Inflectra SpiraPlan vs OpenText Software Delivery Management comparison

Inflectra and OpenText are both solutions in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category. Inflectra is ranked #14 with an average rating of 10.0, while OpenText is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.3. Inflectra holds a 0.4% mindshare in ALM, compared to OpenText’s 5.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Inflectra users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Inflectra SpiraPlan

Read 1 Inflectra SpiraPlan review

259 Views
202 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText Software Delivery ...

Read 41 OpenText Software Delivery Management reviews

3,308 Views
3,176 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Inflectra SpiraPlan

OpenText Software Delivery ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 19, 2025

OpenText Software Delivery Management and Inflectra SpiraPlan compete in the software delivery management category. Inflectra SpiraPlan has an edge due to its feature set and positive data despite OpenText's competitive pricing and support.

Features: OpenText is recognized for comprehensive integration, lifecycle management, and robust support capabilities. Inflectra SpiraPlan stands out with customizable dashboards, strong collaboration tools, and adaptability. Inflectra's ease of customization also provides a competitive advantage.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText offers flexible deployment options with strong support. Inflectra SpiraPlan provides a straightforward cloud-based deployment model with exceptional customer service, leading in ease and support satisfaction.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText’s competitive pricing focuses on streamlined ROI through robust integration. Inflectra SpiraPlan, initially more costly, justifies investment with rapid ROI due to customizable features and enhanced user satisfaction. Inflectra’s customization emphasis potentially offers better long-term ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 868,759 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Inflectra SpiraPlan

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

14th

Ranking in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools

9th

Average Rating

10.0

Reviews Sentiment

1.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OpenText Software Delivery ...

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

8th

Ranking in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools

8th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category, the mindshare of Inflectra SpiraPlan is 0.4%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Software Delivery Management is 5.0%, down from 5.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
OpenText Software Delivery Management	5.0%
Inflectra SpiraPlan	0.4%
Other	94.6%

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

Featured Reviews

Priye Tamunokuro

Business Development/Technical Sales Specialist at Tezza Business Solutions

Has improved project traceability and accelerated test case creation with strong AI assistance

As for improvements needed for Inflectra SpiraPlan, I don't know if there are much more to improve, but in the case of creating users when you want to create roles, there's a checkbox that gives access to the users. There should be one checkbox that can click everything at a time and then you can just uncheck the few ones that you don't need. Most times you want to check almost all the boxes and just leave a few, but then you have to check a lot of boxes one after the other. For someone who tries to work really smart, that impacts our time, so a single checkbox to select all would be great.

Read full review

GeorgNauerz

Managing Partner at Georg Nauerz Consulting

A stable tool for sprint planning, test management, quality management, and automated testing

I think the area of release management in the tool is an area of concern where improvements are required. In general, the connection between releases and scrum teams needs improvement, as it could be optimized owing to its linkages, making it very uncomfortable as soon as you have strong teams or scrum teams that work with different items over several releases. In future product releases, the solution needs to focus a bit more on the metric part. The product's dashboard is a metric for productivity and process control.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

868,759 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

24%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Computer Software Company

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	32

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Inflectra SpiraPlan?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing was smooth and easy. I had the trial version initially, then reached out to subscribe based on the number of concurrent users, which makes it v...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Inflectra SpiraPlan?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Inflectra SpiraPlan?

Inflectra SpiraPlan has been instrumental in transforming how we manage our software quality assurance and our agile project delivery. Mostly we use it for requirements management, test cases, trac...

See all answers

Is Jira better or would you go with Micro Focus ALM Octane?

Hi Netanya, Basically , it all depends on the use cases for your environment and the business needs. Hope the below data may be relevant to you for identifying your needs and deciding on the approp...

See all answers

What do you like most about Micro Focus ALM Octane?

The platform's most valuable feature is pipeline integration or continuous integration services.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus ALM Octane?

OpenText ALM Octane is an expensive product. However, it offsets costs by saving time and money, thus creating a balance between expenses and benefits. Our organization with over 1500 users sees sa...

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs Inflectra SpiraPlan

Compared 100% of the time

More Inflectra SpiraPlan Competitors

Jira vs OpenText Software Delivery Management

Compared 40% of the time

OpenText Application Quality Management vs OpenText Software Delivery Management

Compared 27% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs OpenText Software Delivery Management

Compared 7% of the time

Rally Software vs OpenText Software Delivery Management

Compared 6% of the time

TFS vs OpenText Software Delivery Management

Compared 4% of the time

More OpenText Software Delivery Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Agile Planning Tools

September 2025

Download Inflectra SpiraPlan product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Software Delivery Management

September 2025

OpenText Software Delivery Management report

Download OpenText Software Delivery Management product report

Also Known As

SpiraPlan

Micro Focus ALM Octane, Micro Focus Octane

Overview

SpiraPlan from Inflectra is a powerful agile project management solution. Use SpiraPlan to capture and manage user stories, track progress, and collaborate with your team, wherever they are. SpiraPlan is designed to adapt to your way of working: from agile (e.g. Scrum and Kanban), to hybrid approaches, to waterfall.

Inflectra

OpenText Software Delivery Management provides application lifecycle management with Agile and Waterfall support. It features intuitive interfaces, CI/CD integration, automated testing, and robust reporting, improving project management efficiency and usability.

Designed to enhance teams' productivity and streamline processes, OpenText Software Delivery Management integrates seamlessly with Agile methodologies. Its comprehensive backlog and requirements management, user stories, and test management make it a complete tool for managing the development lifecycle. The platform aligns with DevOps, providing traceability and extensive customization options. Traceability from requirements to deployments is enhanced, making it easier for teams to track progress. It offers integration with popular tools like Jenkins and JIRA, ensuring a unified approach to continuous delivery and testing management.

What key features does OpenText Software Delivery Management include?

Versatile across browsers with consistent performance.
Seamless CI/CD integration for smooth development processes.
Intuitive interface aiding in efficiency and ease of use.
Comprehensive backlog management ensures organized prioritization.
Automated testing aligns with Agile and DevOps principles.

What benefits can users expect when evaluating OpenText Software Delivery Management?

Enhanced traceability from inception to delivery.
Improved project management efficiency through streamlined processes.
Robust reporting capabilities offering detailed insights.
Increased flexibility in customization enabling tailored experiences.
Predictive analytics for better decision-making.

OpenText Software Delivery Management is implemented across technology-focused industries, supporting Agile processes like requirements management and defect tracking. Organizations use it to standardize development workflows and optimize continuous delivery integration, choosing it for its ability to support both Agile and Waterfall methodologies within application lifecycle management.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Process1st Technologies, AT&T EG (DIRECTV), Aptus Health, Medvoxel systems, Tolko Industries Ltd., CMMI, Bearwood Consultants Ltd, Mortenson Construction, Soflab Technology, VectorOne Consulting

Orange, Airbus, Haufe Group, Kellogg's, Claro, Bon Secours, World Wide Technology

Buyer's Guide

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

September 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Microsoft, Nutanix and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

868,759 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors and best Enterprise Agile Planning Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.