TFS and OpenText Software Delivery Management are major competitors in application lifecycle management tools. TFS holds an advantage due to its cost-effectiveness and robust integration with Visual Studio.
Features: TFS provides a comprehensive suite for managing the entire application lifecycle, including version control, source code management, and agile project management. Its integration with Visual Studio boosts collaboration and productivity. OpenText Software Delivery Management emphasizes complete Agile support, requirements management, and test automation, catering to complex and regulated industries.
Room for Improvement: TFS struggles with stability and customization during feature merging. Its Windows dependency may hinder use in diverse environments. OpenText Software Delivery Management's complexity and high cost can be prohibitive for smaller organizations, and it could benefit from enhanced integration and widget flexibility for reporting.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: TFS excels with versatile deployment options like on-premises, cloud, and hybrid, coupled with reliable customer support. OpenText Software Delivery Management offers multiple deployment choices but is often criticized for complexity, though praised for its excellent and responsive customer service.
Pricing and ROI: TFS is noted for its affordability within Microsoft’s ecosystem, providing significant ROI for large enterprises despite its higher expense compared to some competitors. OpenText Software Delivery Management's high licensing costs can deter smaller businesses but offer noteworthy productivity improvements in larger setups.
The ability to generate audit evidence with a single click saves ten days of work for ten people, enabling them to focus on other tasks.
Integrating TFS with Visual Studio and Azure Cloud has improved our development processes by providing better integration and reducing errors.
as a Microsoft product, it might have limited global documentation or support options compared to GitLab.
We can expand the number of servers and resources as required.
Its stability is lacking as we have encountered security leaks and glitches.
While it aims to be as flexible as possible for a large enterprise application, sometimes there are limitations that may not meet specific organizational needs.
TFS is not as fast, easy to use, or configurable as GitLab, despite moving into the cloud.
I am content with how TFS is structured now, particularly the Azure version.
OpenText ALM Octane is an expensive product.
Its ability to generate audit evidence with a single click is a significant advantage, as it saves considerable time and money compared to manual processes.
The integration with Azure DevOps also offers seamless functionality for CI/CD processes.
Makes it easier for me to create builds and release pipelines without needing to program YAML files.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| TFS | 3.7% |
| OpenText Software Delivery Management | 4.5% |
| Other | 91.8% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 32 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 17 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 25 |
| Large Enterprise | 64 |
OpenText Software Delivery Management provides application lifecycle management with Agile and Waterfall support. It features intuitive interfaces, CI/CD integration, automated testing, and robust reporting, improving project management efficiency and usability.
Designed to enhance teams' productivity and streamline processes, OpenText Software Delivery Management integrates seamlessly with Agile methodologies. Its comprehensive backlog and requirements management, user stories, and test management make it a complete tool for managing the development lifecycle. The platform aligns with DevOps, providing traceability and extensive customization options. Traceability from requirements to deployments is enhanced, making it easier for teams to track progress. It offers integration with popular tools like Jenkins and JIRA, ensuring a unified approach to continuous delivery and testing management.
What key features does OpenText Software Delivery Management include?OpenText Software Delivery Management is implemented across technology-focused industries, supporting Agile processes like requirements management and defect tracking. Organizations use it to standardize development workflows and optimize continuous delivery integration, choosing it for its ability to support both Agile and Waterfall methodologies within application lifecycle management.
Visual Studio’s Team Foundation Server (TFS) is a powerful application development lifecycle management solution. It aids developers in managing every aspect of their DevOps and application creation. TFS combines many different types of solutions into a single powerful platform.
Visual Studio TFS Benefits
Some of the ways that organizations can benefit by choosing to deploy TFS include:
Visual Studio TFS Features
Source code management. TFS comes with all of the tools that developers need to completely manage their source code. They can share their code so that multiple developers can work on the same project. Additionally, TFS enables them to do things like review the history of a particular piece of source code.
Reviews from Real Users
TFS is a highly effective solution that stands out when compared to many of its competitors. Two major advantages it offers are its source code management capabilities and its powerful integration suite.
Carl B., the vice president of engineering at Vertex Downhole Ltd, writes, “The most valuable features are related to source code management. Using TFS for source code management and being able to branch and have multiple developers work on the same projects is valuable. We can also branch and merge code back together.”
Ashish K., the principal consultant at Wipro, says, “I have found almost all of the features valuable because it integrates well with your Microsoft products. If a client is using the entire Microsoft platform, then TFS would be definitely preferable. It integrates with the digital studio development environment as well.”
We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
