Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

OpenText Software Delivery Management vs Polarion ALM comparison

OpenText and Siemens are both solutions in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category. OpenText is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.3, while Siemens is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.2. OpenText holds a 6.0% mindshare in ALM, compared to Siemens’s 8.2% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of Siemens users who would recommend it.
OpenText Software Delivery ...
Read 41 OpenText Software Delivery Management reviews
  • 3,963 Views
  • 2,200 Comparison Views
92% willing to recommend
Polarion ALM
Read 22 Polarion ALM reviews
  • 3,837 Views
  • 2,560 Comparison Views
87% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 19, 2025

OpenText Software Delivery Management and Polarion ALM are competitors in the Software Development Lifecycle Management space. OpenText gains an edge due to its strong support and pricing mechanisms like flexible licensing, while Polarion is favored for its comprehensive traceability and requirements management features.

Features: OpenText Software Delivery Management offers a comprehensive toolset for software lifecycle management, supports Agile methodologies, and integrates with DevOps pipelines. It provides robust reporting and consolidates management tasks into one platform. Polarion ALM prioritizes requirements management and traceability. It supports various development methodologies and offers end-to-end traceability but may need third-party tools for additional features.

Room for Improvement: OpenText could enhance integration flexibility and usability, especially in task comments and attachments handling. Polarion ALM needs better integration with external tools and a more intuitive interface. OpenText is working on bridging Agile and legacy testing methods, while Polarion could benefit from simpler configuration handling.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText provides both on-premises and hybrid cloud deployment options with engaged technical support, including R&D collaboration for client issue resolution. Polarion ALM offers similar deployment options but requires enhancements in its support structure to address complex issues efficiently.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText is considered expensive but justified by its comprehensive features, and flexible licensing offers scalable solutions for different demand levels. Polarion ALM is high-cost, potentially prohibitive for smaller enterprises, but offers long-term value through its robust requirements and traceability management capabilities.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Software Delivery Management vs. Polarion ALM Report (Updated: May 2025).
Buyer's Guide
OpenText Software Delivery Management vs. Polarion ALM
May 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Software Delivery ...
Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
7th
Ranking in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools
7th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
41
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Polarion ALM
Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
6th
Ranking in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools
6th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
22
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category, the mindshare of OpenText Software Delivery Management is 6.0%, up from 5.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Polarion ALM is 8.2%, up from 5.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
 

Featured Reviews

GeorgNauerz - PeerSpot reviewer
A stable tool for sprint planning, test management, quality management, and automated testing
I think the area of release management in the tool is an area of concern where improvements are required. In general, the connection between releases and scrum teams needs improvement, as it could be optimized owing to its linkages, making it very uncomfortable as soon as you have strong teams or scrum teams that work with different items over several releases. In future product releases, the solution needs to focus a bit more on the metric part. The product's dashboard is a metric for productivity and process control.
Read full review
Dina Bindi - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides traceability and compliance with high flexibility
It's extremely flexible. Configuring items is straightforward and doesn't require involving the supplier each time. We find the requirement management, test management, documentation, and dashboards very effective. However, we don't use DevOps-related features, such as integration with tools like SVN or Git, because we use Azure DevOps. The aspects related to requirements, testing, changes, tasks, and agile methodology are excellent, which is why we've been using it for a long time.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It's more streamlined because we have it all under one umbrella. And once the business requirements and rules have been created, we can do test cases and apply them to the business rules."
"It is a very stable tool. The tool has been in the industry for so many years. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten."
"The defect management gives us full-fledged capabilities for handling defects, including capturing the details of the defects and even screenshotting the defect cases. The defect management is comprehensive."
"A valuable feature is the pipeline, so that we can now connect to Jenkins and then have all the results from testing, from external, in the tool, so that we can see the whole approach from there. Also, We can work with labels so we have better filtering solutions than in ALM. And it's much smarter and leaner to use than ALM."
"Octane works well with the Jira portfolio to track the project with two methods: Agile and Waterfall. We can track all the testing in Waterfall or Agile and synchronize it with Agile tools."
"The most valuable features of the solution are its ability to manage test scenarios, test results, and test automation, which are its primary functionalities."
"Backlog management is the most valuable feature. This was a capability that was missing or difficult to achieve in ALM Quality Center."
"I like the fact that you can use it on top of Jira."
More OpenText Software Delivery Management pros
"The features I find the most valuable are requirement tracking and schematics."
"Polarion ALM is excellent for tracking who is working on what and how many people are involved in a project."
"It's extremely flexible. Configuring items is straightforward and doesn't require involving the supplier each time. We find the requirement management, test management, documentation, and dashboards very effective."
"Polarion ALM has some valuable tools for managing our targets and requirements. I think that's its best feature."
"The best feature of Polarion ALM to me is its traceability link."
"The tool helped us to more effectively and efficiently gather and structure the information (requirements, test plans, project management data, etc.), and share it with the involved stakeholders in a safe and change-controlled manner."
"Polarion ALM delivers both document views and table views simultaneously and organizes configurations according to norms and standards."
"The most valuable feature is the function of the ALM system."
More Polarion ALM pros
 

Cons

"They don't support all IDEs yet. We have Visual Studio code, which is not supported, and loved by our developers. This integration is missing. We also had to do our own in-house integration with the Confluence. That is also something that they could add."
"Updating items, sorting, bulk updates—these things could have a bit more flexibility, but it's still possible to do them."
"We have some requests to beef up the manual testing abilities and the ability to report on testing progress. All the basics are there, but there's an issue of maintainability. For example... once you plan a test and it creates a run, more particularly a suite run, you can't edit the suite run afterward... That that is not realistic with how people work. Mistakes are made and people are humans and we change our minds about things. So the tool needs to allow for a bit more flexibility in that testing area, as well as some better widgets to report on progress."
"It would help us if ALM Octane got FedRAMP-certified, so our government departments could use the cloud solution. That way our external consultants could access it. We've created a URL to get to it, but if it were FedRAMP-certified and service and had support in the continental United States, that would be better."
"Security and security management, meaning the integration of the security, could be enhanced. We know about Fortify, but it would be better to have security features in the original Octane platform without the need for another solution or another application."
"The elements in filtering need to be improved, meaning the number of filters I can use in widgets or in the grid views in parallel. There's a limitation which bothers a lot of our users. Filtering in text, or having a complex filter is limited. In a given field, for example, I can use a filter only once. I cannot say, 'Include the values 1, 2, and 3, and exclude value 17.' This is not possible but we have requested it often."
"The limitation of Octane is that we can't do a release outside of the sprint. We can only plan the release in the sprint. With Agile and JIRA tools, we can plan the release outside the sprint and do a global release of all the projects from the sprint."
"There are some challenges when we want to integrate the tool with other products, and it takes time for a team to figure out how to do it."
More OpenText Software Delivery Management cons
"The user interface of Polarion ALM needs improvement as it can experience changes that disrupt workflows, especially during major updates."
"Test management lacks an automated process."
"The ease-of-use could be improved a little."
"The solution needs to improve its user experience and graphics."
"The solution can be improved by making it more user-friendly, and a server-based application rather than client based."
"Integration requires a lot of effort. You typically need to work with an implementation partner to get it done. Most connectors available for Polarion ALM are paid. Unlike other vendors offering several standard connectors for free, integrating third-party software with Polarion ALM involves discussing and coordinating with the third-party software providers, which requires effort."
"Based on my understanding, the tool's integration capabilities with multiple tools is an area of concern that Polarion needs to focus on more."
"The interface for this solution needs to be made more user-friendly to provide a better user experience."
More Polarion ALM cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would say that it is an affordable product. There is an annual service fee, which is one of the additional payments to be made apart from the standard licensing costs attached to the solution."
"The solution has reduced our testing costs."
"The cost of this product is very high."
"If you compare the price with the functionality, it is pretty much the same as other solutions. If you compare it to Jira, for instance, it has a lot more functionality. You don't need any plug-ins, but it's also more expensive. Once you start adding your different plug-ins to Jira, you'll probably end up with the same amount or more. There is also a yearly support cost, which is usually 25% of the initial cost of the license."
"I rate the tool's pricing an eight on a scale from one to ten, where ten is very expensive."
"ALM Octane is very expensive."
"It's pretty pricey, one of the most expensive ones on the market... The value depends on if you use all the features that it has. It comes with a lot of features. The difference between the license structure of ALM and Octane versus JIRA, is that you get everything with ALM and Octane... For JIRA, you buy the pieces one piece at a time."
"Pricing is the weakest point. It is expensive, but the tool has plenty of features. The main problem we have is that the pricing is very high compared to some other solutions."
More OpenText Software Delivery Management pricing and cost advice
"Our license for Polarion ALM is yearly. And it's not the cheapest tool that we've looked at. So if we had made our decision purely based on the licensing cost, we wouldn't have selected Polarion."
"It is an expensive product."
"The solution is expensive."
"You have to pay around 50-60 euros per user."
"Software for medical devices is always expensive."
"The license model is okay for large companies but would be quite expensive for smaller enterprises."
"If the pricing would come down and it was more affordable then we wouldn't have to switch."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
25%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Computer Software Company
11%
Government
8%
Manufacturing Company
26%
Computer Software Company
13%
Healthcare Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
4%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Is Jira better or would you go with Micro Focus ALM Octane?
Hi Netanya, Basically , it all depends on the use cases for your environment and the business needs. Hope the below data may be relevant to you for identifying your needs and deciding on the approp...
See all answers
What do you like most about Micro Focus ALM Octane?
The platform's most valuable feature is pipeline integration or continuous integration services.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus ALM Octane?
OpenText ALM Octane is an expensive product. However, it offsets costs by saving time and money, thus creating a balance between expenses and benefits. Our organization with over 1500 users sees sa...
See all answers
What do you like most about Polarion ALM?
It is a very stable solution.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Polarion ALM?
The user interface of Polarion ALM needs improvement as it can experience changes that disrupt workflows, especially during major updates. Sometimes, database migrations take too long, spanning two...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Polarion ALM?
As a manual tester, I use Polarion ALM ( /products/polarion-alm-reviews ) for our weekly builds validation. These builds are crucial as they eventually lead to final release builds for customers. I...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Jira vs OpenText Software Delivery Management Logo
Jira vs OpenText Software Delivery Management
Compared 46% of the time
OpenText Application Quality Management vs OpenText Software Delivery Management Logo
OpenText Application Quality Management vs OpenText Software Delivery Management
Compared 26% of the time
Microsoft Azure DevOps vs OpenText Software Delivery Management Logo
Microsoft Azure DevOps vs OpenText Software Delivery Management
Compared 8% of the time
Rally Software vs OpenText Software Delivery Management Logo
Rally Software vs OpenText Software Delivery Management
Compared 4% of the time
ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management vs OpenText Software Delivery Management Logo
ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management vs OpenText Software Delivery Management
Compared 2% of the time
More OpenText Software Delivery Management Competitors
Codebeamer vs Polarion ALM Logo
Codebeamer vs Polarion ALM
Compared 30% of the time
Jira vs Polarion ALM Logo
Jira vs Polarion ALM
Compared 23% of the time
Microsoft Azure DevOps vs Polarion ALM Logo
Microsoft Azure DevOps vs Polarion ALM
Compared 15% of the time
Jama Connect vs Polarion ALM Logo
Jama Connect vs Polarion ALM
Compared 8% of the time
More Polarion ALM Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
OpenText Software Delivery Management
June 2025
OpenText Software Delivery Management reportDownload OpenText Software Delivery Management product report
Buyer's Guide
Polarion ALM
June 2025
Polarion ALM reportDownload Polarion ALM product report
 

Also Known As

Micro Focus ALM Octane, Micro Focus Octane
No data available
 

Overview

OpenText Software Delivery Management provides application lifecycle management with Agile and Waterfall support. It features intuitive interfaces, CI/CD integration, automated testing, and robust reporting, improving project management efficiency and usability.

Designed to enhance teams' productivity and streamline processes, OpenText Software Delivery Management integrates seamlessly with Agile methodologies. Its comprehensive backlog and requirements management, user stories, and test management make it a complete tool for managing the development lifecycle. The platform aligns with DevOps, providing traceability and extensive customization options. Traceability from requirements to deployments is enhanced, making it easier for teams to track progress. It offers integration with popular tools like Jenkins and JIRA, ensuring a unified approach to continuous delivery and testing management.

What key features does OpenText Software Delivery Management include?
  • Versatile across browsers with consistent performance.
  • Seamless CI/CD integration for smooth development processes.
  • Intuitive interface aiding in efficiency and ease of use.
  • Comprehensive backlog management ensures organized prioritization.
  • Automated testing aligns with Agile and DevOps principles.
What benefits can users expect when evaluating OpenText Software Delivery Management?
  • Enhanced traceability from inception to delivery.
  • Improved project management efficiency through streamlined processes.
  • Robust reporting capabilities offering detailed insights.
  • Increased flexibility in customization enabling tailored experiences.
  • Predictive analytics for better decision-making.

OpenText Software Delivery Management is implemented across technology-focused industries, supporting Agile processes like requirements management and defect tracking. Organizations use it to standardize development workflows and optimize continuous delivery integration, choosing it for its ability to support both Agile and Waterfall methodologies within application lifecycle management.

OpenText

The world’s first 100% browser-based ALM enterprise solution, which enables seamless collaboration across disparate teams, multi-directionally linked work items, full traceability, accelerated productivity and automated proof of compliance.

Siemens
 

Sample Customers

Orange, Airbus, Haufe Group, Kellogg's, Claro, Bon Secours, World Wide Technology
Engineering Ingegneria Informatica, IBS AG, Zumtobel Group
Buyer's Guide
OpenText Software Delivery Management vs. Polarion ALM
May 2025
Free Report: OpenText Software Delivery Management vs. Polarion ALM
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Software Delivery Management vs. Polarion ALM and other solutions. Updated: May 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our OpenText Software Delivery Management vs. Polarion ALM report.

We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.