Apigee vs Oracle API Management comparison

Google and Oracle are both solutions in the API Management category. Google is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.2, while Oracle is ranked #21 with an average rating of 9.0. Google holds a 13.7% mindshare in APIM, compared to Oracle’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Google users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Apigee

Read 88 Apigee reviews

18,900 Views
14,821 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Oracle API Management

Read 5 Oracle API Management reviews

466 Views
339 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Apigee

Oracle API Management

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Apigee and Oracle API Management compete in the API lifecycle category. Apigee has the upper hand due to its advanced feature set and customer service, while Oracle offers easier integration and competitive pricing.

Features: Apigee delivers extensive analytics, a developer portal, and comprehensive security features including policy management. Oracle API Management distinguishes itself with integration and compatibility within Oracle's ecosystem and offers robust monitoring tools.

Room for Improvement: Apigee could benefit from simplified deployment and more cost-effective pricing models. Oracle API Management might improve by expanding its feature set and enhancing its customer service and flexibility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Apigee's deployment is complex but offset by exceptional customer service. Oracle provides easier deployment and adequate customer support, appealing to current Oracle suite users.

Pricing and ROI: Apigee involves higher upfront costs but promises significant ROI for enterprises needing advanced features. Oracle's lower setup costs offer a better immediate ROI for cost-sensitive organizations.

To learn more, read our detailed Apigee vs. Oracle API Management Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Apigee vs. Oracle API Management

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 851,604 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Apigee

Ranking in API Management

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

API Testing Tools (8th)

Oracle API Management

Ranking in API Management

21st

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the API Management category, the mindshare of Apigee is 13.7%, down from 15.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle API Management is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Management

Featured Reviews

ShawkyFoda

Senior Consultant at Goverment

Provides high visibility and control with good traffic monitoring

Analytics is one of the areas needing enhancement, specifically more visibility and control over traffic to improve capacity management and high availability. The replication process between Master and Slave for disaster recovery takes too long. Dependencies on analytics impact the performance of the user interface, which should be separate. The complex setup process on-premises, especially with multi-node installations, could also be improved. Additional control in product declarations, based on operations like POST and GET, is needed.

Read full review

Sagar SampadMall

IT-Operation Head at Granules India Ltd

Provides robust security for financial transactions and protects the ERP database from direct exposure

My main feedback is about the account management. I feel they should connect with clients more frequently, beyond just selling the product. They should actively seek feedback and tailor the approach to client needs. It shouldn't always be about pushing additional products. My main suggestion is focused solely on the account management approach, specifically fostering closer and more proactive client relationships. So, the pricing could also be bit improvement.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The ease of creating policies has been the most useful of the solution's features. It's a quick ramp-up time. It's easy for our support staff to implement the policies in the API management layer."

"Apigee is a pioneer in the industry and has good features and functionalities. It is a good tool for API management and it has more advancements than all other tools in the market in certain areas."

"It is scalable."

"Deploying Apigee is straightforward and does not involve significant difficulties."

"The capabilities are very powerful."

"Its flexibility allows seamless management of different products, showcasing scalability to handle extensive solutions."

"A very functional solution."

"Lifecycle management."

More Apigee pros

"It is very secure, easy to manage, and easy to configure. It is a web-based API. Moreover, we get direct support from Oracle guys."

"The most valuable features for us are security and centralization."

"The security, the authentication, and the publishing qualities are great."

"The initial setup isn't overly difficult."

Cons

"They should improve the monitoring tools for on-premises environments."

"Apigee's user interface could be more straightforward and have more options. Also, it would be nice if it were ready to work out of the box without so much configuration."

"The company needs to better support webhooks. It used to support webhooks and their policies and they have since stopped. They had some issues in the product and they abandoned the support for them. It's not come back since."

"Apigee lacks market presence."

"Development IDE, especially for Architect Review."

"The caching capabilities are somewhat limited. This is more on the developer-oriented capabilities."

"The initial setup for the on-prem solution is a little complex."

"We are experiencing issues with automation; the production in Apigee is quite time-consuming."

More Apigee cons

"We'd like it if they could reduce the cost without sacrificing on features."

"Oracle should actively seek feedback and tailor the approach to client needs. It shouldn't always be about pushing additional products."

"Before gaining experience with the product, I found that it was not simple to use and things took longer to do than I had anticipated."

"From an administration and developer point of view, the user interface and user experience are not great."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It was fairly expensive. I don't know what the standard pricing is. I want to say that it's something like $80,000 for 800 million requests (approximately) a year."

"The cost of the licensing is based on the number of API calls that are made."

"Pricing options need to be chosen on a case-by-case basis."

"It is more expensive when you compare to open-source products or other vendors."

"Compared to other products, Apigee had higher pricing."

"As most of the customers say, the tool is a bit expensive."

"The solution’s pricing could be more competitive."

"In Latin America, Apigee is expensive. It's not for small businesses; it's more for big businesses."

More Apigee pricing and cost advice

"Oracle is not a cheap solution and it is not affordable for all of our clients in Portugal."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

21%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

12%

Healthcare Company

Real Estate/Law Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does Apigee differ from Azure API Management?

Apigee offers both cloud-based and on-prem options while Microsoft Azure API Management currently only offers a cloud-based solution. Both solutions are easy to use. Apigee allows for the ability...

See all answers

Which is better - Apigee or Amazon API Gateway?

Amazon API Gateway is a platform that supports the creation and publication of API for web applications. The platform can support thousands of simultaneous API calls, and it provides monitoring, ma...

See all answers

What do you like most about Apigee?

We can customize the dashboard.

See all answers

What do you like most about Oracle API Management?

It is very secure, easy to manage, and easy to configure. It is a web-based API. Moreover, we get direct support from Oracle guys.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle API Management?

We opted for a five-year license. It's mid-range, not too high. More affordable than many other options. It's already more affordable than others, especially for small companies it is accommodating...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle API Management?

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure API Management vs Apigee

Compared 26% of the time

IBM API Connect vs Apigee

Compared 10% of the time

WSO2 API Manager vs Apigee

Compared 8% of the time

Layer7 API Management vs Apigee

Compared 6% of the time

MuleSoft API Manager vs Apigee

Compared 6% of the time

More Apigee Competitors

Microsoft Azure API Management vs Oracle API Management

Compared 20% of the time

IBM API Connect vs Oracle API Management

Compared 16% of the time

WSO2 API Manager vs Oracle API Management

Compared 10% of the time

More Oracle API Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Apigee

May 2025

Download Apigee product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle API Management

May 2025

Download Oracle API Management product report

Overview

Apigee is a platform for developing and managing APIs. Apigee offers an interface for your core services by wrapping them with a proxy layer which is then accessed by other developers. With Apigee, you can design and build APIs and then securely share their services and data without exposing any code.

Because app developers make HTTP requests to an API proxy rather than directly to your services, your services are separated from the developers. All the developer needs to know is the URL of the API proxy endpoint, necessary query parameters, authorization credentials (if they exist), and the response data format.

The API proxy isolates the app developer from your backend service. Therefore, you are free to change the service implementation if the public API remains consistent. By maintaining a consistent frontend API, existing client apps will continue to work regardless of changes on the backend.

Key capabilities of the Apigee API management platform include:

Security: Protect APIs, messages, and backends with configurable policies such as OAuth, API key verification, XML/JSON threat protection, and access control.
API gateway: Secure and mediate the traffic between clients and backends, and between a company’s APIs and the developers who use the APIs.
Developer portal: Attract and engage application developers, enabling them to discover, explore, purchase, and test APIs and register to access and use the APIs.
API console: The console helps developers learn and work with APIs.
API lifecycle management: Manage the process of designing, developing, publishing, deploying, and versioning APIs.
Automated documentation: Automate the development of API documentation and software development kits.
Machine learning: Utilize machine learning and analytics to generate actionable insights and reports.

API monitoring: Apigee offers monitoring tools for API troubleshooting, security, and optimization.

Reviews from Real Users:

Apigee stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Several major ones are its rich developer portal, its advanced analytics, and its central monitoring system.

Carlos R., a software architect at Caja Los Andes writes, “The central monitoring feature is the most valuable. It also provides security for the APIs and high availability for our use cases. Apigee is the best product in the industry in comparison to other API management solutions. It helps in fast development, which is a top point. It also supports a lot of industry standards and has excellent documentation.”

An associate vice president at a tech services company notes, “The analytics function and the developer portal are the two valuable features of Apigee. The analytics part is very good, and the developer portal is quite rich in features. The authentication mechanisms are quite easily built into Apigee, which is something that most of the other products have also now started supporting.”

Google

Oracle API Management enable you to streamline business and IT objectives by managing the lifecycle of your APIs, outsource application enhancement by empowering developers through API adoption, and add a mobile front to your applications and capture new revenue opportunities with seamless API enablement.

Oracle

Sample Customers

Adobe, advance.net, Amadeus, AT&T, Bechtel, Belly, Burberry, Chegg, Citrix, Dell, eBay, Equifax, GameStop, First Data, Globe, HCSC, Intralinks, Kao, Meredith, Mitchell, Orange, Pearson

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Apigee vs. Oracle API Management

April 2025

Free Report: Apigee vs. Oracle API Management

Find out what your peers are saying about Apigee vs. Oracle API Management and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Apigee vs. Oracle API Management report.

See our list of best API Management vendors.

We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.