Polarion ALM vs TFS comparison

Siemens and Microsoft are both solutions in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category. Siemens is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.4, while Microsoft is ranked #9 with an average rating of 7.4. Siemens holds a 6.1% mindshare in ALM, compared to Microsoft’s 3.7% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Siemens users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Polarion ALM

Read 24 Polarion ALM reviews

3,475 Views
3,197 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

TFS

Read 99 TFS reviews

3,574 Views
2,645 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Polarion ALM

TFS

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

TFS and Polarion ALM compete in application lifecycle management. TFS offers a more integrated experience with Visual Studio, providing it with the upper hand in environments already using Microsoft tools.

Features: TFS is valued for its end-to-end application lifecycle management capabilities, seamless integration with Visual Studio, and agile project management features. It offers robust source control options and is highly scalable and configurable. Polarion ALM is praised for its effective requirement management, superior test and quality management, and exceptional traceability. It provides a structured system that aids in verification and validation, which benefits projects requiring high-level traceability and compliance.

Room for Improvement: TFS users suggest enhancements in stability, merging features, and administration tools, while highlighting issues with build definition management and agile integration challenges. Polarion ALM needs better reporting capabilities, improved integration with third-party tools, and streamlined task management. Its configuration could be simplified for enhanced user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: TFS supports deployment on-premises, hybrid, and public cloud, offering flexibility tailored to various organizational needs. Its extensive online community often supplements Microsoft's technical support, though response times can vary. Polarion ALM allows deployment in both private and public clouds. However, integration challenges might require external help, pointing to potential improvements in technical assistance.

Pricing and ROI: TFS is considered cost-effective for users integrating it with Visual Studio, though it entails relatively high licensing fees. Organizations report notable ROI due to increased productivity and workflow efficiency. Polarion ALM has a higher price point, which might deter smaller enterprises. Its value lies in extensive functionality, though additional expenses for integrations or plugins add to the cost.

To learn more, read our detailed Polarion ALM vs. TFS Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Polarion ALM vs. TFS

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,733 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Polarion ALM

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

5th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (6th)

TFS

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

9th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Management Tools (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category, the mindshare of Polarion ALM is 6.1%, down from 7.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TFS is 3.7%, down from 4.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Polarion ALM	6.1%
TFS	3.7%
Other	90.2%

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

Featured Reviews

LasseMikkonen

CEO at byte

Has provided mature traceability and configuration features while supporting complex product development for mid-to-large companies

Polarion ALM can learn from Atlassian tools a lot, as the usability is not the best, and it is really narrowly focused on requirements management only. For example, if you want to do testing and test result management with it, it is very limited. Jama Connect has similar limitations, and both should really focus on developing the integrations and extendability. For example, Jama Connect does not even have an extension marketplace, whereas Polarion has a small one. However, compared to the Atlassian Marketplace where you can get whatever applications for whatever price, it is a totally different ballgame. I would highly recommend Polarion ALM add more AI features to it. I know they have started to do something, but for example, I have been developing widgets for IBM DOORS Next, AI widgets, so that you can write and analyze requirements with the AI, and I have also done the same for Jira, creating a couple of Jira applications in the marketplace as well.

Read full review

Parvez Shaikh

Service delivery manager at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

Ensures team collaboration with strong version control but could improve testing capabilities

Version control is the most basic feature in TFS. It has been there since the beginning. We use it primarily for that purpose. Basically ensuring that the code is not overwritten by other team members and maintaining the sanctity of the code. Bringing order to a disparate team which is virtual at different locations is very important, and TFS provides that control. Once you update a code, nobody can modify it until you are done working on it and check in. It is a great product that revolutionized the way teams work together on Microsoft pieces of code. The versioning part has unique features and capabilities which are unmatched with other products out there.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It offers good performance."

"We had a nice experience with technical support."

"The tool's most valuable feature is its browser experience. I rate its traceability feature a ten out of ten. From the initial stage to the release, you can manage everything through a single point."

"The features I find the most valuable are requirement tracking and schematics."

"The solution offers good integration."

"The initial setup of this solution was straightforward, and there were not too many problems with it."

"Polarion ALM delivers both document views and table views simultaneously and organizes configurations according to norms and standards."

"You can see the work ticket and you can circulate that within the teams. You can define your flows, customize according to your needs, and you can create dashboards and create the reports according to your needs."

More Polarion ALM pros

"The solution's iteration board is good because you can track all your work with it."

"It is a stable solution."

"What I like the most is that you can set permissions on just one folder."

"It is easy to push our changes from quality to pre-prod and prod."

"The solution is very much stable."

"From the project management perspective, the tool is efficiently managing teams by giving management information, such as reports, graphs, velocity, capacity, etc."

"Team Foundation Server (TFS) is easy to use, and we have a complete trail and traceability. We also like the access control part."

"Once TFS is installed, there are no major issues."

More TFS pros

Cons

"The most important thing for them to improve should be platform-independent features. They should also provide extensive pipelines and release pipelines that we can define and we can work on."

"The ease-of-use could be improved a little."

"As Polarion ALM is a development-oriented tool, easy support or easy access is provided by default, but if I want to use detailed features, I need to write the script, particularly the VM script, and this is its area for improvement. I want Polarion ALM to have a graphical user interface that doesn't need scripting. In the next release of the tool, I'd like for it to not require scripting and programming because needing to run script language is time-consuming."

"Technical support needs some improvement."

"The weak point of Polarion ALM software is about reporting and time for extraction of the data...The quality of reporting needs to improve."

"The solution's editing capabilities need improvement."

"The configuration aspect of the solution is not easy. A person needs a lot of programming knowledge in order to successfully handle the job."

"I also recently suggested that CMS consider incorporating generative artificial intelligence into the system."

More Polarion ALM cons

"Since the TFS was an on-prem solution, the private network accessibility was restricted."

"The dashboard needs more enhancements."

"The program and portfolio planning facility can be improved."

"They have room for improvement in merging the source code changes for multiple developers across files. It is very good at highlighting the changes that the source code automatically does not know how to handle, but it's not very good at reporting the ones that it did automatically. There are times when we have source code that gets merged, and we lose the changes that we expected to happen. It can get a little confusing at times. They can just do a little bit better on the merging of changes for multiple developers."

"There are glitches, such as runners getting stuck, deployments generating errors, and it's becoming outdated."

"Integration from Visual Studio could be improved."

"Currently, we are looking for a solution with which we can incorporate third-party development sites or third-party project teams into the system. Because it is on-premise, it is a bit problematic because we need to have a VPN or something else in the system. A cloud-based solution would be better for us, and that's what we are looking for. Our biggest problem is the external connection, which, of course, is limited by our own IT. It would be good to have some kind of publishing service for this external connection. It might be there, and it might be that our IT is making it impossible for us. Its template editor could be easier to use. Currently, customizing the project templates according to your needs requires some work."

"The product access management features and connectivity need improvement. Rights management is also complex and could be simplified."

More TFS cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is expensive."

"If the pricing would come down and it was more affordable then we wouldn't have to switch."

"Software for medical devices is always expensive."

"You have to pay around 50-60 euros per user."

"Our license for Polarion ALM is yearly. And it's not the cheapest tool that we've looked at. So if we had made our decision purely based on the licensing cost, we wouldn't have selected Polarion."

"It is an expensive product."

"The license model is okay for large companies but would be quite expensive for smaller enterprises."

"There are different prices depending on the configurations. There is a free version available. There is no extra cost for the solution. However, the hardware could be something that needs to be considered."

"There is a yearly licensing fee that needs to be paid."

"We pay for the license yearly."

"The price of the solution is cheaper than other competitors and it is a per-user license."

"TFS is more competitively priced than some other solutions."

"We are using the open-source version."

"I wouldn't say that this tool is cheap or expensive but in the middle."

"I was working with the engineering team, and that was not under my umbrella. From what I can remember, its license was yearly. They had the licenses on a per-user basis, and they included MTM."

More TFS pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

29%

Computer Software Company

11%

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Marketing Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	12

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	25
Large Enterprise	64

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Polarion ALM?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Polarion ALM?

We are in our product development using Polarion ALM's functionalities. I am a power user, partly responsible for configuring the tool. We are using it for many things. The idea was to go for a req...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Polarion ALM?

The pricing of Polarion ALM and IBM ELM is pretty much aligned. They are not at the same level, but I would say aligned according to the capabilities of the tools, with DOORS being more expensive b...

See all answers

Which is better - TFS or Azure DevOps?

TFS and Azure DevOps are different in many ways. TFS was designed for admins, and only offers incremental improvements. In addition, TFS seems complicated to use and I don’t think it has a very fri...

See all answers

What do you like most about TFS?

Microsoft's technical team is supportive.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for TFS?

While I do not know the exact pricing, TFS is likely more expensive than GitLab.

See all answers

Comparisons

Codebeamer vs Polarion ALM

Compared 27% of the time

Jira vs Polarion ALM

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs Polarion ALM

Compared 11% of the time

Jama Connect vs Polarion ALM

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Application Quality Management vs Polarion ALM

Compared 3% of the time

More Polarion ALM Competitors

Jira vs TFS

Compared 15% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs TFS

Compared 14% of the time

TestRail vs TFS

Compared 6% of the time

OpenText Application Quality Management vs TFS

Compared 5% of the time

OpenText Software Delivery Management vs TFS

Compared 4% of the time

More TFS Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Polarion ALM

January 2026

Download Polarion ALM product report

Buyer's Guide

TFS

January 2026

Download TFS product report

Also Known As

No data available

Team Foundation Server

Overview

The world’s first 100% browser-based ALM enterprise solution, which enables seamless collaboration across disparate teams, multi-directionally linked work items, full traceability, accelerated productivity and automated proof of compliance.

Siemens

Visual Studio’s Team Foundation Server (TFS) is a powerful application development lifecycle management solution. It aids developers in managing every aspect of their DevOps and application creation. TFS combines many different types of solutions into a single powerful platform.

Visual Studio TFS Benefits

Some of the ways that organizations can benefit by choosing to deploy TFS include:

Build automation. TFS enables users to create definitions that can easily automate any and all tasks that are critical to the development of their applications. Businesses can utilize features that are built into TFS to accomplish preset tasks that can help them create the application of their choice. This can include enabling them to run automated tests when the need arises. Additionally, users can create custom tasks that will run automatically and allow users to focus their attention on the areas that most demand their focus.

Security. TFS is designed with the security of a user’s DevOps in mind. It enables an organization to restrict user permissions so that only developers that are meant to have access to particular parts of the development process can perform tasks related to those sections. It segments the development process to reduce the possibility of sensitive data being stolen.

Enables product rollbacks. TFS keeps copies of past versions of the organization’s application. Users can sift through the different versions that are available and can redeploy the version that best fits their needs should it ever become necessary to do so.

Visual Studio TFS Features

Source code management. TFS comes with all of the tools that developers need to completely manage their source code. They can share their code so that multiple developers can work on the same project. Additionally, TFS enables them to do things like review the history of a particular piece of source code.
Project management. Organizations can leverage the wealth of project management features that TFS offers and ensure that their projects run as smoothly as possible. Project managers are able to use TFS to control every aspect of their project, from the planning stage until the application’s development has reached its conclusion.

Reporting. TFS enables users to generate reports that leverage critical metrics and provide them with important insights into the applications that they are creating. These comprehensive reports can be secured so that only users with the proper level of clearance can access them.

Reviews from Real Users

TFS is a highly effective solution that stands out when compared to many of its competitors. Two major advantages it offers are its source code management capabilities and its powerful integration suite.

Carl B., the vice president of engineering at Vertex Downhole Ltd, writes, “The most valuable features are related to source code management. Using TFS for source code management and being able to branch and have multiple developers work on the same projects is valuable. We can also branch and merge code back together.”

Ashish K., the principal consultant at Wipro, says, “I have found almost all of the features valuable because it integrates well with your Microsoft products. If a client is using the entire Microsoft platform, then TFS would be definitely preferable. It integrates with the digital studio development environment as well.”

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Engineering Ingegneria Informatica, IBS AG, Zumtobel Group

Vendex KBB IT Services, Info Support, Fujitsu Consulting, TCSC, Airways New Zealand, HP

Buyer's Guide

Polarion ALM vs. TFS

February 2026

Free Report: Polarion ALM vs. TFS

Find out what your peers are saying about Polarion ALM vs. TFS and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Polarion ALM vs. TFS report.

See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.

We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.