Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
InfluxDB Logo

Top 10 InfluxDB Alternatives

Vendor: InfluxData
4.1 out of 5
Badge Ranked 1
Leave a review

Top InfluxDB Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to InfluxDB based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Zabbix, Datadog, and New Relic. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. InfluxDB surpasses its competitors by offering high-performance data ingestion, real-time analytics, and an intuitive interface that simplifies time series data management. It supports extensive integrations and scalability, making it ideal for business intelligence and monitoring applications.

InfluxData Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with InfluxData, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
InfluxDB Logo
Zabbix
4.2 out of 5
InfluxDB Logo
Zabbix
4.2 out of 5
Zabbix offers comprehensive monitoring with cost efficiency, ideal for users needing robust open-source solutions. In comparison, InfluxDB excels as a time-series database with strong Grafana integration, appealing to those focused on data visualization and cloud-centric deployment with simpler hybrid architecture.
Download InfluxDB vs. Zabbix Report
Zabbix requires a significant setup cost, while InfluxDB offers a more budget-friendly initial expense.
View comparison
Pricing
Zabbix requires a significant setup cost, while InfluxDB offers a more budget-friendly initial expense.
InfluxDB Logo
Datadog
4.3 out of 5
InfluxDB Logo
Datadog
4.3 out of 5
Datadog excels with integrations that enhance monitoring and logging, while its complex pricing requires careful consideration. In comparison, InfluxDB's lightweight structure suits heavy workloads, though improvements in query language and cloud costs are needed, attracting tech buyers seeking affordability and adaptability.
Download Datadog vs. InfluxDB Report
Datadog offers a straightforward setup cost, while InfluxDB provides a more cost-effective initial setup, highlighting notable pricing differences.
View comparison
Pricing
Datadog offers a straightforward setup cost, while InfluxDB provides a more cost-effective initial setup, highlighting notable pricing differences.
InfluxDB Logo
New Relic
4.2 out of 5
InfluxDB Logo
New Relic
4.2 out of 5
InfluxDB is favored for its efficient time-series data storage and ease of integration. In comparison, New Relic appeals to businesses with its comprehensive monitoring and advanced analytics capabilities, balancing a higher cost with extensive features and detailed insights suited for data-intensive needs.
Download InfluxDB vs. New Relic Report
InfluxDB's setup cost is minimal compared to New Relic, which requires higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
InfluxDB's setup cost is minimal compared to New Relic, which requires higher initial investment.
InfluxDB Logo
InfluxDB Logo
Juniper Mist Premium Analytics
4.0 out of 5
InfluxDB stands out for its affordability and ease of integration, appealing to projects prioritizing efficient data management. In comparison, Juniper Mist Premium Analytics attracts those seeking advanced network insights, justifying its higher cost with robust analytics capabilities and dedicated support for complex deployments.
Download InfluxDB vs. Juniper Mist Premium Analytics Report
InfluxDB typically has a lower setup cost compared to Juniper Mist Premium Analytics, which may impact initial budget considerations.
View comparison
Pricing
InfluxDB typically has a lower setup cost compared to Juniper Mist Premium Analytics, which may impact initial budget considerations.
InfluxDB Logo
MySQL
4.1 out of 5
InfluxDB Logo
MySQL
4.1 out of 5
MySQL is ideal for users needing a robust relational database for structured data, offering efficiency and compatibility. In comparison, InfluxDB is suited for handling time-series data, providing fast analyses for real-time applications, appealing to those focused on performance and data monitoring.
Download InfluxDB vs. MySQL Report
MySQL has an affordable setup cost, while InfluxDB tends to have a higher initial investment. MySQL is typically preferred for its cost-effectiveness, whereas InfluxDB attracts users needing specialized time-series data handling despite the higher setup cost.
View comparison
Pricing
MySQL has an affordable setup cost, while InfluxDB tends to have a higher initial investment. MySQL is typically preferred for its cost-effectiveness, whereas InfluxDB attracts users needing specialized time-series data handling despite the higher setup cost.
InfluxDB Logo
PostgreSQL
4.2 out of 5
InfluxDB Logo
PostgreSQL
4.2 out of 5
PostgreSQL supports complex queries and scalability, appealing due to its SQL standards compliance and extensibility. In comparison, InfluxDB integrates well with Grafana, offering robust time-series capabilities, ideal for performance-focused data compilation and retrieval in time-series data applications.
Download InfluxDB vs. PostgreSQL Report
PostgreSQL generally involves a higher initial setup cost compared to InfluxDB, which offers a more cost-effective entry point for users prioritizing budget.
View comparison
Pricing
PostgreSQL generally involves a higher initial setup cost compared to InfluxDB, which offers a more cost-effective entry point for users prioritizing budget.
InfluxDB Logo
InfluxDB Logo
PRTG Network Monitor
4.0 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor appeals to tech buyers for its ease of deployment, scalability, and comprehensive monitoring features, making it ideal for simple setups. In comparison, InfluxDB attracts with its strong integration capabilities and flexibility, suitable for data-intensive, high-performance environments.
Download InfluxDB vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor has an upfront setup cost that may be higher, while InfluxDB offers a more flexible setup. This reflects differences in approach, with PRTG being more comprehensive and InfluxDB focusing on customization and scalability.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor has an upfront setup cost that may be higher, while InfluxDB offers a more flexible setup. This reflects differences in approach, with PRTG being more comprehensive and InfluxDB focusing on customization and scalability.
InfluxDB Logo
MariaDB
4.1 out of 5
InfluxDB Logo
MariaDB
4.1 out of 5
InfluxDB efficiently handles time-series data, offering high performance for IoT and monitoring. In comparison, MariaDB excels in supporting complex SQL queries and relational data structures, appealing to those needing versatile functionality and advanced query capabilities across various database tasks.
Download InfluxDB vs. MariaDB Report
InfluxDB has a lower setup cost compared to MariaDB, making it a more budget-friendly option for initial deployment. MariaDB's setup cost is higher, potentially offering more advanced features or support with its premium pricing.
View comparison
Pricing
InfluxDB has a lower setup cost compared to MariaDB, making it a more budget-friendly option for initial deployment. MariaDB's setup cost is higher, potentially offering more advanced features or support with its premium pricing.
InfluxDB Logo
Redis
4.4 out of 5
InfluxDB Logo
Redis
4.4 out of 5
InfluxDB excels in time-series data handling with high precision, ideal for monitoring and IoT. In comparison, Redis offers simplicity and high-speed data processing for caching and real-time applications, appealing with its versatility and rapid data handling capabilities.
Download InfluxDB vs. Redis Report
InfluxDB has an affordable setup cost, making it attractive for small-scale projects, while Redis demands higher initial investments, positioning it better for enterprise-level implementations.
View comparison
Pricing
InfluxDB has an affordable setup cost, making it attractive for small-scale projects, while Redis demands higher initial investments, positioning it better for enterprise-level implementations.
InfluxDB Logo
InfluxDB Logo
Splunk Observability Cloud
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud offers extensive analytics and integration, appealing to complex environments. In comparison, InfluxDB attracts with high-speed data processing and competitive pricing for budget-conscious buyers seeking rapid deployment without needing extensive support. Both cater to different needs within their advanced monitoring capabilities.
Download InfluxDB vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
InfluxDB's setup cost is lower, making it more budget-friendly, while Splunk Observability Cloud offers a more comprehensive set of features with a higher setup cost.
View comparison
Pricing
InfluxDB's setup cost is lower, making it more budget-friendly, while Splunk Observability Cloud offers a more comprehensive set of features with a higher setup cost.
InfluxDB Logo
InfluxDB Logo
MongoDB Enterprise Advanced
4.1 out of 5
MongoDB Enterprise Advanced excels with its flexibility and robust security features, supporting diverse deployments. In comparison, InfluxDB advances time-series data processing and provides powerful integration with Grafana, making it ideal for analytics. MongoDB's versatility complements organizations handling various data types, while InfluxDB focuses on cost-effective time-series analysis.
Download InfluxDB vs. MongoDB Enterprise Advanced Report
MongoDB Enterprise Advanced involves a higher setup cost, while InfluxDB presents a more budget-friendly alternative. MongoDB's setup can be complex, contrasting with InfluxDB's simpler initial configuration process.
View comparison
Pricing
MongoDB Enterprise Advanced involves a higher setup cost, while InfluxDB presents a more budget-friendly alternative. MongoDB's setup can be complex, contrasting with InfluxDB's simpler initial configuration process.
InfluxDB Logo
Checkmk
4.2 out of 5
InfluxDB Logo
Checkmk
4.2 out of 5
InfluxDB excels in handling large volumes of time-series data, ideal for developers needing detailed temporal analysis. In comparison, Checkmk provides comprehensive IT infrastructure monitoring with various integrations, offering broad system oversight. Tech buyers choose based on time-series analytics needs or infrastructure monitoring priorities.
Download Checkmk vs. InfluxDB Report
InfluxDB has a relatively higher setup cost, whereas Checkmk offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
InfluxDB has a relatively higher setup cost, whereas Checkmk offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
InfluxDB Logo
Nagios Core
4.1 out of 5
InfluxDB Logo
Nagios Core
4.1 out of 5
InfluxDB excels in high-performance time-series analysis, offering ease of deployment. In comparison, Nagios Core provides extensive system monitoring with advanced alerting. Tech buyers may prefer InfluxDB for analytics while choosing Nagios Core for comprehensive monitoring and detailed network management.
Download InfluxDB vs. Nagios Core Report
InfluxDB offers lower setup costs, making it more budget-friendly, whereas Nagios Core has higher initial expenses but provides robust monitoring features for extensive setups.
View comparison
Pricing
InfluxDB offers lower setup costs, making it more budget-friendly, whereas Nagios Core has higher initial expenses but provides robust monitoring features for extensive setups.
InfluxDB Logo
ScienceLogic
4.3 out of 5
InfluxDB Logo
ScienceLogic
4.3 out of 5
ScienceLogic offers comprehensive monitoring and customizable dashboards, excelling in event management and automation. In comparison, InfluxDB efficiently handles time-series data, offering robust integration with Grafana. Both cater to different needs with their unique features in data management and deployment options.
Download InfluxDB vs. ScienceLogic Report
ScienceLogic has a higher setup cost compared to InfluxDB, which offers a more affordable entry point.
View comparison
Pricing
ScienceLogic has a higher setup cost compared to InfluxDB, which offers a more affordable entry point.
InfluxDB Logo
InfluxDB Logo
Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB
4.1 out of 5
InfluxDB excels with ease of use and cost-effectiveness, appealing to users seeking affordable time-series performance. In comparison, Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB offers advanced features like global distribution and scalability, suiting tech buyers prioritizing robust, versatile capabilities over budget constraints.
Download InfluxDB vs. Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB Report
InfluxDB offers a budget-friendly setup with minimal initial costs, while Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB presents a more complex and expensive initial setup, highlighting a clear cost difference between these database solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
InfluxDB offers a budget-friendly setup with minimal initial costs, while Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB presents a more complex and expensive initial setup, highlighting a clear cost difference between these database solutions.
InfluxDB Logo
OpenSearch
1 out of 5
InfluxDB Logo
OpenSearch
1 out of 5

OpenSearch is a powerful search and data analysis tool that enhances search capabilities and improves data analysis. 

It is commonly used for indexing and searching large volumes of data, enabling real-time monitoring and analysis, and integrating with various applications and systems. 

OpenSearch is suitable for both small-scale and enterprise-level deployments, offering flexibility and scalability. 

Users appreciate the flexibility and scalability of OpenSearch, allowing them to easily adapt it to their specific needs. The platform's open-source nature also fosters a vibrant community and frequent updates, ensuring continuous improvement and innovation.

View comparison
InfluxDB Logo
ITRS Geneos
4.1 out of 5
InfluxDB Logo
ITRS Geneos
4.1 out of 5
InfluxDB provides cost-effective, scalable solutions ideal for handling real-time analytics and time-series data efficiently. In comparison, ITRS Geneos offers sophisticated monitoring features, suitable for financial enterprises willing to invest in advanced event processing and dashboard capabilities.
Download ITRS Geneos vs. InfluxDB Report
InfluxDB offers lower setup costs than ITRS Geneos, making it more economical for budget-conscious users, while ITRS Geneos provides a more comprehensive setup catering to enterprises with advanced monitoring needs.
View comparison
Pricing
InfluxDB offers lower setup costs than ITRS Geneos, making it more economical for budget-conscious users, while ITRS Geneos provides a more comprehensive setup catering to enterprises with advanced monitoring needs.
InfluxDB Logo
InfluxDB Logo
VMware Aria Operations for Applications
4.0 out of 5
InfluxDB appeals to developers with cost-effective pricing, time-series data specialization, and open-source flexibility. In comparison, VMware Aria Operations for Applications attracts enterprises through advanced predictive analytics, extensive monitoring, seamless VMware ecosystem integration, and comprehensive operational analytics, justifying its higher price with potential ROI advantages.
Download InfluxDB vs. VMware Aria Operations for Applications Report
InfluxDB offers a cost-effective setup, whereas VMware Aria Operations for Applications demands a higher initial investment, emphasizing a notable difference in affordability.
View comparison
Pricing
InfluxDB offers a cost-effective setup, whereas VMware Aria Operations for Applications demands a higher initial investment, emphasizing a notable difference in affordability.
InfluxDB Logo
InfluxDB Logo
IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM)
4.2 out of 5
IBM SevOne Network Performance Management offers comprehensive real-time network monitoring with scalability for vast infrastructures. In comparison, InfluxDB excels in processing time-series data efficiently and integrates well with Grafana. SevOne is ideal for detailed network oversight, while InfluxDB suits advanced data analysis needs.
Download IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) vs. InfluxDB Report
IBM SevOne NPM has a higher setup cost, while InfluxDB offers a more budget-friendly option, making them suitable for different budgetary needs.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM SevOne NPM has a higher setup cost, while InfluxDB offers a more budget-friendly option, making them suitable for different budgetary needs.
InfluxDB Logo
Meraki Dashboard
4.3 out of 5
InfluxDB Logo
Meraki Dashboard
4.3 out of 5
InfluxDB excels in high-volume time series data handling and real-time analytics, appealing to those focused on data insights. In comparison, Meraki Dashboard offers robust network management with centralized configuration, attracting buyers prioritizing seamless network control and visibility while valuing minimal technical expertise.
Download InfluxDB vs. Meraki Dashboard Report
InfluxDB offers a straightforward setup with low initial costs, whereas the Meraki Dashboard requires higher initial investments, reflecting the integrated solutions and advanced features included in the pricing structure.
View comparison
Pricing
InfluxDB offers a straightforward setup with low initial costs, whereas the Meraki Dashboard requires higher initial investments, reflecting the integrated solutions and advanced features included in the pricing structure.
InfluxDB Logo
Cassandra
4.0 out of 5
InfluxDB Logo
Cassandra
4.0 out of 5
Cassandra leads in scalability and fault tolerance, ideal for extensive data operations. In comparison, InfluxDB excels in time-series data, providing efficient performance for real-time analytics. A tech buyer might choose Cassandra for scalability or InfluxDB for specialized monitoring tasks.
Download Cassandra vs. InfluxDB Report
Cassandra's setup cost is competitive, offering scalability benefits, while InfluxDB presents a more cost-effective setup, attracting users with budget constraints.
View comparison
Pricing
Cassandra's setup cost is competitive, offering scalability benefits, while InfluxDB presents a more cost-effective setup, attracting users with budget constraints.
InfluxDB Logo
SQLite
3.6 out of 5
InfluxDB Logo
SQLite
3.6 out of 5
SQLite is a lightweight, file-based database ideal for embedded applications and small projects due to its simplicity and zero-configuration setup. In comparison, InfluxDB offers robust time-series data analytics and flexible data retention, catering to advanced real-time monitoring needs.
Download InfluxDB vs. SQLite Report
SQLite offers a straightforward setup with minimal costs, while InfluxDB's setup can be more complex and potentially higher in cost.
View comparison
Pricing
SQLite offers a straightforward setup with minimal costs, while InfluxDB's setup can be more complex and potentially higher in cost.
InfluxDB Logo
ClickHouse
4.4 out of 5
InfluxDB Logo
ClickHouse
4.4 out of 5
InfluxDB's favorable pricing and support make it appealing for time-series data management needs. In comparison, ClickHouse's robust features attract buyers focused on large-scale analytics. InfluxDB excels in ease of deployment, while ClickHouse is chosen for comprehensive data processing capabilities.
Download ClickHouse vs. InfluxDB Report
InfluxDB's setup cost is affordable, appealing to small enterprises, whereas ClickHouse offers a more scalable solution with initially higher setup expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
InfluxDB's setup cost is affordable, appealing to small enterprises, whereas ClickHouse offers a more scalable solution with initially higher setup expenses.
InfluxDB Logo
InfluxDB Logo
Couchbase Enterprise
4.1 out of 5
InfluxDB excels in time-series data management with ease of use and cost-effective deployment for specific projects. In comparison, Couchbase Enterprise offers a versatile feature set, including distributed architecture and advanced querying, making it ideal for complex, large-scale applications despite higher initial costs.
Download Couchbase Enterprise vs. InfluxDB Report
InfluxDB offers an affordable initial setup, while Couchbase Enterprise incurs higher initial costs.
View comparison
Pricing
InfluxDB offers an affordable initial setup, while Couchbase Enterprise incurs higher initial costs.
InfluxDB Logo
ScyllaDB
3.9 out of 5
InfluxDB Logo
ScyllaDB
3.9 out of 5
InfluxDB handles time-series data efficiently with low setup costs and user-friendly deployment. In comparison, ScyllaDB excels in scalability and performance for high-throughput applications, offering flexible deployment and comprehensive service options, despite its higher price, making it ideal for data-intensive environments requiring robust performance.
Download InfluxDB vs. ScyllaDB Report
InfluxDB has upfront setup costs that are generally higher, whereas ScyllaDB offers a more cost-effective initial setup option, highlighting a significant difference in pricing structure between the two databases.
View comparison
Pricing
InfluxDB has upfront setup costs that are generally higher, whereas ScyllaDB offers a more cost-effective initial setup option, highlighting a significant difference in pricing structure between the two databases.
InfluxDB Logo
InfluxDB Logo
Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop
4.0 out of 5
Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop offers granular security and high-speed processing but faces licensing and stability challenges. In comparison, InfluxDB excels with lightweight integration and fast queries, though struggles with high-cardinality data and recent pricing increases. Each provides unique deployment and support options.
Download Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop vs. InfluxDB Report
Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop typically has a higher setup cost, while InfluxDB is known for its lower initial expenses, making it more accessible for smaller-scale implementations.
View comparison
Pricing
Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop typically has a higher setup cost, while InfluxDB is known for its lower initial expenses, making it more accessible for smaller-scale implementations.
InfluxDB Logo
Zenoss Cloud
4.2 out of 5
InfluxDB Logo
Zenoss Cloud
4.2 out of 5
Zenoss Cloud excels in comprehensive monitoring with easy deployment and robust support, ideal for businesses needing extensive solutions. In comparison, InfluxDB is suited for efficient time-series data management with lower costs but requires technical expertise for configuration.
Download InfluxDB vs. Zenoss Cloud Report
Zenoss Cloud offers low setup costs appealing to startups, while InfluxDB's moderate setup cost suits mid-size enterprises.
View comparison
Pricing
Zenoss Cloud offers low setup costs appealing to startups, while InfluxDB's moderate setup cost suits mid-size enterprises.
InfluxDB Logo
Netdata
1 out of 5
InfluxDB Logo
Netdata
1 out of 5
Users utilize Netdata for real-time monitoring and troubleshooting of system performance, gaining in-depth insights into server metrics. They track CPU, memory, and bandwidth, appreciate detailed dashboards, and value ease of setup. Users highlight low resource consumption, granular insights, and integrations. Some desire better documentation, easier alerts configuration, and improved performance on older systems.
View comparison
InfluxDB Logo
InfluxDB Logo
Neo4j Graph Database
4.3 out of 5
InfluxDB excels in high-frequency data ingestion and efficient retention policies crucial for time-series analysis. In comparison, Neo4j provides powerful graph-based querying for complex relationships. InfluxDB's lower setup costs suit budget projects, while Neo4j's advanced analytics justify higher investment with superior ROI potential.
Download InfluxDB vs. Neo4j Graph Database Report
InfluxDB requires a moderate initial setup cost while Neo4j Graph Database has a higher setup expenditure, highlighting a significant cost difference between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
InfluxDB requires a moderate initial setup cost while Neo4j Graph Database has a higher setup expenditure, highlighting a significant cost difference between the two solutions.
InfluxDB Logo
Apache HBase
3.0 out of 5
InfluxDB Logo
Apache HBase
3.0 out of 5
InfluxDB is advantageous for real-time analytics with its time-series-centric design and efficient performance. In comparison, Apache HBase offers scalability and integration, appealing for large-scale storage. InfluxDB suits time-sensitive needs, while HBase supports extensive, consistent data management and integration within Hadoop environments.
Download Apache HBase vs. InfluxDB Report
InfluxDB offers a lower setup cost, while Apache HBase requires a more substantial initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
InfluxDB offers a lower setup cost, while Apache HBase requires a more substantial initial investment.
InfluxDB Logo
Oracle NoSQL
4.0 out of 5
InfluxDB Logo
Oracle NoSQL
4.0 out of 5
InfluxDB excels in time-series data solutions, ideal for monitoring with cost-effective pricing and easy deployment. In comparison, Oracle NoSQL's robust architecture supports distributed operations, offering scalability and advanced security, appealing to buyers needing reliable, feature-rich solutions for complex, large-scale applications.
Download InfluxDB vs. Oracle NoSQL Report
InfluxDB generally presents a lower setup cost than Oracle NoSQL, which can be a decisive factor for projects with limited budgets, highlighting a notable difference in initial investment between the two database solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
InfluxDB generally presents a lower setup cost than Oracle NoSQL, which can be a decisive factor for projects with limited budgets, highlighting a notable difference in initial investment between the two database solutions.
InfluxDB Logo
VictoriaMetrics
1 out of 5
InfluxDB Logo
VictoriaMetrics
1 out of 5
VictoriaMetrics efficiently handles time-series data, making it suitable for real-time monitoring. It offers powerful query capabilities, high ingestion rates, and compact storage. Users appreciate its scalability and performance. Some reviewers suggest improving the documentation and enhancing visualization features for wider adoption.
View comparison
InfluxDB Logo
Google BigTable
4.3 out of 5
InfluxDB Logo
Google BigTable
4.3 out of 5
Cloud Bigtable is Google's NoSQL Big Data database service. Bigtable is designed to handle massive workloads at consistent low latency and high throughput, so it's a great choice for both operational and analytical applications, including IoT, user analytics, and financial data analysis.
Download Google BigTable vs. InfluxDB Report
I would like to see better pricing. It is not too expensive, but it isn't cheap either.
View comparison
Pricing
I would like to see better pricing. It is not too expensive, but it isn't cheap either.

Related categories

Open Source Databases
Network Monitoring Software
IT Infrastructure Monitoring