Immuta vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance comparison

Immuta and Microsoft are both solutions in the Data Governance category. Immuta is ranked #19 with an average rating of 8.0, while Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 7.8. Immuta holds a 2.2% mindshare in DG, compared to Microsoft’s 12.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Immuta users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 84% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Immuta

Read 5 Immuta reviews

1,622 Views
1,184 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Purview Data Gove...

Read 59 Microsoft Purview Data Governance reviews

14,550 Views
12,222 Comparison Views

84% willing to recommend

Immuta

Microsoft Purview Data Gove...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

Microsoft Purview Data Governance and Immuta compete in data governance and management. Data comparisons indicate Immuta has an advantage due to its robust feature set focusing on data-centric capabilities.

Features: Microsoft Purview offers data cataloging, lineage tracking, and security policy management, with strong Microsoft services integration. Immuta provides automated policy enforcement, dynamic data masking, and precise access control for advanced security.

Room for Improvement: Microsoft Purview could enhance multi-cloud integration and simplify complex security configurations. It also needs to improve its data classification accuracy. Immuta requires a user-friendly interface, easier configuration for novice users, and enhanced documentation for its advanced features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Purview's deployment is straightforward, especially within Microsoft ecosystems, supported by extensive training and documentation. Immuta's deployment can be more complex, requiring dedicated resources, but it provides robust support for complex data privacy challenges.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Purview is cost-effective, aligning well with organizations using Microsoft, offering a favorable ROI with low setup costs. Immuta, while initially more expensive, delivers enhanced ROI through robust data control and security, justifying higher costs for data-sensitive enterprises.

To learn more, read our detailed Immuta vs. Microsoft Purview Data Governance Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Immuta vs. Microsoft Purview Data Governance

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,733 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Immuta

Ranking in Data Governance

19th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Security Posture Management (DSPM) (14th), AI Data Analysis (18th)

Microsoft Purview Data Gove...

Ranking in Data Governance

1st

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Microsoft Security Suite (8th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Data Governance category, the mindshare of Immuta is 2.2%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Purview Data Governance is 12.1%, down from 21.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Governance Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Microsoft Purview Data Governance	12.1%
Immuta	2.2%
Other	85.7%

Data Governance

Featured Reviews

Dibyajyoti Rath

Data Analyst at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

Centralized access control has secured sensitive data and supports compliant self-service analytics

Immuta is very helpful, but it can be improved in a few areas. The initial setup and policy design can be complex and require a learning curve. The user interface could be more interactive, especially for non-technical users. Policy troubleshooting and debugging could be easier with better visibility into why access was allowed or denied. Performance optimization and deeper integration with more tools could make it even better. Additional improvements would strengthen Immuta further. The documentation and real-world examples would help teams onboard faster. More out-of-the-box policy templates could reduce setup time. Improved policy simulation and testing would help teams understand the impact of changes before applying them. Stronger alerting and monitoring features would help quickly identify access issues. Finally, more end-user training and simplified workflows would make it easier for business users to adopt.

Read full review

Ayinampudi Srikanth

Tech lead at a healthcare company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Automated data discovery has streamlined management while configuration remains complex

Compared to Big-ID, Microsoft Purview Data Governance looks complicated to me. I do not feel it has a good user-level UI. The interface feels a little complicated compared to Big-ID. I did not appreciate the configuration part. It felt complex, whereas when I went for a Big-ID demo, the interface looked better and was easier to understand for any user.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The tool's most valuable feature is restriction."

"Immuta has had a very positive impact on our organization, helping us strengthen data security by ensuring sensitive data is only accessible to the right users, simplifying compliance with clear audit trails and consistent policy enforcement, reducing manual access management to save time for data and security teams, and enabling safe self-service analytics so our team can access data faster while still meeting governance and regulatory requirements."

"All features available are good."

"Instead of manually tagging data, Immuta’s auto-discovery capability identifies sensitive information, such as country labels, gender information, and other personal data."

"What I appreciate the most is its user-friendliness."

"MIP also provides strong information rights management settings, such as the ability to specify who has access to content and at what time."

"Data authentication enables us to classify documents based on whether they should be restricted for internal consumption or permitted for external sharing."

"Has a good interface and is reasonably priced."

"The most significant value lies in its seamless integration into the Azure ecosystem, automating various processes and reducing operational burdens."

"The DLP part and the AI related ones are the most valuable features; I mostly appreciate their automated data discovery."

"It starts off with records management, insider risk management, and information protection. And there is the discovery of the clouds, and we can get analytics on that as well, so that we know which user is using which cloud application and for how much time. The Activity explorer tells us which user was transferring out what data at what moment and on which device, including the serial number."

"The most valuable feature is the tracking activity and device onboarding."

"From my experience and customer feedback, one of the most valuable features of Microsoft Purview is ease of use, especially for content hosted within Microsoft 365 and Azure. I also like that the pricing model for the solution is reasonable."

More Microsoft Purview Data Governance pros

Cons

"We have had some challenges with their support when we were migrating to the cloud version. We we had some issues, and it took us several attempts to get a proper responses as part of that migration."

"Immuta is behind in updating upgrades and software releases."

"There is room for improvement in enhancing the monitoring capabilities."

"Immuta is very helpful, but it can be improved in a few areas."

"The implementation process with Immuta was quite challenging, primarily due to issues related to database handling and the syncing of user groups."

"We have had a lot of issues since we moved to Unified Support. There have been work gaps there, and we believe they fixed them, but we need to make sure that they are going to be sustainable. It is to be seen."

"One area for improvement is better documentation on what is working and what is not, as well as what features are allowed depending on your licensing model. It's essential to know if a feature isn't working due to missing licenses."

"One drawback of Microsoft Purview, though it's beneficial and easy to use, is that when you start plugging in connectors for third-party sources when setting the solution up for data collection, it becomes a bit more tricky."

"It could reduce pricing to encourage usage."

"We haven't really gotten too far into it to identify areas for improvement just yet."

"I try to avoid opening tickets with Microsoft due to long response times, which is frustrating."

"I would like to have complete video documentation for training."

"Enhancing the tool's capability to connect to multiple sources would be valuable."

More Microsoft Purview Data Governance cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Immuta's pricing is expensive."

"Currently, the licensing differs for the governance side compared to the risk and compliance side."

"Microsoft Purview is the best option I have encountered when it comes to price. Maybe some of my information is outdated, but Microsoft offered it so that you could use it almost without paying."

"We pay $15,000 per end user for the E5 license."

"The categorization within the licensing could be improved. There are a lot of solutions within Microsoft Purview. If the licensing could be a bit clearer and the solutions could be better categorized according to function and across multiple environments, that would be excellent. The licensing is very confusing."

"It's not cheap. I'm not exactly sure how much our license costs, but it is very expensive."

"The solution is extremely affordable for the K-12 space."

"Price-wise, I think it's very generous and accessible to not just enterprises but small to medium-sized companies as well. I think it's very fair in terms of how they break apart the storage and the actual computing, and that makes it very accessible. So, that is a very big plus for Purview."

"Microsoft Purview requires a Microsoft 365 license and is included with an E5 license."

More Microsoft Purview Data Governance pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Governance solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

21%

Computer Software Company

11%

Government

11%

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

10%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	20
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	31

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Immuta?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Immuta?

My main use case for Immuta is data governance. In my project, which is a data governance project, I use Immuta as a centralized data access management tool. A specific example of how I use Immuta ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Immuta?

My advice for others considering Immuta would be to plan your policies carefully. Think through roles, data sensitivity, and use cases before setup. Invest in training to ensure both technical and ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Microsoft Azure Purview?

It is designed to seamlessly connect to various data sources, which is particularly beneficial for our customers who primarily use Microsoft technologies.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Azure Purview?

Microsoft Purview Data Governance is quite affordable compared to other market solutions, which have high initial costs. It allows for a cost-effective start with negligible initial cost. However, ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Azure Purview?

See all answers

Comparisons

Satori vs Immuta

Compared 15% of the time

Privacera vs Immuta

Compared 11% of the time

SecuPi Data Security Platform vs Immuta

Compared 10% of the time

Protegrity’s Data Protection Platform vs Immuta

Compared 9% of the time

Okera vs Immuta

Compared 6% of the time

More Immuta Competitors

Varonis Platform vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance

Compared 16% of the time

Collibra Platform vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance

Compared 15% of the time

Alation Data Catalog vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance

Compared 9% of the time

Atlan vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance

Compared 4% of the time

BigID Next vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance

Compared 4% of the time

More Microsoft Purview Data Governance Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Data Governance

January 2026

Download Immuta product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Purview Data Governance

January 2026

Microsoft Purview Data Governance report

Download Microsoft Purview Data Governance product report

Also Known As

No data available

Microsoft Purview, MS Azure Purview

Overview

Immuta ensures secure, controlled access to sensitive data, excelling in data governance, regulatory compliance, and privacy. Key features include dynamic policy enforcement, fine-grained access control, and seamless integration with diverse data sources. Users report improved operational efficiency and enhanced teamwork.

Immuta

The new Microsoft Purview portal offers an enhanced governance experience, serving as a unified platform for managing and governing data across various sources, including Azure, Microsoft 365, on-premises, and multicloud environments. Designed to streamline governance, compliance, risk, and security efforts, the new portal provides a user-friendly interface and unlocks advanced features like live view and preset scans. Existing users of Microsoft Purview can upgrade to this enhanced experience, gaining access to improved user interface, enhanced capabilities, and consolidated management of data assets. Additionally, the upgrade sets the stage for future developments, including account consolidation and fine-grained access control.

Microsoft

Buyer's Guide

Immuta vs. Microsoft Purview Data Governance

February 2026

Free Report: Immuta vs. Microsoft Purview Data Governance

Find out what your peers are saying about Immuta vs. Microsoft Purview Data Governance and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Immuta vs. Microsoft Purview Data Governance report.

See our list of best Data Governance vendors.

We monitor all Data Governance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.