No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Pros & Cons summary

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.
Get the report

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

OpenText Software Delivery Management offers comprehensive integration of agile, requirements, test, and defects management, providing an all-in-one tool with full traceability.
The platform excels at backlog management, offering features such as release and sprint planning, plus a complete quality management module integrated with DevOps toolchains like Jenkins.
Octane enhances defect and reporting capabilities, allowing extensive customization, including integrated reports in Word and PDF formats with linked data.
The tool supports Agile-Waterfall hybrid methodologies, catering to varied project needs while offering superior reporting and audit capabilities.
Pipeline integration and CI/CD stack compatibility are highly valued features, supporting comprehensive agile project management.

CONS

OpenText Software Delivery Management lacks robust integration with Jira, causing complexity for users.
The release planning process in OpenText Software Delivery Management is cumbersome and cannot be managed outside of sprints, unlike Agile counterparts.
There are significant challenges with filtering capabilities in OpenText Software Delivery Management, limiting users' ability to use complex filters efficiently.
OpenText Software Delivery Management requires improvements in requirements management functionality to better support development processes.
There are resource-intensive setup requirements in OpenText Software Delivery Management, presenting barriers to implementation.
 

OpenText Software Delivery Management Pros review quotes

PE
Senior Test Automation Specialist at APG
Mar 11, 2025
The ability to generate audit evidence with a single click saves ten days of work for ten people, enabling them to focus on other tasks.
EH
Operational Manager at LMI
Jul 8, 2024
It is a very scalable solution.
GeorgNauerz - PeerSpot reviewer
Managing Partner at Georg Nauerz Consulting
Nov 16, 2023
It is a very stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.
Learn what your peers think about OpenText Software Delivery Management. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: June 2026.
900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.
reviewer1644000 - PeerSpot reviewer
Executive Vice President at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Oct 25, 2023
The most valuable features of the solution are its ability to manage test scenarios, test results, and test automation, which are its primary functionalities.
Steve-Roberts - PeerSpot reviewer
Manager at MFGS, Inc.
Jul 18, 2022
It’s easy to set up.
JK
QA Engineer at Amadeus
Jun 10, 2024
The integration capability of ALM Octane was very straightforward. We had a supporting team, and they provided us with detailed documentation.
JV
Technical Vice President at Dugson Consulting
Nov 30, 2023
The platform's most valuable feature is pipeline integration or continuous integration services.
KS
Automation Architect at Capgemini
May 26, 2023
The most valuable feature of Micro Focus ALM Octane is the reports. We are able to do customization.
Raghunathan Govindarajapuram - PeerSpot reviewer
Principal at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Apr 24, 2023
It is a very stable tool. The tool has been in the industry for so many years. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.
reviewer1996359 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Director, Global Project Management & Research at a non-profit with 11-50 employees
Nov 2, 2022
I like the fact that you can use it on top of Jira.
 

OpenText Software Delivery Management Cons review quotes

PE
Senior Test Automation Specialist at APG
Mar 11, 2025
There is room for improvement in OpenText ALM Octane's flexibility. While it aims to be as flexible as possible for a large enterprise application, sometimes there are limitations that may not meet specific organizational needs.
EH
Operational Manager at LMI
Jul 8, 2024
The tool's price is high, making it an area where improvement is high.
GeorgNauerz - PeerSpot reviewer
Managing Partner at Georg Nauerz Consulting
Nov 16, 2023
I think the area of release management in the tool is an area of concern where improvements are required.
Learn what your peers think about OpenText Software Delivery Management. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: June 2026.
900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.
reviewer1644000 - PeerSpot reviewer
Executive Vice President at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Oct 25, 2023
There are some challenges when we want to integrate the tool with other products, and it takes time for a team to figure out how to do it.
Steve-Roberts - PeerSpot reviewer
Manager at MFGS, Inc.
Jul 18, 2022
We’d like to see Platform One/Iron Bank compliant containers.
JK
QA Engineer at Amadeus
Jun 10, 2024
Promoting it more could help a lot of projects.
JV
Technical Vice President at Dugson Consulting
Nov 30, 2023
The product's requirements management feature needs enhancement in terms of functionality.
KS
Automation Architect at Capgemini
May 26, 2023
The solution should improve by adding scrum board-like functionality.
Raghunathan Govindarajapuram - PeerSpot reviewer
Principal at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Apr 24, 2023
Currently, Micro Focus ALM Octane is considered an old-world tool in the industry and lacks the perception of being a new-age tool among its customers.
reviewer1996359 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Director, Global Project Management & Research at a non-profit with 11-50 employees
Nov 2, 2022
I like their smart analytics; perhaps they should continue to expand and improve there because it's a fantastic start.