IBM DOORS Next vs Jira comparison

IBM and Atlassian are both solutions in the Application Requirements Management category. IBM is ranked #5 with an average rating of 7.3, while Atlassian is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.4. IBM holds a 8.9% mindshare in ARM, compared to Atlassian’s 15.4% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Atlassian users who would recommend it.

IBM DOORS Next

Read 13 IBM DOORS Next reviews

3,461 Views
1,248 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Jira

Read 274 Jira reviews

3,241 Views
2,320 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

IBM DOORS Next

Jira

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 6, 2025

Jira and IBM DOORS Next compete in the fields of project management and requirements management, respectively. Jira seems to have the upper hand in pricing and support, making it attractive for cost-sensitive businesses, while IBM DOORS Next is preferred for its comprehensive features, valuable for teams focusing on detailed requirement management.

Features: Jira offers superior tools for task tracking, agile development, and project management including Kanban and Scrum boards to boost team productivity and workflow management. It also provides robust API support for customization and integration. IBM DOORS Next provides strong capabilities in requirements management, traceability, and collaboration that cater to complex engineering projects, ensuring precise compliance and data management.

Room for Improvement: Jira could enhance its offering with deeper integrated requirement management solutions, better support for non-software development industries, and improved user interface customization. IBM DOORS Next may see improvements in ease of use, particularly concerning newcomers, making training less time-consuming, and could further develop its interaction with other software management tools to streamline projects.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Jira supports both cloud and on-premises deployment, allowing easy integration across diverse workflows with comprehensive support and documentation. Its swift deployment capabilities are beneficial for teams seeking immediate solutions. IBM DOORS Next, with its strong on-premise deployment, ensures data security while providing extensive training and support, emphasizing tailored solutions for complex environments where data integrity is crucial.

Pricing and ROI: Jira offers a cost-effective entry with scalable pricing suitable for smaller teams, providing a quick return on investment for agile-focused teams at an attractive licensing cost. Conversely, IBM DOORS Next requires higher initial investment, which potentially yields significant returns for organizations prioritizing long-term value in managing complex requirements and fostering collaboration through its premium features.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM DOORS Next vs. Jira Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IBM DOORS Next vs. Jira

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 851,604 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM DOORS Next

Ranking in Application Requirements Management

5th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Jira

Ranking in Application Requirements Management

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

274

Ranking in other categories

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (1st), Project Management Software (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Application Requirements Management category, the mindshare of IBM DOORS Next is 8.9%, up from 7.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Jira is 15.4%, down from 16.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Requirements Management

Featured Reviews

Roger Trackwell

System Engineering Manager at a wholesaler/distributor with 10,001+ employees

An industry-leading tool to demonstrate traceability between requirements, with valuable features for tailoring modules and managing several thousand requirements

The biggest thing is that it shows cradle to grave traceability between the initial parent requirement and the lowest level, or what we call a CID, a critical item development spec. You can establish your verification plans in DOORS, and then as you get test results, you can put them in DOORS as a link or as a pointer to where that specific test resides on a company database. Then you can also write compliance rationale and add a column for coding, like pass, fail, green, yellow, red, meets, does not meet, partially meets, or whatever scoring criteria you want to use. Like I said, the best thing about it is that it provides you that visibility of your verification, allowing you to know how close you are to your pre-production activities, prototyping, go ahead, or whatever it is.

Read full review

Saroj Ekka

Technical Delivery Lead at Applied Materials

Offers good repository integration, sprint board and easy to set up

There are some features and reports we need that are not there. For example, if I have to find out the capacity of the current sprint by user and compare it with the previous sprint, that visibility isn't there. We can know the capacity and what happened with the whole sprint, but not for an individual person to see where it's falling and how it's tracking. Report and analytics capabilities are important for a product manager. That visibility is important, so we use Jira. Some of the features are there, and I use my own Excels or other data things to compensate for that.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"My company contacts the solution's technical support, and they are good and responsive."

"There are many good features with DOORS. The solution has a concept of streams and baselines, as well as a concept of components. A component is a subproject inside a project."

"As far as maintaining our requirements so that we can have copies of them, it's good. I can print it out if necessary."

"It's web-based, so you don't have anything to install."

"The most valuable features are the baselines and links."

"The "Link by Attribute" feature is useful for making links without needing to use the web interface manually."

"The most valuable features are the versioning of requirements and the possibility to reuse them."

"One of the most valuable features is how you can tailor the modules."

More IBM DOORS Next pros

"I like seeing which tickets are open and what our response rate is. They have a lot of good metrics in their system to see what's going on."

"Scaling the product wouldn't be difficult."

"The timeline management is great."

"The JIRA user interface looks great. It's an overall good experience. It's very intuitive in the sense that you understand how it's going to work. It's very self-explanatory, and it's beneficial overall."

"We have the best community to support any problems that we have."

"The burndown chart is also helpful when it comes to reporting and allows us to know where we are going, especially during development."

"In our organization, we use Jira for project management and usually use the Scrum project type. We might adjust the workflows and stages to better suit our needs, but we mostly use the default functionalities it offers to manage our projects."

"It's a Scrum tool, so it's very easy to use."

More Jira pros

Cons

"There is room for improvement in the APIs that they have exposed for integration."

"When you are in Jira or Confluence, you have some freedom in how you type in text. That's also a weakness of Confluence, however, as it opens the doors to sloppy work. In DOS Next Generation, the text is very rigorous, but it might be difficult for people who don't have the discipline. Having a way to quickly enter requirements could help. It might already be in there, but I don't know. I don't have enough experience with the tool yet."

"Both the data storage and reporting for this solution need improvement."

"I have come to the conclusion that if you are considering migrating from DOORS to DNG, don't! Instead of spending 100's to 1000's of hours doing migrations, invest those hours in a DXL programmer to make DOORS do what it isn't doing for you now."

"It offers a bad user experience and the usability is poor."

"IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation is not a very user-friendly product."

"As a web tool, DNG can be difficult to use if the server is loaded or your network connection to it is saturated."

"Be very careful how you load your DNG server. There are limits to the number of artifacts a server can handle."

More IBM DOORS Next cons

"There is always a bit of a performance problem. It's a bit slow to load the whole data."

"Workflows can be improved. We don't use workflows because we can't handle that much complexity. Its interface could be more intuitive for workflows."

"It would be ideal if Jira had future functionalities to integrate more easily with various aspects of code reviews."

"There should be a way to look for specific comments. When we have thousands of comments on a Jira ticket, there is no way to look at the comments of a specific type. In the comments, if there is a way to put a tag, it would be helpful. For example, when there are a lot of lengthy discussions happening on a particular ticket, there could be a conclusion tag or something like that to indicate a conclusion. It would help in sorting the comments based on a certain category, such as conclusion."

"I don't know if it's the way it's deployed in the organization, but the interface we are provided is not as customizable as other tools. The multi-language report is not enabled in our installation. I don't really know if it's something related to the tool or our installation."

"Scripts should be more readily available for implementing projects."

"I have noticed a problem with Jira in the Philippines. In the Philippines, there are only a few companies that offer local support, which is alarming."

"It is not user-friendly."

More Jira cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"If the product price were not reasonable enough, our company would not use IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation."

"The cost of maintenance is €20,000 to €30,000 ($22,000 to $33,000 USD) and there are no additional fees."

"You are going to need a beefy server and a fat network pipe to it in order to make DNG and its companion tools work well for users."

"The price of this solution is very high, and it increases year after year."

"Users can buy a three-year license for about 12,000 Euros."

"The tool's pricing is reasonable."

"It is certainly a long-term solution for our company and for previous companies that I have worked for. They have these long-term term licenses, but I'm not sure if they really pay on a yearly basis. They are certainly using it for a really long period and for a lot of users."

"The price seems reasonable to me. It's very similar to Splunk."

"I don't deal with licensing in my current consultant position."

"We are using the enterprise license which is nice because it ensures that we always have the latest versions of Jira software."

"There is a monthly license required for this solution and it is expensive."

"We feel that the product is a good value for the cost."

"If you are using just Jira, it is cheap, but if you start to use it and you feel you need some more services or more functions, then you have to buy add-ons, which can make it expensive."

More Jira pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Requirements Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

23%

Aerospace/Defense Firm

Government

Computer Software Company

Educational Organization

48%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation?

The tool's most valuable feature is displaying requirements in a tabular format. This means you can see everything laid out in columns and rows. It is more aesthetic compared to other tools. The tr...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation?

The pricing is considered unreasonable, and there is speculation that IBM may not be putting much effort into further development, possibly treating it as a cash cow.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation?

There is a need for improvement in user experience, as the UI is too complex and outdated. Updates should be more frequent to ensure security and functionality, especially in addressing vulnerabili...

See all answers

Is Jira better or would you go with Micro Focus ALM Octane?

Hi Netanya, Basically , it all depends on the use cases for your environment and the business needs. Hope the below data may be relevant to you for identifying your needs and deciding on the approp...

See all answers

Which is better - Jira or Microsoft Azure DevOps?

Jira is a great centralized tool for just about everything, from local team management to keeping track of products and work logs. It is easy to implement and navigate, and it is stable and scalabl...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Jira?

We operate under a nonlimited license with Jira, allowing a number of users to access it with a single enterprise license.

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM DOORS vs IBM DOORS Next

Compared 37% of the time

Jama Connect vs IBM DOORS Next

Compared 21% of the time

Polarion Requirements vs IBM DOORS Next

Compared 17% of the time

3SL Cradle vs IBM DOORS Next

Compared 5% of the time

Helix ALM vs IBM DOORS Next

Compared 3% of the time

More IBM DOORS Next Competitors

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs Jira

Compared 14% of the time

IBM DOORS vs Jira

Compared 11% of the time

OpenText ALM Octane vs Jira

Compared 8% of the time

Polarion ALM vs Jira

Compared 6% of the time

Rally Software vs Jira

Compared 6% of the time

More Jira Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IBM DOORS Next

May 2025

Download IBM DOORS Next product report

Buyer's Guide

Jira

May 2025

Download Jira product report

Also Known As

Rational DOORS Next Generation, RDNG, Rational Requirements Composer and IBM RRC

Jira Software

Overview

IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next (DOORS Next) is a requirements management (RM) software designed to help organizations manage engineering project requirements throughout the development lifecycle. It offers a central location for capturing, defining, and organizing project requirements, facilitating collaboration among stakeholders like engineers, system designers, and customers. Key features include requirements traceability, version control, and impact analysis. DOORS Next improves efficiency, enhances communication, reduces risks, and aids in better decision-making through clear traceability and version control. Compared to its predecessor, DOORS 9, DOORS Next is a web-based version with a modern interface that integrates with other IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) tools, while DOORS 9 offers a wider range of features in a non-web-based format.

IBM

Jira is a powerful cloud- and subscription-based application lifecycle and issue management solution. It is designed to aid users both in project management and in resolving any issues that arise at any point in the software development process. It is especially concerned with easing the ability of developers to collaborate.

Jira Benefits

Some of the ways that organizations can benefit by choosing to deploy Jira include:

DevOps lifecycle visibility and planning. Jira provides application developers with tools that enable them to track and visualize where they are in the development process. This means that a DevOps team can measure their progress at all times. Jira’s roadmapping feature also enables a DevOps team to work more efficiently by setting goals for their projects, keeping them on track. Additionally, they are able to track whether they are meeting the goals that they set for their projects.

Regular product updates. Atlassian is constantly updating Jira so that it is continuously evolving into an ever more powerful and user-friendly solution. Users can be sure that the product that they are using is always being tweaked so as to provide them with the best possible project management solution.

Flexibility. Jira enables users to customize their workflows and dashboard so that the solution is operating in a way that best matches their needs. Jira can also integrate with more than 3,000 other applications and integrations. Organizations can use it to expand their project management and DevOps capabilities in many different ways.

Jira Features

Security capabilities. Jira is equipped with a number of useful security features. It gives administrators the ability to restrict access to certain tools so that only users who are authorized to complete certain tasks have access to the tools related to the completion of that task. Users can also set default permissions so that only particular users can work on new projects or particular projects.

Real-time notification feature. Users can set Jira so that it offers them notifications that contain critical information in real time. It can send users email notifications when pressing issues have been updated. They can also set it to notify them about tasks that may be due, or other similar events.
Activity log. Jira has the ability to track any and all changes that are taking place within the software framework. Users can keep a close eye on everything that is going on. This promotes a high level of visibility and can be leveraged to aid developers in their collaboration efforts.

Reviews from Real Users

Jira is a powerful solution that stands out when compared to many of its competitors. Two major advantages it offers are its workflow engine and its highly customizable dashboard.

Bharath R., the tool implementation and project management lead at a financial services firm, writes, “I feel the strongest feature of Jira is its workflow engine. It empowers us to automate our workflows within our organization. It's the one characteristic of Jira which I think can help any organization, be it in any domain.”

Uday J., a staff engineer at a computer company, says, “Another thing that I like a lot about Jira is that in the dashboard, you can plug the modules that you want. You can enable certain sections. For example, you can show trend history, open Jira tickets, etc. Some of the managers have created a dashboard for each engineer.”

Atlassian

Sample Customers

Major health insurer

Square, Nasa, eBay, Cisco, SalesForce, Adobe, BNP Paribas, BMW and LinkedIn, Pfizer, Citi.

Buyer's Guide

IBM DOORS Next vs. Jira

April 2025

Free Report: IBM DOORS Next vs. Jira

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM DOORS Next vs. Jira and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM DOORS Next vs. Jira report.

See our list of best Application Requirements Management vendors.

We monitor all Application Requirements Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.