IBM App Connect vs TIBCO Cloud Integration comparison

The compared IBM and TIBCO solutions aren't in the same category. IBM is ranked #12 in CDI , with an average rating of 8.2, and holds a 3.0% mindshare in the category. TIBCO is ranked #19 in PaaS , and holds a 2.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of TIBCO users who would recommend it.

IBM App Connect

Read 26 IBM App Connect reviews

2,327 Views
1,233 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

TIBCO Cloud Integration

Read 3 TIBCO Cloud Integration reviews

872 Views
488 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

IBM App Connect

TIBCO Cloud Integration

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM App Connect and TIBCO Cloud Integration based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Informatica, Salesforce and others in Cloud Data Integration.

To learn more, read our detailed Cloud Data Integration Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Data Integration

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,733 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM App Connect

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Data Integration (12th)

TIBCO Cloud Integration

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

8.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (19th)

Mindshare comparison

IBM App Connect and TIBCO Cloud Integration aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. IBM App Connect is designed for Cloud Data Integration and holds a mindshare of 3.0%, down 3.8% compared to last year.
TIBCO Cloud Integration, on the other hand, focuses on Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS), holds 2.1% mindshare, up 0.7% since last year.

Cloud Data Integration Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
IBM App Connect	3.0%
AWS Glue	9.2%
AWS Database Migration Service	7.4%
Other	80.4%

Cloud Data Integration

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
TIBCO Cloud Integration	2.1%
Boomi iPaaS	8.3%
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform	6.8%
Other	82.8%

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

Featured Reviews

Emirhan Guven

Team Leader, Software Development at a manufacturing company with 11-50 employees

Transforms data efficiently and navigates licensing challenges with ease

The transition between version 12 and version 13 presents some challenges. While version 12 had approximately 10 features, version 13 includes around 200 features with cloud platform compatibility. The learning curve for developers moving from version 12 to 13 could be smoother. When using new components, better context explanations would be beneficial. In version 13, accessing new features requires connecting through a web browser, which can be challenging to understand. The explanation of new features could be more user-friendly.

Read full review

NarendraThota

Vice President of Technology Services at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

A product that is easy to install and offers good stability to users

The API part of the solution is an area in the solution where improvements are made since I see that TIBCO is currently trying to revamp its tool by focusing more on redesigning it. There was a tool called Mashery, which is an API management tool that was acquired by TIBCO. TIBCO Cloud Integration is not a user-friendly tool when it comes to the installation phase or for maintaining the systems since its architecture is really complex. I think in the UK, one of the major telecom providers for whom I had done the infrastructure setup uses TIBCO Cloud Integration. Basically, TIBCO Cloud Integration is a bit difficult to install and manage the platform, but I feel there are improvements in the tool's latest version, especially on the API management side. Instead of moving to the higher version and converting the older version of TIBCO Cloud Integration or the legacy platform covered under TIBCO, they still use it because the architecture is completely different, and the components that the product has are completely different from what the new version of the product offers, making it one of the major reasons why TIBCO is coming up with a new version of the product that will be released in the upcoming year. The legacy platform of TIBCO will run on the cloud directly. TIBCO plans to develop a unified tool that is supported on the cloud and in an on-premises environment.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"IBM App Connect definitely saves a lot of time, approximately 50 to 60%, and based on the time savings, we can reduce the number of employees needed and save money on reduced resources."

"The most valuable feature is the security."

"App Connect's best feature is that it can be deployed in a container."

"It has different type of interfaces that can integrate with companies."

"Technical support is good."

"The transformation capabilities in IBM App Connect are particularly beneficial."

"It's stable to use, connect with the cloud, and to deploy."

"The solution is very fast-paced when it comes to making things right. We can quickly download what we need if we need any app migrations for our software business. We can download it plenty of times when we need to use it. It gives us very high speed for delivering any development."

More IBM App Connect pros

"I am really impressed by TIBCO's integration of any level of complexity."

"I like that it is a very good integration tool with many other things. TIBCO is very good for cloud integration"

"The product's initial setup phase was easy."

Cons

"IBM needs to enhance and have a stronger offering for the event streaming part because this is the future needed for the containerization and the new integration requirement."

"It is not easy to deploy. It requires someone with a high level of knowledge in the solution to deploy it, not just anyone can do it."

"I've been using IBM App Connect for about twenty-five years, and while I like it, there are some areas for improvement. The trace policy is ridiculous, and the biggest issue is the cost—it's expensive. People would use it much more if the price point weren't so high."

"The user interface of IBM App Connect can be a little bit more user-friendly, I would say because the first-time developer is onboarded while using IBM App Connect, he or she may get a little intimidated or daunted looking at all the options available or the pipelines, et cetera."

"The interface could be better."

"The setup time for App Connect could be improved."

"The product should improve its support."

"The platform is somewhat expensive and hard to predict in terms of cost."

More IBM App Connect cons

"The deployment was rather complicated."

"Integrations could be better. Although integration is good, we have faced some block issues."

"TIBCO Cloud Integration is not a user-friendly tool when it comes to the installation phase or for maintaining the systems since its architecture is really complex."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is very expensive if we want to scale."

"App Connect is not cheap."

"IBM App Connect's pricing is high compared to other products."

"The cost depends upon the consumer."

"The licensing cost for IBM App Connect is very high."

"The price could be better."

"Initially, App Connect was quite expensive because the cost was based on the number of processors we used. However, it's now based on containers, which means we can be more specific about our consumption and get a better price."

"The solution's pricing isn't cheap, but you can get good discounts based on your competitive deal."

"We don't pay for a license."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

11%

Retailer

Consumer Goods Company

Outsourcing Company

Comms Service Provider

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	21

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM App Connect?

I like the adapters. The adapters help us achieve scalability. If you want to connect to SAP, there's an adapter. Salesforce? There's an adapter. You want to connect to another system? There's like...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM App Connect?

Configuration time varies by implementation. For insurance companies with simple JDBC connections, the process is straightforward. However, companies requiring multiple configurations for ODBC, JDB...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for IBM App Connect?

I am a developer specializing in IBM App Connect. We have a customer interested in comparing ESB tools, such as webMethods, which was previously owned by Software AG company before IBM acquired the...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

webMethods.io vs IBM App Connect

Compared 21% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs IBM App Connect

Compared 11% of the time

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs IBM App Connect

Compared 9% of the time

TIBCO BusinessWorks vs IBM App Connect

Compared 6% of the time

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator vs IBM App Connect

Compared 4% of the time

More IBM App Connect Competitors

Boomi iPaaS vs TIBCO Cloud Integration

Compared 18% of the time

Informatica PowerCenter vs TIBCO Cloud Integration

Compared 13% of the time

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs TIBCO Cloud Integration

Compared 10% of the time

Oracle Integration Cloud Service vs TIBCO Cloud Integration

Compared 9% of the time

webMethods.io vs TIBCO Cloud Integration

Compared 7% of the time

More TIBCO Cloud Integration Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IBM App Connect

January 2026

Download IBM App Connect product report

Buyer's Guide

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

January 2026

Download TIBCO Cloud Integration product report

Also Known As

IBM Cast Iron

No data available

Overview

Rapidly connect public clouds, private clouds and on-premises application

App Connect Professional is IBM’s cloud integration offering which delivers an integration solution
• With ease-of-use, flexibility and increased responsiveness to the evolving business needs, while removing the daunting complexities of integration.
• Provides the powerful combination of a ‘simple integration experience’ for business users looking to automate how their applications talk to each other; coupled with a ‘configuration based integration’ approach for IT.
• App Connect Professional is for the teams and integration developers who need to solve more complex problems and need powerful tooling for integration scenarios

IBM

TIBCO Cloud Integration, built on open-source technologies, can connect cloud, on-premises, and IoT edge applications. It has a drag-and-drop and API-led design approach and a deploy-anywhere model.

TIBCO

Sample Customers

United Way of Allegheny County, Saint-Gobain CPS, Ricoh, SunTrust Banks Inc.

NASA, T-Mobile, EagleView, Air France KLM, Caesars Entertainment

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Data Integration

January 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Informatica, Salesforce and others in Cloud Data Integration. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.