IBM Security Network IPS vs KerioControl comparison

IBM and GFI are both solutions in the Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) category. IBM is ranked #21, while GFI is ranked #15 with an average rating of 9.3. IBM holds a 1.9% mindshare in ID, compared to GFI’s 3.0% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of GFI users who would recommend it.

IBM Security Network IPS

Read 4 IBM Security Network IPS reviews

1,037 Views
902 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

KerioControl

Read 58 KerioControl reviews

6,933 Views
2,080 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

IBM Security Network IPS

KerioControl

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

IBM Security Network IPS and KerioControl compete in the network security space, with IBM offering advanced features suitable for larger enterprises, while KerioControl appeals to smaller businesses due to affordability. IBM's feature set provides an edge in sophisticated threat protection, but KerioControl shines in cost-effectiveness and usability.

Features: IBM Security Network IPS provides in-depth threat detection, real-time monitoring, and customizable analytics. Meanwhile, KerioControl features a robust firewall, VPN support, and effective bandwidth management, emphasizing usability and flexibility across varied network conditions.

Room for Improvement: IBM Security Network IPS could enhance ease of deployment and user experience. Simplifying setup processes might reduce dependency on technical expertise. KerioControl may improve advanced threat analysis capabilities, scalability for larger environments, and the depth of its reporting tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Security Network IPS generally requires more complex deployment and significant technical knowledge, though comprehensive support is available. KerioControl, by contrast, is praised for straightforward deployment and intuitive setup, backed by responsive customer service that enhances its appeal.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Security Network IPS incurs higher setup costs, justified by a comprehensive feature set for large networks, offering substantial ROI in environments prone to threats. KerioControl's pricing remains accessible, providing a balance of cost and functionality, making it ideal for smaller organizations seeking robust protection.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM Security Network IPS vs. KerioControl Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

IBM Security Network IPS vs. KerioControl

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,747 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Security Network IPS

Ranking in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)

21st

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

KerioControl

Ranking in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)

15th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Firewalls (28th), Unified Threat Management (UTM) (8th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) category, the mindshare of IBM Security Network IPS is 1.9%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of KerioControl is 3.0%, down from 3.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
KerioControl	3.0%
IBM Security Network IPS	1.9%
Other	95.1%

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)

Featured Reviews

Jacob_Koithra

Project & Program manager at Shell Grp

User-friendly and has a good blocking feature but is quite expensive

Defining the new security rules and policies sometimes becomes a challenge. Integration with other platforms becomes a challenge as well. I'd like to see more integration with other tools and technologies. XGS 7100 has an end of support for the 30th of December 2022. Many are losing support. All the products of the XGS, including XGS 3100, 4100, 5100, and 7100, support is ending in December 2022. We need to know what is the plan post that? Do we need to spend money on them? Will that be extended? There has been no communication on the website either. It's an expensive device.

Read full review

Constantnos Achilleos

Product manger at Asbis Mediteranean

Leveraging geo-tagging and web filtering for enhanced network security

The solution is used for site-to-site VPN connections and it is valued for its cost efficiency and easy connectivity. It is especially beneficial for multi-site VPNs and is used in about fifteen different components KerioControl has provided a financial benefit as it allows purchasing one license…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Signature based analysis and preventing different types of network attacks."

"This is definitely a product that I recommend, especially for organizations that want a quick integration of data from the transaction systems, with a very low cost of operations."

"The blocking feature is great; it acts as an in-line blocker, and any malicious traffic that you see, or anything really, it can block the traffic."

"The initial setup is simple."

"IPS has helped us in understanding more about the latest threats out there and made us realize that we need to be proactive when it comes to security rather than reactive."

"The most valuable feature is its simplicity."

"Kerio Control has helped my organization by hiding my private IP address behind the firewall and we use the proxy destination instead of my website."

"The ease of use in the GUI itself is the most valuable feature. The GUI is really the best part of it. We like the traffic rules so we can control who can get to what. It's easy to determine the flow of the traffic itself so we aren't having to guess through command lines and reading out basically command-driven output. It's just a very easy-to-use interface. The interface is the best part of the product."

"I find this solution to be rich in features and does all that I require, for example, it is easily manageable and has comprehensive virus detection."

"The stability of Kerio Control is good."

"The firewall and intrusion detection features are very useful these days because hackers have a lot of tricks that they use to get into a system. With Kerio Control you can see something that's happening. Otherwise, you have to use other tools to see what's happening on the firewalls. Having IPS in it is quite useful for us."

"The solution’s firewall and intrusion detection features are quite good because you can see exactly who is attacking you and who is getting blocked."

"Compared to other solutions, accounting and live monitoring of firewall status are very good features in KerioControl."

"The installation is straightforward."

More KerioControl pros

Cons

"The management server can be made more user friendly and also the database configuration could be made simpler."

"In terms of scalability, I would say that it is a little on the poor side."

"In the future, I would like to see a hybrid option so that we can work both on-premises and in the cloud."

"It's an expensive device."

"The configuration of this product is complex. It could be made more user friendly."

"I'd like to see more integration with other tools and technologies."

"The upgrades make the network slower."

"Because of Kerio Control, we failed to protect kids from such content, and we expected them to respond to it with the urgency it required, but their support was pathetic."

"After the takeover by GFI, one of the things that Kerio built was MyKerio environment. This has not been very reliable because I get many messages that MyKerio is not functioning. For some reason, there are things that they changed and it is not very reliable at this moment, instead I have to connect to the firewall to see what is happening."

"The only issue that we had is when they changed versions, they removed a security feature and blocked out all the old VPN connections."

"The security part of the software, like virus scanning, website, traffic monitoring, things like that, can take a beating on the appliance. And when there's a lot of things going on, the system can get bogged down. The actual security functionality of it needs a little bit more work, which I believe they are remedying or attempting to remedy at this time, but that's the downfall at this time."

"I would like to be able to inspect https packets for the purpose of virus scanning."

"The filtering on the unlicensed version of Kerio Control is inefficient - you have to add each website manually, which isn't feasible."

"If you have to dive deeper into the firewall or any other features, then you really have to read up a bit about how to set it up properly. Some of my colleagues, in the beginning, jumped in and made a bunch of rules but then it got really messy. If Kerio had a template or guidelines for best practices, at the beginning, that would really help. With Kerio Control it's basically 'find out for yourself.'"

More KerioControl cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost of operations is very low."

"The yearly maintenance fee is a bit high for the Kerio Control Boxes. The end of life for the devices is kind of short. It seems like they're making you upgrade within a short period of time. They should at least allow five years, but it seems like they are changing their end of life to be shorter to generate revenue."

"Search and compare."

"It gets expensive pretty quickly if you need to purchase license packs."

"Its licensing is yearly. You renew every year. Its price is all-inclusive."

"The biggest advice that I could probably give people is when you buy the solution be prepared to either buy the unlimited license or buy more licenses than you think. Each user license gives you one employee and each a user gives you five devices. In the world nowadays where everybody has a cellphone, tablet, desktop, and laptop, that's four devices. You still get one more device per person. That covers your servers and back-ends."

"KerioControl's pricing is reasonable. The license for KerioControl is annual. It's difficult to specify an exact cost since it varies depending on the number of users and additional software combined with it. For example, a basic box might cover 25 users, but licenses can be purchased starting from 10 users."

"It's very affordable."

"On the low-end device that I use, it has unlimited IP addresses. So, they have a subscription model where, on the higher models, you pay X dollars for 10 IP addresses. Then, if you want any more, you have to pay more on the model. On the low-end model, it has unlimited IP addresses, because if you have too many users, the thing will just slow you down and stop working. At some point, you need to say, "Okay, I've grown to a point where performance is impacted. I need to get some bigger hardware." If I get to that stage, I will possibly look at using one of the virtual appliances and putting it on some bigger hardware."

More KerioControl pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Performing Arts

14%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Media Company

Construction Company

Computer Software Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Construction Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	44
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for KerioControl?

KerioControl offers good pricing as one license covers all features needed without extra payment. The price for the product is rated as ten out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with KerioControl?

Regarding KerioControl's application awareness and control feature, I have not used it much.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for KerioControl?

With KerioControl, we usually use them for site-to-site VPNs for most of our clients. With multiple offices, we use KerioControl as our solution.

See all answers

Comparisons

ExtremeCloud IQ vs IBM Security Network IPS

Compared 14% of the time

Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention vs IBM Security Network IPS

Compared 14% of the time

Darktrace vs IBM Security Network IPS

Compared 12% of the time

Hillstone S-Series Network Intrusion Prevention System vs IBM Security Network IPS

Compared 11% of the time

Cisco Sourcefire SNORT vs IBM Security Network IPS

Compared 5% of the time

More IBM Security Network IPS Competitors

Fortinet FortiGate vs KerioControl

Compared 10% of the time

Netgate pfSense vs KerioControl

Compared 10% of the time

OPNsense vs KerioControl

Compared 9% of the time

Sophos UTM vs KerioControl

Compared 7% of the time

Sophos Firewall vs KerioControl

Compared 4% of the time

More KerioControl Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)

June 2026

Download IBM Security Network IPS product report

Buyer's Guide

KerioControl

June 2026

Download KerioControl product report

Also Known As

Security Network Intrusion Prevention System, IBM Security Network Protection, XGS, GX

No data available

Overview

IBM Security Network IPS offers comprehensive protection and threat intelligence to secure network infrastructures, designed for businesses seeking enhanced cyber defense mechanisms.

IBM Security Network IPS stands out with robust features that deliver high-performance network protection. It actively analyzes traffic to prevent intrusions, offering a proactive approach to cyber threats. With seamless integration capabilities, it fits into existing security frameworks, ensuring enhanced visibility and control for IT administrators.

What are the key features of IBM Security Network IPS?

Real-time Threat Protection: Continuously monitors and inspects traffic to block and respond to threats instantly.
Advanced Threat Intelligence: Utilizes global threat data to provide insights and protective measures against emerging threats.
Scalable Architecture: Designed to accommodate varying network sizes, ensuring consistent protection as networks grow.
Comprehensive Reporting: Offers detailed analytics and reports for informed decision-making and strategy adjustments.

What benefits can be expected from IBM Security Network IPS?

Enhanced Security Posture: Robust prevention mechanisms that reduce the risk of cyber attacks significantly.
Cost Efficiency: By reducing incidents, it minimizes potential costs associated with data breaches.
Operational Efficiency: Streamlined workflows and automation that free up resources for strategic initiatives.

Industries such as finance and healthcare implement IBM Security Network IPS to safeguard sensitive information and ensure compliance with industry regulations. Its adaptability and thorough threat inspection make it an ideal choice for critical infrastructures requiring reliable protection.

IBM

KerioControl is a comprehensive network security solution integrating firewall, antivirus, and VPN in an easy-to-use interface for small to medium businesses seeking robust protection.

KerioControl offers a blend of essential security features wrapped in a user-friendly graphical interface that enables effective network management. It supports firewall protection, intrusion detection, real-time monitoring, and flexible VPN capabilities ensuring high reliability and productivity. Despite being suitable for small to medium enterprises, improvements could enhance its overall performance, such as better GUI updates, stronger connectivity, and advanced VPN functionality. Common uses include unified threat management, bandwidth management, remote access, and web filtering.

What are the important features of KerioControl?

Ease of Use: Intuitive interface for effortless security management.
Firewall and VPN Integration: Combines essential security tools seamlessly.
Real-time Monitoring: Offers constant insight into network activities.
Intrusion Detection: Advanced system for prevention and alerts.
Bandwidth Management: Efficient allocation for optimized network usage.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Cost Savings: Economical security solution for smaller businesses.
Productivity Gains: Simplified management increases operational efficiency.
Enhanced Security: Comprehensive coverage with antivirus and malware protection.
Remote Access: Streamlined management of multiple sites and networks.

KerioControl is effectively implemented in industries needing strong security measures, supporting small to medium businesses in sectors like IT services, retail, and education. It's particularly well-suited for companies requiring efficient threat management and convenient internet service management across various sites.

GFI

Sample Customers

Equifax, Christian Hospital Centre

Triton Technical, McDonald's

Buyer's Guide

IBM Security Network IPS vs. KerioControl

June 2026

Free Report: IBM Security Network IPS vs. KerioControl

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Security Network IPS vs. KerioControl and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM Security Network IPS vs. KerioControl report.

See our list of best Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) vendors.

We monitor all Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.