IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs Kong Gateway Enterprise comparison

Why PeerSpot?

IBM and Kong are both solutions in the API Management category. IBM is ranked #36, while Kong is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.0. IBM holds a 1.1% mindshare in APIM, compared to Kong’s 3.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Kong users who would recommend it.

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Read 5 IBM Cloud Pak for Integration reviews

3,040 Views
1,520 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Kong Gateway Enterprise

Read 26 Kong Gateway Enterprise reviews

7,756 Views
7,756 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Kong Gateway Enterprise

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Kong Gateway Enterprise and IBM Cloud Pak for Integration compete in the API management and integration space. Kong Gateway Enterprise stands out in pricing and support, whereas IBM Cloud Pak for Integration is notable for its extensive features, suggesting its higher cost is worthwhile.

Features: Kong Gateway Enterprise provides high-performance API gateway capabilities, excellent scalability, and seamless integration with multiple platforms. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration offers robust integration features, including comprehensive data integration, AI-driven automation, and multi-cloud flexibility.

Room for Improvement: Kong Gateway Enterprise could enhance its integration capabilities to compete with more comprehensive solutions, improve its AI-driven functionalities, and support even broader platform agnosticity. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration may benefit from simplifying its deployment model, reducing operational complexity, and offering more cost-effective options for smaller businesses.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Kong Gateway Enterprise is praised for its straightforward deployment and configuration, coupled with responsive customer service. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration, despite its complex deployment model, provides detailed documentation and strong customer support, catering well to organizations with intricate environments.

Pricing and ROI: Kong Gateway Enterprise is cost-effective, with attractive ROI prospects, suitable for budget-conscious organizations. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration, while involving higher upfront costs, promises long-term ROI with its expansive features and scalability, making it ideal for strategic investments.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs. Kong Gateway Enterprise Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs. Kong Gateway Enterprise

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 914,938 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Ranking in API Management

36th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Data Integration (28th)

Kong Gateway Enterprise

Ranking in API Management

11th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the API Management category, the mindshare of IBM Cloud Pak for Integration is 1.1%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kong Gateway Enterprise is 3.5%, down from 7.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Kong Gateway Enterprise	3.5%
IBM Cloud Pak for Integration	1.1%
Other	95.4%

API Management

Featured Reviews

Neelima Golla

Senior Software Engineer at NessPRO Italy

A hybrid integration platform that applies the functionality of closed-loop AI automation

I recommend using it because, in today's context, the cloud plays a significant role. Within the same user interface, you can develop applications and manage multiple applications, making it a more user-friendly option. Moreover, you can explore various other technologies while deploying on the cloud, broadening your knowledge of cloud technologies. In my case, the transition led to my learning of Kubernetes, enabling multi-scaling and expanding my technical skills. It was a valuable experience, and I had the opportunity to learn many new things during the migration process. I can easily rate it an eight or nine out of ten.

Read full review

KuntalSaha

Business Consultant at Ernst & Young

Modernization projects have progressed well but documentation and security guidance still need work

Bringing in additional features to Kong Gateway Enterprise would not necessarily help it. Improving the existing features, increasing security, and adding robustness would be more beneficial. The focus should be on stabilizing the product, improving it, and increasing the documentation. Kong should focus on how the product can be self-onboarded or self-implemented, as this would ease and help customers significantly. The necessary deployment of Kong Gateway Enterprise, API management, and guidance on how customers can use it or improve that area would be helpful. Security is a major concern, especially with new security architecture coming into place. These are the areas that should be prioritized. Beyond these areas, I do not see anything lacking. Kong Gateway Enterprise is quite comprehensive.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable aspect of the Cloud Pak, in general, is the flexibility that you have to use the product."

"Cloud Pak for Integration is definitely scalable. That is the most important criteria."

"It is a stable solution."

"In general, the solution works very, very well."

"The most preferable aspect would be the elimination of the command, which was a significant improvement. In the past, it was a challenge, but now we can proceed smoothly with the implementation of our policies and everything is managed through JCP. It's still among the positive aspects, and it's a valuable feature."

"Redirection is a key feature. It helps in managing multiple microservices by centralizing control and access."

"The price is reasonable compared to that of alternative solutions."

"Kong is great at organising our API ecosystem and providing the required manageability, scalability, observability and security."

"Kong Enterprise is a good API gateway and API management product which is based on lightweight and high-performance software."

"There are a few features that I like about Kong when it comes to authentication and authorization. Specifically, being able to use Kong for role-based access control (RBAC), and then further being able to integrate the RBAC mechanism with our enterprise directory, was very useful."

"Protocol transformation is the most valuable feature of Kong Enterprise."

"The features of Kong are plugin-based network services, and it enables us to include our security policy when creating customers."

"It offers a wide range of plugins that we leverage, including OIDC, Rate Limiting, Lambda functions, and more."

"This is a solid intrusion prevention system that combines a firewall and antivirus in a single solution."

More Kong Gateway Enterprise pros

Cons

"Enterprise bots are needed to balance products like Kafka and Confluent."

"The initial setup is not easy."

"Setting up Cloud Pak for Integration is relatively complex. It's not as easy because it has not yet been fully integrated. You still have some products that are still not containerized, so you still have to run them on a dedicated VM."

"Its queuing and messaging features need improvement."

"What needs to be improved is the restriction that they have on the product."

"The pricing can be improved."

"The ease of billing is lost when Kong is not available directly on the Azure marketplace. This is one area where they can improve."

"We would like to see an automatic data API when we have a table in the database."

"The open-source version of Kong does not support a dashboard, which would be very helpful."

"They could focus more on pricing."

"The tool needs improvement in UX."

"For us, implementing Kong Gateway Enterprise with existing infrastructures and the cloud in tandem requires more effort than implementing MuleSoft or Azure APIM or AWS."

"From an improvement perspective, the product should offer more readily available connectors and also allow for more seamless AI integrations."

"The motivation to move to Enterprise edition is still license and cost based."

More Kong Gateway Enterprise cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is an expensive solution."

"The solution's pricing model is very flexible."

"There is a need to pay towards the licensing charges...In some areas, the functionalities are available free of charge."

"Kong Enterprise is cheaper than Apigee. I rate its pricing as four out of ten."

"Basically, my company uses the tool's open-source version."

"The product is reasonably priced because it goes by the SaaS model."

"The licensing is expensive."

"Kong Enterprise's pricing is at par compared to the other technologies."

"It's expensive in Thailand (10 million baht, in Thai currency)."

"There are many factors that influence the price of Kong Enterprise, such as scale, licenses, and usage."

More Kong Gateway Enterprise pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

914,938 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Construction Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

17%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Large Enterprise	20

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How does Kong Enterprise compare with Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager?

The Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager was designed with its users in mind. Though it is a reasonably complex piece of software, it is easy to install and upgrade. While there are different things that ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kong Enterprise?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Kong Enterprise?

Our primary use cases for Kong Gateway Enterprise are modernizations, migrations, and digitalizations of financial institutions. These are the primary areas we are looking for.

See all answers

Comparisons

AWS Glue vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Compared 11% of the time

AVAP Sphere vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Compared 9% of the time

IBM App Connect vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Compared 9% of the time

IBM API Connect vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Compared 8% of the time

IBM DataPower Gateway vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Compared 6% of the time

More IBM Cloud Pak for Integration Competitors

Microsoft Azure API Management vs Kong Gateway Enterprise

Compared 11% of the time

Apigee vs Kong Gateway Enterprise

Compared 10% of the time

Apache APISIX vs Kong Gateway Enterprise

Compared 8% of the time

WSO2 API Manager vs Kong Gateway Enterprise

Compared 8% of the time

Kong Konnect vs Kong Gateway Enterprise

Compared 6% of the time

More Kong Gateway Enterprise Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

API Management

September 2026

Download IBM Cloud Pak for Integration product report

Buyer's Guide

Kong Gateway Enterprise

September 2026

Download Kong Gateway Enterprise product report

Overview

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration offers multi-cloud management and automation, focusing on connecting core systems for seamless integration using advanced technologies and efficient API management.

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration provides flexibility, automation, and accounting tools on the OpenShift Container Platform, easing license and management. Among its notable features are effective streaming capabilities, simplified policy implementation via JCP, and enhanced control with redirection, particularly beneficial for microservices management. Its stability and practical container management are major advantages. However, limitations include exclusive IBM product deployment over OpenShift and complex initial setup. Users seek better pricing, enhanced streaming features, improved queuing and messaging, and integration with monitoring tools. Enhanced enterprise bots are needed for balance with Kafka and Confluent.

What are IBM Cloud Pak for Integration's key features?

Flexibility: Supports multi-cloud management and automation for seamless integration.
Streaming: Effective streaming feature for data processing and policy implementation.
Redirection: Enhances control and access for microservices management.
OpenShift Platform: Simplifies licensing and management with container technology.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Efficiency: Simplified policy implementation and automation reduce operational challenges.
Control: Enhanced management of microservices and APIs for streamlined operations.
Stability: Robust container management for consistent performance.
Integration: Supports integration with multiple technologies like Kafka and DataPower.

Implemented across industries like travel and banking, IBM Cloud Pak for Integration aids in connecting core systems and enables effective automation and API management. It supports data conversion, format alterations, and comprehensive management of numerous APIs, providing deployment options based on specific needs.

IBM

Kong Gateway Enterprise is an advanced API management platform offering seamless integration, robust security features, and flexible deployment options for modern enterprises needing efficient API handling.

Kong Gateway Enterprise stands out with its plugin-based network services and ease of implementation in Kubernetes environments. It delivers robust API governance, impressive rate limiting, and customization with Lua scripts. Enhanced with high-performance handling and AI-driven functionality, it supports efficient API monetization. It also ensures competitive pricing, scalability, and strong community support.

What are the key features of Kong Gateway Enterprise?

Plugin-Based Services: Allows easy customization and integration.
Security: Delivers comprehensive API security options.
Rate Limiting: Offers control over API traffic for better performance.
Deployment Flexibility: Supports cloud environments effortlessly.
AI Integration: Enhances functionality with AI-driven applications.

What benefits and ROI should users consider in Kong Gateway Enterprise?

Ease of Use: Simplifies API management tasks.
Scalability: Supports growth with robust infrastructure.
Customizability: Tailors API management with Lua scripts.
Community Support: Offers strong resources and collaboration opportunities.
API Monetization: Enables revenue opportunities through efficient management.

Organizations across finance, IoT, manufacturing, and e-commerce sectors implement Kong Gateway Enterprise to streamline microservices deployment and integration. It manages API security and traffic while providing observability and scalability. The platform enables integration with IDPs and other systems, securing extensive API ecosystems.

Kong

Sample Customers

CVS Health Corporation

Cargill, Zillow, Ferrari, WeWork, Healthcare.gov, Yahoo! Japan, Giphy, SkyScanner

Buyer's Guide

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs. Kong Gateway Enterprise

September 2026

Free Report: IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs. Kong Gateway Enterprise

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs. Kong Gateway Enterprise and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

914,938 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs. Kong Gateway Enterprise report.

See our list of best API Management vendors.

We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.