

IBM Engineering Test Management and Tricentis qTest offer distinct advantages depending on user needs and competes within the test management category. Users indicate Tricentis qTest has the upper hand due to its seamless automation capabilities.
Features: IBM Engineering Test Management is valued for its comprehensive test planning, coverage analysis, and integration with other IBM tools. Tricentis qTest stands out for its powerful test automation, easy-to-use dashboards, and extensive reporting features. Users find Tricentis qTest more feature-rich and intuitive, particularly in automation capabilities.
Room for Improvement: Users suggest IBM Engineering Test Management could enhance its reporting tools and simplify some complex features. Tricentis qTest users point to occasional stability issues and the need for more robust customer support.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Engineering Test Management is noted for its detailed documentation and reliable customer support, making the deployment process smoother. Tricentis qTest receives mixed reviews regarding deployment ease, with some users experiencing initial setup challenges. Customer service for Tricentis qTest is less consistent compared to IBM.
Pricing and ROI: IBM Engineering Test Management has a higher initial setup cost but offers solid long-term ROI through its extensive integration features. Tricentis qTest is perceived as providing better value for money despite its occasional higher recurring costs, driven by its ease of use and quality automation features.
Due to the fast adoption, there is a quick ROI along with faster and better maintenance due to Tosca's AI and self-healing aspects.
Support has never been an issue, except for consulting which Tricentis charges for.
As for stability and performance, apart from a few hiccups and glitches, Tricentis qTest worked fine.
There may be missing features that should be included in the next release of Tricentis qTest, such as integration with other tools, specifically integration with Parasoft.
It also does not allow for task tracking or calculating time spent on tasks, which affects project timelines.
The solution is expensive.
The pricing and execution of qTest are easy.
There are also AI insights available based on the data and defects raised, which gives a view of functionalities where there are challenges and where more regression needs to happen.
A valuable feature is the ease of uploading, as well as creating folders.
I have seen measurable benefits with Tricentis qTest in terms of time-saving and resource-saving.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Tricentis qTest | 6.2% |
| IBM Engineering Test Management | 3.3% |
| Other | 90.5% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 1 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 7 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 3 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 14 |
IBM Engineering Test Management integrates with development and test automation tools, offering traceability between requirements and defects. It features versioning for artifact management, customizable Rational Quality Manager, web-based administration, and manual test case automation capabilities.
IBM Engineering Test Management supports Agile and DevOps, facilitating manual and automated testing. It allows for creating and executing test cases and plans using tools like Selenium and Micro Focus Quick Test Professional. Users manage testing processes by developing plans and automating test cases, with results stored in Rational Quality Manager. While valued for its integration and artifact management, users request usability enhancements, faster uploads, improved task management, and better support for automation integration, hierarchical test case organization, parameter support, and storage management.
What are the key features of IBM Engineering Test Management?IBM Engineering Test Management is implemented across industries to manage testing processes in Agile and DevOps environments. Consulting firms utilize it to create test plans for clients, while testing teams automate processes with Selenium and Micro Focus Quick Test Professional, storing outcomes in Rational Quality Manager for comprehensive analysis and decision-making.
Tricentis qTest, with its intuitive interface and powerful integration capabilities, is designed to streamline testing processes, offering project teams enhanced test management and traceability while allowing integration with tools like JIRA and Azure DevOps.
Tricentis qTest provides a comprehensive solution for efficient test management with centralized data storage and seamless integration with tools such as JIRA. It enables easy test case uploads and offers customizable dashboards for comprehensive reporting. Test teams benefit from automation capabilities through integrations with Azure DevOps and Selenium, facilitating real-time tracking of test executions and defects. Despite its powerful features, qTest is noted for some challenges in API documentation and reporting, and users have expressed a need for enhancements in support response and dashboard customization. Teams predominantly use qTest for linking test cases with JIRA and managing defects, valuing the centralized repository for accessing test histories and CI/CD pipeline integration.
What are the most important features of Tricentis qTest?Tricentis qTest is widely implemented across various industries, including technology and e-commerce, with teams using it for test management and defect tracking. Its integration with tools like JIRA and Selenium supports agile development, while cloud deployment ensures the latest software version is always accessible. Organizations utilize qTest to manage complex logic and user stories efficiently, especially valuing its test execution features within CI/CD pipelines.
We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.