PTC Integrity vs TFS comparison

PTC and Microsoft are both solutions in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category. PTC is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.5, while Microsoft is ranked #5 with an average rating of 7.7. PTC holds a 4.3% mindshare in ALM, compared to Microsoft’s 4.1% mindshare. Additionally, 68% of PTC users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

PTC Integrity

Read 13 PTC Integrity reviews

1,975 Views
1,555 Comparison Views

68% willing to recommend

TFS

Read 98 TFS reviews

5,239 Views
2,488 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

PTC Integrity

TFS

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

PTC Integrity and TFS are competing in application lifecycle management and project collaboration. TFS is favored for its integration capabilities and flexibility, while PTC Integrity is renowned for its reliability and advanced change management features.

Features: PTC Integrity offers excellent configuration management, traceability, and is suited for stringent control environments. Its advanced change management ensures reliable operations. TFS provides strong integration within the Microsoft ecosystem, DevOps capabilities, and supports agile development. Its flexibility and seamless Visual Studio integration make it ideal for diverse environments.

Room for Improvement: PTC Integrity's user interface could be modernized and simplified for easier navigation. Integration with third-party tools might be limited. Users may face a learning curve due to complex configurations. TFS could enhance its test management usability without costly licensing. Reporting depth could be improved to offer more detailed insights. Simplifying deployment configurations further would cater to less experienced users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: PTC Integrity is recognized for stable deployments in complex environments and is supported by reliable customer service. TFS offers flexible cloud and on-premise options, benefiting from extensive documentation and community support. Its deployment options cater to various organizational needs.

Pricing and ROI: PTC Integrity demands a higher upfront investment, justified by its advanced features, offering long-term ROI for compliance-heavy industries. TFS features scalable pricing, enabling quicker ROI through existing infrastructure and enhanced integration efficiencies. TFS appeals to cost-conscious buyers seeking robust features at manageable costs.

To learn more, read our detailed PTC Integrity vs. TFS Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

PTC Integrity vs. TFS

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 851,604 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

PTC Integrity

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

13th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

TFS

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

5th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Management Tools (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category, the mindshare of PTC Integrity is 4.3%, up from 3.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TFS is 4.1%, down from 7.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

Featured Reviews

Neha Wanjari

Technical Lead at KPIT Technologies

Helps to create tasks, change requests and documentation

I personally like PTC Integrity because it provides everything within the software. You can store and access your data and perform various tasks. Compared to other products, I find it user-friendly, which can sometimes feel complex. I think PTC Integrity is user-friendly, making it nice to use. The tool is easier to learn. The tool has a dashboard that details our projects and products, including the number of tasks, change requests, and their statuses (incomplete or complete). Having all this data within the solution makes collaborating easy for our project team. Unlike using multiple tools, having everything we need in one software platform is convenient. I rate the tool's user experience and interface a nine point five out of ten.

Read full review

Pmurki@Micron.Com Praveen

VP & GM, Client Storage at Micron Technology

Version control is excellent and good for code review, branching, merging strategies and more

I've worked with TFS for source control and Agile project management. We also used TFS for seamless team collaboration and tracking. I used TFS for a couple of years. Now, we use Azure DevOps. It's a wonderful tool for source control and CI/CD pipelines It's a really valuable tool for…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is traceability starting from the requirements until the end of a project."

"I personally like PTC Integrity because it provides everything within the software. You can store and access your data and perform various tasks. Compared to other products, I find it user-friendly, which can sometimes feel complex. I think PTC Integrity is user-friendly, making it nice to use. The tool is easier to learn."

"The solution is flexible in terms of customization. You can bend and reformat it in many ways. You can also customize the APIs and public functions."

"I have found that previously, the OEM sector was managing everything, possibly manually. However, with the introduction of the product, it has become much easier for customers to handle their products. Previously, customers were using different software to manage their products. However, PTC Integrity offers a solution for requirements management, test management, and even development to support live ticket management. So instead of using multiple software tools, we can use it for all these purposes."

"The most valuable feature of PTC Integrity is its integration with our existing PTC tools, especially for drawing release activities."

"PTC Integrity has good stability."

"Complete traceability as per process requirements."

"We have been using it because it gives certain abilities in the automotive industry, such as auditing or keeping track of information."

More PTC Integrity pros

"Microsoft's technical team is supportive."

"Version Control: TFS offers both the centralized “TFVC” version control technology as well as the distributed “Git” version control technology."

"TFS' most valuable feature is the triage process. It is a robust solution that is easy to use."

"The most valuable feature of TFS is its compatibility with Microsoft Windows systems. We have predominantly Microsoft solutions and TFS work well."

"The most valuable feature of TFS is integration."

"Stability is okay."

"The initial setup was straightforward: creating a new project, importing code, and setting up branches."

"From the project management perspective, the tool is efficiently managing teams by giving management information, such as reports, graphs, velocity, capacity, etc."

More TFS pros

Cons

"I would like to see better integration from the architectural side."

"The user-friendliness of PTC Integrity can be improved. The interface is not intuitive for first-time users and takes time to get accustomed to."

"To be honest, the third controller system is kind of old. There are lots of transactional changes that have not been implemented in PTC. If you have a larger project, for example, whenever you give bits and need to change 10,000 files you can just commit them. But here the work style is a little more file based, so you'll have to take care of almost all the files individually. It's not a single commit like you do here, but rather you have to allocate time for each component or file that you want to check in or commit. That's a very big issue."

"From my experience over the years, I believe there might be room for improvement in PTC Integrity. While it's already a good product, it tends to be slower than other software. When it becomes bulky, it slows down even more, sometimes leading to crashes or hangs that require restarting the computer before being able to use PTC Integrity again. This has been my experience multiple times."

"The web version does not have all the functionalities of the non-web version. Administration and adding/removing fields, etc. cannot be done on the web version. People want solutions that are compatible with Android. I also want to have a version by which I can bulk edit all the fields."

"For complex businesses, the internal templates could have more flexibility and compatibility."

"There are not enough reports. People would like to see something similar to what is available in JIRA."

"The tool's web-based UI needs improvement. Some functionalities don't work yet, and querying items is slow. Also, it's not in the cloud yet. I don't know if they'll do it in the future because they already have core agreements with customers. If they offer these functionalities, customers will likely buy their product."

More PTC Integrity cons

"The usability of TFS is not that great."

"The price could be cheaper."

"TFS on-premise does not support integration with SharePoint Online."

"The manageability and performance of the product are areas of concern where improvements are required."

"There should be management of the project built-in."

"The test management interface is not very handy."

"There are many things that I cannot do, and I have a lot of bugs."

"TFS and MTM have their own style of working and they are different from other tools like Jira or TestRail, which are simpler and easy to use."

More TFS cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is expensive."

"It is pretty expensive compared to other project management tools."

"There is a yearly licensing fee that needs to be paid."

"The tool's licensing costs are yearly."

"Microsoft products are always expensive. Obviously, they are quality products, but it would be helpful if there was a reduction in price. But compared to other vendors, I think the cost is high."

"I believe we pay on a yearly basis. I don't know the current costs of them. We outsource all that to a third party. Each of the developers gets a Microsoft Visual Studio Azure DevOps license, which gives them access to the TFS server as well. We probably pay on average about 1,800 Canadian Dollars a year for every developer, but that covers a lot more than just TFS."

"We are using the open-source version."

"Use the Microsoft recommended “seat-based” licensing model. This allows a single developer with multiple machines to consume only one client license."

"TFS is expensive, and the licensing costs are yearly. I rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten."

More TFS pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

27%

Computer Software Company

18%

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

Educational Organization

66%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about PTC Integrity?

I have found that previously, the OEM sector was managing everything, possibly manually. However, with the introduction of the product, it has become much easier for customers to handle their produ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PTC Integrity?

PTC Integrity is expensive, but it is cheaper compared to IBM Rational. The comparative affordability in pricing is an advantage.

See all answers

What needs improvement with PTC Integrity?

The user-friendliness of PTC Integrity can be improved. The interface is not intuitive for first-time users and takes time to get accustomed to. A more straightforward and intuitive interface would...

See all answers

Which is better - TFS or Azure DevOps?

TFS and Azure DevOps are different in many ways. TFS was designed for admins, and only offers incremental improvements. In addition, TFS seems complicated to use and I don’t think it has a very fri...

See all answers

What do you like most about TFS?

Microsoft's technical team is supportive.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for TFS?

While I do not know the exact pricing, TFS is likely more expensive than GitLab.

See all answers

Comparisons

Codebeamer vs PTC Integrity

Compared 59% of the time

Polarion ALM vs PTC Integrity

Compared 13% of the time

Jira vs PTC Integrity

Compared 8% of the time

IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) vs PTC Integrity

Compared 7% of the time

More PTC Integrity Competitors

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs TFS

Compared 28% of the time

Jira vs TFS

Compared 23% of the time

Rally Software vs TFS

Compared 8% of the time

TestRail vs TFS

Compared 8% of the time

Visual Studio Test Professional vs TFS

Compared 2% of the time

More TFS Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

PTC Integrity

May 2025

Download PTC Integrity product report

Buyer's Guide

TFS

March 2025

Download TFS product report

Also Known As

MKS

Team Foundation Server

Overview

The PTC Integrity Software Suite provides a comprehensive set of Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) and Systems Engineering capabilities that enable cross-discipline collaboration, improve time-to-market, streamline compliance, and reduce product risk. Simplify the complexity involved in developing today's complex engineered and smart, connected products.

PTC

Visual Studio’s Team Foundation Server (TFS) is a powerful application development lifecycle management solution. It aids developers in managing every aspect of their DevOps and application creation. TFS combines many different types of solutions into a single powerful platform.

Visual Studio TFS Benefits

Some of the ways that organizations can benefit by choosing to deploy TFS include:

Build automation. TFS enables users to create definitions that can easily automate any and all tasks that are critical to the development of their applications. Businesses can utilize features that are built into TFS to accomplish preset tasks that can help them create the application of their choice. This can include enabling them to run automated tests when the need arises. Additionally, users can create custom tasks that will run automatically and allow users to focus their attention on the areas that most demand their focus.

Security. TFS is designed with the security of a user’s DevOps in mind. It enables an organization to restrict user permissions so that only developers that are meant to have access to particular parts of the development process can perform tasks related to those sections. It segments the development process to reduce the possibility of sensitive data being stolen.

Enables product rollbacks. TFS keeps copies of past versions of the organization’s application. Users can sift through the different versions that are available and can redeploy the version that best fits their needs should it ever become necessary to do so.

Visual Studio TFS Features

Source code management. TFS comes with all of the tools that developers need to completely manage their source code. They can share their code so that multiple developers can work on the same project. Additionally, TFS enables them to do things like review the history of a particular piece of source code.
Project management. Organizations can leverage the wealth of project management features that TFS offers and ensure that their projects run as smoothly as possible. Project managers are able to use TFS to control every aspect of their project, from the planning stage until the application’s development has reached its conclusion.

Reporting. TFS enables users to generate reports that leverage critical metrics and provide them with important insights into the applications that they are creating. These comprehensive reports can be secured so that only users with the proper level of clearance can access them.

Reviews from Real Users

TFS is a highly effective solution that stands out when compared to many of its competitors. Two major advantages it offers are its source code management capabilities and its powerful integration suite.

Carl B., the vice president of engineering at Vertex Downhole Ltd, writes, “The most valuable features are related to source code management. Using TFS for source code management and being able to branch and have multiple developers work on the same projects is valuable. We can also branch and merge code back together.”

Ashish K., the principal consultant at Wipro, says, “I have found almost all of the features valuable because it integrates well with your Microsoft products. If a client is using the entire Microsoft platform, then TFS would be definitely preferable. It integrates with the digital studio development environment as well.”

Microsoft

Sample Customers

TRW Automotive

Vendex KBB IT Services, Info Support, Fujitsu Consulting, TCSC, Airways New Zealand, HP

Buyer's Guide

PTC Integrity vs. TFS

April 2025

Free Report: PTC Integrity vs. TFS

Find out what your peers are saying about PTC Integrity vs. TFS and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our PTC Integrity vs. TFS report.

See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.

We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.