InfluxDB vs MySQL comparison

InfluxData and Oracle are both solutions in the Open Source Databases category. InfluxData is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.3, while Oracle is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.3. InfluxData holds a 5.0% mindshare in OSD, compared to Oracle’s 10.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of InfluxData users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

InfluxDB

Read 20 InfluxDB reviews

5,305 Views
2,175 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

MySQL

Read 152 MySQL reviews

12,543 Views
7,024 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

InfluxDB

MySQL

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 23, 2025

MySQL and InfluxDB are popular databases competing in the database solutions category. MySQL appears to have the upper hand in terms of pricing and support, while InfluxDB stands out for its features and scalability, appealing for specific use cases despite higher costs.

Features: MySQL is known for its multi-threaded architecture, triggers, replication, and full-text search, making it flexible and reliable for small to medium applications and popular in web development. InfluxDB excels in time-series database capabilities, efficient data handling, and strong performance with visualization tools, although it may lack some relational features compared to MySQL.

Room for Improvement: MySQL users highlight challenges with InnoDB complexity, limited support for advanced RDBMS features, and replication reliability. InfluxDB could improve with better clustering, user-friendly interfaces, and comprehensive documentation for easier integration with other tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: MySQL offers flexibility in deployment across various environments and extensive community support due to its open-source nature. InfluxDB supports diverse deployment options, though users seek better integration. MySQL relies on community forums for support, while InfluxDB users may face higher support costs.

Pricing and ROI: MySQL is cost-effective with a free open-source version and paid enterprise options, offering solid ROI for basic database functions without licensing fees. InfluxDB, also open-source, may incur scaling costs with recent price increases impacting its value for extensive deployments. Both can provide good returns depending on business needs and technical demands.

To learn more, read our detailed InfluxDB vs. MySQL Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

InfluxDB vs. MySQL

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,244 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

5.6

InfluxDB enhances efficiency with real-time monitoring automation, reducing manual work and boosting system reliability and uptime.

Sentiment score

6.2

MySQL offers cost benefits with open-source use, achieving up to 60% ROI, despite challenges in precise financial calculations.

These improvements translated into both cost savings and better service reliability, directly impacting business outcomes.

reviewer2804886

Senior Data Engineer at a university with 201-500 employees

It simplifies processes and reduces the need for additional employees.

Mugeesh Husain

Team Lead, Software at Energybox

InfluxDB reduced my time to show data without any interruption, also reducing the number of people needed to manage the project; it is very good to have InfluxDB in my project.

Btece Lodi

Student at a educational organization with 1,001-5,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the InfluxDB report

I have seen a return on investment with MySQL, as it allows us to manage with fewer employees, focusing on business logic rather than database management.

AmitVerma4

Software Developer at 8 Gallery India

For more quotes and insights, download the MySQL report

Customer Service

Sentiment score

5.8

InfluxDB's customer service is efficient with enterprise licenses, yet response times vary; knowledgeable support aids complex issues.

Sentiment score

6.8

MySQL users primarily rely on community resources for support, with official Oracle support noted as costly but effective.

They get on a call, resolve issues, and handle everything efficiently.

Manas Kashyap

DevOps Engineer at Elevenxcapital

The InfluxDB support team was knowledgeable and helped us troubleshoot complex problems efficiently.

reviewer2804886

Senior Data Engineer at a university with 201-500 employees

Obtaining that quantity of data directly from InfluxDB is quite challenging, and that is why we ask for help from the InfluxDB team to retrieve the data to avoid timeouts and those kinds of issues.

Mugeesh Husain

Team Lead, Software at Energybox

For more quotes and insights, download the InfluxDB report

I would rate the documentation and online support a 10 out of 10.

reviewer2599590

Student at a university with 10,001+ employees

We have no issues and usually receive timely responses.

Muzzamil Hussain

Assistant Vice President at National Bank of Pakistan

For more quotes and insights, download the MySQL report

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

7.0

InfluxDB is valued for scalability in handling large data volumes, with enterprise features supporting extensive scale despite variable costs.

Sentiment score

6.7

MySQL scalability depends on the specific environment, with challenges arising in larger applications and benefits from cloud solutions.

The main challenge with InfluxDB, which is common with all databases, was handling very high throughput systems and high throughput message flow.

Sayak Roy

Deployment Engineer at Derq

It can handle large volumes of time-series data and with high ingestion rates, making it suitable for enterprise-scale deployments.

reviewer2804886

Senior Data Engineer at a university with 201-500 employees

We’ve scaled on volume with seven years of continuous data without performance degradation.

Henning Jansen

Senior System Developer at Norled

For more quotes and insights, download the InfluxDB report

Meeting scalability requirements through cloud computing is an expensive affair.

Ravi Kant-Sharma

Technical Architect at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

MySQL's scalability is currently adequate, as we have increased operations from ten thousand to twelve thousand devices, and it is working fine for us.

AmitVerma4

Software Developer at 8 Gallery India

For more quotes and insights, download the MySQL report

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

8.0

InfluxDB is generally stable, with some crash reports; praised support, but monitoring metrics is recommended for mission-critical use.

Sentiment score

7.7

MySQL is generally stable and reliable but faces issues with large data operations and server overload, needing regular maintenance.

It serves as the backbone of our application, and its stability is crucial.

Henning Jansen

Senior System Developer at Norled

We have used it to support mission-critical systems with continuous data ingestion and real-time analytics.

reviewer2804886

Senior Data Engineer at a university with 201-500 employees

It is very stable, with no reliability or downtime in InfluxDB.

Btece Lodi

Student at a educational organization with 1,001-5,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the InfluxDB report

We face certain integration issues, especially when we integrate the database with security solutions like IBM QRadar.

Muzzamil Hussain

Assistant Vice President at National Bank of Pakistan

From my experience, MySQL was pretty stable.

reviewer2599590

Student at a university with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the MySQL report

Room For Improvement

InfluxDB should enhance its query language, scalability, documentation, and integration while improving performance, security, and pricing flexibility.

MySQL needs improved scalability, performance, integration, replication, user interface, security, monitoring tools, documentation, backup, and clustering.

InfluxDB deprecated FluxQL, which was intuitive since developers are already familiar with standard querying.

Milan Predic

Chief Technology Officer at Presta Agency

Having a SQL abstraction in InfluxDB could be beneficial, making it more accessible for teams that prefer querying with SQL-style syntax.

Henning Jansen

Senior System Developer at Norled

It could include automated backup and a monitoring solution for InfluxDB or a script developed by a REST API.

reviewer2778060

Network engineer at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the InfluxDB report

It could be more beneficial if MySQL can enhance its data masking functionality in the same way it has improved data encryption.

Muzzamil Hussain

Assistant Vice President at National Bank of Pakistan

Oracle could improve on scalability.

Ravi Kant-Sharma

Technical Architect at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

The load balancer, MySQL LB, which is used to connect to the application, lacks clear documentation.

Prabir Kumar Kundu

SR AVP–Presales Cloud & Platform Management Services at Path Infotech ltd

For more quotes and insights, download the MySQL report

Setup Cost

InfluxDB provides cost-effective scalability for enterprises, but requires careful cost planning due to increasing subscription prices.

MySQL's free community edition is popular, while the paid Enterprise edition offers advanced features and lower costs than competitors.

We use the open-source version of InfluxDB, so it is free.

Henning Jansen

Senior System Developer at Norled

I find the cloud version pricing of InfluxDB reasonable, and for the on-premises solution we use in our service, we need to purchase licenses.

Mugeesh Husain

Team Lead, Software at Energybox

Pricing is based on data volume, retention, and features, which really makes it scalable but requires careful planning to avoid unexpected costs.

reviewer2804886

Senior Data Engineer at a university with 201-500 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the InfluxDB report

Oracle has different components, so if you need security, you have to procure a different license, but here everything is inbuilt and it's not costly.

Prabir Kumar Kundu

SR AVP–Presales Cloud & Platform Management Services at Path Infotech ltd

For more quotes and insights, download the MySQL report

Valuable Features

InfluxDB excels in fast writes, real-time analytics, seamless integration, scalability, and ease of use, enhancing organizational decision-making.

MySQL offers fast performance, open-source adaptability, reliability, scalability, and excels in web applications with strong community support.

The most important feature for us is low latency, which is crucial in building a high-performance engine for day trading.

Milan Predic

Chief Technology Officer at Presta Agency

InfluxDB’s core functionality is crucial as it allows us to store our data and execute queries with excellent response times.

Henning Jansen

Senior System Developer at Norled

It helps me maintain my solution easily because it is very reliable, so we didn't face any performance issues or crashes regarding our queries; we can get the results very fast.

reviewer2761710

Solutions Engineer at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the InfluxDB report

With Oracle, we have to buy another solution for encryption and masking, but MySQL supports native encryption, which enhances our return on investment.

Muzzamil Hussain

Assistant Vice President at National Bank of Pakistan

The main feature we utilize in MySQL is the view, and I can say that it is the most valuable feature for our needs.

AmitVerma4

Software Developer at 8 Gallery India

It allows programming, writing stored procedures, creating views, constraints, and triggers easily.

Ravi Kant-Sharma

Technical Architect at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the MySQL report

Categories and Ranking

InfluxDB

Ranking in Open Source Databases

7th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Non-Relational Databases (1st), Network Monitoring Software (13th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (14th), NoSQL Databases (6th)

MySQL

Ranking in Open Source Databases

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

152

Ranking in other categories

Relational Databases Tools (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Open Source Databases category, the mindshare of InfluxDB is 5.0%, up from 3.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of MySQL is 10.5%, down from 10.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Open Source Databases Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
MySQL	10.5%
InfluxDB	5.0%
Other	84.5%

Open Source Databases

Featured Reviews

Mugeesh Husain

Team Lead, Software at Energybox

Time series data has been managed efficiently for IoT sensors but reporting still needs improvement

How InfluxDB can be improved is relevant since for Energy Box, we face certain issues. We have customers worldwide, including the United States, United Kingdom, and Europe, but when we expanded to China two years ago, they indicated that they do not support the cloud version there. Our application is built on the cloud, which required us to create a separate application for Azure China, which was painful for us. The second issue involves frequent version changes. For example, we started with version one, transitioned to version two, and I heard they are considering InfluxDB version three, reverting to earlier practices. InfluxDB should improve without completely changing its approach. Now we have to redo our work for InfluxDB version three. Regarding needed improvements, the documentation is sufficient, but pricing presents a challenge. InfluxDB has standard pricing, which is acceptable for large companies. However, for startups in our position, they should provide special discounts so everyone can utilize it. The pricing should adapt as companies grow, which is a reasonable expectation.

Read full review

Prabir Kumar Kundu

SR AVP–Presales Cloud & Platform Management Services at Path Infotech ltd

Offers robust security and availability with impressive replication capabilities

Regarding their documentation and interface, there is room for improvement. Documentation is definitely required when running multiple databases on a cluster system. The load balancer, MySQL LB, which is used to connect to the application, lacks clear documentation. When there are multiple application servers connecting to the MySQL cluster and going through the MySQL load balancer, the documentation is not user-friendly. It's there, but only technical persons with deep knowledge of the MySQL database can implement it. Most of the community users or ISVs who use MySQL don't have many technical persons or DBA experts, so they face some challenges for the high availability of connecting high available databases from high available applications. That documentation should be simplified.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Open Source Databases solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	8

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	75
Midsize Enterprise	33
Large Enterprise	61

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with InfluxDB?

InfluxDB can be improved by addressing issues such as performance drops, queries being more difficult to understand, and its high memory usage. InfluxDB is not suitable for relational databases lik...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for InfluxDB?

My main use case for InfluxDB is storing a time series database and analyzing data changes over time. I use InfluxDB to store my infrastructure and application metrics, logs, events, and data, and ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering InfluxDB?

I would advise others looking into using InfluxDB that if they want to store a time series database for monitoring, logging, and event-based tasks, and also want long-term retention of the database...

See all answers

Why are MySQL connections encrypted and what is the biggest benefit of this?

MySQL encrypts connections to protect your data and the biggest benefit from this is that nobody can corrupt it. If you move information over a network without encryption, you are endangering it, m...

See all answers

Considering that there is a free version of MySQL, would you invest in one of the paid editions?

I may be considered a MySQL veteran since I have been using it since before Oracle bought it and created paid versions. So back in my day, it was all free, it was open-source and the best among sim...

See all answers

What is one thing you would improve with MySQL?

One thing I would improve related to MySQL is not within the product itself, but with the guides to it. Before, when it was free, everyone was on their own, seeking tutorials and how-to videos onli...

See all answers

Comparisons

SQLite vs InfluxDB

Compared 7% of the time

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced vs InfluxDB

Compared 7% of the time

PostgreSQL vs InfluxDB

Compared 7% of the time

ClickHouse vs InfluxDB

Compared 6% of the time

VictoriaMetrics vs InfluxDB

Compared 4% of the time

More InfluxDB Competitors

Firebird SQL vs MySQL

Compared 17% of the time

PostgreSQL vs MySQL

Compared 7% of the time

Oracle Database vs MySQL

Compared 5% of the time

SQL Server vs MySQL

Compared 5% of the time

ClickHouse vs MySQL

Compared 3% of the time

More MySQL Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

InfluxDB

May 2026

Download InfluxDB product report

Buyer's Guide

MySQL

April 2026

Download MySQL product report

Overview

InfluxDB offers efficient time series data handling with fast writes, optimized storage, and seamless Grafana integration, making it ideal for high-volume applications like crypto trading and real-time monitoring. Its SQL-like query language and cloud-based options enhance user experience and system scalability.

InfluxDB stands out with its ability to handle high-volume time series data efficiently, thanks to fast data writes and efficient compression. It is highly scalable, providing clustering features for improved performance management. Integration with Grafana enhances visualization, making it easier to analyze complex data through a user-friendly SQL-like query language. Real-time monitoring, historical data access, and proactive alerts enhance system reliability. Its cloud offering simplifies maintenance and operations, making it attractive for users seeking an efficient time series database.

What are the key features of InfluxDB?

Fast Data Writes: Ensures quick data handling necessary for real-time applications.
Optimized Storage: Reduces space requirements and improves performance.
Efficient Compression: Supports high-volume data like time series, enhancing throughput.
Grafana Integration: Supports seamless visualization and analysis of data.
SQL-like Query Language: Simplifies complex data operations with user-friendly queries.

What benefits or ROI can users expect?

Enhanced Performance: Fast processing and optimized storage for better application responsiveness.
Scalability: Clustering features ensure adaptability to growing data volumes.
Improved Reliability: Proactive alerts and real-time monitoring prevent system downtimes.
Ease of Use: SQL-like language and intuitive visuals improve user accessibility.

InfluxDB is applied extensively in industries handling high-volume data needs. For sensor data storage in production environments, it offers reliable performance. Its role in server management metrics and performance monitoring is crucial for maintaining optimal operations. In crypto market data collection, it supports fast-paced trading environments. Industries use it for real-time tracking, like maritime vessel monitoring, leveraging its rapid data handling and visualization capabilities. Its applications also extend to IoT environments, API performance tracking, HVAC systems, and log aggregation, often integrating with Prometheus, Docker, and AWS to enhance system capabilities.

InfluxData

MySQL is an open-source database known for its ease of use and high performance. It offers features like replication and clustering, making it ideal for diverse applications. Its cost-effectiveness and LAMP integration are key advantages for businesses.

MySQL supports a variety of languages and platforms, providing reliable, scalable data management. Its graphical interface and LAMP architecture integration enhance its usability, while community support further strengthens its appeal. Challenges include scalability issues with large databases, lack of advanced clustering, and limited high-availability features. Complex queries may affect performance, and integration can pose difficulties. The outdated interface and insufficient documentation are also concerns, along with replication and backup reliability issues.

What are MySQL's key features?

Open-source nature: Freely available and customizable.
Cross-platform compatibility: Supports multiple operating systems.
Scalability: Capable of handling large volumes of data.
Replication and clustering: Ensure data redundancy and load balancing.
Full-text search: Provides powerful search capabilities.
LAMP integration: Seamlessly integrates with Linux, Apache, and PHP.

What benefits should users consider?

Cost-effectiveness: Reduces expenses due to its open-source nature.
High performance: Efficiently processes large volumes of data.
Active community support: Access to a wide range of resources and expertise.
Versatile use cases: Suitable for varied applications including web development and IoT.

MySQL is widely implemented in industries such as web development, e-commerce, and finance. It's used for managing dynamic websites, powering e-commerce platforms, and supporting financial applications. Its compatibility with PHP and cost-effectiveness make it suitable for CMS platforms like WordPress. With cloud services integration, MySQL is a backend choice for scalable applications in various sectors.

Oracle

Sample Customers

ebay, AXA, Mozilla, DiDi, LeTV, Siminars, Cognito, ProcessOut, Recommend, CATS, Smarsh, Row 44, Clustree, Bleemeo

Facebook, Tumblr, Scholastic, MTV Networks, Wikipedia, Verizon Wireless, Sage Group, Glassfish Open Message Queue, and RightNow Technologies.

Buyer's Guide

InfluxDB vs. MySQL

April 2026

Free Report: InfluxDB vs. MySQL

Find out what your peers are saying about InfluxDB vs. MySQL and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our InfluxDB vs. MySQL report.

See our list of best Open Source Databases vendors.

We monitor all Open Source Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.