OpenText Application Quality Management vs PTC Integrity comparison

OpenText Application Quality Management vs. PTC Integrity

Download the complete report

Helped 913,924 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Application Qualit...

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

3rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

208

Ranking in other categories

Quality Management Software (1st), Test Management Tools (1st)

PTC Integrity

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

12th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category, the mindshare of OpenText Application Quality Management is 7.7%, up from 5.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PTC Integrity is 2.7%, down from 4.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OpenText Application Quality Management	7.7%
PTC Integrity	2.7%
Other	89.6%

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

Featured Reviews

Greg Stone

Partner at IS Nordic AS

Manages multiple releases seamlessly

We have done some work with companies, probably four or five years ago and found the ability to manage multiple releases simultaneously as a main advantage, especially in complex programs with multiple concurrent releases. Running automated tests against back-level versions in certain environments is possible, and newer versions can be tested as well. It creates constant visibility into the test process, showing the status, bugs, and automated test results. It is a solid product in large corporations in Denmark, ensuring everyone knows where the process stands. There is a good understanding of what is critical, allowing prioritization of test cases.

Read full review

SHRINIVAS ALAGERI

Architect at a media company with 10,001+ employees

Customization has enabled long-term document and requirement management for complex projects

PTC Integrity should get rid of the old thick client and move everything to the thin client. The thin client should be made the single source of truth, the way it is for Codebeamer. PTC Integrity should try to integrate this with AI and should have automatic requirement to test case mapping and other AI features that are in Codebeamer. It is not easy for people to migrate from one tool to another, even though it is from the same product. PTC took over the In-Link product, so if I have to migrate my Integrity to In-Link, why would I replicate everything here? People are happy with what they have. The only headache is the thick client, which is a problem for the installation team. By having a thin client, people can directly open it from the web browser and it would be much easier and much better than a thick client on the system. With a thick client, you have Java installation that needs to be done and you have all those certificates to be installed for SSL. With a thin client, it would be much better and you could do all the administrative things also in that. I don't understand why they want a thick client. They could replace it with a thin client, the way it is for Codebeamer. They should incorporate all the AI things. PTC Integrity should become another tool with all the new features and new enhancements, and they should eliminate the thick client altogether.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The ability to integrate this solution with other applications is helpful. If there is automation, it comes with improved quality and speed."

"Within thirty days the defect resolution time was reduced to 3.1 days and averaged 1.1 days over the next eighteen (18) months."

"For me and for our organization, it's a really good product; I'm really happy with it and it meets my needs completely."

"With test execution, you have an option to create custom fields. It is also really user-friendly. With other tools, we only have restricted fields and we cannot customize or add new columns or fields that users can make use of while testing. ALM is very flexible for creating new fields. It is easy for users to understand the application."

"All types of data can be seen in one place."

"It's a centralized test management solution, the fact that you have a place where you can go and find all the stuff that you need to find, and keep track of all of the results long term is extremely valuable."

"With the addition of BPT (Business Process Testing), QC along with QTP has been the choice for test automation in most of the IT businesses."

"While comparing to the previous solution, this solution gave us as much as 60% cost savings."

More OpenText Application Quality Management pros

"The most valuable feature is traceability starting from the requirements until the end of a project."

"The tool is quite structured and has a good command set."

"PTC Integrity has good stability."

"The product is powerful and stable."

"The solution is flexible in terms of customization, you can bend and reformat it in many ways, and you can also customize the APIs and public functions."

"This tools improve teams productivity, a lot of flexibility for automation."

"It's a good tool to manage software versions, update the status, and manage tasks."

"I personally like PTC Integrity because it provides everything within the software. You can store and access your data and perform various tasks. Compared to other products, I find it user-friendly, which can sometimes feel complex. I think PTC Integrity is user-friendly, making it nice to use. The tool is easier to learn."

More PTC Integrity pros

Cons

"If somebody's looking for an independent tool for test management, it's good, however, for other areas where you need to get the full integration without investment on other add-ons, this solution won't easily allow this."

"What happens is, we're having to use multiple products to come to one goal."

"I think if we're looking at the legacy owned product, I think it's kind of come and gone as far as its ability to do what you need to do in a DevOps world."

"Licensing model is relatively expensive compared to alternate solutions."

"The initial setup was not straightforward."

"The downside is that the Quality Center's only been available on Windows for years, but not on Mac."

"Browser support needs improvement. Currently, it can only run on IE, Internet Explorer. It doesn't work on Firefox, doesn't work on Chrome, doesn't work on a Mac book. Those are the new technologies where most companies move towards. That's been outstanding for quite a while before it even became Micro Focus tools when it was still HP. Even before HP, that's always been an issue."

"ALM requires that you install client side components. If your organization does not allow admin rights on your local machine, this means you will need someone to run the installation for you with admin rights. This client side install is also limited to Internet Explorer and does not support any other browsers."

More OpenText Application Quality Management cons

"There are not enough reports. People would like to see something similar to what is available in JIRA."

"Scalability is a concern for this particular tool."

"I am writing this review because I don't think there's a fair portrayal online of how cumbersome the GUI is, and how difficult the software is to use."

"The web version does not have all the functionalities of the non-web version. Administration and adding/removing fields, etc. cannot be done on the web version. People want solutions that are compatible with Android. I also want to have a version by which I can bulk edit all the fields."

"We are unhappy because everything that we needed required customization and this is not a plug-and-play type of solution at all."

"Scalability is a little difficult because the product gets slower as it's scaled."

"From my experience over the years, I believe there might be room for improvement in PTC Integrity. While it's already a good product, it tends to be slower than other software. When it becomes bulky, it slows down even more, sometimes leading to crashes or hangs that require restarting the computer before being able to use PTC Integrity again. This has been my experience multiple times."

"PTC Integrity is causing us a headache. We have to install it in 3,000 different systems."

More PTC Integrity cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I've never been in the procurement process for it. I don't think it is cheap. Some of the features can be quite expensive."

"Only major companies that can afford it use OpenText ALM."

"It is very expensive as compared to other tools. We didn't get their premier version. It is a lesser version, and to upgrade, there will be an additional cost for us."

"It allows us to keep our costs low. I do not want to pay beyond a certain point for this solution."

"The full ALM license lets you use the requirements tab, along with test automation and the Performance Center. You can also just buy the Quality Center edition (Manual testing only), or the Performance Center version (Performance Testing only)."

"It is an expensive tool. I think one needs to pay 10,000 USD towards the perpetual licensing model."

"Most vendors offer the same pricing, though some vendors offer a cheaper price for their cloud/SaaS solution versus their on-premise. However, cloud/SaaS solutions result in a loss of freedom. E.g., if you want to make a change, most of the time it needs to be validated by the vendor, then you're being charged an addition fee. Sometimes, even if you are rejected, you are charged because it's a risk to the entire environment."

"ALM Quality Center is a little bit costly."

More OpenText Application Quality Management pricing and cost advice

"The product is expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Outsourcing Company

11%

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

24%

Computer Software Company

Construction Company

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	41
Midsize Enterprise	32
Large Enterprise	161

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	13

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?

The on-premises setup tends to be on the expensive side. It would be cheaper to use a cloud model with a pay-per-use licensing model.

What needs improvement with Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?

Regarding integration with various development tools, I can provide examples, and I am using customizable dashboards in OpenText ALM _ Quality Center, which definitely help identify project bottlen...

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?

People are using OpenText ALM _ Quality Center for recording user cases, testing and hand documentation, defect tracking, business purposes, and reporting.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PTC Integrity?

PTC Integrity is expensive, but it is cheaper compared to IBM Rational. The comparative affordability in pricing is an advantage.

What needs improvement with PTC Integrity?

What is your primary use case for PTC Integrity?

I am still working with PTC Integrity because we have a lot of customizations and we have been working for the past 10 years on it. We are planning and proposing to go to a different tool such as C...

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs OpenText Application Quality Management

Comparisons

Compared 24% of the time

Jira vs OpenText Application Quality Management

Compared 5% of the time

Zephyr Enterprise vs OpenText Application Quality Management

Compared 4% of the time

TFS vs OpenText Application Quality Management

Compared 3% of the time

OpenText Software Delivery Management vs OpenText Application Quality Management

Compared 3% of the time

More OpenText Application Quality Management Competitors

Codebeamer vs PTC Integrity

Compared 17% of the time

Jira vs PTC Integrity

Compared 12% of the time

Polarion ALM vs PTC Integrity

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs PTC Integrity

Compared 8% of the time

Kovair Intelligent DevOps vs PTC Integrity

Compared 7% of the time

More PTC Integrity Competitors

Product Reports

OpenText Application Quality Management

Download OpenText Application Quality Management product report

OpenText Application Quality Management report

PTC Integrity

Download PTC Integrity product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus ALM Quality Center, HPE ALM, Quality Center, Quality Center, Micro Focus ALM, OpenText Quality Manager

MKS

Overview

OpenText Application Quality Management offers centralized data management, traceability, and integration capabilities. It aids in handling requirements, test planning, and defect tracking while supporting both manual and automated testing. Challenges exist in deployment and browser compatibility.

Known for its robust reporting and flexibility, OpenText Application Quality Management is tailored for large organizations requiring a comprehensive solution supporting lifecycle coverage and seamless tool integration. Users can consolidate testing processes, manage requirements, and centralize reporting across manual and automated testing. While some face issues with project tracking, outdated interfaces, and limited browser compatibility beyond Internet Explorer, it remains widely used for regression and performance testing. Integration with tools like JIRA and support for tools such as UFT and ALM PC underscore its utility.

What are the key features of OpenText Application Quality Management?

Centralized Data Management: Consolidates and organizes testing data efficiently.
Traceability: Ensures traceability across all stages of the testing lifecycle.
Integration Capabilities: Connects seamlessly with automation and other essential tools.
Test Planning and Execution: Supports both manual and automated tests in a streamlined manner.
Advanced Reporting: Provides robust options to generate insightful test reports.
Customization: Offers tailored solutions to fit specific organizational needs.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Efficiency: Increases test management efficiency across projects.
Scalability: Adapts to the varying scope of large-scale projects.
Lifecycle Coverage: Comprehensive management from requirement to defect tracking.
User-Friendly Interface: Designed for ease of use despite needing updates.
Cost-Effectiveness: Balances high initial costs with long-term savings through efficient testing management.

In industries such as finance and healthcare, OpenText Application Quality Management is implemented to ensure rigorous testing standards. It supports test case creation and execution, defect tracking, and requirements management. Integration with JIRA and performance testing tools make it suitable for organizations needing synchronized testing environments.

OpenText

PTC Integrity offers robust requirement management, comprehensive traceability, and efficient real-time collaboration. It integrates seamlessly with existing PTC tools, providing a unified platform that supports efficient project management and data handling.

PTC Integrity is a comprehensive tool for managing software versions, tasks, and projects. Its flexibility allows users to customize using APIs, making it user-friendly despite providing a wide range of functionalities. The platform replaces multiple tools, enhancing the user experience. However, there is a need for improvements in usability, interface modernization, and compatibility with other tools. The demand is also high for a fully web-based version offering comprehensive features that simplify navigation.

What are the most important features of PTC Integrity?

Requirement Management: Facilitates efficient handling of project requirements from conception to completion.
Version Control: Efficient tracking and managing of software versions ensures consistency.
Traceability: Comprehensive traceability across various project stages enhances accountability.
Integration: Seamless integration with PTC tools enables smoother data transfer.
Customization: APIs offer flexibility for tailored user needs and workflows.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Enhanced Collaboration: Real-time collaboration fosters team efficiency.
Efficiency in Project Management: Combines tools on a unified platform to streamline processes.
User-Friendliness: Simplifies software version management, suiting Agile methodologies.
Cost Savings: Reducing the number of tools lowers overhead costs.

Organizations across industry sectors utilize PTC Integrity for agile methodologies, item tracking, and requirement management tasks. It's widely used for application lifecycle management, task creation, and drawing release activities. It supports change requests and specification creation, facilitating management processes in diverse industries.

PTC

Sample Customers

Airbus Defense and Space, Vodafone, JTI, Xellia, and Banco de Creìdito e Inversiones (Bci)

TRW Automotive

OpenText Application Quality Management vs. PTC Integrity