Imperva Web Application Firewall vs Reblaze comparison

Imperva and Link11 are both solutions in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category. Imperva is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.8, while Link11 is ranked #23 with an average rating of 8.5. Imperva holds a 5.6% mindshare in WAF, compared to Link11’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of Imperva users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Link11 users who would recommend it.

Imperva Web Application Fir...

Read 52 Imperva Web Application Firewall reviews

4,495 Views
2,154 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Reblaze

Read 10 Reblaze reviews

467 Views
213 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Imperva Web Application Fir...

Reblaze

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 31, 2025

Imperva Web Application Firewall and Reblaze compete in web application protection. Imperva seems to have the upper hand with its advanced threat intelligence and flexible policy configuration, whereas Reblaze distinguishes itself through ease of use and dynamic traffic management.

Features: Imperva shines with advanced bot protection, API security, and robust threat intelligence. Its policy configuration offers flexibility, appealing to enterprises needing customized security setups. Reblaze emphasizes real-time monitoring and robust DDoS protection, alongside its user-friendly interface, which is ideal for enterprises with less security expertise.

Room for Improvement: Imperva's interface complexity and additional services requirement for URL filtering can hinder ease of use, coupled with high licensing costs. Policy setup challenges also persist. Reblaze could benefit from enhanced bot management and more granular WAF features, along with a simplified interface and more competitive pricing.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Imperva offers diverse deployment options across on-premises, public, and hybrid clouds to meet various enterprise needs. While proactive support is a plus, response times can sometimes lag. Reblaze focuses on cloud deployment for simplicity, with comprehensive customer support that is personalized yet may experience similar response delays.

Pricing and ROI: Imperva is recognized as a costlier solution with a complex pricing model but delivers strong ROI, particularly against DDoS threats. Reblaze, although also expensive, provides straightforward bundled pricing that appeals to customers looking for cost predictability. Both products' pricing reflects their robust security offerings.

To learn more, read our detailed Imperva Web Application Firewall vs. Reblaze Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Imperva Web Application Firewall vs. Reblaze

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,592 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Imperva Web Application Fir...

Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)

7th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Reblaze

Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)

23rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection (18th), Bot Management (10th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category, the mindshare of Imperva Web Application Firewall is 5.6%, down from 6.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Reblaze is 0.6%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Web Application Firewall (WAF)

Featured Reviews

Mitesh D Patel

Senior Technical Consultant- Cyber Security at Ivalue Infosolution

Effectively defends against threats like cross-site scripting (XSS), SQL injection, and others

It does bring value. For example, consider a BFSI customer. Their application is critical and represents their brand. Without a WAF, an attack could take their application down, harming their reputation. It leads to hampering the customer's workflow. With an Imperva WAF, they protect against attacks like DDoS or SQL injection, ensuring their application remains available and customers are happy. That's the main benefit for both the customer and the organization. The impact depends on the customer's use case. If their business primarily operates online, a CDN is beneficial for traffic optimization. Moreover, the integration options depend on the specific use case of our customers. Generally, integration capabilities are good with SIEM (Security Information and Event Management) parts.

Read full review

Shivendra S.

Senior Director of Engineering - Information Security at Apna

Offers flexibility with a kill switch for bypassing Reblaze if needed and provides a reliable Layer 7 defense against attacks

There is still some room for improvement when it comes to bot management from Reblaze because they are relatively new compared to other vendors in the town. AWS WAF, the Web Application Firewall from AWS, has a vast database of bad IP addresses due to its long-standing presence in this business. Reblaze, being a new entrant, is still building its database of bad IP addresses and malicious systems. So, Reblaze needs to work on that aspect. But other than that, I don't think scaling Reblaze has been an issue. There were some initial glitches, but they were all sorted out. So currently, I would say that the bot management and the database are areas they should focus on for further improvement.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is cloud-based and offers us good uptime. It has combined web and API security. Therefore, with one license, you access both application security and also API security."

"Imperva has a complete picture of how the applications are utilizing it. It is handy. DDoS is good. It has an internally managed database. It is very easy to integrate. We have integrated it with SIEM services."

"Imperva is easy to use and deploy. The UI is excellent."

"The features I have found most valuable with Imperva Web Application Firewall are account takeover protection, advanced bot protection, and API security."

"Imperva Web Application Firewall is a highly stable solution and is very mature."

"The dynamic profiling of websites is the solution's most valuable feature. The security is also good."

"If you are using the appliance as opposed to the virtual deployment, it can stand as the network layer-two and provide real transparency."

"Imperva is a Gartner leader, so its scalability, performance, and features are excellent."

More Imperva Web Application Firewall pros

"Provides mobile app security."

"The real-time monitoring and reporting are very good. There are information updates in their portal every two minutes. They also have the ability to spill it into Sumo Logic, for example. It's very easy to use."

"The feature I find most valuable is the user-friendly dashboard. It is easy to understand how everything works and it allows you to make decisions quickly and efficiently."

"It is a highly resilient product that can handle significantly larger workloads and high volumes of traffic with ease."

"We like the website protection. It's really good. The dashboard is really simple to use."

"The best thing about Reblaze, for us, is that it has been a game changer because previously, we were using Google's Web Application Firewall, but it wasn't up to the mark."

"Reblaze knows how to manage security. For me as, someone who knows little about security, it's good that I have a firm that optimizes everything according to their standards. It's their responsibility and they are fully hands-on."

"I very much like the elastic search and reports, allowing us to have a 360-degree view of the customer's activities and enabling us to track down any suspicious bots."

More Reblaze pros

Cons

"The reporting is missing some features, such as: only two export formats, and the time period does not include the last day, week, year."

"The user interface could be better."

"Sometimes our web application firewall will slow down."

"The Imperva Web Application Firewall automations are good, but there is still room for improvement with them."

"Support is one thing I wish Imperva could improve."

"The initial setup could be simplified. Every time you have to install the solution you have to get in touch with support or somebody that can to do that for you."

"The UI interface needs improvement."

"Imperva Web Application Firewall is a good system, but we found that the visibility of the diverse-path server, e.g. where the traffic is coming from, the different IPs, etc., needs improvement."

More Imperva Web Application Firewall cons

"The WAF features are not as granular as we would expect from a WAF system. There should be more granularity and in-depth rules, out-of-the-box."

"The next release should have next-generation automation."

"They have an interface that you have to adjust to. That is a bit of a downfall because I expect an interface to be very intuitive for someone who knows little about security. But if you know about security, the interface is wonderful."

"There is room for improvement in helping us understanding session management... We want Reblaze to catch and identify everything. We want to see the various devices doing one activity and to see, in a timeline, what's happened. We would like to see a more human-readable display to understand what's happening in the web app."

"Some of the settings on the dashboard are confusing."

"I would like to have seen more automated reports. Maybe it has been improved in the last year and I'm just not aware of it. But from a managerial point of view, you want a summary report, a weekly report: How many attacks were blocked? How much bandwidth was saved due to the caching mechanism? What were the top-ten attacks that were tested on the network, etc? I could most likely have found all that data if I logged in to the system and ran different reports. It would be very helpful to get a management report on a weekly basis."

"We have multiple products behind different instances of Reblaze. We have one instance for staging and then we have a production instance for multiple products. One of the things that we have requested is a unified view panel, so that we can see each of the instances in a unified view. That way, we won't have to go bouncing from instance to instance."

"Up to now the only cons I could find is sometimes getting change management back on track, because it's a company that evolves, and sometimes I don't have the same needs that they have. But besides that, up until now, I am really pleased with their service and I've also recommended them to some of my clients."

More Reblaze cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Imperva Web Application Firewall price is higher compared to other solutions. However, everything is included in the price."

"The solution's pricing is an issue."

"Licensing can range from one to twenty thousand dollars annually. Additionally, some features, including software support, require an annual subscription as well."

"Everybody complains about the price of this solution."

"The price of Imperva Web Application Firewalls is expensive compared to others."

"It's an excellent product, but it can be very costly."

"We sell three-year licenses for Imperva Web Application Firewall to our customers. The price is a little expensive."

"Imperva’s pricing is a bit higher in the market since it offers a full-blown WAF."

More Imperva Web Application Firewall pricing and cost advice

"I believe that for the six instances we have right now, it's costing us $16,000 per month."

"On a monthly basis we pay $750."

"We found the cost to be a bit on the higher side, starting at approximately three to four thousand dollars for a small configuration."

"There is still some room for improvement when it comes to bot management from Reblaze because they are relatively new compared to other vendors in the town."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

12%

Insurance Company

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

15%

Educational Organization

11%

Manufacturing Company

Media Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Which is the best DDoS protection solution for a big ISP for monitoring and mitigating?

My recommendation is Imperva.

See all answers

Is Citrix ADC (formerly Netscaler) the best ADC to use and if not why?

For ADC, any ADC can do a good job. But in case if you want to add WAF functionality to the same ADC hardware you have to look for other ADC's like F5, Imperva, Radware, Fortinet, etc.

See all answers

DDoS solutions: Any other solutions to consider aside from Radware DDoS Protection Service and F5 Silverline DDoS Protection?

You can have a look to Imperva Cloud WAF, the anti-DDoS mitigation is under 1s and works very well. I observed a lot of DDoS attacks that were well managed (even not seen by the customer) by Imperv...

See all answers

What do you like most about Reblaze?

It is a highly resilient product that can handle significantly larger workloads and high volumes of traffic with ease.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Reblaze?

We found the cost to be a bit on the higher side, starting at approximately three to four thousand dollars for a small configuration. It is worth mentioning that these figures might not be current....

See all answers

What needs improvement with Reblaze?

There is a potential improvement regarding simplifying the complexity of rule creation. It would be beneficial if it had a workflow or a feature that could fine-tune settings based on high-level re...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs Imperva Web Application Firewall

Compared 15% of the time

F5 Advanced WAF vs Imperva Web Application Firewall

Compared 12% of the time

Azure Front Door vs Imperva Web Application Firewall

Compared 9% of the time

AWS WAF vs Imperva Web Application Firewall

Compared 8% of the time

Fortinet FortiWeb vs Imperva Web Application Firewall

Compared 6% of the time

More Imperva Web Application Firewall Competitors

AWS WAF vs Reblaze

Compared 29% of the time

Cloudflare vs Reblaze

Compared 25% of the time

Akamai App and API Protector vs Reblaze

Compared 18% of the time

Barracuda Web Application Firewall vs Reblaze

Compared 15% of the time

F5 Advanced WAF vs Reblaze

Compared 14% of the time

More Reblaze Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Imperva Web Application Firewall

June 2025

Download Imperva Web Application Firewall product report

Buyer's Guide

Reblaze

June 2025

Download Reblaze product report

Overview

Imperva Web Application Firewall is a versatile solution that protects web applications and databases from various attacks, including DDoS, cross-site scripting, and SQL injection attacks. It offers data security, availability, and access control and can be deployed on-premises or on the cloud.

The solution has good security against web attacks and offers advanced bot protection, API security, and mitigation features. Imperva WAF is easy to configure and deploy; it has good customer service and an excellent user interface.

Imperva

Reblaze provides real-time monitoring, reporting, and botnet protections, enhancing security management with agile customization. Its intuitive dashboard supports efficient decision-making, while flexible rules and geo-blocking ensure security across geographies.

Reblaze is primarily deployed for web application firewall (WAF), DDoS prevention, and bot management, effectively defending against Layer 7 DDoS, phishing, SQL injections, cross-site scripting, and unwanted IP traffic. Supporting both public and private cloud deployments, including Amazon-hosted applications, Reblaze filters malicious activities to safeguard internet businesses. Users appreciate its comprehensive security approach, particularly for mobile app protection through its API and advanced filtering against script injections. Room for improvement includes change management, automation, reporting alerts, session management, and more granular WAF features. Adjustments in pricing and enhancements for bot management and bad IP address databases are sought after.

What are Reblaze's Most Important Features?

Intuitive Dashboard: Facilitates efficient decision-making with customizable settings.
Real-Time Monitoring: Provides active tracking and instant security insights.
WAF with Traffic Analysis: Allows detailed inspection of all incoming traffic.
Swift DDoS Defense: Rapid response against distributed denial-of-service attacks.
Flexible Rule Management: Supports extensive customization for specific needs.
Geo-Blocking: Secures resources from threats originating in specific locations.
API Security: Offers robust protection for mobile applications.
Advanced Filtering: Shields against SQL and script injection threats.

What Benefits Should Be Evaluated in Reviews?

Enhanced Security: The ability to detect and neutralize latest attacks.
Efficient Customization: Tailoring security measures to fit organizational requirements.
Real-Time Alerts: Immediate notifications of security events for prompt action.
Cloud Deployment Flexibility: Compatibility with public and private cloud environments.

In finance, Reblaze addresses the stringent demands of data protection. E-commerce platforms benefit from its robust perimeter defenses against typical threats. Healthcare industries utilize its capabilities to secure sensitive patient data, leveraging both real-time monitoring and responsive alert systems to maintain compliance and integrity.

Link11

Sample Customers

BlueCross BlueShield, eHarmony, EMF Broadcasting, GE Healthcare, Metro Bank, The Motley Fool, Siemens

eBay, AirAsia, Taboola, Reebonz, IAI, Payoneer, mySupermarket, William Hill, Fanduel

Buyer's Guide

Imperva Web Application Firewall vs. Reblaze

June 2025

Free Report: Imperva Web Application Firewall vs. Reblaze

Find out what your peers are saying about Imperva Web Application Firewall vs. Reblaze and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Imperva Web Application Firewall vs. Reblaze report.

See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.

We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.