IBM Operational Decision Manager vs Software AG Apama comparison

IBM and Software AG are both solutions in the Complex Event Processing (CEP) category. IBM is ranked #3, while Software AG is ranked #2. IBM holds a 14.8% mindshare in CEP, compared to Software AG’s 21.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Software AG users who would recommend it.

IBM Operational Decision Ma...

Read 15 IBM Operational Decision Manager reviews

900 Views
72 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Software AG Apama

Read 1 Software AG Apama review

361 Views
119 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM Operational Decision Ma...

Software AG Apama

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Operational Decision Ma...

Ranking in Complex Event Processing (CEP)

3rd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Rules Management (3rd)

Software AG Apama

Ranking in Complex Event Processing (CEP)

2nd

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Streaming Analytics (23rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Complex Event Processing (CEP) category, the mindshare of IBM Operational Decision Manager is 14.8%, up from 6.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Software AG Apama is 21.9%, down from 27.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Complex Event Processing (CEP) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Software AG Apama	21.9%
IBM Operational Decision Manager	14.8%
Other	63.3%

Complex Event Processing (CEP)

Featured Reviews

Bhasker ReddyPIdintla

Technical Delivery Head at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

The solution provides an efficient, comprehensive way to manage polices for all the applications.

We use ODM to set complex business rules. For instance, we deploy this solution for most of our banking customers because there are frequent changes in the policies and business rules. These are complex to manage for enterprise applications. ODM provides an efficient, comprehensive way to manage…

Read full review

Shekhar Pathak

Sr Executive Accounts at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees

A tool to send out promotional notifications that need to improve areas, like deployment and maintenance

Software AG Apama should support offline scenarios as it may not always be possible to stay connected with the cloud. The solution should be deployed on an on-premises model, and it should be able to handle offline scenarios. If certain rules are set in Software AG Apama, then it should be able to execute them without being connected to an open internet source. With Software AG Apama, one may face challenges since it is difficult to find people with the right skill set to operate it. The solution also makes use of a proprietary programming language that is hard to trace in the market. It is better to go with the new options available in the market since Software AG Apama has become an old product. The ease of development and maintenance should be enhanced, but it is difficult due to the use of the proprietary programming language in the product.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"ODM provides an efficient, comprehensive way to manage all the applications. Regardless of the BPM tool we are using, we choose ODM because it's flexible."

"It reduces operating costs because you are taking some of this work out of the high cost IT people, freeing them up to work on new initiatives and getting them out of maintenance mode. Now, the business people are the ones making business decisions on what needs to change. They are hands on making these changes."

"The solution has reduced the backlog for IT."

"The effects of allowing business users to update business rules instead of IT are business users have a closer relationship with what rules they need and are able to make those rules a lot quicker in the tools that ODM provides than if an IT person had to do it, and do it in code, requiring compiling code and deploying it."

"The most valuable feature is the deployment part because it is very easy to deploy. Even a businessperson or someone from a non-technical background can easily deploy it and the rules will work."

"The most valuable features are the Decision center, a web UI that allows us to make direct edits to our policies or rules; the Rule Execution Server, which allows us to analyze the rules and performance; and Rule Designer, where you can write rules and decision tables."

"With ODM as a centralized rules engine, it's easy to track. You can version the rules in the ODM engine itself."

"ODM's most valuable features are that it's easy to define and divide business rules, and it can handle very large numbers of transactions per second."

More IBM Operational Decision Manager pros

"The most valuable feature of the solution is the ability that it provides its users to handle different kinds of rules."

Cons

"The platform is good. Its footprint is a little heavy. Other than that, the product works great."

"Extracting specific rules could be better. We've had to do a lot of custom work on that. The testing, we've played a little bit with it, but we have our own testing methods. If it could be as simple as we have for our custom work, that would be great."

"It hasn't totally helped our decision-making."

"There is some promise of how decisions could take advantage of machine learning and artificial intelligence. That has been slow to develop. It is still not clear where the market will take it, but that is something that I am looking forward to down the road."

"An area for improvement is that the documentation for ODM is huge and not very clear."

"I think it's stable, but if they could beef it up a little bit for bigger businesses, that'd be great, because we have so much in there. We have products that we have to split up because they are too big for it to handle sometimes. But that's just in development, within ODM. Again, processing has been fine, but I wish things were a little bit beefier."

"One area for improvement is master data integration. That should be more fluid. The others are hierarchical drop-down lists, and hierarchical master data."

"ODM could be improved with better integration with other platforms."

More IBM Operational Decision Manager cons

"The ease of development and maintenance should be enhanced, but it is difficult due to the use of the proprietary programming language in the product."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"ODM's pricing could be more competitive as there are open-source business rules engines that are becoming standard."

"We made a lifetime purchase. We purchased it by number of PVUs for our stage and product environments."

"It is an expensive solution."

"It will definitely improve the cash flow of our clients, thereby it will improve the cash flow to us."

"We have a client who had a three-month ROI on this tool, just in additional sales, from sort of the next best action of what product that they should offer to their clients. ROI can be very quick with this product."

"It was not a large cost. It was a one-time cost."

"A commercial license is required to operate Software AG Apama."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Complex Event Processing (CEP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

25%

Insurance Company

13%

Healthcare Company

Outsourcing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Large Enterprise	15

No data available

Comparisons

FICO Blaze Advisor vs IBM Operational Decision Manager

Compared 46% of the time

Pega Platform vs IBM Operational Decision Manager

Compared 41% of the time

Progress Corticon vs IBM Operational Decision Manager

Compared 9% of the time

TIBCO Streaming vs IBM Operational Decision Manager

Compared 4% of the time

More IBM Operational Decision Manager Competitors

TIBCO Streaming vs Software AG Apama

Compared 34% of the time

Apache Spark Streaming vs Software AG Apama

Compared 25% of the time

WSO2 Stream Processor vs Software AG Apama

Compared 21% of the time

Apache Flink vs Software AG Apama

Compared 19% of the time

More Software AG Apama Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IBM Operational Decision Manager

January 2026

Download IBM Operational Decision Manager product report

Buyer's Guide

Streaming Analytics

January 2026

Download Software AG Apama product report

Also Known As

IBM Operational Decision Management, ILOG JRules, IBM ODM, IBM WebSphere Business Events

Progress Apama

Overview

IBM Operational Decision Manager is a comprehensive decision automation platform that helps you discover, capture, analyze, automate and govern rules-based business decisions. Anyone can work with it―from IT to business-line leaders. In seconds, it can authorize a loan, decide on a promotion or detect a cross-sell opportunity with high precision and customization. With IBM Operational Decision Manager, your applications will continuously remain up to date and well aligned with the changing business objectives of your organization. It is available in editions for both cloud and private cloud environments.

IBM

Enables both sell-side and buy-side traders to leverage proprietary trading strategies.

Software AG

Sample Customers

Odyssey Transportation & Logistics Corporation, Swiss Customs, Athletes' Performance, L_elo, Versicherungskammer Bayern

Okasan Online Securities

See our list of best Complex Event Processing (CEP) vendors.

We monitor all Complex Event Processing (CEP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.