Foglight for Virtualization vs IBM Turbonomic comparison

Quest Software and IBM are both solutions in the Virtualization Management Tools category. Quest Software is ranked #12, while IBM is ranked #4 with an average rating of 9.1. Quest Software holds a 3.2% mindshare in VM, compared to IBM’s 12.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Quest Software users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Foglight for Virtualization

Read 2 Foglight for Virtualization reviews

259 Views
256 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM Turbonomic

Read 205 IBM Turbonomic reviews

7,181 Views
1,364 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Foglight for Virtualization

IBM Turbonomic

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 23, 2025

Foglight for Virtualization and IBM Turbonomic provide virtualization management solutions. IBM Turbonomic leads with comprehensive features and automation capabilities, while Foglight for Virtualization is more cost-effective and offers strong support.

Features: Foglight for Virtualization includes robust monitoring, performance analytics, and resource usage optimization. IBM Turbonomic features advanced automation, strategic planning, and seamless scaling. IBM Turbonomic's enhanced automation focus makes it particularly valuable in feature execution.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Foglight for Virtualization ensures straightforward deployment with an emphasis on integration and customer support. IBM Turbonomic may require complex setup but offers strong service support for initial configurations, contributing to a richer implementation experience.

Pricing and ROI: Foglight for Virtualization is priced competitively, offering a quick ROI through efficient management and savings. IBM Turbonomic requires a higher initial investment but delivers significant long-term operational efficiency and resource optimization, leading to substantial ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Virtualization Management Tools Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Virtualization Management Tools

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,757 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Foglight for Virtualization

Ranking in Virtualization Management Tools

12th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

IBM Turbonomic

Ranking in Virtualization Management Tools

4th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

205

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Migration (3rd), Cloud Management (4th), IT Financial Management (1st), IT Operations Analytics (5th), Cloud Analytics (1st), Cloud Cost Management (1st), AIOps (11th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Virtualization Management Tools category, the mindshare of Foglight for Virtualization is 3.2%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Turbonomic is 12.6%, up from 12.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Virtualization Management Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
IBM Turbonomic	12.6%
Foglight for Virtualization	3.2%
Other	84.2%

Virtualization Management Tools

Featured Reviews

Waleed Masad

Technical Manager at METS

Easy-to-setup product with efficient data migration features

Many customers consider Quest Foglight for Virtualization a critical tool for migrations or new projects. In particular, one noteworthy case involved a bank that made Foglight integration a prerequisite. Some customers now rely 100% entirely on Foglight for their daily operations The product is…

Read full review

Dan Ambrose

Infrastructure Engineer 4 at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees

Helps visibility, bridges the data gap, and frees up time

We use IBM Turbonomic in a hybrid cloud environment. Although it supports multi-cloud capabilities, we currently operate in a single-cloud setting. Turbonomic offers visibility into our environment's performance, spanning across applications, underlying infrastructure, and protection resources. The visibility and analytics help to bridge the data gap between disparate IT teams such as applications and infrastructure. This is important for awareness collaboration, cost saving, and helping to design and improve our application. Enhanced visibility and data analytics have contributed to a significant reduction in our mean time to resolve. Tools like Turbonomic provide crucial visualization and insights, empowering us to make data-driven decisions instead of relying on assumptions as we did before. This newfound transparency translates to a massive improvement, going from complete darkness to having a clear 100 percent view of the situation. Although our applications are not optimized for the cloud we have seen some improvement in response time. IBM Turbonomic empowers us to achieve more with fewer people thanks to automation. Previously, customers frequently contacted us requesting resource increases to resolve issues. Now, we have a tool that allows us to objectively assess their needs, leading to a deeper understanding of our applications. This solution also generates significant cost savings in the cloud and optimizes hardware utilization within our data centers. Its AI algorithm intelligently allocates servers on hosts, maximizing efficiency without compromising performance. By fine-tuning resource allocation without causing performance bottlenecks, Turbonomic extends the lifespan of existing hardware, postponing the need for new purchases. This effectively stretches our capital expenditure budget. We started to see the benefits of IBM Turbonomic within the first 60 days. IBM is a fantastic partner. Their tech support has been outstanding, and the product itself is excellent - a very solid offering. By automating resource management with Turbonomic, our engineers are freed up to focus on more strategic initiatives like innovation and ongoing organizational projects. Previously, manually adding resources was a time-consuming process that interrupted workflows. Now, automation handles scaling efficiently, saving us thousands of man-hours and significant costs. It has illuminated the need for SetOps. It has highlighted areas of overspending, and the actions we've taken have demonstrated significant cost savings. IBM Turbonomic has positively impacted our overall application performance. IBM Turbonomic has helped reduce both CAPEX and OPEX. It has also significantly reduced cloud build times.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product is stable and easy to set up. It provides minimum false alarms."

"I have the ability to automate things similar to the Orchestrator stuff. I do have the ability to have it do some balancing, and if it sees some different performance metrics that I've set not being met, it'll actually move some of my virtual machines from, let's say, one host to another. It is sort of an automation tool that helps me. Basically, I specify the metric, and if I get a certain host or something being over-utilized, it'll automatically move the virtual machines around for me. It basically has to snap into my vCenter and then it can make adjustments and move my virtual machines around. It also has some very nice reporting tools built around virtual machines. It tells you how much storage, memory, or CPU is being used monthly, and then it gives you a very nice way to be able to send out billing structure to your end users who use servers within your environment."

"We've saved hundreds of hours. Most of the time those hours would have to be after hours as well, which are more valuable to me as that's my personal time."

"The system automatically sizes and moves resources based on the needs of the applications."

"I only deal with the infrastructure side, so I really couldn't speak to more than load balancing as the most valuable feature for me. It provides specific actions that prevent resource starvation. It always keeps things in perfect balance."

"The solution has a good optimization feature."

"The proactive monitoring of all our open enrollment applications has improved our organization. We have used it to size applications that we are moving to the cloud. Therefore, when we move them out there, we have them appropriately sized. We use it for reporting to current application owners, showing them where they are wasting money. There are easy things to find for an application, e.g., they decommissioned the server, but they never took care of the storage. Without a tool like this, that storage would just sit there forever, with us getting billed for it."

"It also brings up a list of machines and if something is under-provisioned and needs more compute power it will tell you, 'This server needs more compute power, and we suggest you raise it up to this level.' It will even automatically do it for you. In Azure, you don't have to actually go into the cloud provider to resize. You can just say, 'Apply these resizes,' and Turbonomic uses some back-end APIs to make the changes for you."

"The most valuable features are the cluster utilization reports and the resource capacity planning. We can simulate how much capacity we can add to the current resources. The individual DM reports and VM-facing recommendations report are also helpful."

More IBM Turbonomic pros

Cons

"Quest Foglight for Virtualization's integration needs enhancement."

"The reporting needs to be improved. It's important for us to know and be able to look back on what happened and why certain decisions were made, and we want to use a custom report for this."

"The old interface was not the clearest UI in some areas, and could be quite intimidating when first using the tool."

"It would be nice for them to have a way to do something with physical machines, but I know that is not their strength Thankfully, the majority of our environment is virtual, but it would be nice to see this type of technology across some other platforms. It would be nice to have capacity planning across physical machines."

"Before IBM bought it, the support was fantastic. After IBM bought it, the support became very disappointing."

"We don't use Turbonomic for FinOps and part of the reason is its cost reporting. The reporting could be much more robust and, if that were the case, I could pitch it for FinOps."

"In Azure, it's not what you're using. You purchase the whole 8 TB disk and you pay for it. It doesn't matter how much you're using. So something that I've asked for from Turbonomic is recommendations based on disk utilization. In the example of the 8 TB disk where only 200 GBs are being used, based on the history, there should be a recommendation like, "You can safely use a 500 GB disk." That would create a lot of savings."

"The implementation could be enhanced."

"We're still evaluating the solution, so I don't know enough about what I don't know. They've done a lot over the years. I used Turbonomics six or seven years ago before IBM bought them. They've matured a lot since then."

More IBM Turbonomic cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is affordable."

"The pricing is in line with the other solutions that we have. It's not a bargain software, nor is it overly expensive."

"We see ROI in extended support agreements (ESA) for old software. Migration activities seem to be where Turbonomic has really benefited us the most. It's one click and done. We have new machines ready to go with Turbonomic, which are properly sized instead of somebody sitting there with a spreadsheet and guessing. So, my return on investment would certainly be on currency, from a software and hardware perspective."

"The product is fairly priced right now. Given its capabilities, it is excellently priced. We think that the product will become self-funding because we will be able to maximize our resources, which will help us from a capacity perspective. That should save us money in the long run."

"I don't know the current prices, but I like how the licensing is based on the number of instances instead of sockets, clusters, or cores. We have some VMs that are so heavy I can only fit four on one server. It's not cost-effective if we have to pay more for those. When I move around a VM SQL box with 30 cores and a half-terabyte of RAM, I'm not paying for an entire socket and cores where people assume you have at least 10 or 20 VMs on that socket for that pricing."

"It is an endpoint type license, which is fine. It is not overly expensive."

"We felt the pricing was very fair for the product. It is in no way prohibitive for larger deployments, unlike other similar product on the market."

"I'm not involved in any of the billing, but my understanding is that is fairly expensive."

"I consider the pricing to be high."

More IBM Turbonomic pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Virtualization Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	41
Midsize Enterprise	57
Large Enterprise	147

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Turbonomic?

It offers different scenarios. It provides more capabilities than many other tools available. Typically, its price is set as a percentage of the consumption of some of our customers' services. The ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Turbonomic?

The implementation could be enhanced.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Turbonomic?

We use IBM Turbonomic to automate our cloud operations, including monitoring, consolidating dashboards, and reporting. This helps us get a consolidated view of all customer spending into a single d...

See all answers

Comparisons

VMware Aria Operations vs Foglight for Virtualization

Compared 42% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Foglight for Virtualization

Compared 24% of the time

More Foglight for Virtualization Competitors

VMware Aria Operations vs IBM Turbonomic

Compared 7% of the time

Densify vs IBM Turbonomic

Compared 6% of the time

Spot by Flexera vs IBM Turbonomic

Compared 5% of the time

IBM Kubecost vs IBM Turbonomic

Compared 4% of the time

Cloudability vs IBM Turbonomic

Compared 4% of the time

More IBM Turbonomic Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Virtualization Management Tools

February 2026

Download Foglight for Virtualization product report

Buyer's Guide

IBM Turbonomic

January 2026

Download IBM Turbonomic product report

Also Known As

VKernel vScope Explorer, vOPS Server, Vizioncore

Turbonomic, VMTurbo Operations Manager

Interactive Demo

Demo not available

Quest Software

IBM

Overview

Foglight for Virtualization optimizes and monitors virtual environments, offering insights into performance and resource allocation to enhance virtualization management efficiency.

Designed to provide IT professionals with robust capabilities, Foglight for Virtualization aids in monitoring performance, managing resources, and troubleshooting. It delivers comprehensive analytics that helps identify issues before they impact operations, thereby supporting proactive management of virtual infrastructures. As virtualization becomes crucial in IT infrastructure, having a tool like Foglight that ensures high efficiency and minimal downtime is invaluable.

What are the valuable features of Foglight for Virtualization?

Comprehensive Analytics: Provides detailed insights into virtual environments, facilitating informed management decisions.
Resource Optimization: Ensures efficient allocation of resources by identifying underused and overused assets.
Performance Troubleshooting: Quickly pinpoints issues impacting virtual environment performance.
Capacity Planning: Aids in predicting future needs to prevent resource shortages.
Cross-Platform Support: Manages diverse virtualization platforms within a single dashboard.

What benefits and ROI should users look for in reviews?

Improved Efficiency: Streamlines operations by reducing diagnostic and troubleshooting time.
Cost Savings: Optimizes resource utilization, leading to decreased hardware and energy expenses.
Scalability: Supports growth by providing adaptable management solutions for expanding virtual environments.
Enhanced Performance: Ensures smooth operations with proactive management and monitoring.
Reduced Downtime: Minimizes interruptions by resolving performance issues promptly.

This tool is implemented across sectors like finance, healthcare, and education, where managing virtualized environments efficiently is crucial. Users in these industries rely on Foglight for its ability to adapt to specific requirements and maintain high standards of performance in complex infrastructures.

Quest Software

IBM Turbonomic enhances IT efficiency with automation, capacity planning, and reporting features, enabling organizations to optimize resource utilization and improve performance through advanced workload management and scenario analysis.

IBM Turbonomic equips organizations with robust capabilities for dynamic resource allocation and informed decision-making. Its planning module provides scenario analysis, right-sizing recommendations, and a customizable dashboard for tailored insights. Automation features improve workload placements and resource efficiency, while forecasting capabilities enhance performance. Simulation of environments helps in decision-making, leading to significant savings in cloud and hardware management. There is a need for a more intuitive interface, enhanced navigation, and improved customization in reporting with integration potential with third-party applications. Transition to the HTML5 interface and stronger training resources are among anticipated improvements.

What are the key features of IBM Turbonomic?

Automation: Automates workload placement and dynamic resource allocation to boost efficiency.
Capacity Planning: Provides scenario analysis and right-sizing for optimal resource use.
Customizable Dashboard: Offers tailored insights for organization needs.
Forecasting: Enhances decision-making through resource-use predictions.
Simulation Capabilities: Aids in assessing savings and performance gains.

What benefits and ROI should be evaluated?

Cost Optimization: Reduces spending on cloud and hardware resources.
Enhanced Performance: Promotes consistent application performance and resource efficiency.
Improved Decision-Making: Supports informed choices with scenario simulation.
Flexibility and Scalability: Assists with workload migrations and resource management across environments.

IBMTurbonomic is implemented across industries such as cloud management and virtualization, helping organizations balance clusters, optimize virtual machine performance, and manage Azure configurations. In resource-monitored environments like VMware and XenServer, its features facilitate load balancing, VM rightsizing, and automation shutoffs. Industries can rely on its insights for cost-saving measures, ensuring efficient resource allocation for hybrid and cloud environments.

IBM

Sample Customers

Unimat, AeroM_xico Delta TechOps

IBM, J.B. Hunt, BBC, The Capita Group, SulAmérica, Rabobank, PROS, ThinkON, O.C. Tanner Co.

Buyer's Guide

Virtualization Management Tools

February 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom, Nutanix, Veeam Software and others in Virtualization Management Tools. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Virtualization Management Tools vendors.

We monitor all Virtualization Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.