Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
TFS Logo

Top 10 TFS Alternatives

Vendor: Microsoft
4.0 out of 5
Leave a review

Top TFS Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to TFS based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include OpenText Application Quality Management, Jira, and Codebeamer. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

TFS surpasses its competitors by offering robust version control, agile project management, and seamless integration with Azure, providing a comprehensive suite for streamlined development, improved collaboration, and enhanced productivity for software teams.

Microsoft Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Microsoft, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
TFS Logo
TFS Logo
OpenText Application Quality Management
4.0 out of 5
TFS excels in seamless integration with Microsoft environments, offering agile usability and strong project management. In comparison, OpenText provides extensive lifecycle management with centralized testing but may appear less intuitive, appealing to enterprises with complex testing needs despite its high cost.
Download OpenText Application Quality Management vs. TFS Report
TFS has a competitive initial setup cost, while OpenText Application Quality Management often incurs higher upfront expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
TFS has a competitive initial setup cost, while OpenText Application Quality Management often incurs higher upfront expenses.
TFS Logo
Jira
4.1 out of 5
TFS Logo
Jira
4.1 out of 5
TFS provides a comprehensive ALM tool with strong Visual Studio integration, appealing to those seeking end-to-end lifecycle management. In comparison, Jira's robust bug tracking and configurable agile management attract users needing flexibility and cost-effective solutions with extensive public and private cloud deployment options.
Download Jira vs. TFS Report
TFS offers competitive setup costs, focusing on enterprise solutions, whereas Jira's setup cost generally caters to agile teams, highlighting key pricing differences between the two.
View comparison
Pricing
TFS offers competitive setup costs, focusing on enterprise solutions, whereas Jira's setup cost generally caters to agile teams, highlighting key pricing differences between the two.
TFS Logo
Codebeamer
3.9 out of 5
TFS Logo
Codebeamer
3.9 out of 5
TFS excels with end-to-end lifecycle management, integrating well with Visual Studio, but is Windows-bound and can improve in usability and third-party integrations. In comparison, Codebeamer offers full traceability and compliance for regulatory industries, needing enhancements in interface and network compatibility.
Download Codebeamer vs. TFS Report
TFS has a lower setup cost compared to Codebeamer, which has a more expensive initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
TFS has a lower setup cost compared to Codebeamer, which has a more expensive initial investment.
TFS Logo
Polarion ALM
3.9 out of 5
TFS Logo
Polarion ALM
3.9 out of 5
TFS excels with seamless Visual Studio integration and ALM capabilities, ideal for comprehensive project management. In comparison, Polarion ALM focuses on robust requirements engineering and traceability. TFS offers value within Microsoft's ecosystem, while Polarion suits teams requiring advanced documentation control and collaboration.
Download Polarion ALM vs. TFS Report
TFS setup costs are lower and straightforward, whereas Polarion ALM setup costs are higher and more complex.
View comparison
Pricing
TFS setup costs are lower and straightforward, whereas Polarion ALM setup costs are higher and more complex.
TFS Logo
Eggplant Test
4.0 out of 5
TFS Logo
Eggplant Test
4.0 out of 5
TFS is valued for its integration with Microsoft tools and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, Eggplant Test excels in advanced automation and AI-driven testing, justifying its higher setup costs. A tech buyer may choose TFS for affordability or Eggplant Test for superior automation capabilities.
Download Eggplant Test vs. TFS Report
TFS has a lower setup cost compared to Eggplant Test, making it a more budget-friendly option.
View comparison
Pricing
TFS has a lower setup cost compared to Eggplant Test, making it a more budget-friendly option.
TFS Logo
Rally Software
4.0 out of 5
TFS Logo
Rally Software
4.0 out of 5
TFS excels in ALM, version control, and integration with Microsoft tools, appealing to those in a Microsoft environment. In comparison, Rally Software focuses on agile planning with strong Scrum and Kanban support, ideal for large teams needing flexible planning features.
Download Rally Software vs. TFS Report
TFS offers a lower setup cost compared to Rally Software, providing a cost-effective option for budget-conscious teams, while Rally Software, with its higher setup cost, provides advanced functionalities that may appeal to larger enterprises.
View comparison
Pricing
TFS offers a lower setup cost compared to Rally Software, providing a cost-effective option for budget-conscious teams, while Rally Software, with its higher setup cost, provides advanced functionalities that may appeal to larger enterprises.
TFS Logo
Jama Connect
3.8 out of 5
TFS Logo
Jama Connect
3.8 out of 5
TFS is ideal for teams in a Microsoft ecosystem with its integration capabilities and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, Jama Connect provides comprehensive requirements management and traceability, making it suitable for industries demanding detailed documentation and compliance-focused features.
Download Jama Connect vs. TFS Report
TFS setup cost is minimal compared to Jama Connect, which has higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
TFS setup cost is minimal compared to Jama Connect, which has higher initial expenses.
TFS Logo
TFS Logo
OpenText Software Delivery Management
4.1 out of 5
TFS offers strong integration with Visual Studio, making it ideal for Microsoft-heavy environments, especially for those needing agile project management. In comparison, OpenText Software Delivery Management provides richer out-of-the-box functionality, appealing to buyers seeking comprehensive solutions for Agile and DevOps processes.
Download OpenText Software Delivery Management vs. TFS Report
TFS offers a low setup cost, contrasting with OpenText Software Delivery Management, which incurs a higher initial expense.
View comparison
Pricing
TFS offers a low setup cost, contrasting with OpenText Software Delivery Management, which incurs a higher initial expense.
TFS Logo
PTC Integrity
3.7 out of 5
TFS Logo
PTC Integrity
3.7 out of 5
PTC Integrity is preferred for its strong change management, version control, and traceability, suitable for complex projects and high compliance needs. In comparison, TFS appeals with its flexibility, integration with Microsoft services, and cloud-based deployment, ideal for faster and scalable solutions.
Download PTC Integrity vs. TFS Report
PTC Integrity setup cost is notably higher compared to TFS, highlighting a significant pricing difference. TFS offers more budget-friendly setup costs, making it a more economical choice for initial implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
PTC Integrity setup cost is notably higher compared to TFS, highlighting a significant pricing difference. TFS offers more budget-friendly setup costs, making it a more economical choice for initial implementation.
TFS Logo
Tricentis qTest
4.2 out of 5
TFS Logo
Tricentis qTest
4.2 out of 5
TFS provides strong integration within Microsoft's ecosystem, valuable for those invested in Microsoft tools, but lacks advanced test automation and reporting. In comparison, Tricentis qTest excels in automation and comprehensive management, although it needs better integration and a more user-friendly interface.
Download TFS vs. Tricentis qTest Report
TFS has an affordable setup cost while Tricentis qTest offers a more comprehensive suite at a higher initial expense.
View comparison
Pricing
TFS has an affordable setup cost while Tricentis qTest offers a more comprehensive suite at a higher initial expense.
TFS Logo
TestRail
4.0 out of 5
TFS Logo
TestRail
4.0 out of 5
TFS excels in integration with development environments, while TestRail is superior in test management and reporting. In comparison, TestRail offers customizable workflows and flexibility. TFS has a more complex deployment but strong customer service, whereas TestRail features easier deployment. TFS has a lower initial cost, but TestRail offers higher ROI.
Download TFS vs. TestRail Report
TFS has notably lower setup costs compared to TestRail, which is reflected in user reviews indicating TFS as a budget-friendly option.
View comparison
Pricing
TFS has notably lower setup costs compared to TestRail, which is reflected in user reviews indicating TFS as a budget-friendly option.
TFS Logo
Helix ALM
3.2 out of 5
TFS Logo
Helix ALM
3.2 out of 5
TFS appeals with robust version control and integrated development environment. In comparison, Helix ALM excels in advanced traceability and requirements management. TFS offers cost-effectiveness and smoother deployment, while Helix ALM, despite higher costs and complexity, delivers substantial ROI and comprehensive features.
Download Helix ALM vs. TFS Report
TFS has a higher setup cost, whereas Helix ALM offers a more affordable initial expense.
View comparison
Pricing
TFS has a higher setup cost, whereas Helix ALM offers a more affordable initial expense.
TFS Logo
Digital.ai Agility
4.3 out of 5
TFS Logo
Digital.ai Agility
4.3 out of 5
TFS offers robust integration with Microsoft tools, ideal for development-focused organizations. In comparison, Digital.ai Agility excels in agile planning and tracking, appealing to businesses prioritizing adaptability. TFS benefits from Microsoft infrastructure, while Digital.ai Agility provides flexible deployment options and agile support.
Download Digital.ai Agility vs. TFS Report
TFS setup costs are typically lower, offering a straightforward onboarding process, while Digital.ai Agility may involve higher initial expenses but provides more comprehensive customization options.
View comparison
Pricing
TFS setup costs are typically lower, offering a straightforward onboarding process, while Digital.ai Agility may involve higher initial expenses but provides more comprehensive customization options.
TFS Logo
Zephyr Enterprise
3.8 out of 5
TFS Logo
Zephyr Enterprise
3.8 out of 5
TFS excels in integration with development environments and version control, while Zephyr Enterprise offers comprehensive test management features and advanced analytics. In comparison, TFS has scalable reporting capabilities, and Zephyr Enterprise handles extensive datasets more effectively, offering a feature-rich solution for large test teams.
Download TFS vs. Zephyr Enterprise Report
TFS has a significantly lower setup cost than Zephyr Enterprise, which presents a higher initial investment requirement.
View comparison
Pricing
TFS has a significantly lower setup cost than Zephyr Enterprise, which presents a higher initial investment requirement.
TFS Logo
Atlassian ALM
3.8 out of 5
TFS Logo
Atlassian ALM
3.8 out of 5
TFS attracts those in the Microsoft ecosystem with its cost-effective integration and development tools. In comparison, Atlassian ALM offers adaptability with strong project management and issue tracking, appealing to organizations seeking flexibility and scalability across platforms with comprehensive cloud-based support.
Download Atlassian ALM vs. TFS Report
TFS requires a higher initial setup cost, while Atlassian ALM offers a more budget-friendly setup option, highlighting a significant cost difference between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
TFS requires a higher initial setup cost, while Atlassian ALM offers a more budget-friendly setup option, highlighting a significant cost difference between the two solutions.
TFS Logo
TFS Logo
Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer
4.0 out of 5
TFS excels in integration with Microsoft tools and offers customization options. In comparison, Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer provides extensive test case generation and requirement traceability. TFS is cost-effective while Broadcom, though pricier, offers advanced features and higher productivity gains.
Download Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer vs. TFS Report
TFS has a lower setup cost compared to Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer, which has a higher initial investment for configuration.
View comparison
Pricing
TFS has a lower setup cost compared to Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer, which has a higher initial investment for configuration.
TFS Logo
TFS Logo
Cognizant ADPART
1 out of 5

Cognizant ADPART is a Model-based testing product that enables organization get their products business ready 30% faster and ensure 100% quality coverage. 

View comparison
TFS Logo
TFS Logo
Zeenyx AscentialTest
4.7 out of 5
TFS provides an integrated ALM solution with strong version control, making it ideal for comprehensive project management. In comparison, Zeenyx AscentialTest excels in test automation, enhancing productivity with easy test creation and maintenance. TFS offers a broad toolset, while Zeenyx focuses on automation capabilities.
Download TFS vs. Zeenyx AscentialTest Report
TFS has a lower setup cost, while Zeenyx AscentialTest's setup cost is higher, emphasizing its comprehensive feature set.
View comparison
Pricing
TFS has a lower setup cost, while Zeenyx AscentialTest's setup cost is higher, emphasizing its comprehensive feature set.
TFS Logo
Rocket Aldon
1 out of 5
TFS Logo
Rocket Aldon
1 out of 5

Software enhances your business. Rocket® Aldon® solutions provide the tools and infrastructure you need to automate everything from the moment a change request comes in until a solution is delivered to production, as well as automate compliance reporting and audit tracking.

View comparison

Related categories

Test Management Tools
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
Quality Management Software