Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
IBM Rational Performance Tester Logo

IBM Rational Performance Tester Reviews

Vendor: IBM
3.8 out of 5

What is IBM Rational Performance Tester?

Featured IBM Rational Performance Tester reviews

IBM Rational Performance Tester mindshare

As of March 2026, the mindshare of IBM Rational Performance Tester in the Test Management Tools category stands at 2.5%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Test Management Tools Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
IBM Rational Performance Tester2.5%
OpenText Application Quality Management8.2%
Tricentis qTest7.8%
Other81.5%
Test Management Tools

PeerResearch reports based on IBM Rational Performance Tester reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryTest Management ToolsMar 26, 2026Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersMar 26, 2026Download
ComparisonIBM Rational Performance Tester vs OpenText Application Quality ManagementMar 26, 2026Download
ComparisonIBM Rational Performance Tester vs TestRailMar 26, 2026Download
ComparisonIBM Rational Performance Tester vs Tricentis qTestMar 26, 2026Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
OpenText Application Quality Management4.08.2%89%208 interviewsAdd to research
Eggplant Test3.93.3%80%19 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise6
Large Enterprise7
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business27
Midsize Enterprise13
Large Enterprise60
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
19%
Computer Software Company
11%
Government
9%
Healthcare Company
6%
Marketing Services Firm
6%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Educational Organization
5%
Performing Arts
4%
Transportation Company
4%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
3%
Real Estate/Law Firm
3%
University
3%
Media Company
3%
Comms Service Provider
2%
Insurance Company
2%
Non Profit
2%
Outsourcing Company
2%
Renewables & Environment Company
2%
Retailer
2%
Wholesaler/Distributor
2%
Logistics Company
1%
Museum Or Institution
1%
Hospitality Company
1%
Energy/Utilities Company
1%
 
IBM Rational Performance Tester Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
CEO at Xcelliti4.0No summary available
Testing Tool Expert at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees4.0No summary available
Senior Test Architect at a tech services company with 11-50 employees3.5I value this tool for its comprehensive protocol support, excellent scalability, and integrated performance test management, enabling agile development. Despite the time-consuming initial setup, its cloud load generation and features are highly beneficial.
Architect Software Test Engineer at MAS Global Consulting3.5I find its code extension valuable if you have Java skills, enabling effective load testing. However, it suffers from stability issues due to Eclipse, is a resource-eater, and has average customer support.
Associate - Projects at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees3.5I find its automatic correlation, Java integration, and detailed performance reports valuable. While cheaper than LoadRunner and good for web applications, it needs better protocol support.
Java Developer + Workflow/Process Automation Developer with 501-1,000 employeesI mainly used it for load and stress tests, finding its data pools and logging valuable for scaling our application's performance. Customer and technical support were good, though initial setup was complex for a novice.
Solutions Architect at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employeesI've used this for 8 years, valuing its Java customization, editor, and server metrics; it even caught a critical CPU error. But, customer service sometimes incorrectly claims "works as designed" and deployment issues have occurred.
Quality Assurance Software Testing Lead at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees3.5I appreciate this tool's ease for non-programmers and its responsive support. It offers significant ROI by eliminating vendor costs, unlike our previous expensive HP solution, despite HP being marginally better overall.