IBM DOORS vs IBM DOORS Next comparison

IBM DOORS and IBM DOORS Next are both solutions in the Application Requirements Management category. IBM DOORS is ranked #2 with an average rating of 7.1, while IBM DOORS Next is ranked #5 with an average rating of 7.6. IBM DOORS holds a 32.5% mindshare in ARM, compared to IBM DOORS Next’s 9.2% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of IBM DOORS users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of IBM DOORS Next users who would recommend it.

IBM DOORS

Read 55 IBM DOORS reviews

6,772 Views
2,309 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

IBM DOORS Next

Read 15 IBM DOORS Next reviews

3,217 Views
706 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

IBM DOORS

IBM DOORS Next

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 6, 2025

IBM DOORS and IBM DOORS Next compete in the product requirements management category. IBM DOORS Next is often seen with the upper hand due to its innovation and modern capabilities.

Features: IBM DOORS offers robust capabilities for managing complex requirements, a fully integrated environment, and is ideal for large-scale projects. It excels in traceability audit trail, configuration management, and integrates with various engineering tools. IBM DOORS Next, with its advanced module configurations, offers a modern architecture, better tool integration, and enhances team collaboration through improved features.

Room for Improvement: IBM DOORS could benefit from simplifying its complex traditional setup and enhancing its user interface. Additionally, reducing dependency on legacy systems and improving integration with newer tools can make it more appealing. For IBM DOORS Next, areas of improvement include extending its customizable features similar to DXL in DOORS, optimizing cloud-based performance across different environments, and enhancing legacy system transition support.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM DOORS requires a traditional, complex deployment setup, which can be time-consuming. On the other hand, IBM DOORS Next supports cloud-based deployment, enabling easier setup and providing a better support ecosystem for configuration and infrastructure management.

Pricing and ROI: IBM DOORS generally offers a lower initial setup cost but incurs higher ongoing maintenance expenses. Conversely, IBM DOORS Next involves a higher initial investment but offers better long-term ROI through reduced hardware needs and adaptability to changing requirements without additional costs.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM DOORS vs. IBM DOORS Next Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IBM DOORS vs. IBM DOORS Next

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,592 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM DOORS

Ranking in Application Requirements Management

2nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

IBM DOORS Next

Ranking in Application Requirements Management

5th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Application Requirements Management category, the mindshare of IBM DOORS is 32.5%, down from 35.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM DOORS Next is 9.2%, up from 8.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Requirements Management

Featured Reviews

SHRINIVAS ALAGERI

Architect at itcinfotech

Offers a well-refined ASPICE template and satisfying requirement management features

IBM DOORS effectively synchronizes with Polarion. But suppose when Polarion is running on Linux and you want to integrate with IBM DOORS on Windows, that is when compatibility issues arise. For the aforementioned issue we often receive advise in our company to migrate Polarion to Windows before integration. IBM DOORS is a heavy-duty application compared to competitors such as PTC Integrity. Exporting an IBM DOORS module is highly time-consuming for its bulkiness. PTC Integrity is a lighter solution that allows the development of a gateway template. It's crucial to consider the use cases and the other vendors that need to be integrated before using IBM DOORS. Our company is a PTC competence center, so most of our customers are from PTC. The customer integrations our company deals with include modeling tools such as Simulink, MATLAB, and Integrity Modeler to synchronize documents. The digital threat maintenance between IOD and Windchill is also a crucial part of our organization's operations. The solution should be more compatible with thin clients, there should be focus on web-based clients who can be more effective in IBM DOORS. At our company, we don't want every customer to use the thick client format with the solution. I would like to witness the seamless integration of IBM DOORS with Windchill in the future version. The integrations in IBM DOORS should be web-based, I don't prefer to use multiple plug-ins. For example, I want to integrate IBM DOORS with MATLAB, Simulink and Jenkins effortlessly which is possible in Codebeamer. I want every feature of Codebeamer to be present in IBM DOORS in the future releases.

Read full review

Roger Trackwell

System Engineering Manager at a wholesaler/distributor with 10,001+ employees

An industry-leading tool to demonstrate traceability between requirements, with valuable features for tailoring modules and managing several thousand requirements

The biggest thing is that it shows cradle to grave traceability between the initial parent requirement and the lowest level, or what we call a CID, a critical item development spec. You can establish your verification plans in DOORS, and then as you get test results, you can put them in DOORS as a link or as a pointer to where that specific test resides on a company database. Then you can also write compliance rationale and add a column for coding, like pass, fail, green, yellow, red, meets, does not meet, partially meets, or whatever scoring criteria you want to use. Like I said, the best thing about it is that it provides you that visibility of your verification, allowing you to know how close you are to your pre-production activities, prototyping, go ahead, or whatever it is.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I really enjoyed the API."

"The solution is stable."

"It's a very interesting tool. I like that it's simple. You have to create your document, add your templates, and have your headings and definitions, and it's done. You must attribute the discipline and fill out the comment field for requirements. It also provides you with unique IDs for each requirement. I like that it never duplicates IDs."

"Very customizable and can be as powerful as you want it to be."

"The most valuable feature of IBM Rational DOORS is the full requirements development and testing."

"Compared to other tools that I have used over the past 20 years, DOORS is the best of the best."

"It has the features of: traceability, configuration management, and user access."

"What I like about DOORS is baselines, it's easy and I use the capability of multiple users. The traceability or links between different levels are very nice. Additionally, it is used by all of our suppliers, which brings us commonality."

More IBM DOORS pros

"IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation is easier to expand to build a backend with several servers, so you can also use it to scale up to several hundreds of users without major problems."

"As far as maintaining our requirements so that we can have copies of them, it's good. I can print it out if necessary."

"There are many good features with DOORS. The solution has a concept of streams and baselines, as well as a concept of components. A component is a subproject inside a project."

"My company contacts the solution's technical support, and they are good and responsive."

"One of the most valuable features is how you can tailor the modules."

"The "Link by Attribute" feature is useful for making links without needing to use the web interface manually."

"The most valuable features are the versioning of requirements and the possibility to reuse them."

"The usability of IBM DOORS Next is very good, and the features are very good."

More IBM DOORS Next pros

Cons

"I think there is probably room to improve by offering free training."

"Rational DOORS' most valuable feature is that you can write any kind of requirement you want."

"The interface is not very user-friendly and has not evolved in a long time."

"The problem is that because the GUI is so bad, you either have to spend a lot of money customizing the interface yourself, or a lot of money on training."

"One thing that I would like to see is a lower-cost version of it that we could use for smaller projects. Sometimes, we do projects for commercial customers who would benefit from something like DOORS, but it's just so expensive. It's just a monster, so a lower-cost version would be the thing that we'd like to see."

"There needs to be quicker access to tech support. When I have a two minute question that takes two minutes to answer, it shouldn't take me 45 minutes and/or a few days of callbacks to get to the right technical support person. It's unnecessary and frustrating for the user."

"One of the things that many people complain about is it's hard to manage attributes. For example, tables or figures. This is something that can be improved."

"It is complicated sometimes, such as the logic about updating, moving from one server version to another, and the communication between restricted and non-restricted servers."

More IBM DOORS cons

"IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation is not a very user-friendly product."

"Both the data storage and reporting for this solution need improvement."

"The only additional feature would be if it had dynamic linking to other MBSE tool sets or industry-leading tools."

"It offers a bad user experience and the usability is poor."

"Be very careful how you load your DNG server. There are limits to the number of artifacts a server can handle."

"The solution is slightly high in terms of affordability. I give eight points only because the price is a bit high, which is the only problem since I am the purchasing person, but not the technical user."

"As a web tool, DNG can be difficult to use if the server is loaded or your network connection to it is saturated."

"When you are not working on it every day it is not very intuitive."

More IBM DOORS Next cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"IBM is a bit too expensive in terms of pricing. Customers are paying a lot for the license, and the price is quite high for this kind of environment. It is quite high as compared to what we can get today with other solutions."

"The licensing cost is too high."

"IBM DOORS is available at a reasonable price"

"I would rate the pricing a seven out of ten, with one being very affordable and ten being quite expensive."

"I am not sure why it is so expensive, but one license will cost approximately $15,000 in US dollars."

"I think it's expensive because you have to pay for the licenses to IBM and all that and maintain them."

"Licensing fees are billed annually and there is no support included with what I pay."

"The licensing costs for the product are quite high."

More IBM DOORS pricing and cost advice

"Users can buy a three-year license for about 12,000 Euros."

"If the product price were not reasonable enough, our company would not use IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation."

"You are going to need a beefy server and a fat network pipe to it in order to make DNG and its companion tools work well for users."

"The cost of maintenance is €20,000 to €30,000 ($22,000 to $33,000 USD) and there are no additional fees."

"The price of this solution is very high, and it increases year after year."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Requirements Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

26%

Computer Software Company

Aerospace/Defense Firm

Government

Manufacturing Company

22%

Aerospace/Defense Firm

Government

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM Rational DOORS?

The traceability matrix in DOORS improved our project outcomes. It helps ensure coverage of requirements at different levels, from user requirements to software requirements to test requirements.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Rational DOORS?

Over the years, the first version cost something around 5800 euros.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Rational DOORS?

Compared to today, DOORS' competitors also excel in this discipline. Yet the price is too high. It's often not as generic as it used to be. IBM promised to find a way for a generic format that allo...

See all answers

What do you like most about IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation?

The tool's most valuable feature is displaying requirements in a tabular format. This means you can see everything laid out in columns and rows. It is more aesthetic compared to other tools. The tr...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation?

The solution is slightly high in terms of affordability. I give eight points only because the price is a bit high, which is the only problem since I am the purchasing person, but not the technical ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation?

We are not interested in integration with lifecycle management tools. If required, we will connect to the local India team for dashboard reporting tools or additional features. I am not an exact us...

See all answers

Comparisons

Jama Connect vs IBM DOORS

Compared 25% of the time

Polarion Requirements vs IBM DOORS

Compared 24% of the time

Jira vs IBM DOORS

Compared 23% of the time

OpenText Dimensions RM vs IBM DOORS

Compared 5% of the time

PTC Integrity Requirements Connector vs IBM DOORS

Compared 5% of the time

More IBM DOORS Competitors

Jama Connect vs IBM DOORS Next

Compared 20% of the time

Jira vs IBM DOORS Next

Compared 16% of the time

Polarion Requirements vs IBM DOORS Next

Compared 15% of the time

3SL Cradle vs IBM DOORS Next

Compared 4% of the time

Helix ALM vs IBM DOORS Next

Compared 3% of the time

More IBM DOORS Next Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IBM DOORS

June 2025

Download IBM DOORS product report

Buyer's Guide

IBM DOORS Next

June 2025

Download IBM DOORS Next product report

Also Known As

Rational DOORS

Rational DOORS Next Generation, RDNG, Rational Requirements Composer and IBM RRC

Overview

IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS (DOORS) is a Requirements Management (RM) software designed to help organizations manage engineering project requirements throughout the development lifecycle. It provides a central location for capturing, defining, and organizing project requirements, facilitating communication and collaboration among stakeholders like engineers, system designers, and customers. Key features include requirements traceability, version control, and impact analysis, ensuring effective implementation and testing. DOORS improves efficiency, enhances communication, reduces risks, and supports better decision-making through clear visibility into requirements. Compared to its newer, web-based counterpart DOORS Next, the mature DOORS 9 offers a wider range of features with a traditional user interface but lacks web-based functionality and modern integration with IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) tools.

IBM

IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next (DOORS Next) is a requirements management (RM) software designed to help organizations manage engineering project requirements throughout the development lifecycle. It offers a central location for capturing, defining, and organizing project requirements, facilitating collaboration among stakeholders like engineers, system designers, and customers. Key features include requirements traceability, version control, and impact analysis. DOORS Next improves efficiency, enhances communication, reduces risks, and aids in better decision-making through clear traceability and version control. Compared to its predecessor, DOORS 9, DOORS Next is a web-based version with a modern interface that integrates with other IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) tools, while DOORS 9 offers a wider range of features in a non-web-based format.

IBM

Sample Customers

Infosys, Chevrolet Volt

Major health insurer

Buyer's Guide

IBM DOORS vs. IBM DOORS Next

June 2025

Free Report: IBM DOORS vs. IBM DOORS Next

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM DOORS vs. IBM DOORS Next and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM DOORS vs. IBM DOORS Next report.

See our list of best Application Requirements Management vendors.

We monitor all Application Requirements Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.