Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM Operational Decision Manager vs TIBCO Streaming comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 30, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM Operational Decision Ma...
Ranking in Complex Event Processing (CEP)
2nd
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
Business Rules Management (3rd)
TIBCO Streaming
Ranking in Complex Event Processing (CEP)
1st
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Streaming Analytics (24th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Complex Event Processing (CEP) category, the mindshare of IBM Operational Decision Manager is 17.8%, up from 7.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TIBCO Streaming is 19.4%, down from 30.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Complex Event Processing (CEP) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
TIBCO Streaming19.4%
IBM Operational Decision Manager17.8%
Other62.8%
Complex Event Processing (CEP)
 

Featured Reviews

Bhasker ReddyPIdintla - PeerSpot reviewer
Technical Delivery Head at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
The solution provides an efficient, comprehensive way to manage polices for all the applications.
We use ODM to set complex business rules. For instance, we deploy this solution for most of our banking customers because there are frequent changes in the policies and business rules. These are complex to manage for enterprise applications.  ODM provides an efficient, comprehensive way to manage…
MK
Head of Data and Analytics Solutions at a tech vendor with 201-500 employees
Good stability and scalability with the capability to combine with Spotfire
The ability for StreamBase to combine with Spotfire is its most valuable aspect. The ability to handle data in motion and the entirety of data at the same time is very good. If you don't integrate the two together it's just a monitoring tool, but if they're combined together it becomes a powerful analytical tool. When you can combine live data from streaming data sources with standing data from the customer's primary database then you can calculate some KPIs or thresholds based on the previous information. We can do data science, machine learning methods or just clever queries. You can view all this online. If a KPI hits a redline, you can send alerts, which is the solution's most functional feature.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The effects of allowing business users to update business rules instead of IT are business users have a closer relationship with what rules they need and are able to make those rules a lot quicker in the tools that ODM provides than if an IT person had to do it, and do it in code, requiring compiling code and deploying it."
"ODM provides an efficient, comprehensive way to manage all the applications. Regardless of the BPM tool we are using, we choose ODM because it's flexible."
"With ODM as a centralized rules engine, it's easy to track. You can version the rules in the ODM engine itself."
"It is a scalable solution."
"By using ODM, we get rules to our applications, then we get those applications to go to market a lot faster."
"The most valuable feature is the deployment part because it is very easy to deploy. Even a businessperson or someone from a non-technical background can easily deploy it and the rules will work."
"ODM has probably been one of the more stable IBM products I have used."
"The solution has reduced the backlog for IT."
"The ability for StreamBase to combine with Spotfire is its most valuable aspect. The ability to handle data in motion and the entirety of data at the same time is very good. If you don't integrate the two together it's just a monitoring tool, but if they're combined together it becomes a powerful analytical tool."
 

Cons

"There is some promise of how decisions could take advantage of machine learning and artificial intelligence. That has been slow to develop. It is still not clear where the market will take it, but that is something that I am looking forward to down the road."
"The only thing we have trouble with is integrating IBM ODM with the cloud. The product is on-prem, and we need to migrate the rules to the cloud. It's a hectic process."
"The errors I get from time to time are not easy to debug or easy to understand. They are very vague because if a XOM file is missing or there is a deserialization problem, on the client's side I only get a 500 Internal Server Error. To learn where the problem is, I have to go on the Rule Execution Server and test it myself. The deserialization issue is very vague. The error messages should be more straightforward and easy to understand."
"I would like to have integration of the user interfaces, and they are putting them together in the next version of the solution."
"The solution's licensing cost needs improvement."
"I think there should be a facility for business to really create rules from scratch. The only part for IT should be to make sure the platform is stable, the technology platform, but everything else, the business should be able to create those rules."
"Extracting specific rules could be better. We've had to do a lot of custom work on that. The testing, we've played a little bit with it, but we have our own testing methods. If it could be as simple as we have for our custom work, that would be great."
"One area for improvement is master data integration. That should be more fluid. The others are hierarchical drop-down lists, and hierarchical master data."
"The solution should be more user-friendly for developers. Right now, you need a strong programmer to tune the solution. It's complicated product. I'm not sure if it can be done via self-service with BI. Because I'm from BI, I want more simplicity."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is an expensive solution."
"We made a lifetime purchase. We purchased it by number of PVUs for our stage and product environments."
"It will definitely improve the cash flow of our clients, thereby it will improve the cash flow to us."
"We have a client who had a three-month ROI on this tool, just in additional sales, from sort of the next best action of what product that they should offer to their clients. ROI can be very quick with this product."
"It was not a large cost. It was a one-time cost."
"ODM's pricing could be more competitive as there are open-source business rules engines that are becoming standard."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Complex Event Processing (CEP) solutions are best for your needs.
881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
26%
Insurance Company
11%
Healthcare Company
6%
Outsourcing Company
5%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business1
Large Enterprise15
No data available
 

Also Known As

IBM Operational Decision Management, ILOG JRules, IBM ODM, IBM WebSphere Business Events
TIBCO Streambase CEP
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Odyssey Transportation & Logistics Corporation, Swiss Customs, Athletes' Performance, L_elo, Versicherungskammer Bayern
Blendtec, Brembo, CargoSmart, Hunt Oil, Autodata, Bank of Montreal