Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM Tivoli Business Service Manager vs OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 23, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM Tivoli Business Service...
Ranking in Event Monitoring
15th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.4
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
OPS/MVS Automation Intellig...
Ranking in Event Monitoring
13th
Average Rating
9.4
Reviews Sentiment
8.3
Number of Reviews
27
Ranking in other categories
Mainframe Management (6th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Event Monitoring category, the mindshare of IBM Tivoli Business Service Manager is 0.9%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence is 2.8%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Event Monitoring
 

Featured Reviews

RH
The most valuable feature for my team is the ability to taken event feeds from all/any source tool and put them in a single pane of glass. It's being replaced for our work by another Tivoli tool.
TBSM is being replaced for our work by another Tivoli tool - DASH. This replacement will address the biggest area of improvement. We need the most commonly leveraged real-time metric trends from the source tools in the same pane of glass as the event stream is presenting, and DASH gives a way to do that with logical grouping by type & app.
it_user779109 - PeerSpot reviewer
Considering its longevity, it's functioning well with ROI continuing to grow
The most important criteria when selecting a vendor are depth of support, intelligence on the industries that we are in, and similarities of different organizations so we can leverage their data points to make sure that we have a streamlined approach on support going forward. I would look at the vendor's internal teams to see if there people capable of supporting it, and what it will take to ensure that there is sustainability around it. And last but not least, what is the roadmap of the product compared to the roadmap of your company? Strategically, they should be in lock step.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable feature of this solution is the efficiency."
"I do not have to keep recordings. It is there and is proactive. It helps the operators, human editors, and me."
"OPS/REXX is valuable because it allows us almost unlimited flexibility in automating our system."
"Their technical support is incredible, immediately responsive, and even if it is not updated to Level 2 support sometimes, they chip in providing more detailed answers and options to fix the problem."
"It's a very stable product. I very much like the SSM stuff in it. The rules engine, it's awesome."
"Because we can define complex commands, the training of new operators is quicker. We can also put checks in place, that will prevent user errors."
"With the automation pieces we can bring this region up or take this region down, and it allows us to always meet our time critical requirements."
"​It is an easy product to use and it is stable."
"It reduces the number of repetitive motions required by a human to respond to the system."
 

Cons

"This application should be made easier to use because it usually needs training and it is not easy to operate."
"​It’s a complex product. The initial installation is easy, but implementing various functions is a constant process.​"
"The reason sometimes it is not stable, we do not have the expertise to write the script.​"
"Because of its age, it's a little bit difficult to modernize some of the integrations and some of the functions."
"The GUI interface could be improved, but that is coming. They are working on that."
"Performing a stop/restart of OPS/MVS could be a little smoother. Without special coding, some undesired tasks will be started and some necessary tasks will be stopped if we have to bounce OPS/MVS during the day."
"The further expansion of the mainframe teamcenter interface. Also, the web services support is something that I am looking into."
"It definitely needs more web-based interface, to be more mobile-open. More APIs, more open source to it."
"Scalability is zero. It cannot be scaled because of its age."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Event Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.
851,823 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
21%
Logistics Company
21%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
11%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Also Known As

Tivoli Business Service Manager, BSM
CA OPS MVS Event Management and Automation, CA OPS/MVS Event Management and Automation, Unicenter CA-OPS/MVS Event Management and Automation
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

SSGC
Tieto
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Tivoli Business Service Manager vs. OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
851,823 professionals have used our research since 2012.