No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Pros & Cons summary

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.
Get the report

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

OpenText Software Delivery Management offers comprehensive integration of agile, requirements, test, and defects management, providing an all-in-one tool with full traceability.
The platform excels at backlog management, offering features such as release and sprint planning, plus a complete quality management module integrated with DevOps toolchains like Jenkins.
Octane enhances defect and reporting capabilities, allowing extensive customization, including integrated reports in Word and PDF formats with linked data.
The tool supports Agile-Waterfall hybrid methodologies, catering to varied project needs while offering superior reporting and audit capabilities.
Pipeline integration and CI/CD stack compatibility are highly valued features, supporting comprehensive agile project management.

CONS

OpenText Software Delivery Management lacks robust integration with Jira, causing complexity for users.
The release planning process in OpenText Software Delivery Management is cumbersome and cannot be managed outside of sprints, unlike Agile counterparts.
There are significant challenges with filtering capabilities in OpenText Software Delivery Management, limiting users' ability to use complex filters efficiently.
OpenText Software Delivery Management requires improvements in requirements management functionality to better support development processes.
There are resource-intensive setup requirements in OpenText Software Delivery Management, presenting barriers to implementation.
 

OpenText Software Delivery Management Pros review quotes

PE
Senior Test Automation Specialist at APG
Mar 11, 2025
The ability to generate audit evidence with a single click saves ten days of work for ten people, enabling them to focus on other tasks.
EH
Operational Manager at LMI
Jul 8, 2024
It is a very scalable solution.
JK
QA Engineer at Amadeus
Jun 10, 2024
The integration capability of ALM Octane was very straightforward. We had a supporting team, and they provided us with detailed documentation.
Learn what your peers think about OpenText Software Delivery Management. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2026.
893,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.
GeorgNauerz - PeerSpot reviewer
Managing Partner at Georg Nauerz Consulting
Nov 16, 2023
It is a very stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.
KS
Automation Architect at Capgemini
May 26, 2023
The most valuable feature of Micro Focus ALM Octane is the reports. We are able to do customization.
reviewer1644000 - PeerSpot reviewer
Executive Vice President at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Oct 25, 2023
The most valuable features of the solution are its ability to manage test scenarios, test results, and test automation, which are its primary functionalities.
Vindy Yonathan - PeerSpot reviewer
Assistant QA Manager at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Oct 5, 2022
The feature I found most valuable in Micro Focus ALM Octane is its ability to integrate with the CI/CD stack.
Steve-Roberts - PeerSpot reviewer
Manager at MFGS, Inc.
Jul 18, 2022
It’s easy to set up.
Alice MacNeil - PeerSpot reviewer
Director Quality Engineering at a retailer with 10,001+ employees
Jun 1, 2022
The dashboards and metric reporting are valuable features.
Jesper Halden - PeerSpot reviewer
Product and System manager at Tietoevry
May 9, 2022
The filtering options are very good once you learn them. The document reports are also valuable. You can create reports in Word and PDF formats. That's very useful.
 

OpenText Software Delivery Management Cons review quotes

PE
Senior Test Automation Specialist at APG
Mar 11, 2025
There is room for improvement in OpenText ALM Octane's flexibility. While it aims to be as flexible as possible for a large enterprise application, sometimes there are limitations that may not meet specific organizational needs.
EH
Operational Manager at LMI
Jul 8, 2024
The tool's price is high, making it an area where improvement is high.
JK
QA Engineer at Amadeus
Jun 10, 2024
Promoting it more could help a lot of projects.
Learn what your peers think about OpenText Software Delivery Management. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2026.
893,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.
GeorgNauerz - PeerSpot reviewer
Managing Partner at Georg Nauerz Consulting
Nov 16, 2023
I think the area of release management in the tool is an area of concern where improvements are required.
KS
Automation Architect at Capgemini
May 26, 2023
The solution should improve by adding scrum board-like functionality.
reviewer1644000 - PeerSpot reviewer
Executive Vice President at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Oct 25, 2023
There are some challenges when we want to integrate the tool with other products, and it takes time for a team to figure out how to do it.
Vindy Yonathan - PeerSpot reviewer
Assistant QA Manager at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Oct 5, 2022
Though Micro Focus ALM Octane doesn't have much of a bug, it lacks integration with some solutions. For example, my company has fairly new software, but it can't be integrated with Micro Focus ALM Octane, so integration with other software, particularly with less popular software, could be improved. Micro Focus ALM Octane also requires a lot of resources during its setup, and I find this another area for improvement. An additional feature I'd like to see in the next release of Micro Focus ALM Octane is the ability to customize the interface, especially when doing a manual test.
Steve-Roberts - PeerSpot reviewer
Manager at MFGS, Inc.
Jul 18, 2022
We’d like to see Platform One/Iron Bank compliant containers.
Alice MacNeil - PeerSpot reviewer
Director Quality Engineering at a retailer with 10,001+ employees
Jun 1, 2022
The reporting is lacking from a requirements matrix and a traceability perspective.
Jesper Halden - PeerSpot reviewer
Product and System manager at Tietoevry
May 9, 2022
Development of extensions or connections to GitHub actions could be better. Better integration with Azure DevOps would also help.