration

I have used WSO2 Store and WSO2 API Manager at the architecture level. I worked on two versions, namely WSO2 API Manager 2.6.0 and 5.7.0. I have also worked with WSO2 Identity Server versions 5.7 and 5.11. There are certain things that Apigee handles better than WSO2 API Manager. The user interface of WSO2 API Manager is much easier than that of Apigee. The scope of flexibility was much greater in Apigee. In WSO2 API Manager, we had little flexibility and were restricted to a specific software or tool. On the other hand, we had the scope of customization in Apigee.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is very secure, easy to manage, and easy to configure. It is a web-based API. Moreover, we get direct support from Oracle guys."

"The security, the authentication, and the publishing qualities are great."

"The most valuable features for us are security and centralization."

"The initial setup isn't overly difficult."

"API management lifecycle is the most valuable."

"Most of the time, we need to install a plug-in without having any lapse in services or restarting the application. The WSO2 platform can do all deployments without any downtime."

"It is possible to scale up and scale down with the solution...I can say that I have not seen any issues related to scalability."

"There are a lot of tools to help the manager. WSO2 is very easy to install. It has all the principal functionalities that you think about when you want to put up the management solution. It's a very friendly tool."

"The main feature — the publication of the API, the management section — is great in general."

"It's a good product."

"WSO2 API Manager has a user-friendly model."

"Helped us to quickly publish our Microservice APIs and enforcing different policies against them, it comes up with features like Security, Throttling policy and it provides complete access to customize API's which actually saves development effort and time."

More WSO2 API Manager pros

Cons

"Oracle should actively seek feedback and tailor the approach to client needs. It shouldn't always be about pushing additional products."

"Before gaining experience with the product, I found that it was not simple to use and things took longer to do than I had anticipated."

"From an administration and developer point of view, the user interface and user experience are not great."

"We'd like it if they could reduce the cost without sacrificing on features."

"The initial setup can be difficult."

"I would like it to be a more convenient development platform with the ability to write orchestrations and so on. Our problem with this product is that in my country, we are the only enterprise that has been using this product. We're missing a lot of knowledge from colleagues to consult with, and we also aren't able to recruit people with relevant skills. It is a big problem. The small team that is maintaining this product is the only team that can actually relate to any technical issue. The support that we're getting from the company is not great. There is also a cultural gap there because they're from Sri Lanka, and it is not easy. They're putting in a lot of effort, but they are not meeting our expectations."

"From what I have experienced from the versions I have tried, they could improve on the multi-tenant environments to allow some kind of SSO single sign-on between tenant."

"The tool's commercial aspect could be improved. Pricing varies with partners, so selecting the appropriate pricing can be challenging."

"I would like to see improvements in the speed of the solution as it can be a bit slow compared to other platforms along with addressing memory issues would be beneficial."

"I would like it to be a more stable solution. Maybe in the last version that is approved. For me it would be good if they had a community established version."

"The user interface needs to improve, it is a bit outdated."

"They are developing another platform called Choreo that allows you to create API itself using the WSO2 programming language Ballerina. It would be great if they added a direct connection between Choreo and API Manager, that would be great. I think they are working on that, but I'm not sure."

More WSO2 API Manager cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Oracle is not a cheap solution and it is not affordable for all of our clients in Portugal."

"We use the open-source version — the free version."

"WSO2 API Manager is a low-cost solution. It is one of the most affordable solutions."

"I think the other competitors that are providing the same solution are quite expensive. WSO2 API Manager is quite cheap."

"For our projects, we found the pricing to be a little high."

"There is a subscription-based pricing structure and also the open-sourced version available."

"WSO2 API Manager is an open-source solution."

"It is costly, around ten thousand per year, per instance"

"The solution costs less than 20,000 euros a year. I'm not sure of the exact number."

More WSO2 API Manager pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

11%

Healthcare Company

10%

Government

10%

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

18%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Oracle API Management?

It is very secure, easy to manage, and easy to configure. It is a web-based API. Moreover, we get direct support from Oracle guys.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle API Management?

We opted for a five-year license. It's mid-range, not too high. More affordable than many other options. It's already more affordable than others, especially for small companies it is accommodating...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle API Management?

See all answers

What do you like most about WSO2 API Manager?

It is possible to scale up and scale down with the solution...I can say that I have not seen any issues related to scalability.

See all answers

What needs improvement with WSO2 API Manager?

One area for improvement is monitoring. Dashboards for application monitoring of the APIs would be beneficial, allowing us to check for faulty APIs.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for WSO2 API Manager?

We use WSO2 API Manager for our microservices and our APIs, both internally and externally.

See all answers

Comparisons

Apigee vs Oracle API Management

Compared 60% of the time

Microsoft Azure API Management vs Oracle API Management

Compared 21% of the time

IBM API Connect vs Oracle API Management

Compared 19% of the time

More Oracle API Management Competitors

Apigee vs WSO2 API Manager

Compared 23% of the time

Kong Gateway Enterprise vs WSO2 API Manager

Compared 17% of the time

Apache APISIX vs WSO2 API Manager

Compared 15% of the time

Amazon API Gateway vs WSO2 API Manager

Compared 13% of the time

Microsoft Azure API Management vs WSO2 API Manager

Compared 11% of the time

More WSO2 API Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Oracle API Management

March 2025

Download Oracle API Management product report

Buyer's Guide

WSO2 API Manager

March 2025

Download WSO2 API Manager product report

Overview

Oracle API Management enable you to streamline business and IT objectives by managing the lifecycle of your APIs, outsource application enhancement by empowering developers through API adoption, and add a mobile front to your applications and capture new revenue opportunities with seamless API enablement.

Oracle

WSO2 API Manager is a comprehensive platform that allows organizations to design, publish, and manage APIs.

It provides a centralized interface for API governance, security, and analytics.

With features like API monetization and developer portal, it enables businesses to drive innovation and create new revenue streams.

WSO2

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

1. eBay 2. StubHub 3. Cisco 4. Verizon 5. T-Mobile 6. Vodafone 7. Orange 8. BT Group 9. Telstra 10. Deutsche Telekom 11. Swisscom 12. AT&T 13. Sprint 14. Telefonica 15. O2 16. British Airways 17. Lufthansa 18. Emirates 19. Qatar Airways 20. Etihad Airways 21. Air France 22. KLM 23. American Express 24. Visa 25. Mastercard 26. PayPal 27. Western Union 28. Citibank 29. HSBC 30. Barclays 31. Santander 32. Goldman Sachs

Buyer's Guide

Oracle API Management vs. WSO2 API Manager

March 2025

Free Report: Oracle API Management vs. WSO2 API Manager

Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle API Management vs. WSO2 API Manager and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Oracle API Management vs. WSO2 API Manager report.

See our list of best API Management vendors.

We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.