No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

IBM Engineering Test Management vs WorkloadWisdom comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM Engineering Test Manage...
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
Test Management Tools (13th), Load Testing Tools (15th)
WorkloadWisdom
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Storage Performance (4th)
 

Mindshare comparison

IBM Engineering Test Management and WorkloadWisdom aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. IBM Engineering Test Management is designed for Test Management Tools and holds a mindshare of 3.1%, up 2.5% compared to last year.
WorkloadWisdom, on the other hand, focuses on Storage Performance, holds 12.6% mindshare.
Test Management Tools Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
IBM Engineering Test Management3.1%
OpenText Application Quality Management9.4%
TestRail5.9%
Other81.6%
Test Management Tools
Storage Performance Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
WorkloadWisdom12.6%
DataCore SANsymphony19.6%
Infinio18.5%
Other49.3%
Storage Performance
 

Featured Reviews

HZ
Lead Systems Tester at Government of Ontario, Canada
Scalable and Stable solution with good integration function and support team
IBM Rational has the RFT, which is rational functional testing. We do test automation with rational functional testing. So after we do that, we can put in all the code, then I can build it, then put all the test cases, and put all the build code for the shared location. And then rational that shared location means that RQM has access to the shared location. So, when we execute, if a test case is automated, we can run it from RQM. We need to have the environment ready for it to execute. Once we have that, then we can select the task case. So, by clicking on one button, the other environment is automatically plugged in. Then test results will be automatically transferred back to our RQM. So, in RQM, we can view it, and it is integrated. So we can run the test and the automation from RQM, and the test results will come back. Azure DevOps first test case is there, but then we tried to use Selenium to do half automation. Still, we realized that it wouldn't have the integration. We could do something in the pipeline, but it fires the Selenium test automation code. But then the test results won't be brought back or added to AzureDesk DevOps. That's something that I do hope that there can be another other system that can have this kind of integration. RQM can be improved because it's not related to our server and could be faster. We need to find out how much database storage is needed and keep increasing it. We heard that the latest version of RQM can clean up some old ones and give the same test result. But that one feature we are yet to use. It's a setting that we can set up, and then it goes automatically or gives me the choice to do it manually.
Use WorkloadWisdom?
Leave a review
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.
900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Healthcare Company
21%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Construction Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
9%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business1
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise7
No data available
 

Also Known As

IBM Rational Quality Manager, Rational Quality Manager
Workload Wisdom, Load DynamiX, Load DynamiX Enterprise
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Ehrhardt, Cisco Systems, Anadolu Hayat Emeklilik, CareCore National, ItaÒ BBA, Barr
New York Presbyterian Hospital, Oracle, Riverbed Technology, Hitachi, F5 Networks, Exinda, Avere Systems, Nationwide, Firehost, Go Daddy
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText, UiPath, IDERA and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: May 2026.
900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.