

IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) and Rally Software are competitors in the project management and development lifecycle sector. IBM ELM has the upper hand due to its robust integration capabilities, while Rally Software excels in agile project management for teams focused on agile methodologies.
Features: IBM ELM provides comprehensive solutions for managing requirements, quality, and engineering workflows, offering tools for traceability, collaboration, and integration with other systems. Rally Software is known for its agility and adaptability, supporting iterative development with features centered on planning and tracking and enabling the integration of various agile methodologies.
Room for Improvement: IBM ELM could enhance usability and reduce complexity in configuration. Its interface might benefit from updates to meet user expectations. The integration processes could be streamlined to improve efficiency. Rally Software might enhance its reporting capabilities and scalability to better cater to large-scale projects. It could also benefit from improved test management features and better customization options for varying project needs.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM ELM's deployment model is complex, requiring initial setup and configuration, supported by extensive customer service. Rally Software offers a simpler deployment model with flexibility for agile environments and satisfactory customer service, ideal for quick implementations.
Pricing and ROI: IBM ELM involves higher upfront costs but offers long-term ROI with its comprehensive feature set. Rally Software provides a more cost-effective initial setup with quicker ROI, emphasizing its value for teams embracing fast-paced agile practices.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Rally Software | 5.3% |
| IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) | 3.9% |
| Other | 90.8% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 6 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 12 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 13 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 14 |
| Large Enterprise | 110 |
IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) offers an integrated platform with customizable workflows, Scrum planning tools, and resource management features, enhancing project execution and collaboration.
ELM supports Agile and Scrum project management through its integration with tools like Git and IBM Doors, providing cataloging, traceability, and reporting capabilities. While users benefit from requirement management and dashboard functionalities, the interface and reporting could be improved for better navigation and customization. Its cloud-based architecture facilitates compliance and auditing, making it a valuable tool for engineering teams focusing on configuration and version control.
What are the essential features of IBM ELM?ELM is widely used in the automotive and manufacturing sectors for managing requirements and monitoring performance. Engineering teams leverage ELM for Agile methodologies, with central teams deploying it for end-to-end development processes including requirement gathering and backlog management. Stability and improved integration support remain critical implementation areas, along with enhanced governance features for comprehensive application.
With Rally Software, you can plan, prioritize, manage, track, and continuously improve your work so that you can deliver the value that your customers need with speed, quality, and efficiency. Our enterprise-class Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) SaaS platform provides visibility into progress, roadblocks, and dependencies across multiple teams, projects, and programs. This allows you to align to your strategic goals and create better business results, and to do it all in a single system of record.
We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.