OpenText Application Quality Management vs PTC Integrity comparison

Why PeerSpot?

OpenText and PTC are both solutions in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category. OpenText is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.0, while PTC is ranked #12 with an average rating of 7.5. OpenText holds a 8.5% mindshare in ALM, compared to PTC’s 2.5% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 70% of PTC users who would recommend it.

OpenText Application Qualit...

Read 208 OpenText Application Quality Management reviews

22,317 Views
13,837 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

PTC Integrity

Read 14 PTC Integrity reviews

3,373 Views
3,339 Comparison Views

70% willing to recommend

OpenText Application Qualit...

PTC Integrity

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

PTC Integrity and OpenText Application Quality Management are two competing products in the application lifecycle management market. OpenText holds the upper hand due to its superior testing environment and efficient cloud deployment.

Features: PTC Integrity provides seamless integration with development tools, emphasizing requirement management and traceability. It offers a unified platform for hardware and software collaboration and allows real-time collaboration through stable APIs. OpenText Application Quality Management stands out with its test automation capabilities, real-time quality insights, easy integration with JIRA, and excellent traceability features.

Room for Improvement: PTC Integrity could improve in ease of deployment and customization options without heavy scripting for traceability. Additionally, simplifying its setup process and enhancing cloud capabilities would be beneficial. OpenText Application Quality Management can enhance its user experience, expand its integration capabilities beyond testing tools, and offer more intuitive customization options for different business needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Application Quality Management provides a cloud-based model, allowing for quick integration and scaling with strong customer support. PTC Integrity, while comprehensive, might require a lengthier installation time and does not offer the same degree of cloud-native flexibility as OpenText.

Pricing and ROI: PTC Integrity involves higher initial costs but promises a strong long-term ROI with its lifecycle integration. OpenText Application Quality Management is considered cost-effective, with competitive upfront pricing and clear ROI through enhanced testing efficiencies, making it an attractive option for businesses looking for immediate value.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Application Quality Management vs. PTC Integrity Report (Updated: November 2026).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Application Quality Management vs. PTC Integrity

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,929 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Application Qualit...

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

3rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

208

Ranking in other categories

Quality Management Software (1st), Test Management Tools (1st)

PTC Integrity

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

12th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category, the mindshare of OpenText Application Quality Management is 8.5%, up from 4.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PTC Integrity is 2.5%, down from 4.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OpenText Application Quality Management	8.5%
PTC Integrity	2.5%
Other	89.0%

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

Featured Reviews

Greg Stone

Partner at IS Nordic AS

Manages multiple releases seamlessly

We have done some work with companies, probably four or five years ago and found the ability to manage multiple releases simultaneously as a main advantage, especially in complex programs with multiple concurrent releases. Running automated tests against back-level versions in certain environments is possible, and newer versions can be tested as well. It creates constant visibility into the test process, showing the status, bugs, and automated test results. It is a solid product in large corporations in Denmark, ensuring everyone knows where the process stands. There is a good understanding of what is critical, allowing prioritization of test cases.

Read full review

SHRINIVAS ALAGERI

Architect at a media company with 10,001+ employees

Customization has enabled long-term document and requirement management for complex projects

PTC Integrity should get rid of the old thick client and move everything to the thin client. The thin client should be made the single source of truth, the way it is for Codebeamer. PTC Integrity should try to integrate this with AI and should have automatic requirement to test case mapping and other AI features that are in Codebeamer. It is not easy for people to migrate from one tool to another, even though it is from the same product. PTC took over the In-Link product, so if I have to migrate my Integrity to In-Link, why would I replicate everything here? People are happy with what they have. The only headache is the thick client, which is a problem for the installation team. By having a thin client, people can directly open it from the web browser and it would be much easier and much better than a thick client on the system. With a thick client, you have Java installation that needs to be done and you have all those certificates to be installed for SSL. With a thin client, it would be much better and you could do all the administrative things also in that. I don't understand why they want a thick client. They could replace it with a thin client, the way it is for Codebeamer. They should incorporate all the AI things. PTC Integrity should become another tool with all the new features and new enhancements, and they should eliminate the thick client altogether.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Valuable for us is having all the data in one place."

"The ability to keep test cases and defects centrally located, accessible to multiple people instead of in document format, is the most valuable feature."

"ALM is for sure scalable."

"Micro Focus ALM Quality Center is quite stable."

"Very robust API to interface with the tool and you can customize how it is used."

"Lab Management is a valuable feature, because you have a 360 view."

"As a stand-alone test management tool, it's a good tool."

"With the addition of BPT (Business Process Testing), QC along with QTP has been the choice for test automation in most of the IT businesses."

More OpenText Application Quality Management pros

"We found the requirement management and the version control features to be the most useful for our client."

"We have been using it because it gives certain abilities in the automotive industry, such as auditing or keeping track of information."

"PTC Integrity provides some set of APIs which makes it very flexible to build an end-to-end SaaS product and an end-to-end software product."

"The most valuable feature relates to traceability, we have complete traceability as per process requirements."

"The solution is flexible in terms of customization, you can bend and reformat it in many ways, and you can also customize the APIs and public functions."

"The tool is quite structured and has a good command set."

"The most valuable feature of PTC Integrity is its integration with our existing PTC tools, especially for drawing release activities."

"I have found that previously, the OEM sector was managing everything, possibly manually. However, with the introduction of the product, it has become much easier for customers to handle their products. Previously, customers were using different software to manage their products. However, PTC Integrity offers a solution for requirements management, test management, and even development to support live ticket management. So instead of using multiple software tools, we can use it for all these purposes."

More PTC Integrity pros

Cons

"Certain features are lousy. Those features can drag the whole server down. There are times that the complex SQL queries are not easy to do within this solution."

"Quality Center's UI is outdated, and it's a little bit slow on the login part and different parts of the application. That's why we're switching solutions. I believe most companies are switching to Octane or something else. Micro Focus should enhance the interface and reports."

"Expensive tool which could become an overload on the budget in the future."

"ALM bridges our development gap, but it's not quite full-scale yet."

"They should specify every protocol or process with labels or names."

"The performance needs work, as over the past couple years, where I have worked with large companies, I noticed slower response times."

"Graphs can be further improved to manage more requirements at a time."

"It’s too expensive for most organizations compared to some other tools on the market."

More OpenText Application Quality Management cons

"To be honest, the third controller system is kind of old. There are lots of transactional changes that have not been implemented in PTC. If you have a larger project, for example, whenever you give bits and need to change 10,000 files you can just commit them. But here the work style is a little more file based, so you'll have to take care of almost all the files individually. It's not a single commit like you do here, but rather you have to allocate time for each component or file that you want to check in or commit. That's a very big issue."

"We are unhappy because everything that we needed required customization and this is not a plug-and-play type of solution at all."

"Usability, and the human factor, and if they improve this then i would rate this 10/10."

"You can use it for things from the previous decade. After 2010, whatever you want to do in terms of programming is very unusable."

"It's not easy to plan on this solution and it's not user-friendly. The interface should be more like a web interface. It's not easy to use."

"For complex businesses, the internal templates could have more flexibility and compatibility."

"The web version does not have all the functionalities of the non-web version."

"I would like to see better integration from the architectural side."

More PTC Integrity cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is very expensive as compared to other tools. We didn't get their premier version. It is a lesser version, and to upgrade, there will be an additional cost for us."

"I've never been in the procurement process for it. I don't think it is cheap. Some of the features can be quite expensive."

"The solution was expensive for us."

"HPE has one of the most rigid, inflexible, and super expensive license models."

"I don't know the exact numbers, but I know it is pricey. When we talked to the sales reps we work with from our company, they say, "Well, Micro Focus will never lose on price." So, they are willing to do a lot of negotiating if it is required."

"It has several limitations in adapting its agility easily."

"I feel that the licenses are expensive. "

"Only major companies that can afford it use OpenText ALM."

More OpenText Application Quality Management pricing and cost advice

"The product is expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,929 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

24%

Construction Company

Computer Software Company

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	41
Midsize Enterprise	32
Large Enterprise	161

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	14

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?

The on-premises setup tends to be on the expensive side. It would be cheaper to use a cloud model with a pay-per-use licensing model.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?

Regarding integration with various development tools, I can provide examples, and I am using customizable dashboards in OpenText ALM _ Quality Center, which definitely help identify project bottlen...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?

People are using OpenText ALM _ Quality Center for recording user cases, testing and hand documentation, defect tracking, business purposes, and reporting.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PTC Integrity?

PTC Integrity is expensive, but it is cheaper compared to IBM Rational. The comparative affordability in pricing is an advantage.

See all answers

What needs improvement with PTC Integrity?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for PTC Integrity?

I am still working with PTC Integrity because we have a lot of customizations and we have been working for the past 10 years on it. We are planning and proposing to go to a different tool such as C...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs OpenText Application Quality Management

Compared 25% of the time

Jira vs OpenText Application Quality Management

Compared 5% of the time

Zephyr Enterprise vs OpenText Application Quality Management

Compared 4% of the time

TFS vs OpenText Application Quality Management

Compared 3% of the time

OpenText Software Delivery Management vs OpenText Application Quality Management

Compared 3% of the time

More OpenText Application Quality Management Competitors

Codebeamer vs PTC Integrity

Compared 16% of the time

Jira vs PTC Integrity

Compared 12% of the time

Polarion ALM vs PTC Integrity

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs PTC Integrity

Compared 8% of the time

Kovair Intelligent DevOps vs PTC Integrity

Compared 7% of the time

More PTC Integrity Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Application Quality Management

October 2026

OpenText Application Quality Management report

Download OpenText Application Quality Management product report

Buyer's Guide

PTC Integrity

October 2026

Download PTC Integrity product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus ALM Quality Center, HPE ALM, Quality Center, Quality Center, Micro Focus ALM, OpenText Quality Manager

MKS

Overview

OpenText Application Quality Management offers centralized data management, traceability, and integration capabilities. It aids in handling requirements, test planning, and defect tracking while supporting both manual and automated testing. Challenges exist in deployment and browser compatibility.

Known for its robust reporting and flexibility, OpenText Application Quality Management is tailored for large organizations requiring a comprehensive solution supporting lifecycle coverage and seamless tool integration. Users can consolidate testing processes, manage requirements, and centralize reporting across manual and automated testing. While some face issues with project tracking, outdated interfaces, and limited browser compatibility beyond Internet Explorer, it remains widely used for regression and performance testing. Integration with tools like JIRA and support for tools such as UFT and ALM PC underscore its utility.

What are the key features of OpenText Application Quality Management?

Centralized Data Management: Consolidates and organizes testing data efficiently.
Traceability: Ensures traceability across all stages of the testing lifecycle.
Integration Capabilities: Connects seamlessly with automation and other essential tools.
Test Planning and Execution: Supports both manual and automated tests in a streamlined manner.
Advanced Reporting: Provides robust options to generate insightful test reports.
Customization: Offers tailored solutions to fit specific organizational needs.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Efficiency: Increases test management efficiency across projects.
Scalability: Adapts to the varying scope of large-scale projects.
Lifecycle Coverage: Comprehensive management from requirement to defect tracking.
User-Friendly Interface: Designed for ease of use despite needing updates.
Cost-Effectiveness: Balances high initial costs with long-term savings through efficient testing management.

In industries such as finance and healthcare, OpenText Application Quality Management is implemented to ensure rigorous testing standards. It supports test case creation and execution, defect tracking, and requirements management. Integration with JIRA and performance testing tools make it suitable for organizations needing synchronized testing environments.

OpenText

PTC Integrity offers robust requirement management, comprehensive traceability, and efficient real-time collaboration. It integrates seamlessly with existing PTC tools, providing a unified platform that supports efficient project management and data handling.

PTC Integrity is a comprehensive tool for managing software versions, tasks, and projects. Its flexibility allows users to customize using APIs, making it user-friendly despite providing a wide range of functionalities. The platform replaces multiple tools, enhancing the user experience. However, there is a need for improvements in usability, interface modernization, and compatibility with other tools. The demand is also high for a fully web-based version offering comprehensive features that simplify navigation.

What are the most important features of PTC Integrity?

Requirement Management: Facilitates efficient handling of project requirements from conception to completion.
Version Control: Efficient tracking and managing of software versions ensures consistency.
Traceability: Comprehensive traceability across various project stages enhances accountability.
Integration: Seamless integration with PTC tools enables smoother data transfer.
Customization: APIs offer flexibility for tailored user needs and workflows.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Enhanced Collaboration: Real-time collaboration fosters team efficiency.
Efficiency in Project Management: Combines tools on a unified platform to streamline processes.
User-Friendliness: Simplifies software version management, suiting Agile methodologies.
Cost Savings: Reducing the number of tools lowers overhead costs.

Organizations across industry sectors utilize PTC Integrity for agile methodologies, item tracking, and requirement management tasks. It's widely used for application lifecycle management, task creation, and drawing release activities. It supports change requests and specification creation, facilitating management processes in diverse industries.

PTC

Sample Customers

Airbus Defense and Space, Vodafone, JTI, Xellia, and Banco de Creìdito e Inversiones (Bci)

TRW Automotive

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Application Quality Management vs. PTC Integrity

November 2026

Free Report: OpenText Application Quality Management vs. PTC Integrity

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Application Quality Management vs. PTC Integrity and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,929 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Application Quality Management vs. PTC Integrity report.

See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.

We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.