No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

IBM Rational Performance Tester vs Visual Studio Test Professional comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM Rational Performance Te...
Ranking in Test Management Tools
15th
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
17
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Visual Studio Test Professi...
Ranking in Test Management Tools
6th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
53
Ranking in other categories
Functional Testing Tools (12th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Test Management Tools category, the mindshare of IBM Rational Performance Tester is 3.4%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Visual Studio Test Professional is 3.3%, up from 2.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Test Management Tools Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Visual Studio Test Professional3.3%
IBM Rational Performance Tester3.4%
Other93.3%
Test Management Tools
 

Featured Reviews

KashifJamil - PeerSpot reviewer
CEO at Xcelliti
Supports web and mobile applications, very scalable, very stable, and wonderful support
There are some features that Micro Focus LoadRunner provides, but they are not available in IBM Rational Performance Tester. They should include such features. It can also have more reports similar to what HP provides. It might also need some improvement in terms of the tools and support for other technology areas. Certain technologies are not supported by every tool. They need to support all sorts of technologies and platforms on which web applications and mobile applications are built. They need complete support for all sorts of technologies.
Payel Saha - PeerSpot reviewer
Test Automation Architect at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Integrated collaboration with automated test management has improved our agile workflows and continuously supports quality reporting
Visual Studio Test Professional could be improved as earlier we had flexibility in automation testing with TFS, which became a bit difficult moving to Azure DevOps. Additionally, in Visual Studio Code, we have an agent mode for GitHub Copilot, which is very helpful in testing or development phases, while Visual Studio's GitHub Copilot is a bit tricky and sometimes does not provide my desired output.For future improvements, I would like to see prompt fixing, as currently, if something goes wrong in Visual Studio, the fixing options are not always correct. If that intelligence is embedded, it would be very helpful.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"I strongly recommend this solution to others."
"Less coding is needed, it is easy to understand, and it is easy to integrate with existing systems so I can test more than one performance test type, including load testing, stress testing, and scalability testing."
"Rational Performance Tester was perfectly suited to provide the means to monitor the availability and performance of our web services."
"Technical support is very good. I'm very satisfied with the assistance we've received so far."
"This tool is very scalable, and for large scale tests, i.e., 5000 virtual users and up, it performs very well."
"Helped in improving response times in a few of our transactions."
"ROI is big because we do not need vendors to assist some with performance testing."
"It has improved our visibility of reporting and simplifying performance testing for larger projects/programs."
"Visual Studio Test Professional is a scalable solution."
"The most valuable features of this solution are the speed of the application, it is a well-documented, complete product, and reasonably priced."
"The most valuable features are the SSIS reports, the deployment models, and the ability to interact with other Microsoft tools."
"The most valuable feature is the in-built support for C# and .NET projects."
"The solution is very useful for compiling existing projects and developing new projects."
"Visual Studio Test Professional is a very scalable solution."
"The setup is easy and straightforward."
"Source Control stores our sources securely and TFS assists in tracking our issues."
 

Cons

"Support for more protocols is required."
"Installation and configuration processes, and support from IBM all need to be improved."
"The installation and tool setup can take some time, since this involves several components."
"Reporting needs improvement to provide more customization options in the performance test analyst to build custom reports."
"We had open many PMRs for problems found in the products, and I'm not sure if all of them have been fixed."
"The HP tool is overall a little better but much more expensive."
"For a rational performance testing solution, the initial setup is very complex. The setup was difficult and the documentation was not very up to date."
"User friendliness can be better, as this is one area where it lacks."
"The data flow can be improved."
"The pricing of this solution should be lowered."
"The solution should be cheaper."
"It would be great to support other languages and applications, and that is one of the things we can improve."
"There are too many features with the product and I would like there to be less."
"The product must provide more integration."
"There are some bugs, and sometimes it runs very slowly, but nothing that is major."
"The interface should be made attractive."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is much cheaper than Micro Focus LoadRunner. We need perpetual licenses. Support is included in the first sale. After that, you need to renew support every year."
"The product is very expensive."
"We pay a yearly licensing fee for Visual Studio Test Professional, which is expensive."
"There is a paid version of the solution as well as a community version that is free."
"It is a price-effective solution"
"The tool is affordable."
"The pricing is expensive."
"We use the solution’s community version, and the solution’s pricing could be cheaper."
"The tool is expensive in my region."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.
893,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
17%
Construction Company
7%
Government
7%
Healthcare Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Construction Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Marketing Services Firm
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise6
Large Enterprise8
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business15
Midsize Enterprise14
Large Enterprise24
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Visual Studio Test Professional?
The tool is free, resulting in no costs associated with its use. The absence of price makes it cost-effective.
What needs improvement with Visual Studio Test Professional?
Visual Studio Test Professional could be improved as earlier we had flexibility in automation testing with TFS, which became a bit difficult moving to Azure DevOps. Additionally, in Visual Studio C...
What is your primary use case for Visual Studio Test Professional?
We are using Microsoft Visual Studio for automation testing, specifically using C# Selenium.Visual Studio Test Case Management, which is embedded in Azure DevOps itself, is part of our process. We ...
 

Also Known As

Rational Performance Tester
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

andagon, Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Oregon
Transport for Greater Manchester, Ordina, Bluegarden A/S, CLEAResult, Jet.com, OSIsoft, Australian Taxation Office, BookedOut, Tracasa
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Rational Performance Tester vs. Visual Studio Test Professional and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.
893,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.