IFS Cloud Platform vs Infor M3 comparison

IFS and Infor are both solutions in the ERP category. IFS is ranked #19 with an average rating of 6.5, while Infor is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.7. IFS holds a 2.6% mindshare in ERP, compared to Infor’s 3.4% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of IFS users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Infor users who would recommend it.

IFS Cloud Platform

Read 31 IFS Cloud Platform reviews

5,297 Views
1,695 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Infor M3

Read 15 Infor M3 reviews

2,917 Views
2,800 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

IFS Cloud Platform

Infor M3

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 29, 2025

IFS Cloud Platform and Infor M3 are leading competitors in the ERP market. Based on the available data, IFS Cloud Platform has an upper hand due to its customizable features and robust pricing capabilities.

Features: IFS Cloud Platform offers customizable features with seamless integration due to its open architecture, allowing in-house development. It provides robust warehouse functionality and complex pricing models to maximize profit. Infor M3 excels in comprehensive supply chain and production management features, detailed process handling in manufacturing verticals, and integration with third-party applications.

Room for Improvement: IFS Cloud Platform needs improvements in usability, specifically in customizing workflows and simplifying reporting tools. Users desire a more intuitive interface and faster support resolution. Infor M3 requires better training resources, global support availability, and enhanced integration features. There is also a need for improved industry practice alignment and more user-friendly procurement processes.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IFS Cloud Platform provides deployment flexibility with on-premises, hybrid, and cloud options, tailoring to business needs with comprehensive technical support, although non-critical issues have slow response times. Infor M3 offers robust public cloud solutions and prompt technical support, especially with its Annual Maintenance and Support package, but global community support is less favorable.

Pricing and ROI: IFS Cloud Platform is competitively priced with flexible models ideal for medium to large enterprises, offering significant ROI over time despite initial costs. Infor M3 is generally less expensive than tier-one products but more costly than some tier-two options, with pricing dependent on user numbers and modules. Both products stress negotiation for better license terms and ROI, enhanced by financial reporting and integration efficiencies.

To learn more, read our detailed IFS Cloud Platform vs. Infor M3 Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IFS Cloud Platform vs. Infor M3

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IFS Cloud Platform

Ranking in ERP

19th

Ranking in Activity Based Costing Software

9th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

CRM (35th), Customer Experience Management (9th), Field Service Management (2nd), Help Desk Software (21st), Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) (4th), Local Government CRM (15th), IT Asset Management (15th), IT Service Management (ITSM) (19th), License Management (2nd)

Infor M3

Ranking in ERP

11th

Ranking in Activity Based Costing Software

7th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the ERP category, the mindshare of IFS Cloud Platform is 2.6%, up from 2.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Infor M3 is 3.4%, down from 4.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

ERP Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Infor M3	3.4%
IFS Cloud Platform	2.6%
Other	94.0%

ERP

Featured Reviews

Thangaraj Ramasamy

Consultant at Arcwide

Has supported project management and business customization through strong modular flexibility

The cloud feature in IFS Cloud Platform is predominantly valuable, especially the enterprise asset management module, which IFS has very good business into, along with strong finance, project management, and supply chain management modules; these are the major modules that are performing well with IFS, and the cloud options along with user-friendly customizations for any technical developments are additional advantages. The integration of IoT with IFS Cloud Platform is performing well, enabling us to integrate with predominantly any third party through the standard inbuilt connectors that are readily available, and if we need to customize the integration, we can certainly do that too.

Read full review

Umesh D

Vice President, Delivery at Independent Computer Consulting Group, Incorporated

Maximized industry-specific process efficiency with rapid implementation

The best features of Infor M3 are the micro-vertical and industry ready-made solutions rather than generic solutions. They have ready-made solutions ready, so the implementation of the process discovery happens very fast. It won't take more than two months, and if the process is very simple and they adopt the standard, it may happen within five weeks, covering the implementation cycle which will finish within seven to eight months. Most of the time, it helps streamline business processes; maybe some processes such as unique subcontracting vary by continent or job work, which could be different due to legal compliance. Other than that, everything helps because the processes are very much streamlined. Everywhere you have a check and maker concept, there is a workflow, and all those things are there; document management is also very simple. You can drag and drop the reports. The workflow feature is very good and flexible, working with multi-level authorization and all those capabilities. Apart from that, the GUI interface screens are really good. Users can design their own workspace based on the roles, and there are roles-based security options, with many roles available that you need not define—you can just tweak them.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"There are fewer fields on the user screen compared to other products."

"There are fewer fields on the user screen compared to other products. This makes the UI a little bit easier to understand."

"The platform is reliable and stable."

"The main reason for the ERP project was to bring together our fourteen sites, which had until then worked in separate silos."

"The product is quite flexible."

"Individual user profiles that can be configured as templates to minimize data entry."

"The financial posting controls are quite handy. The user interface is really friendly, highly flexible, and pretty intuitive for end users."

"I like the connectivity and interfaces. In V10, it's easy to modify the interfaces and layouts, but it's becoming more complicated in the cloud. IFS is excellent at asset maintenance and incident management. They have specialized modules for IFS that cover incident and asset management and everything else connected to finance. The reporting in IFS is also easy to use."

More IFS Cloud Platform pros

"Infor M3 has tailor-made packages for each and every industry."

"Infor M3 has ready-made processes, which provide the best workflows."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is the Infor GL tool that allows us to do our application support and development."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it is highly customizable."

"The user interface and user experience were good."

"The product's initial setup phase is easy."

"Infor M3 has several valuable features, including customer order management and integration capabilities with third-party applications like ION."

"The most valuable feature of Infor M3 is the level of detail it has about the different manufacturing processes compared to other ERP solutions. Other ERP solutions provide the same level of integration as Infor M3, but Infor M3 specializes in several functions, such as planning and manufacturing."

More Infor M3 pros

Cons

"IFS uses Crystal Report mostly, which isn't too user-friendly. Developing reports isn't easy and requires a lot of dev time. Since SAP bought it, Crystal Report has become more complicated to use on IFS. You have a dashboard for reporting that is good, but it's incomplete. Most of our clients use Power BI or some additional tooling for BI."

"Documentation-wise, they need more."

"The next version has already been released, and some of the technical things are a little bit behind the curve in development. This is specifically security, maintenance, security role maintenance, and creation. This is in their new product, called IFS Cloud."

"IFS Applications can improve the reporting capabilities and increase the speed of feedback time in the IFS Applications. This would help with the overall performance of the solution and provide better experiences for customers."

"I have seen that one of the areas that my company has identified for improvement might be the rental management capabilities within the solution."

"Sometimes from the sales perspective, clients don't always fully understand how large a task or a project they're getting involved in when they decide, "We're going to switch across to IFS." They could probably do a little bit more, maybe around preparing people for these projects."

"The solution needs to improve its documentation and user-friendliness."

"We would like to see AI-driven CSI functions built into the tool that would allow us to quickly tie our improvement goals to metrics and activities, so Assyst will suggest the next steps to help us get closer to our goals."

More IFS Cloud Platform cons

"Sometimes, M3 alone cannot handle all the planning functionalities required by a customer. It has to be used along with industry-specific planning tools because M3 doesn't have all the features. However, no product can handle all the requirements of all the industries. There will be some shortcomings in all the products. Though this is an area for improvement, it is not a very serious shortfall or limitation. It can be covered by using third-party planning applications that integrate with Infor M3."

"The solution is stable but not agile."

"The solution's technical support is an area with shortcomings that need improvement, especially the support for the product named M3 rather than the support offered by Infor as an organization."

"Its initial setup was probably complex, but it is a very good system."

"An area for improvement in Infor M3 is training. There should be more training resources available for clients. Clients also find it challenging to get consultants or integrators for Infor M3. The product doesn't have enough resources in the market to help clients."

"We can't make modifications to fit the client's requirements."

"Here in Infor M3, you have certain limitations where the main components cannot be modified—you must work around or use bolt-ons."

"It would be great if Infor added some new workflows in the finance module. I'd also like to see better integration with third-party applications."

More Infor M3 cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"IFS Applications is expensive software, but it's on par with SAP and Oracle. It's for large enterprises and government entities and not for small and medium-sized enterprises. They have one licensing model, but if you want to have a module-specific license, they provide component-based licenses. Unlike SAP and Oracle, it doesn't have different levels of licensing. It's one level of licensing."

"The pricing of the solution may appear to be expensive for smaller companies with only tens of users; however, for larger and mid-size industrial companies, IFS is able to win deals and the pricing is competitive in the market."

"Licensing is on an annual basis, with no additional costs."

"It is better to buy implementation services from IFS than from partners"

"Ask for all-inclusive pricing, as they are pretty flexible if you ask for custom models."

"Pricing is an area that could be improved. They could be more competitive."

"There's an additional yearly cost for support."

"IFS Applications are competitive in terms of pricing compared to other vendors, such as SAP, Oracle, and Epicor. They are generally cheaper, especially for licensing costs."

More IFS Cloud Platform pricing and cost advice

"The cost is between $50 and $100 per user annually."

"If you compare Infor M3 to SAP, Infor M3 is less expensive than SAP, but if you compare Infor M3 to Dynamics 365, Infor M3 is more expensive. It also depends on the model that you buy. It depends on whether you have the complete package or whether you have separate models."

"Infor M3 is a tier-two product and is cheaper than tier-one products such as SAP and Oracle. However, it is more expensive than some other tier-two products. The licensing cost is dependent on the number of users. Also, if you purchase other tools from Infor as a package, then there may be other discounts offered."

"I'm not part of the team that manages Infor M3 pricing, but it depends on the client, integration, ship-out, and training levels. You get the price from the solution provider, but it would be best to discuss it because nothing is set in stone regarding pricing."

"There is a yearly licensing cost. The price is based on the modules you need. There are several modules, such as HR module, accounting module, sales module, scheduling module, etc., and the price will vary depending on the number of modules you choose. The customers always say that it's very expensive. It can cost a lot of money if your organization is huge. It's not implemented in a lot of organizations in my country because it's too expensive."

"The tool’s licensing is yearly."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ERP solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

14%

Computer Software Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	10

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IFS Applications?

The product is reasonably priced. The costs are justified by the value provided, considering the comprehensive features and minimal need for customization. I rate the pricing a seven out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IFS Applications?

When it comes to AI, I feel that is the area where we expect something more from IFS Cloud Platform. They are working on IFS AI, but we have not explored much into that yet, and if they want to kee...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for IFS Applications?

Currently, I am working with Arcwide, which is a service industry that predominantly focuses on IFS consulting, including IFS implementations, rollouts, upgrades, and support services.

See all answers

What do you like most about Infor M3?

The product's initial setup phase is easy.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Infor M3?

Some customers expect more out-of-box reports, and in some areas, they should provide more reports. However, Infor has introduced a report tool so that key users or global champions can generate re...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Infor M3?

Infor M3 is specifically dominant in fashion, food and beverages, and chemicals manufacturing; it works into micro-verticals. In food and beverage, it specializes in meat processing, confectionery,...

See all answers

Comparisons

SAP ERP vs IFS Cloud Platform

Compared 14% of the time

IBM Maximo vs IFS Cloud Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Oracle E-Business Suite vs IFS Cloud Platform

Compared 6% of the time

IFS assyst vs IFS Cloud Platform

Compared 4% of the time

ServiceNow vs IFS Cloud Platform

Compared 4% of the time

More IFS Cloud Platform Competitors

SAP ERP vs Infor M3

Compared 34% of the time

Infor LN vs Infor M3

Compared 17% of the time

Infor CloudSuite vs Infor M3

Compared 9% of the time

Infor Distribution SX.e vs Infor M3

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central vs Infor M3

Compared 5% of the time

More Infor M3 Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IFS Cloud Platform

January 2026

Download IFS Cloud Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

Infor M3

January 2026

Download Infor M3 product report

Also Known As

IFS Applications, Assyst, IFS Cloud

Infor Lawson M3, Lawson M3

Overview

IFS is the world’s leading provider of Industrial AI and enterprise software for hardcore businesses that make, service, and power our planet. Our technology enables businesses which manufacture goods, maintain complex assets, and manage service-focused operations to unlock the transformative power of Industrial AI™ to enhance productivity, efficiency, and sustainability. Industrial AI is IFS.ai.

IFS Cloud is a fully composable AI-powered platform, designed for ultimate flexibility and adaptability to our customers’ specific requirements and business evolution. It spans the needs of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP), Enterprise Asset Management (EAM), Supply Chain Management (SCM), Information Technology Service Management (ITSM), and Field Service Management (FSM). IFS technology leverages AI, machine learning, real-time data and analytics to empower our customers to make informed strategic decisions and excel at their Moment of Service™.

IFS

Infor M3 offers ultimate flexibility in operations, technology, and scale. As a multi-site, multi-country, and multi-company solution, M3 empowers your organization to adapt to changing business needs. It provides flexibility in managing mixed-mode and complex environments, with the agility to make quick adjustments at any time. Written in Java, M3 also gives you platform independence and choice.

Infor

Sample Customers

China Airlines, Electrolux Group, Babcock, Cimcorp, Sky, Multiplex, Veolia.

Grosfillex, High Five Sportswear, L_derach, OTK Group, PHS Group, Propper International, Red Wing Shoe Company, Reynolds Catering Supplies, Saudi Diesel, Sheetz, Zeppelin, Zodiac Aerospace

Buyer's Guide

IFS Cloud Platform vs. Infor M3

December 2025

Free Report: IFS Cloud Platform vs. Infor M3

Find out what your peers are saying about IFS Cloud Platform vs. Infor M3 and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IFS Cloud Platform vs. Infor M3 report.

See our list of best ERP vendors and best Activity Based Costing Software vendors.

We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.