IBM Security Verify Access vs Oracle Access Manager comparison

IBM and Oracle are both solutions in the Access Management category. IBM is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.0, while Oracle is ranked #15 with an average rating of 9.3. IBM holds a 3.8% mindshare in AM, compared to Oracle’s 2.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 76% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

IBM Security Verify Access

Read 8 IBM Security Verify Access reviews

1,592 Views
1,019 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Oracle Access Manager

Read 21 Oracle Access Manager reviews

892 Views
830 Comparison Views

76% willing to recommend

IBM Security Verify Access

Oracle Access Manager

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 11, 2024

Oracle Access Manager and IBM Security Verify Access compete in the identity and access management solutions category. IBM Security Verify Access seems to have the upper hand due to ease of configuration and deployment simplicity.

Features: Oracle Access Manager is known for its comprehensive integration capabilities, strong security features, and reliable performance. IBM Security Verify Access stands out due to its advanced risk-based authentication, ease of configuration, and extensive features for user management.

Room for Improvement: Oracle Access Manager can improve in performance speed, enhance reporting capabilities, and optimize the user interface for better experience. IBM Security Verify Access needs enhancements in centralized policy management, scalability, and support for additional authentication methods.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle Access Manager has mixed reviews regarding its deployment complexity but is praised for strong customer service. IBM Security Verify Access is noted for its straightforward deployment process and effective support.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle Access Manager has higher initial setup costs but offers good ROI over time due to its reliability. IBM Security Verify Access provides more competitive upfront pricing with satisfactory ROI, balancing cost and features effectively.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM Security Verify Access vs. Oracle Access Manager Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IBM Security Verify Access vs. Oracle Access Manager

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 868,759 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Security Verify Access

Ranking in Access Management

14th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Single Sign-On (SSO) (13th), Identity Management (IM) (21st), Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (14th)

Oracle Access Manager

Ranking in Access Management

15th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Access Management category, the mindshare of IBM Security Verify Access is 3.8%, up from 2.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Access Manager is 2.3%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Access Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
IBM Security Verify Access	3.8%
Oracle Access Manager	2.3%
Other	93.9%

Access Management

Featured Reviews

Ateeq Rehman

Unit Head System Implementor at Allied Bank Limited

Has improved secure user access while managing development through multiple technologies

I have already explained this in my previous call; I don't handle financial terms and commercials. Pricing is generally managed by functional teams and management looking after licensing matters. In Pakistan, vendors such as Oracle and IBM manage account relationships with clients and have tailored pricing models, so I do not have sufficient insights into that aspect.IBM Security Verify Access installation process is not straightforward; it requires underlying specialized knowledge upon which the IBM products are based. The complexity and scalability of the architecture necessitate in-depth technical knowledge and understanding of the system. Thus, installation is not as simple as clicking through; it requires extensive configuration of the underlying application servers, such as IBM WebSphere, where these products are deployed and configured.

Read full review

Upendar G

Senior Consultant at Wipro Limited

Efficiently manage applications with secure single sign-on and streamlined operations

Access Manager allows us to efficiently manage a broad spectrum of applications while ensuring secure, single-page application access. Its ability to consolidate applications on a single interface streamlines operations significantly. The product is highly secure and reliable, especially in managing user access across various platforms. Multi-factor authentication enhances security by requiring additional verification steps.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's a good solution for identification and access management."

"The most valuable feature of IBM Security Access Manager, at least for my company, is multi-factor authentication. That's the only feature my company is using. The solution works well and has no glitches. IBM Security Access Manager is a very good solution, so my company is still using it."

"The tool provides a password vault, single sign-on, and multifactor authentication. It offers various authentication methods like fingerprint integration, one-time passwords, or tokens sent via email or SMS. This ensures secure access to your accounts by providing multiple authentication options."

"The solution has powerful authentification and authorization. It offers a good way to increase security."

"Its stability and UI are most valuable."

"IBM Security Verify Access is providing a secure way of handling the user login journey, and secure user authentication is fully managed by ISAM or ISVA."

"I have found this solution to be really practical and when a user wants to log in, it is effortless and runs smooth."

"IBM Security Verify Access, formerly known as ISAM, IBM Security Access Manager, now renamed to ISVA, integrates with central directory services for our organization and provides user management functionality."

More IBM Security Verify Access pros

"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten."

"From a technical perspective, the solution is very good we can operate and control the user by ourselves."

"The product was built to be scalable."

"The most important functions of Oracle Access Manager are single sign-on and its integration capability with different applications."

"Access Manager allows us to efficiently manage a broad spectrum of applications while ensuring secure, single-page application access."

"The MFA is the most valuable aspect."

"I find the authentication module, authentication scheme, and security policy most useful in Oracle Access Manager."

"The scalability of the solution is good. We haven't felt we've been restricted from expanding as necessary and we haven't heard of any issues from our clients."

More Oracle Access Manager pros

Cons

"The user interface needs to be simplified, it's complex and not user-friendly."

"They can improve the single sign-on configuration for OIDC and OAuth. That is not very mature in this product, and they can improve it in this particular area. OIDC is a third-party integration that we do with the cloud platforms, and OAuth is an authorization mechanism for allowing a user having an account with Google or any other provider to access an application. Organizations these days are looking for just-in-time provisioning use cases, but IBM Security Access Manager is not very mature for such use cases. There are only a few applications that can be integrated, and this is where this product is lagging. However, in terms of configuration and single sign-on mechanisms, it is a great product."

"There are a lot of areas that can be improved, but the main area is the lack of customization. You cannot easily customize anything in the product. It is not easy to tweak the functionality. It is challenging to change the out-of-the-box functionality."

"Configuration could be simplified for the end-user."

"IBM Security Verify Access installation process is not straightforward; it requires underlying specialized knowledge upon which the IBM products are based."

"The user interface for users and administrators could be improved to make it easier. Automating some functions could also be beneficial."

"IBM Security Verify Access installation process is not straightforward; it requires underlying specialized knowledge upon which the IBM products are based."

"The solution could be classified as a hilt system. There are a lot of resources being used and it is suitable for very large enterprises or the public sector."

More IBM Security Verify Access cons

"Installation and deployment take time, but implementation is straightforward and easy, and they have very good support."

"The user interface is a bit complicated and could be made more lightweight. Simplifying the installation process, perhaps through a VDAR-based installation, would also be beneficial."

"In the next release, I would like to see improvements made to the interface."

"There could be some improvements in the documentation and overall knowledge base of the solution."

"To improve Oracle Access Manager, they should consider integrating more policies and enhancing automation, especially in managing server load and cache cleanup."

"Although Oracle Access Manager is generally stable, we experienced issues with multi-domain configurations and web agent settings."

"The product is complicated and difficult to install and configure."

"The initial implementation can definitely be improved because you have to work on several components to configure it correctly."

More Oracle Access Manager cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The license and costs depend on the amount range of users you have. For just approximately 2,000 users, the price is practical and fair. However, when you have 20,000 users, it starts to become really expensive, and the discount per user is not attractive enough to go ahead and purchase."

"The product is not expensive. It depends on the number of users."

"It costs about 300K AED for a year. Its pricing is a bit on the higher end, but in comparison to other products in the market, its price is still better. There are lots of other products that are very costly."

"The product is a little expensive."

"The tool is affordable."

"Can be expensive as a solution."

"The price is really good and it is flexible because they have CPU licenses. The license is a one-time-only purchase."

"I cannot comment on the exact pricing because Oracle has different licensing models for other clients, making it flexible."

"On a scale where one is a high price, and ten is a low price, I rate the solution a one. Purchasing a license for the solution is very expensive now."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Access Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

868,759 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

22%

Insurance Company

14%

Government

12%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

16%

Government

13%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	8

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM Security Access Manager?

The tool provides a password vault, single sign-on, and multifactor authentication. It offers various authentication methods like fingerprint integration, one-time passwords, or tokens sent via ema...

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Security Access Manager?

The user interface for users and administrators could be improved to make it easier. Automating some functions could also be beneficial.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering IBM Security Access Manager?

I rate the product an eight out of ten.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Access Manager?

I am currently not exposed to the pricing issue, but I think Oracle Access Manager is more expensive than other products. I have not dealt with the setup cost concern as we have a team responsible ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Access Manager?

For scalability, Oracle Access Manager demonstrates a high level due to high availability and scalability with redundant nodes to load balance across multiple nodes for Oracle Access Manager and Or...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Oracle Access Manager?

My main use cases for Oracle Access Manager involve using it as an authentication server integrated with Oracle Internet Directory as LDAP, which contains the user store for authentication. We have...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Entra ID vs IBM Security Verify Access

Compared 13% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs IBM Security Verify Access

Compared 9% of the time

Okta Workforce Identity vs IBM Security Verify Access

Compared 9% of the time

IBM Cloud Identity Service vs IBM Security Verify Access

Compared 8% of the time

Ping Identity Platform vs IBM Security Verify Access

Compared 8% of the time

More IBM Security Verify Access Competitors

Microsoft Entra ID vs Oracle Access Manager

Compared 17% of the time

OpenText Access Manager with Managed Services vs Oracle Access Manager

Compared 10% of the time

ForgeRock vs Oracle Access Manager

Compared 10% of the time

Auth0 vs Oracle Access Manager

Compared 7% of the time

Okta Workforce Identity vs Oracle Access Manager

Compared 7% of the time

More Oracle Access Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

September 2025

Download IBM Security Verify Access product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Access Manager

September 2025

Download Oracle Access Manager product report

Also Known As

IBM Security Verify Access (SVA), IBM Security Access Manager, ISAM

No data available

Overview

IBM Security Verify Access is a complete authorization and network security policy management solution. It provides end-to-end protection of resources over geographically dispersed intranets and extranets.Provides a wide range of built-in authenticators and supports external authenticators.Provides permit and deny decisions for protected resources requests in the secure domain through the authorization API.Manages secure access to private internal network-based resources by using the public Internet's broad connectivity and ease of use with a corporate firewall system.

IBM

Oracle Access Manager delivers risk-aware end-to-end user authentication, single sign-on, and authorization protection, enabling enterprises to secure access from mobile devices and seamlessly integrate social identities with applications.

Oracle

Sample Customers

POST Luxembourg

SekerBank, University of Melbourne

Buyer's Guide

IBM Security Verify Access vs. Oracle Access Manager

September 2025

Free Report: IBM Security Verify Access vs. Oracle Access Manager

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Security Verify Access vs. Oracle Access Manager and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

868,759 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM Security Verify Access vs. Oracle Access Manager report.

See our list of best Access Management vendors.

We monitor all Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.