OpenText Software Delivery Management and Polarion ALM are competitive in the software delivery management sector. OpenText, with its Agile alignment, seems to have an edge due to its integration capabilities and pipeline management, which are well-suited for Agile practices. Polarion ALM excels in document management and traceability, which are vital for compliance-driven industries.
Features: OpenText Software Delivery Management integrates seamlessly with existing pipelines, supports Agile methodologies, and offers flexible SaaS options. Its user interface is praised for ease of use and flexibility. Polarion ALM stands out in traceability and document control, making it a good fit for compliance-focused industries. It efficiently handles configurations and workflows applicable to sectors like medical and automotive.
Room for Improvement: OpenText Software Delivery Management could enhance its test management flexibility, reporting capabilities, and handling of legacy integration. Addressing licensing complexity and supporting Agile-Waterfall hybrid methodologies would be beneficial. Polarion ALM requires improvements in usability, integration with newer tools, scalability, and performance. Enhancing real-time collaboration and analytics would strengthen its user experience.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Software Delivery Management offers on-premises, hybrid, and private cloud deployment, with comprehensive support involving R&D team engagement. It receives positive feedback for customer interaction. Polarion ALM provides public and private cloud alongside on-premises deployment, widely appreciated for flexibility. It could improve support services by expanding rapid response and optimizing processes across time zones.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText Software Delivery Management is positioned at a higher price due to its extensive features and integration capabilities, promising significant ROI in full utilization. Its flexible license management contributes to potential cost efficiencies. Polarion ALM's price may deter smaller enterprises, but its functionality justifies the expense in compliance-heavy industries, offering substantial ROI when deeply integrated into operations.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Polarion ALM | 6.1% |
| OpenText Software Delivery Management | 4.7% |
| Other | 89.2% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 32 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 10 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 12 |
OpenText Software Delivery Management provides application lifecycle management with Agile and Waterfall support. It features intuitive interfaces, CI/CD integration, automated testing, and robust reporting, improving project management efficiency and usability.
Designed to enhance teams' productivity and streamline processes, OpenText Software Delivery Management integrates seamlessly with Agile methodologies. Its comprehensive backlog and requirements management, user stories, and test management make it a complete tool for managing the development lifecycle. The platform aligns with DevOps, providing traceability and extensive customization options. Traceability from requirements to deployments is enhanced, making it easier for teams to track progress. It offers integration with popular tools like Jenkins and JIRA, ensuring a unified approach to continuous delivery and testing management.
What key features does OpenText Software Delivery Management include?OpenText Software Delivery Management is implemented across technology-focused industries, supporting Agile processes like requirements management and defect tracking. Organizations use it to standardize development workflows and optimize continuous delivery integration, choosing it for its ability to support both Agile and Waterfall methodologies within application lifecycle management.
The world’s first 100% browser-based ALM enterprise solution, which enables seamless collaboration across disparate teams, multi-directionally linked work items, full traceability, accelerated productivity and automated proof of compliance.
We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
