IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus vs OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence comparison

IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus vs. OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence

Download the complete report

Helped 884,976 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus

Ranking in Event Monitoring

3rd

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OPS/MVS Automation Intellig...

Ranking in Event Monitoring

10th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

5.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mainframe Management (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Event Monitoring category, the mindshare of IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus is 6.5%, down from 8.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence is 3.8%, up from 2.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Event Monitoring Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus	6.5%
OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence	3.8%
Other	89.7%

Event Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Ramnarayan Saminatharao

EMEA Senior Sales Manager at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Customization and robust network monitoring enhance operational efficiency

The most useful functions for monitoring purposes with IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus are that it can be automated in many ways. Most importantly, it can communicate with many network components without requiring any medium connectors. You can directly integrate it if you have SNMP, which is great. The main benefits that IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus provides are that it's an umbrella tool that can be placed on top of any existing monitoring system. You can monitor the entire network from this tool. The underlying interfaces can be many, but you can keep it as a single tool in IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus and it can manage the load on its own. It negates the need to train the user base with other tools. I can provide this single tool and have hundreds of different tools underlying, but I only need to train one single user base, which is a great advantage.

Read full review

Sakkamon Rapeepisarn

System Programmer at Krungsri

Automation has improved alerts and file handling but script-based setup still needs simplification

OPS_MVS Automation Intelligence is the automation tool I use. I think OPS_MVS Automation Intelligence is good for creating complex rules because it's coding, but it takes time to learn how to use it. OPS_MVS Automation Intelligence works well if you know the syntax very well and you have experience in creating scripts or REXX syntax; it would be very good and is a good tool, but it takes time to learn, so that is for experienced staff to work with. I would rate the product a six from one to ten. I cannot think of any additional features in the next release of OPS_MVS Automation Intelligence.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus supports legacy protocols like CORBA, Huawei, and other telecom protocols, which I find beneficial."

"OMNIbus is valuable for its compatibility and performance, as I haven't encountered any performance issues."

"It also offers us everything we need in terms of features and functionality."

"Offers very good event/alert drill-down and statistical reporting capabilities."

"The biggest plus points for me are the configurability and scalability of the solution, as well as the multi-tenancy of the platform."

"Difficult to implement ( more resource and timing) but flexibility in implementation."

"It's good for managed systems. The end query on the user interface is good. You can view lots of charts and graphs."

"The monitoring is the solution's most valuable feature."

More IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus pros

"We really do need this product, we have the necessity now because we have implemented for so long that we can't function without this product."

"OPS/MVS is much more intuitive to use, especially compared to Netview/SA/GDPS."

"The follow-up surprised me. Making sure that I am happy with what I have gone to them on. They will call after I have made changes and verify that I am happy with the changes that I did have to make. If it did not fix the complete problem, they go back over it until I am satisfied."

"OPS/REXX is valuable because it allows us almost unlimited flexibility in automating our system."

"We have eliminated human error in the startup of one of our most critical applications, thereby reducing the risk of unwanted downtime."

"The technical support is top notch; they have always been right there for us whenever we were needed, including the offer to be available on weekends during a recent upgrade if needed, and they are friendly, professional, and knowledgeable."

"When selecting a vendor, the most important thing is the ability to meet our needs, and CA does a very good job of that."

"It’s invaluable for expediting the shutdowns/IPLs of our z/OS LPARs and monitoring our z/OS LPARs for issues/problems."

More OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence pros

Cons

"A lot can be improved in this product considering the performance."

"The solution has limitations in database integration as it cannot integrate with databases other than IBM DB2."

"The cost of the product is quite high. They should work to adjust their pricing models."

"I would like for the next release to be more user-friendly and out of date."

"The web portal and typical event controls are a little outdated."

"Its integration could be better. They should provide an easier integration for all the monitoring stuff, and it will make things easier for us. Currently, there is a complexity in integrating it with a vendor application, and we have to use another tool to integrate it with a vendor application. To integrate some applications with NetCool, I need to install an IBM tool on top of it. It would be good if they can provide an API or any kind of interface that we can leverage while developing a new protocol interface or application. We should be able to use an API or interface with NetCool. Its GUI can also be better. As compared to other tools, it is not user friendly, and it is not easy to do stuff through GUI. Whenever we do anything on the GUI, it takes time. They need to focus on the GUI part, especially the dashboard. They should focus on how users can effectively drill down from one box to another. The visual appeal of the dashboard is as important as the data and functionality."

"They could enhance the visibility to give us a unified view of our entire IT infrastructure."

"The web portal and typical event controls are a little outdated."

More IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus cons

"We're missing the boat. We don't have a graphical display and we need something beyond just pretty PC pictures for the other departments."

"It needs to have more compatibility/interfaces to other vendors’ products."

"Scalability is zero. It cannot be scaled because of its age."

"The new release addressed some shortcomings of the product."

"One thing that comes to mind is the MQ interface. The last time we tried to use it, it seemed a little clunky."

"My impressions on OPS_MVS Automation Intelligence is that it's quite difficult to use, as it relies mainly on the coding syntax and doesn't provide an easy-to-use GUI."

"It definitely needs more web-based interface, to be more mobile-open. More APIs, more open source to it."

"The reason sometimes it is not stable, we do not have the expertise to write the script."

More OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is a costly solution."

"Its license cost is a little bit more than other solutions. Our customers expect a standard market price that is comparative to other products. For each and every NetCool OMNIbus component, we have to purchase a separate license. These components are not free with the product."

"You have to have the right level of budget to afford this solution."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Event Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

26%

Computer Software Company

14%

Energy/Utilities Company

Retailer

Financial Services Firm

11%

Logistics Company

10%

Educational Organization

Marketing Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Large Enterprise	25

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus?

I would rate the pricing for IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus as three, where one is a high price and ten is a low price.

What needs improvement with IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus?

Based on my experience and my colleagues' feedback, IBM can improve IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus in automation with respect to using AI, as it lacks considerably compared to other tools. The integrat...

What is your primary use case for IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus?

My current use case for IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus is for monitoring the networks.

What needs improvement with OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence?

My impressions on OPS_MVS Automation Intelligence is that it's quite difficult to use, as it relies mainly on the coding syntax and doesn't provide an easy-to-use GUI. OPS_MVS should have an easy-t...

What is your primary use case for OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence?

We use the auto-purge transaction for some transactions that run very long, and we also use automation to open and close files in CICS as well.

What advice do you have for others considering OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence?

ServiceNow IT Operations Management vs IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus

Comparisons

Compared 17% of the time

SCOM vs IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus

Compared 9% of the time

BMC TrueSight vs IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus

Compared 9% of the time

IBM Tivoli NetCool Impact vs IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus

Compared 8% of the time

OpsRamp vs IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus

Compared 4% of the time

More IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus Competitors

BMC AMI Ops vs OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence

Compared 19% of the time

IBM OMEGAMON vs OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence

Compared 14% of the time

IBM Tivoli Business Service Manager vs OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence

Compared 10% of the time

BMC TrueSight vs OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence

Compared 10% of the time

IDERA SQL Diagnostic Manager for SQL Server vs OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence

Compared 8% of the time

More OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence Competitors

Product Reports

IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus

Download IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus product report

OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence

Download OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence product report

Also Known As

Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus

CA OPS MVS Event Management and Automation, CA OPS/MVS Event Management and Automation, Unicenter CA-OPS/MVS Event Management and Automation

Overview

Tivoli Netcool OMNIbus provides near real-time service assurance for business infrastructure, applications, servers, network devices and protocols, Internet protocols, storage and security devices.

IBM

z/OS, its subsystems, databases, middleware, applications, and software generate thousands of event messages daily. IT professionals need a tool to filter, prioritize, and respond quickly to these events before they impact availability and threaten business processing and associated service level agreements. CA OPS/MVS EMA automates processes, enabling you to resolve problems as they arise. It also automates more routine tasks, simplifying IT management and operations.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Consolidated Communications, €sterreichische Bundesbahnen (€BB), Capgemini

Tieto

IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus vs. OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence