Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

OpenText Software Delivery Management vs Polarion ALM comparison

OpenText and Siemens are both solutions in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category. OpenText is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.0, while Siemens is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.3. OpenText holds a 4.5% mindshare in ALM, compared to Siemens’s 6.4% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Siemens users who would recommend it.
OpenText Software Delivery ...
Read 41 OpenText Software Delivery Management reviews
  • 3,237 Views
  • 3,075 Comparison Views
92% willing to recommend
Polarion ALM
Read 24 Polarion ALM reviews
  • 3,418 Views
  • 3,145 Comparison Views
88% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 28, 2025

OpenText Software Delivery Management and Polarion ALM are competitive in the software delivery management sector. OpenText, with its Agile alignment, seems to have an edge due to its integration capabilities and pipeline management, which are well-suited for Agile practices. Polarion ALM excels in document management and traceability, which are vital for compliance-driven industries.

Features: OpenText Software Delivery Management integrates seamlessly with existing pipelines, supports Agile methodologies, and offers flexible SaaS options. Its user interface is praised for ease of use and flexibility. Polarion ALM stands out in traceability and document control, making it a good fit for compliance-focused industries. It efficiently handles configurations and workflows applicable to sectors like medical and automotive.

Room for Improvement: OpenText Software Delivery Management could enhance its test management flexibility, reporting capabilities, and handling of legacy integration. Addressing licensing complexity and supporting Agile-Waterfall hybrid methodologies would be beneficial. Polarion ALM requires improvements in usability, integration with newer tools, scalability, and performance. Enhancing real-time collaboration and analytics would strengthen its user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Software Delivery Management offers on-premises, hybrid, and private cloud deployment, with comprehensive support involving R&D team engagement. It receives positive feedback for customer interaction. Polarion ALM provides public and private cloud alongside on-premises deployment, widely appreciated for flexibility. It could improve support services by expanding rapid response and optimizing processes across time zones.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Software Delivery Management is positioned at a higher price due to its extensive features and integration capabilities, promising significant ROI in full utilization. Its flexible license management contributes to potential cost efficiencies. Polarion ALM's price may deter smaller enterprises, but its functionality justifies the expense in compliance-heavy industries, offering substantial ROI when deeply integrated into operations.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Software Delivery Management vs. Polarion ALM Report (Updated: January 2026).
Buyer's Guide
OpenText Software Delivery Management vs. Polarion ALM
January 2026
Download the complete report
Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Software Delivery ...
Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
10th
Ranking in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools
9th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
41
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Polarion ALM
Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
5th
Ranking in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools
6th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.0
Number of Reviews
24
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category, the mindshare of OpenText Software Delivery Management is 4.5%, down from 6.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Polarion ALM is 6.4%, down from 7.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Polarion ALM6.4%
OpenText Software Delivery Management4.5%
Other89.1%
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
 

Featured Reviews

PE
Peter-Paul Eijkenboom
Senior Test Automation Specialist at APG
Generating audit evidence effortlessly saves time and money
OpenText ALM Octane is a new product with full development ongoing, where new ideas are launched regularly. Its ability to generate audit evidence with a single click is a significant advantage, as it saves considerable time and money compared to manual processes. This efficiency is especially valuable for audits required by financial regulators.
Read full review
LasseMikkonen - PeerSpot reviewer
LasseMikkonen
Principal Consultant at byte
Has provided mature traceability and configuration features while supporting complex product development for mid-to-large companies
Polarion ALM can learn from Atlassian tools a lot, as the usability is not the best, and it is really narrowly focused on requirements management only. For example, if you want to do testing and test result management with it, it is very limited. Jama Connect has similar limitations, and both should really focus on developing the integrations and extendability. For example, Jama Connect does not even have an extension marketplace, whereas Polarion has a small one. However, compared to the Atlassian Marketplace where you can get whatever applications for whatever price, it is a totally different ballgame. I would highly recommend Polarion ALM add more AI features to it. I know they have started to do something, but for example, I have been developing widgets for IBM DOORS Next, AI widgets, so that you can write and analyze requirements with the AI, and I have also done the same for Jira, creating a couple of Jira applications in the marketplace as well.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The dashboards and metric reporting are valuable features."
"The interface is user-friendly."
"The filtering options are very good once you learn them. The document reports are also valuable. You can create reports in Word and PDF formats. That's very useful."
"The user experience is a lot better than any tool that I have used before. Overall, it is great. It has a smooth interface, which is very user-friendly. It makes it easier to work together and have more transparency and customization, which is very good."
"The most valuable features of the solution are its ability to manage test scenarios, test results, and test automation, which are its primary functionalities."
"It is a very stable tool. The tool has been in the industry for so many years. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten."
"The feature I found most valuable in Micro Focus ALM Octane is its ability to integrate with the CI/CD stack."
"The most valuable feature of Micro Focus ALM Octane is the reports. We are able to do customization."
More OpenText Software Delivery Management pros
"The tool helped us to more effectively and efficiently gather and structure the information (requirements, test plans, project management data, etc.), and share it with the involved stakeholders in a safe and change-controlled manner."
"Polarion ALM delivers both document views and table views simultaneously and organizes configurations according to norms and standards."
"Scalability is good...The integration is quite good."
"It offers good performance."
"The best feature of Polarion ALM to me is its traceability link."
"The software is stable."
"I am impressed with the solution’s stability."
"It meets with everybody's needs without having to grab plugins."
More Polarion ALM pros
 

Cons

"I have yet to experience the CI/CD part of Micro Focus ALM Octane but as demonstrated by the team who is providing the services, I see that the CI/CD could improve. When we check in the code, for the code snippet that has been checked in by a particular user, you need to open a separate file. When comparing Micro Focus ALM Octane to Jira, they have a separate window in which you can click on the ID and the code is visible in the snippet. It's a two-step process in Micro Focus ALM Octane and it's a single-step process in Jira. It's essential for the developers to think about this difference."
"The solution should improve by adding scrum board-like functionality."
"Security and security management, meaning the integration of the security, could be enhanced. We know about Fortify, but it would be better to have security features in the original Octane platform without the need for another solution or another application."
"Documentation is not clear."
"Because JIRA is a leading tool for both development and requirements management - everybody is using JIRA - I'm pretty there will be a use case where people are trying to connect between ALM Octane and JIRA. The back-end configuration of the synchronization with JIRA could be simplified. The architecture is really complicated. We required a lot of machines to build the cluster and the configuration was not really clearly described within the documentation. This may have something to do with the fact that the software is pretty new."
"The product's requirements management feature needs enhancement in terms of functionality."
"Also, while there is a Requirements Module in Octane, it is very plain. It's okay to have some requirements described there, but it's not really following the whole BDD approach. I would like to have more features for requirements in there."
"There is room for improvement in OpenText ALM Octane's flexibility. While it aims to be as flexible as possible for a large enterprise application, sometimes there are limitations that may not meet specific organizational needs."
More OpenText Software Delivery Management cons
"The interface for this solution needs to be made more user-friendly to provide a better user experience."
"Technical support needs some improvement."
"As Polarion ALM is a development-oriented tool, easy support or easy access is provided by default, but if I want to use detailed features, I need to write the script, particularly the VM script, and this is its area for improvement. I want Polarion ALM to have a graphical user interface that doesn't need scripting. In the next release of the tool, I'd like for it to not require scripting and programming because needing to run script language is time-consuming."
"The system’s technology is not the most current, leading to missing features that are common in web-based applications."
"Integration requires a lot of effort. You typically need to work with an implementation partner to get it done. Most connectors available for Polarion ALM are paid. Unlike other vendors offering several standard connectors for free, integrating third-party software with Polarion ALM involves discussing and coordinating with the third-party software providers, which requires effort."
"The weak point of Polarion ALM software is about reporting and time for extraction of the data...The quality of reporting needs to improve."
"Nowadays, the dashboard is too complex to be created."
"I also recently suggested that CMS consider incorporating generative artificial intelligence into the system."
More Polarion ALM cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Going forward, I think we will want to explore adding more licenses."
"The cost of this product is very high."
"I rate the product price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive. The product is neither cheap nor expensive."
"The senior management of my company handles the purchases of the solution. However, the price per developer was a major reason we switched from Jira. Apart from the complexity and the support, the price was a major reason that a team of 20 people unanimously decided that we would prefer to go with Micro Focus ALM Octane rather than Jira. The senior management had seen some benefit in it and they preferred it over Jira because the per developer cost was less and the support was superior."
"The comparison is always with Jira, so the pricing of Octane is a bit on the higher side. But if you look at what you have to add to Jira, on the plug-in side, to have the same abilities you have with Octane, you're more or less even, or even ahead with Octane."
"It's expensive. HPE products, and now Micro Focus, have always been expensive. The license is not cheap, and it will always be a challenge, particularly for small organizations like ours."
"Microsoft is a big challenge for Micro Focus when it comes to pricing because they are much cheaper. But it definitely depends on the complexity of the environment. If it has multiple technologies, at that point, looking at other options and Microsoft would be a feasible approach."
"The price of Micro Focus ALM Octane is too high compared to other solutions."
More OpenText Software Delivery Management pricing and cost advice
"It is an expensive product."
"The license model is okay for large companies but would be quite expensive for smaller enterprises."
"Software for medical devices is always expensive."
"If the pricing would come down and it was more affordable then we wouldn't have to switch."
"The solution is expensive."
"Our license for Polarion ALM is yearly. And it's not the cheapest tool that we've looked at. So if we had made our decision purely based on the licensing cost, we wouldn't have selected Polarion."
"You have to pay around 50-60 euros per user."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
22%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Computer Software Company
8%
Government
8%
Manufacturing Company
29%
Computer Software Company
11%
Healthcare Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
4%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise32
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business10
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise12
 

Questions from the Community

Is Jira better or would you go with Micro Focus ALM Octane?
Hi Netanya, Basically , it all depends on the use cases for your environment and the business needs. Hope the below data may be relevant to you for identifying your needs and deciding on the approp...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus ALM Octane?
OpenText ALM Octane is an expensive product. However, it offsets costs by saving time and money, thus creating a balance between expenses and benefits. Our organization with over 1500 users sees sa...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Micro Focus ALM Octane?
There is room for improvement in OpenText ALM Octane's flexibility. While it aims to be as flexible as possible for a large enterprise application, sometimes there are limitations that may not meet...
See all answers
What do you like most about Polarion ALM?
It is a very stable solution.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Polarion ALM?
Polarion ALM can learn from Atlassian tools a lot, as the usability is not the best, and it is really narrowly focused on requirements management only. For example, if you want to do testing and te...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Polarion ALM?
We are in our product development using Polarion ALM's functionalities. I am a power user, partly responsible for configuring the tool. We are using it for many things. The idea was to go for a req...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Jira vs OpenText Software Delivery Management Logo
Jira vs OpenText Software Delivery Management
Compared 36% of the time
OpenText Application Quality Management vs OpenText Software Delivery Management Logo
OpenText Application Quality Management vs OpenText Software Delivery Management
Compared 16% of the time
Microsoft Azure DevOps vs OpenText Software Delivery Management Logo
Microsoft Azure DevOps vs OpenText Software Delivery Management
Compared 7% of the time
Rally Software vs OpenText Software Delivery Management Logo
Rally Software vs OpenText Software Delivery Management
Compared 6% of the time
IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) vs OpenText Software Delivery Management Logo
IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) vs OpenText Software Delivery Management
Compared 4% of the time
More OpenText Software Delivery Management Competitors
Codebeamer vs Polarion ALM Logo
Codebeamer vs Polarion ALM
Compared 28% of the time
Jira vs Polarion ALM Logo
Jira vs Polarion ALM
Compared 13% of the time
Microsoft Azure DevOps vs Polarion ALM Logo
Microsoft Azure DevOps vs Polarion ALM
Compared 12% of the time
Jama Connect vs Polarion ALM Logo
Jama Connect vs Polarion ALM
Compared 7% of the time
Helix ALM vs Polarion ALM Logo
Helix ALM vs Polarion ALM
Compared 3% of the time
More Polarion ALM Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
OpenText Software Delivery Management
January 2026
OpenText Software Delivery Management reportDownload OpenText Software Delivery Management product report
Buyer's Guide
Polarion ALM
January 2026
Polarion ALM reportDownload Polarion ALM product report
 

Also Known As

Micro Focus ALM Octane, Micro Focus Octane
No data available
 

Overview

OpenText Software Delivery Management provides application lifecycle management with Agile and Waterfall support. It features intuitive interfaces, CI/CD integration, automated testing, and robust reporting, improving project management efficiency and usability.

Designed to enhance teams' productivity and streamline processes, OpenText Software Delivery Management integrates seamlessly with Agile methodologies. Its comprehensive backlog and requirements management, user stories, and test management make it a complete tool for managing the development lifecycle. The platform aligns with DevOps, providing traceability and extensive customization options. Traceability from requirements to deployments is enhanced, making it easier for teams to track progress. It offers integration with popular tools like Jenkins and JIRA, ensuring a unified approach to continuous delivery and testing management.

What key features does OpenText Software Delivery Management include?
  • Versatile across browsers with consistent performance.
  • Seamless CI/CD integration for smooth development processes.
  • Intuitive interface aiding in efficiency and ease of use.
  • Comprehensive backlog management ensures organized prioritization.
  • Automated testing aligns with Agile and DevOps principles.
What benefits can users expect when evaluating OpenText Software Delivery Management?
  • Enhanced traceability from inception to delivery.
  • Improved project management efficiency through streamlined processes.
  • Robust reporting capabilities offering detailed insights.
  • Increased flexibility in customization enabling tailored experiences.
  • Predictive analytics for better decision-making.

OpenText Software Delivery Management is implemented across technology-focused industries, supporting Agile processes like requirements management and defect tracking. Organizations use it to standardize development workflows and optimize continuous delivery integration, choosing it for its ability to support both Agile and Waterfall methodologies within application lifecycle management.

OpenText

The world’s first 100% browser-based ALM enterprise solution, which enables seamless collaboration across disparate teams, multi-directionally linked work items, full traceability, accelerated productivity and automated proof of compliance.

Siemens
 

Sample Customers

Orange, Airbus, Haufe Group, Kellogg's, Claro, Bon Secours, World Wide Technology
Engineering Ingegneria Informatica, IBS AG, Zumtobel Group
Buyer's Guide
OpenText Software Delivery Management vs. Polarion ALM
January 2026
Free Report: OpenText Software Delivery Management vs. Polarion ALM
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Software Delivery Management vs. Polarion ALM and other solutions. Updated: January 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our OpenText Software Delivery Management vs. Polarion ALM report.

We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.