SCOM and IBM Tivoli Business Service Manager compete in IT operations management. SCOM is favored in Microsoft environments for integration capabilities, while IBM Tivoli offers broad cross-platform support, appealing to diverse IT landscapes.
Features: SCOM offers deep Microsoft product integration, advanced Windows system monitoring, and user-friendly dashboards for data visualization. IBM Tivoli Business Service Manager provides a holistic business service management approach, real-time operational insights, and platform-agnostic capabilities.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SCOM features straightforward deployment in Windows-centric environments with reliable Microsoft support. IBM Tivoli Business Service Manager, although more complex in deployment due to extensive features, benefits from IBM's robust customer service and support structure.
Pricing and ROI: SCOM typically presents lower initial setup costs, beneficial for cost-effective solutions with favorable ROI in Microsoft ecosystems. IBM Tivoli Business Service Manager tends to have higher upfront costs, justified by expansive features and flexible use cases, promising significant ROI for enterprises needing comprehensive service management.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| SCOM | 9.1% |
| IBM Tivoli Business Service Manager | 4.0% |
| Other | 86.9% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 16 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 22 |
| Large Enterprise | 54 |
SCOM (System Center Operations Manager) is a cross-platform data center monitoring and reporting tool that checks the status of various objects defined within the environment, such as server hardware, system services, etc. The solution allows data center administrators to deploy, configure, manage, and monitor the operations, services, devices and applications of multiple enterprise IT systems via a single pane of glass. It is suitable for businesses of all sizes.
SCOM Features
SCOM has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:
SCOM Benefits
There are several benefits to implementing SCOM. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:
Reviews from Real Users
Below are some reviews and helpful feedback written by PeerSpot users currently using the SCOM solution.
A Manager at a financial services firm says, “The feature I like most about SCOM is that it is easy-to-use. I find it very user-friendly. I also like the knowledge base which it has. You can find the resolution to questions or issues directly within the SCOM itself. It will alert you with a recommendation of what you need to do at the same time. This sort of self-diagnosis or prompting is one of the great values you get from SCOM compared to other solutions.”
PeerSpot user Zahari Z., Information Technology Auditor at a financial services firm, mentions, “Availability monitoring is the feature I have found most valuable, as well as the capacity and ability to send notifications. There is a mechanism to set up a notification from the SCOM and whenever there is a drop in the availability the notification alerts not only for availability but for other issues as well. You can align thresholds according to the speed of your environment and you can have a threshold related notification, which is one of the useful features.”
Bill W., Sr. Systems Engineer at Arapahoe County Government, comments, “ I like some of their newer features, such as maintenance schedules, because SCOM records SLA and SLO time. When we patch, things are automatically put into maintenance mode so that the numbers for our systems being down, do not count against us.”
A Project Manager at a tech services company explains, “The feature I have found most valuable is the book feature. While we run the Sprint one we can add some setups for multiple sprints.”
A Systems Engineer at an educational organization states, “Because it's Windows-based, it actually reports quite well. It reports everything you can think of on the Windows server and allows you to monitor anything. It's excellent for those in the Windows world as it's very good at it.”
We monitor all Event Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
