Codebeamer vs PTC Integrity comparison

Codebeamer and PTC Integrity are both solutions in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category. Codebeamer is ranked #10 with an average rating of 7.4, while PTC Integrity is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.5. Codebeamer holds a 8.5% mindshare in ALM, compared to PTC Integrity’s 4.3% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of Codebeamer users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 68% of PTC Integrity users who would recommend it.

Codebeamer

Read 14 Codebeamer reviews

3,428 Views
2,791 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

PTC Integrity

Read 13 PTC Integrity reviews

2,028 Views
1,597 Comparison Views

68% willing to recommend

Codebeamer

PTC Integrity

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

PTC Integrity and Codebeamer are competing in the application lifecycle management domain. Codebeamer appears to have the upper hand due to its robust features and adaptability in various workflows.

Features: PTC Integrity provides robust requirements management, strong internal control, and effective version control, beneficial for high compliance workflows. Codebeamer delivers extensive API integrations, customizable workflows, and excellent connectivity from inception to end, enhancing flexibility and collaboration.

Room for Improvement: PTC Integrity could benefit from improved user interface experience, better traceability capabilities, and simplified customization options. Codebeamer would improve with enhanced usability, better template options, and a smoother migration process for on-prem to cloud services.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Codebeamer offers streamlined cloud-based deployment with swift setup and comprehensive support, making it ideal for quick scenarios. PTC Integrity requires more setup time, offering both on-premises and cloud options, appealing to organizations needing strong internal control.

Pricing and ROI: PTC Integrity has moderate setup costs and offers positive ROI through reliable functionalities. Codebeamer may have higher upfront costs but promises strong long-term ROI due to its flexibility and scalability, ideal for dynamic project environments.

To learn more, read our detailed Codebeamer vs. PTC Integrity Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Codebeamer vs. PTC Integrity

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,040 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Codebeamer

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

10th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

PTC Integrity

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

11th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category, the mindshare of Codebeamer is 8.5%, up from 5.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PTC Integrity is 4.3%, up from 3.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

Featured Reviews

SHRINIVAS ALAGERI

Architect at itcinfotech

Built-in project management modules simplify processes while compatibility improvements are needed

Codebeamer could improve its customization capabilities and integration options. For instance, older versions of PDM Windchill ( /products/ptc-windchill-reviews ) face compatibility issues with newer versions of Codebeamer, requiring users to downgrade Codebeamer to establish integration. The installation on Linux can be tricky, and backward compatibility needs enhancement. Also, Codebeamer struggles with some DevOps integrations and lacks AI features for enhanced user assistance.

Read full review

Neha Wanjari

Technical Lead at KPIT Technologies

Helps to create tasks, change requests and documentation

I personally like PTC Integrity because it provides everything within the software. You can store and access your data and perform various tasks. Compared to other products, I find it user-friendly, which can sometimes feel complex. I think PTC Integrity is user-friendly, making it nice to use. The tool is easier to learn. The tool has a dashboard that details our projects and products, including the number of tasks, change requests, and their statuses (incomplete or complete). Having all this data within the solution makes collaborating easy for our project team. Unlike using multiple tools, having everything we need in one software platform is convenient. I rate the tool's user experience and interface a nine point five out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Codebeamer's API-based integration and many other integration aspects with other solutions are very powerful."

"Utilizing Codebeamer has helped my organization by saving time in our processes."

"The solution easily replaces IBM DOORS, which no longer offers maintenance in China."

"Since implementing this solution we have better communication and information exchange with customers."

"The biggest advantage of Codebeamer is its ability to directly use built-in project management modules without the need for extensive customization."

"The traceability is so simple that I don't need to do any additional configurations related to traceability."

"It is a stable solution."

"One of the most valuable features of Codebeamer is its strong performance."

More Codebeamer pros

"We found the requirement management and the version control features to be the most useful for our client."

"I personally like PTC Integrity because it provides everything within the software. You can store and access your data and perform various tasks. Compared to other products, I find it user-friendly, which can sometimes feel complex. I think PTC Integrity is user-friendly, making it nice to use. The tool is easier to learn."

"We have been using it because it gives certain abilities in the automotive industry, such as auditing or keeping track of information."

"It's a good tool to manage software versions, update the status, and manage tasks."

"The most valuable feature of PTC Integrity is its integration with our existing PTC tools, especially for drawing release activities."

"I have found that previously, the OEM sector was managing everything, possibly manually. However, with the introduction of the product, it has become much easier for customers to handle their products. Previously, customers were using different software to manage their products. However, PTC Integrity offers a solution for requirements management, test management, and even development to support live ticket management. So instead of using multiple software tools, we can use it for all these purposes."

"The tool is quite structured and has a good command set."

"Complete traceability as per process requirements."

More PTC Integrity pros

Cons

"It would be helpful if Codebeamer's overall processing and integration with software like Jira could be improved."

"The solution has a very small market share in China. It's almost like a startup."

"The product's UI is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"Codebeamer is not completely compatible with our internal network setup."

"One improvement could be to reduce the system or server requirements. For a client with a medium configuration server, Codebeamer did not work initially until the system was upgraded."

"We would like to see more industry-specific features that are tailored to the vertical markets."

"I would like to see more, easily trackable reports."

"The primary challenge is adapting the standard product to our workflows and specific needs."

More Codebeamer cons

"It's not easy to plan on this solution and it's not user-friendly. The interface should be more like a web interface. It's not easy to use."

"For complex businesses, the internal templates could have more flexibility and compatibility."

"The web version does not have all the functionalities of the non-web version. Administration and adding/removing fields, etc. cannot be done on the web version. People want solutions that are compatible with Android. I also want to have a version by which I can bulk edit all the fields."

"I would like to see better integration from the architectural side."

"It's not so customizable. Compared to other tools, defining user stories is a slightly more cumbersome process as an ALM engineer."

"We are unhappy because everything that we needed required customization and this is not a plug-and-play type of solution at all."

"To be honest, the third controller system is kind of old. There are lots of transactional changes that have not been implemented in PTC. If you have a larger project, for example, whenever you give bits and need to change 10,000 files you can just commit them. But here the work style is a little more file based, so you'll have to take care of almost all the files individually. It's not a single commit like you do here, but rather you have to allocate time for each component or file that you want to check in or commit. That's a very big issue."

"The tool's web-based UI needs improvement. Some functionalities don't work yet, and querying items is slow. Also, it's not in the cloud yet. I don't know if they'll do it in the future because they already have core agreements with customers. If they offer these functionalities, customers will likely buy their product."

More PTC Integrity cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Codebeamer is not a cheap solution."

"They're not the most expensive product on the market, but they're not the cheapest either — I'd say codeBeamer ALM is moderately priced."

"It is reasonably priced and in accordance with the industry standards."

"Pricing is good when compared to similar ALM solutions."

"The product is expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

31%

Computer Software Company

15%

Healthcare Company

Retailer

Manufacturing Company

27%

Computer Software Company

18%

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about codeBeamer ALM?

The platform provided the flexibility to expand our business processes, accommodating or altering them to suit the requirements of a changing environment.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for codeBeamer ALM?

Codebeamer is on the expensive side, but it provides ready-made modules for standards like ASPICE and ISO 26262, which might justify the cost for customers looking for those solutions.

See all answers

What needs improvement with codeBeamer ALM?

See all answers

What do you like most about PTC Integrity?

I have found that previously, the OEM sector was managing everything, possibly manually. However, with the introduction of the product, it has become much easier for customers to handle their produ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PTC Integrity?

PTC Integrity is expensive, but it is cheaper compared to IBM Rational. The comparative affordability in pricing is an advantage.

See all answers

What needs improvement with PTC Integrity?

The user-friendliness of PTC Integrity can be improved. The interface is not intuitive for first-time users and takes time to get accustomed to. A more straightforward and intuitive interface would...

See all answers

Comparisons

Polarion ALM vs Codebeamer

Compared 26% of the time

Jira vs Codebeamer

Compared 14% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs Codebeamer

Compared 11% of the time

IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) vs Codebeamer

Compared 7% of the time

Jama Connect vs Codebeamer

Compared 4% of the time

More Codebeamer Competitors

Polarion ALM vs PTC Integrity

Compared 13% of the time

Jira vs PTC Integrity

Compared 8% of the time

IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) vs PTC Integrity

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs PTC Integrity

Compared 4% of the time

Rally Software vs PTC Integrity

Compared 4% of the time

More PTC Integrity Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Codebeamer

March 2025

Download Codebeamer product report

Buyer's Guide

PTC Integrity

March 2025

Download PTC Integrity product report

Also Known As

codeBeamer ALM

MKS

Overview

codeBeamer ALM is a market-leading Application Lifecycle Management platform. It is holistically integrated, and is packed with features that help you develop better products faster. Scale, monitor, control, and report on your entire development lifecycle conveniently, and comply with safety-critical regulations. Cut development time and costs.

PTC

The PTC Integrity Software Suite provides a comprehensive set of Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) and Systems Engineering capabilities that enable cross-discipline collaboration, improve time-to-market, streamline compliance, and reduce product risk. Simplify the complexity involved in developing today's complex engineered and smart, connected products.

PTC

Sample Customers

Medtronic, Align Technology, Daimler, Samsung, Harman, Dassault

TRW Automotive

Buyer's Guide

Codebeamer vs. PTC Integrity

March 2025

Free Report: Codebeamer vs. PTC Integrity

Find out what your peers are saying about Codebeamer vs. PTC Integrity and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Codebeamer vs. PTC Integrity report.

See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.

We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.